| Course | ACC 421 Auditing and Forensic Accounting |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | undergraduate fraud risk assessment assignment using the fraud triangle |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Accounting |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACC 421 Module 5
Pressure, Opportunity and a Story to Tell Oneself: A Fraud Risk Assessment for a Composite Linen Rental Company
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
ACC 421: Auditing and Forensic Accounting
Module Five Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Pressure, Opportunity and a Story to Tell Oneself: A Fraud Risk Assessment for a Composite Linen Rental Company
Introduction
Auditing standards require the engagement team to assess the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated because of fraud and to respond to that risk throughout the audit (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2002). Fraud differs from error because someone is hiding it, so ordinary procedures may miss it. This assignment assesses fraud risk at the Columbus-area linen rental client planned in Module Two, using the fraud triangle to organize risk factors, developing specific scenarios and designing responses that would detect them.
The Fraud Triangle
Cressey (1953), interviewing people imprisoned for embezzlement, found that they shared three conditions: a financial problem they could not share, an opportunity to solve it by violating a position of trust and a way of describing the act to themselves that preserved their self-image. Auditing standards adapted those conditions as incentives or pressures, opportunities and attitudes or rationalizations. Dorminey et al. (2012) note that later models add capability and other elements, but the triangle remains the core framework because it directs attention to conditions an auditor can actually observe.
Risk Factors at This Client
Table 1. Fraud Risk Factors
| Category | Fraudulent financial reporting | Misappropriation of assets |
|---|---|---|
| Incentive or pressure | Debt service coverage of 1.31 against a 1.25 covenant; owner exploring a sale | Drivers paid modest wages; personal pressures not observable |
| Opportunity | Estimates for garment amortization lives; weekly billing near year end | Drivers collect cash; supervisor reconciliation failed testing; one payables clerk sets up vendors and processes payments; payments under $5,000 need no second approval |
| Attitude or rationalization | Owner's comment that the bank "just needs to see the right number" | Payables clerk with 19 years of service passed over for controller position |
Rationalization is the hardest leg to observe, but it is not invisible. Comments by management about the purpose of the statements and resentment among long-tenured staff are both signals the team noted during planning interviews, and both were recorded without drawing conclusions about any individual.
Fraud Scenarios
Table 2. Fraud Scenario Matrix
| Scenario | How it would be done and concealed | Likelihood | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue inflated near year end to meet covenant | January deliveries billed in December; reversed in January | Moderate | Cutoff test of handheld delivery data; review of January credits |
| Driver skims cash, covers with credits for lost garments | Payment pocketed; small credit posted to customer | Moderate | Confirm cash customers; test credits to cash customers; ride-along on two routes |
| Fictitious vendor paid by payables clerk | Vendor created with mailbox address; invoices under $5,000 | High | Vendor master file analysis; match vendor bank accounts and addresses to employees; inspect support for repair payments |
| Garment amortization lives extended to raise income | Estimated lives lengthened without support | Moderate | Compare lives with replacement history; review change memos |
| Ghost employees on payroll | Terminated employees left active | Low | Outsourced payroll with controls report; compare payroll to HR records |
| Expense reimbursement abuse by managers | Personal expenses submitted | Low | Analytical review by person; scan for weekend and duplicate claims |
Why the Vendor Scenario Moves to the Top
The planning memo had already flagged a 31 percent jump in repairs at a plant whose machinery barely changed, and that anomaly now takes on new weight. A first look at the payables ledger shows that one vendor, a garment repair service added to the vendor file 26 months ago, accounts for most of the increase. Its payments are frequent, all between $4,500 and $4,990, just under the $5,000 level that requires the controller's approval, and its address is a mailbox at a shipping store. The staff auditor in Module One accepted an explanation for that address without corroboration. Taken together, these facts match the profile of a billing scheme, a scheme type that ranks among the most frequent forms of occupational fraud and usually runs for months before anyone notices (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2024). The response is therefore moved up to interim fieldwork and expanded: the team will obtain the vendor's state registration, compare its bank account with employee and employee-family records, ask the plant manager to identify the repair work and examine any physical evidence of the repairs.
Communication and Skepticism
A fraud risk assessment is sensitive, and how the team handles it matters. The scenarios in Table 2 are hypotheses about what could happen, not accusations, and they are documented in the audit file rather than discussed with the people they concern. The owner will be asked, as standards require, whether he knows of any fraud or suspected fraud and how he oversees the risk, but the specific vendor concern will not be raised with the payables clerk or the controller until the team has gathered independent evidence from outside the payables system. If that evidence suggests fraud, the engagement partner will bring it to the owner directly, since he is the person charged with governance and is not involved in the payables process. The team will also keep in mind that the person with the opportunity is not necessarily the person who acted: the clerk controls the vendor file, but the controller approves larger payments and has access to the same system.
Responses to Management Override
Regardless of the scenarios, every audit must address the risk that management overrides controls. The team will test journal entries made after hours, by senior personnel, to unusual account combinations or in round amounts near year end; review the garment amortization estimate and the allowance for doubtful accounts for bias by comparing prior estimates with outcomes; and evaluate the business purpose of any significant unusual transactions, such as the owner's discussions with potential buyers.
Conclusion
Fraud risk at the linen rental company is concentrated in three places: revenue near year end, cash handled by drivers and payments controlled by one clerk. The fictitious vendor scenario is ranked first because analytical evidence already points to it, and the team will investigate it early rather than wait for year-end testing. If the vendor proves fictitious, the audit's focus will shift from assessing risk to quantifying a loss, which is the subject of the forensic project.
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit (Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99). Author.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational fraud 2024: A report to the nations. Author.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555-579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
What the ACC 421 Module 5 instructions ask for
The Module Five assignment in ACC 421 usually asks you to assess fraud risk for a client in a case. Expect to identify fraud risk factors in the three categories of the fraud triangle, incentives or pressures, opportunities and attitudes or rationalizations, for both fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets. Many versions ask you to develop specific fraud scenarios, explain how each would be concealed, rate their likelihood and design audit responses, including the procedures required for every audit to address management override of controls. Be specific to the client: a scenario should name who would commit the fraud, how and where it would show up, rather than restating categories from the standard.
How this ACC 421 Module 5 fraud risk assessment assignment example is built
The sample assesses a linen rental company. Incentives include a loan covenant near its limit and a family owner who wants to sell. Opportunities include drivers handling cash, a supervisor reconciliation that failed testing, and one clerk who both adds vendors and processes payments under a $5,000 approval threshold. Rationalizations include a long-tenured clerk passed over for promotion. Six scenarios are rated: revenue inflation at year end, driver skimming covered by credits, a fictitious vendor, inflated garment amortization lives, payroll ghost employees and expense reimbursement abuse. Each has a response, and the 31 percent rise in repair expense, with one fast-growing vendor, moves the fictitious vendor scenario to the top.
Where the ACC 421 Module 5 rubric puts the points
Rubrics for the ACC 421 fraud risk assignment typically score identification of risk factors in each category, the development and assessment of specific scenarios, the audit responses, the treatment of management override and the written analysis. Top papers tie factors to the client's facts rather than reciting lists from the standard, describe how each scenario would be carried out and concealed, and design responses that would actually detect it, including unpredictable procedures. Graders reward papers that integrate earlier findings, such as failed controls or analytical anomalies, into the fraud assessment. Common deductions include treating the fraud triangle as a checklist, omitting rationalization because it is hard to observe, and responses that are simply more of the usual testing.
ACC 421 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points
Fraud risk papers usually fall short by listing every risk factor in the standard without saying which ones apply to this client, or by naming scenarios without explaining how they would be concealed and detected. Another common gap is forgetting the procedures every audit must perform for management override: journal entry testing, review of estimates for bias and evaluation of unusual transactions. If your case involves a public company, a nonprofit or a government, the same triangle applies but the incentives differ, and we can build the scenarios around your facts. Rank the scenarios at the end; graders want to see judgment about where the audit should look first.
Get ACC 421 Module 5 written to your instructions
Send the ACC 421 Module 5 case and instructions. The paper will identify fraud risk factors by category, develop specific fraud scenarios, rate them and design audit responses for each, including the required responses to management override. Your first one is free of charge; two days is typical. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More ACC 421 papers and related BS Accounting samples
- ACC 421 Module 1 Discussion: Skepticism and the Auditor's Job
- ACC 421 Module 2 Audit Planning and Materiality Assignment: Materiality and Risk for a Linen Rental Client
- ACC 421 Module 3 Internal Control Testing Assignment: Testing Controls Over Route Cash and Credits
- ACC 421 Module 4 Project One: A Revenue and Receivables Audit Program
- ACC 421 Module 6 Discussion: Benford's Law on Vendor Payments
- ACC 345 Module 6 Cost of Capital Assignment: A Build-Up Discount Rate for a Private Company
- ACC 315 Module 5 Database Design Assignment: An REA Model and Tables for Deliveries
- ACC 330 Module 5 Business Deductions Assignment: Schedule C, Self-Employment Tax and QBI
- ACC 201 Module 3: sample paper, in real form
ACC 421 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free ACC 421 Module 5 fraud risk assessment sample?
This page includes a full ACC 421 Module 5 fraud risk assessment with fraud triangle factors, six scenarios and audit responses for a linen rental company.
What is the fraud triangle?
A model holding that fraud typically involves an incentive or pressure, an opportunity to commit and conceal it, and a rationalization that lets the person justify it.
What are the two types of fraud auditors consider?
Fraudulent financial reporting, which misstates the statements to deceive users, and misappropriation of assets, which is theft concealed in the records.
What procedures address management override of controls?
Testing journal entries and other adjustments, reviewing accounting estimates for bias, and evaluating the business rationale for significant unusual transactions.
How common are billing schemes in small businesses?
The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners consistently reports billing schemes among the most common forms of occupational fraud, especially in smaller organizations.