ACC 640 Module 4 Discussion Example

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA

This ACC 640 Module 4 Discussion sample applies professional skepticism to an accounting estimate that management has reasons to keep low. SNHU ACC 640 (ACC-640), the graduate auditing course in the MS Accounting program, raises skepticism in Module Four, asking what it means and how auditors can practice it. A composite Oregon outdoor apparel company computes its returns reserve with an 11 percent trailing return rate, though returns have risen to 14 percent and a new lifetime returns policy began in September. The post explains skepticism as both a mindset and a set of actions, draws on research showing auditors tend to verify management's estimates rather than challenge them, and shows how an independent expectation changes the audit. It asks classmates what makes skepticism hard to sustain.

CourseACC 640 Auditing
ModuleModule 4
Paper typegraduate discussion post on professional skepticism and auditing estimates
LengthAbout 350 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMS Accounting
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for ACC 640 Module 4

1

Module Four Discussion

Eleven Percent or Fourteen?

The client in my course project computes its returns reserve each December by applying its trailing 12-month online return rate, 11 percent, to fourth-quarter online sales, then multiplying by the gross margin to estimate the profit that returns will reverse. Management calls this a consistent method, and the predecessor auditor accepted it for years. This year three facts suggest the method may not fit: returns have run at 14 percent since summer, a lifetime returns policy began in September, and a new rain jacket sold well in November but is coming back for fit problems.

What this page is doingThe estimate is introduced.
2

AS 1015 frames skepticism as an inquiring attitude that weighs evidence critically, which is not the same as distrust. Nelson (2009) separates skeptical judgment, recognizing that something may be wrong, from skeptical action, doing something about it, and much of the problem lies in the gap between them. An auditor who notices the 14 percent rate but accepts management's answer that the method is consistent has exercised judgment without action.

Skeptical action here means building an independent expectation instead of only testing management's calculation. Using return data by product and month, I would apply recent return rates, including a separate rate for the jacket and an allowance for the policy change, to fourth-quarter sales. That approach suggests a reserve about $1.4 million higher than management's, above our $1.1 million materiality. Griffith et al. (2015) found that auditors tend to approach complex estimates as verification of management's numbers, checking that the model was applied correctly rather than whether it was right, partly because of institutional pressures such as time budgets. Hurtt (2010) shows that skepticism varies across individuals, which is why firms cannot rely on attitude alone and must design procedures, like independent expectations, that force the question.

The independent estimate does not prove management wrong, but it changes the conversation from whether the formula was applied to whether the formula still fits the business.

What this page is doingSkepticism is applied and the research considered.
3

For classmates: in your experience or your case, what pressure most often keeps an auditor from turning a skeptical judgment into a skeptical action, and how would you design around it?

What this page is doingClassmates are asked what erodes skepticism.
4

References

Griffith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., & Kadous, K. (2015). Audits of complex estimates as verification of management numbers: How institutional pressures shape practice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 833-863. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12104

Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149

Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1

What the ACC 640 Module 4 instructions ask for

The Module Four discussion in ACC 640 usually asks about professional skepticism: what the standards require, why it matters most for estimates and fraud risks, and what gets in the way. Plan on three or four paragraphs drawing on AS 1015 and AS 2501, the textbook and research, then respond to classmates. Good posts apply skepticism to a specific estimate or judgment, showing what a skeptical auditor would do differently from one who accepts management's explanation. Some prompts ask whether skepticism is a personality trait or something firms can train and design into procedures, and taking a side with evidence behind it helps. A concrete example keeps the discussion from becoming abstract and shows the grader you can move from attitude to procedure.

How this ACC 640 Module 4 discussion example is built

The post uses an apparel company's returns reserve, computed by applying the trailing 12-month return rate of 11 percent to fourth-quarter online sales. Returns have actually run at 14 percent since summer, the company introduced a lifetime returns policy in September and a new rain jacket is coming back for fit. Management says the trailing rate is the company's consistent method. A skeptical auditor builds an independent expectation from return data by product and month, which suggests a reserve about $1.4 million higher. The post cites Nelson's model of skepticism, Hurtt's scale and Griffith, Hammersley and Kadous on auditors verifying management's numbers, then asks classmates what erodes skepticism and how a team could design around it.

Where the ACC 640 Module 4 rubric puts the points

Scoring for the skepticism discussion typically weighs accuracy on the standards' definition of skepticism, application to a specific estimate or judgment, use of research on skeptical judgment and action, and engagement with classmates. Graduate-level posts distinguish skeptical judgment from skeptical action, identify the specific evidence a skeptical auditor would seek and recognize the pressures that work against skepticism, such as time budgets and client relationships. Posts that define skepticism without applying it, or that equate it with distrust of management, score lower. Replies that propose a specific test for a classmate's estimate earn more participation credit than general agreement. Standard numbers, cited exactly, add precision.

ACC 640 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points

Students sometimes describe skepticism as assuming management is dishonest, when the standards describe a questioning mind and critical assessment of evidence, neither assuming dishonesty nor unquestioned honesty. Others describe a skeptical attitude without saying what the auditor would actually do differently. If your prompt focuses on fraud brainstorming or confirmation bias instead, define the idea, show it in one example and back it with a study. Name the one piece of evidence that would change your view of the estimate; it turns an abstract discussion of attitude into an audit procedure classmates can evaluate. A dollar figure for the possible difference, compared with materiality, makes the stakes clear.

Get ACC 640 Module 4 written to your instructions

Send the ACC 640 Module 4 prompt. The post will define skepticism accurately, apply it to a specific estimate or judgment and connect it to research on why auditors fall short, with a question for replies. Plan on roughly two days; your first costs nothing. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

Request this module free All ACC 640 modules

More ACC 640 papers and related MS Accounting samples

ACC 640 Module 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free ACC 640 Module 4 Discussion sample?

This page includes the full ACC 640 Module 4 post on professional skepticism applied to a returns reserve.

What is professional skepticism?

An attitude of inquiry that weighs audit evidence critically, applied throughout the audit, without assuming management is either dishonest or unquestionably honest.

Why is skepticism especially important for estimates?

Because estimates rest on management's assumptions and judgments, which can be biased intentionally or unintentionally, and the evidence supporting them is often internal and subjective.

What does AS 2501 require for accounting estimates?

Auditors may test management's process, develop an independent expectation, or evaluate subsequent events, and must evaluate whether assumptions are reasonable and whether there are indicators of management bias.

What gets in the way of skepticism?

Time pressure, client relationships, anchoring on management's figures, and incentives that reward efficiency over challenge.