ACC 690 Module 10 Final Project Example

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA

This ACC 690 Module 10 Final Project sample gathers a year of advanced reporting decisions into memos an audit committee can act on. Students in SNHU ACC 690 (ACC-690), an MS Accounting course on advanced reporting topics, submit this final project in Module Ten. A composite Nasdaq-listed ethanol producer resolved seven difficult reporting questions during the year, from consolidating a family-owned rail terminal to choosing a model for a transferable tax credit. The memo set summarizes each conclusion with the guidance applied, the judgment that decided it and the effect on the statements and on investor measures, ranks the matters by risk and lists what the committee should watch in the coming year.

CourseACC 690 Advanced Topics in Financial Reporting
ModuleModule 10
Paper typegraduate final project technical accounting memo set for an audit committee
LengthAbout 850 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMS Accounting
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for ACC 690 Module 10

1

Memorandum

To: Audit Committee

From: Chief Accounting Officer

Date: February 10, 2027

Re: Significant financial reporting matters for 2026

 

Summary

This memo summarizes the seven significant financial reporting matters resolved in 2026, the judgments behind them and their effects. Detailed analyses sit in the supporting memos, and the external auditors reviewed each one and raised no disagreement.

Significant matters, 2026

MatterConclusionEffect
Corn hedgesCash flow hedge accounting appliedGains held in other comprehensive income until corn is used; $6.4 million in first quarter
Rail terminalVariable interest entity; company is primary beneficiaryConsolidated; $28.5 million debt and $8.9 million noncontrolling interest added
SegmentsOne reportable segmentNew disclosures of corn, energy, chemical and labor costs
Clean fuel creditIncome tax model$21.6 million reduces tax expense; gross margin unaffected
Term loan amendmentModification, not a troubled restructuring$1.5 million fee amortized; no gain or loss
Adjusted EBITDAMaintenance no longer excludedPrior periods recast
Critical estimatesThree quantifiedSensitivity disclosed for credit, inventory and Nebraska plant
What this page is doingThe year's conclusions in one table.
2

Hedging and Consolidation

The corn futures meet the requirements for cash flow hedge accounting under ASC 815 as amended in 2017 (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2017). Hedging only the futures price component makes the hedge highly effective by design, and gains move to cost of goods sold when the hedged corn is used, so margins reflect the economics the hedging program secures. The founding families' rail terminal qualifies as a variable interest entity, since the bank would not have lent to it without the company's guarantee, and the company is its primary beneficiary because it directs loading and maintenance. Consolidation under ASC 810 (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2015) adds the terminal's debt to the balance sheet; because the company guarantees that debt, it counts in the covenant calculation. Feng et al. (2009) document that off-balance-sheet entities have been used to manage reported results, a reason the committee should review the related party terms annually.

What this page is doingTwo structural matters.
3

Tax Credit and Non-GAAP Measures

The clean fuel production credit is accounted for under ASC 740, reducing income tax expense, and is recognized only for the Iowa plant, whose emissions score is supportable. The company discloses the policy and provides information similar to the government assistance disclosures (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2021). Because the credit is in tax expense, the company will not add it into adjusted EBITDA, which would effectively apply a grant model through a non-GAAP measure; it will instead present the credit as a separate item in MD&A. In response to the SEC staff's comment, adjusted EBITDA no longer excludes maintenance shutdowns.

What this page is doingTwo matters that interact.
4

Debt, Covenants and Going Concern

The September amendment of the term loan is a modification under ASC 470-50, not a troubled debt restructuring, because the lenders were compensated with a higher effective rate. The amended debt ratio limit of 4.25 through June 2027 is met with about $9 million of EBITDA headroom, including the consolidated terminal's debt. Management's going concern evaluation concludes that no substantial doubt exists.

What this page is doingThe financing picture.
5

Matters Most Exposed to Challenge

Two judgments carry the most risk. First, the clean fuel credit: the emissions inputs and the Treasury's model could change, and the policy choice differs from some peers, so the credit draws attention from investors, auditors and the SEC staff. Second, the Nebraska plant: recoverability headroom of about 20 percent could disappear with a three-cent decline in long-term margins. The VIE conclusion is firm on current facts but would need revisiting if the terminal refinanced without the guarantee.

What this page is doingJudgments are ranked.
6

Segments and Disclosure Quality

The company's three plants remain one reportable segment because their products, processes, customers and margins are alike, a conclusion that rests on the chief operating decision maker's monthly plant reports. The 2023 segment update now requires the company to disclose the significant expenses in those reports, corn, natural gas, chemicals and labor, annually and in each quarter. Investors will therefore see the cost structure behind margins for the first time. The critical accounting estimates section was rewritten to lead with numbers: the per-gallon credit sensitivity, the inventory price sensitivity and the Nebraska plant's headroom, which also answers the SEC staff's second comment.

What this page is doingInvestor-facing changes.
7

Controls Over These Judgments

Each matter has a control: quarterly hedge documentation review by the treasurer and controller, an annual related party and VIE review presented to this committee, a quarterly emissions data review by the environmental manager before credits are recognized, and a review of every non-GAAP adjustment by the disclosure committee before each earnings release. Management's assessment of internal control found these operating effectively, and the auditors reported no deficiencies in them.

What this page is doingHow the conclusions are protected.
8

What to Watch in 2027

The committee should watch four items: legislative or regulatory changes to the clean fuel credit, which could change its value or duration; the FASB's work on accounting for government grants, which could affect the policy choice; crush margins and their effect on the Nebraska plant test; and the expiration of the amended covenant levels in mid-2027, when the debt ratio limit returns to 3.5.

What this page is doingForward-looking items.
9

Conclusion

Each conclusion follows the applicable guidance and is documented. The committee's attention is most useful on the two judgments above and on the four items to watch, which together determine how much the 2026 conclusions might change.

What this page is doingThe committee's role is stated.
10

References

Feng, M., Gramlich, J. D., & Gupta, S. (2009). Special purpose vehicles: Empirical evidence on determinants and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(6), 1833-1876. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.6.1833

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2015). Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the consolidation analysis (Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02). Author.

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2017). Derivatives and hedging (Topic 815): Targeted improvements to accounting for hedging activities (Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12). Author.

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2021). Government assistance (Topic 832): Disclosures by business entities about government assistance (Accounting Standards Update No. 2021-10). Author.

What the ACC 690 Module 10 instructions ask for

For the ACC 690 final project, expect to set out the case company's advanced reporting conclusions as technical memos or a report to the audit committee. Plan to cover each significant matter from the course: the question, the guidance, the analysis and alternatives, the conclusion and its effect on the statements, disclosures and key measures. Integrate milestone feedback rather than restating milestones, rank the matters by risk or judgment, describe the controls over each judgment, and add what the committee should watch next, such as pending standards or changing facts. Write concisely for informed directors who are not technical accountants, and keep detail in supporting memos.

How this ACC 690 Module 10 final project example is built

The memo set opens with a table of seven matters. Corn futures qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, moving $6.4 million of gains to the quarter the corn was used. The rail terminal is a VIE consolidated with a $8.9 million noncontrolling interest. The three plants remain one segment with new expense disclosures. The clean fuel credit is accounted for as a tax credit, $21.6 million recognized. The term loan amendment is a modification. Adjusted EBITDA no longer excludes maintenance. Three critical estimates are quantified. The memo ranks the credit and the Nebraska plant as the matters most exposed to challenge and lists items to watch in 2027, from credit legislation to the expiry of the amended covenant levels.

Where the ACC 690 Module 10 rubric puts the points

Grading for the ACC 690 final project centers on the technical accuracy of each matter, use of authoritative guidance and SEC rules, analysis of alternatives, the statement of effects on statements and measures, integration of milestone feedback, ranking of risk, forward-looking items and writing for the audience. The best memo sets stay brief, open with each conclusion, quantify effects and connect matters where they interact, such as the credit's effect on both tax expense and adjusted EBITDA. Graders also reward candor about the judgments most open to challenge and attention to the controls that protect them. Common deductions include restating milestones at length, omitting effects, ignoring how matters interact and offering no view on what to watch.

ACC 690 Module 10 help: the mistakes that cost points

Final memo sets most often lose points by treating each matter separately, missing the connections a committee cares about, such as how the debt amendment, the VIE consolidation and the covenant calculation fit together. A second weak spot is length: directors need the conclusion, the judgment and the effect, with detail in workpapers. If your guidelines ask for separate memos, keep a one-page summary at the front. Write the summary table first and then one short section per row; if a section does not support its row, cut it. Then add the items to watch, since committees plan their agendas from them.

Get ACC 690 Module 10 written to your instructions

Send the ACC 690 final project guidelines plus the instructor comments from each milestone. The memo set will revise the milestones into concise positions with their guidance, judgments and effects, rank the matters by risk and add the forward-looking items your rubric asks for. Two days is typical, and there is no fee for your first request. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More ACC 690 papers and related MS Accounting samples

ACC 690 Module 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free ACC 690 Module 10 Final Project sample?

This page includes a full ACC 690 final project memo set summarizing seven advanced reporting matters for an audit committee.

What should an audit committee memo on accounting matters include?

For each matter, the question, the guidance applied, the key judgment, alternatives considered and the effect on the statements, disclosures and key measures.

How should matters be prioritized for an audit committee?

By the degree of judgment and the potential effect if the conclusion were challenged or facts changed.

Why connect separate accounting matters?

Because conclusions interact, for example a consolidation decision changing covenant ratios or a tax policy changing a non-GAAP measure, and committees need the combined picture.

What forward-looking items belong in the memo?

Pending standards, changing facts that could reverse a conclusion, and areas where regulators or auditors are focusing attention.