ACC 692 is SNHU’s Interview Techniques/Legal Aspects of Fraud course. It centers on interviewing in fraud examinations and the legal framework around them: interview sequence and planning, question types, admission-seeking interviews and false confessions, the elements of criminal and civil fraud, employee rights in public and union workplaces, evidence and its admissibility, documenting interviews, and expert testimony. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "acc 692 module 3", "ACC692 sample paper" and "ACC 692 milestone example" land on this page.
What ACC 692 is really about
ACC 692 is SNHU's graduate course on investigative interviewing and the legal side of fraud examination, and it rewards work that ties every question asked to an element that must later be proved. Strong submissions plan interviews around documents already in hand, respect the rights of the person across the table and write up what was said so precisely that a defense lawyer finds nothing to attack.
The samples on this shelf share one composite case. A fleet supervisor at a county highway department in western Pennsylvania diverted about 41,000 gallons of diesel and 380 truck tires over three winters, sold them to a private excavating contractor and covered the losses with false plow-truck fueling entries and scrap tickets, for a loss near $258,000. The county, its staff and its figures are illustrative.
What ACC 692’s modules ask for
Across ten modules, ACC 692 typically asks for discussions on interview purpose, admission-seeking methods and deception cues, assignments on interview planning, the legal elements of the offenses and documenting an interview, three final project milestones on the interview plan, employee rights and evidence, and expert testimony, and a final project combining the examination report with a legal strategy.
Where students lose points in ACC 692
The usual ACC 692 deduction goes to interview plans that list questions without saying which fact or element each one is meant to establish. Close behind are legal sections that cite a statute but never walk the facts through its elements, and write-ups that mix the interviewer's opinions into what the witness said. Graders also notice when a public employee's or union member's rights are ignored. Tying each question and each finding to a named element closes most of these gaps.
The ACC 692 drawers
ACC 692 Module 1 Discussion example
An opening post on why a fraud examiner interviews people at all when the documents already tell much of the story, set at a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department where fuel tank telemetry showed about 41,000 gallons of diesel unaccounted for: what only people can supply, why the first conversations are friendly and open-ended, how question types move from introductory to closing, and why most interviews are with people who did nothing wrong, with Memon, Meissner and Fraser and Hartwig, Granhag, Strömwall and Kronkvist. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 2 Interview Planning Assignment example
An interview planning assignment for the diesel and tire losses at a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department: the documents to gather first, nine people sorted into neutral record keepers, corroborating witnesses, a possible accomplice and the subject, the reasons for that order, a detailed plan for the fuel desk clerk covering objectives, setting, a second interviewer, a union representative and question sequence, and the risks of word spreading through a small yard, with Hartwig, Granhag, Strömwall and Kronkvist, Memon, Meissner and Fraser and Kranacher and Riley. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 3 Milestone One example
The first final project milestone sets out the whole interviewing phase for the diesel and tire losses at a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department: what the first six witness interviews established, how the plan changed when a mechanic described night fills, an approach to the excavating contractor agreed with the district attorney, and a two-part plan for the fleet supervisor that moves from an information-gathering account to presenting evidence in a set order, with timing, roles, recording and the legal checks each step needs, with Hartwig, Granhag, Strömwall and Kronkvist, Meissner and colleagues and the cognitive interview review by Memon, Meissner and Fraser. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 4 Discussion example
A discussion post on how far an examiner may push when seeking an admission, set at the moment a composite western Pennsylvania county fleet supervisor is shown his override code on 118 night fuel fills: the accusatory model built on confrontation and offered excuses, the information-gathering model used in England and Wales, what research says about true and false confessions under each, and why a confession that a court throws out is worth less than none, with Kassin, Drizin, Grisso, Gudjonsson, Leo and Redlich and Meissner and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 5 Legal Elements Assignment example
A legal elements assignment that takes the diesel and tire losses at a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department through each possible charge: theft by unlawful taking and its grading by value, tampering with public records for the false fuel and scrap entries, receiving stolen property for the excavating contractor and federal program theft under 18 U.S.C. 666 because the county takes federal highway money, with an element-by-element table of the evidence for and against, the gaps still open and the civil routes to recovery, with Kranacher and Riley, Fischer v. United States and Sabri v. United States. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 6 Milestone Two example
The second final project milestone works through the legal rules that decide whether the highway department examination's findings can be used: why the fleet supervisor's interview must stay voluntary under Garrity, union representation for the fuel desk clerk, the warning the county solicitor gives under Upjohn, keeping the forensic accountant's work privileged through a Kovel engagement, a documented chain of custody for pump controller and telemetry data, and the business records route for the dispensing log, with Garrity v. New Jersey, NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Upjohn Co. v. United States and United States v. Kovel. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 7 Discussion example
A discussion post about a second mechanic at a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department who sweated, looked away and folded his arms when asked about the nights a contractor's tanker sat in the yard, which a colleague read as lying: what meta-analyses say about how weak such cues are and how close to chance people judge lies, why content and checkable detail work better, and the ordinary reason he turned out to be nervous, with Bond and DePaulo, DePaulo and colleagues and Vrij, Granhag and Porter. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 8 Interview Documentation Assignment example
An interview documentation assignment that writes up the voluntary interview of the excavating contractor in the composite western Pennsylvania county highway department case: a memorandum of interview recording who was present, the warnings, his account of buying about 33,000 gallons of diesel at $1.90 a gallon and 240 tires for cash at night, and his admission that he suspected the goods were not surplus, followed by the signed statement he reviewed and initialed, and the rules for writing both so they hold up, with Kranacher and Riley, Kassin, Drizin, Grisso, Gudjonsson, Leo and Redlich and Kassin, Kukucka, Lawson and DeCarlo. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 9 Milestone Three example
The third final project milestone prepares the forensic accountant to testify about the $258,000 diesel and tire loss at a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department: why a state court applies the general acceptance test while a federal court would apply Rule 702 and Daubert, the three ways the fuel loss was measured and why they agree, the valuation of used tires, a direct examination outline, a demonstrative chart and the cross-examination the defense is most likely to try on meter accuracy, temperature and shared codes, with Frye v. United States, Grady v. Frito-Lay, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 692 Module 10 Final Project example
The final project delivers the closing fraud examination report for a composite western Pennsylvania county highway department to its controller and solicitor: scope and methods, findings on 41,000 gallons of diesel and 380 tires worth about $258,000, the false fueling and scrap entries, the excavating contractor's purchases for about $84,300 in cash, a summary of eleven interviews, the legal options already weighed, and a strategy combining the criminal referral, a bond claim, a civil suit against both men and five control fixes, written without any opinion on guilt, with Kranacher and Riley, the ACFE report to the nations and Fischer v. United States. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a ACC 692 sample the right way
Read an ACC 692 sample by asking, for each interview, what the investigator already knew going in and which element the conversation was meant to prove. When the plan, the legal analysis and the write-up line up on those elements, the sample shows what this course rewards. For ACC 692, send the case file, the guidelines and the rubric, and the first custom sample is written free within 24-48h.
ACC 692 questions, answered
What does ACC 692 cover?
Planning and conducting interviews in fraud examinations, admission-seeking techniques, the elements of fraud offenses, the rights of employees being interviewed, rules of evidence, documenting interviews and testifying as an expert.
How is ACC 692 different from ACC 691?
ACC 691 studies how financial statements are falsified and how the signs are read; ACC 692 focuses on the people side of an investigation and the legal rules that decide whether findings can be used.
Do the ACC 692 samples use a real case?
No. They follow one composite county highway department and its fleet supervisor so that each module builds on the last; your course may supply its own case file.