ACC 693 is SNHU’s Investigating with Computers course. It centers on computer-assisted fraud investigation: data analytics on accounting records, identifying and preserving digital evidence, forensic imaging and hashing, email and document metadata, privacy limits on employee devices, anti-forensics and spoliation, link analysis, timelines and authenticating digital evidence for court. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "acc 693 module 3", "ACC693 sample paper" and "ACC 693 milestone example" land on this page.
What ACC 693 is really about
ACC 693 is SNHU's graduate course on investigating fraud with computers, and it rewards work that can show exactly where each piece of digital evidence came from, how it was protected and what it proves. Strong submissions pair data tests that narrow thousands of transactions to a few with forensic steps that keep the resulting evidence admissible.
The samples on this shelf share one composite case. A senior project manager at a Colorado commercial roofing contractor with about $85 million of annual revenue set up a sheet-metal flashing subcontractor in a relative's name, then approved inflated invoices and change orders from it across fourteen projects over twenty-six months, about $1.1 million in all. The company, its people and its figures are illustrative.
What ACC 693’s modules ask for
Across ten modules, ACC 693 typically asks for discussions on how technology changed investigations, employee devices and privacy, and anti-forensics, assignments on data analytics, forensic imaging and link analysis, three final project milestones on an evidence plan, email and document analysis and a timeline of findings, and a final project combining the investigation report with how the evidence would be authenticated.
Where students lose points in ACC 693
Most ACC 693 deductions come from evidence handling described in general terms: imaging mentioned without a write blocker, hashes or a custody log, or data tests reported without the population, the rule and the number of hits. Graders also mark down findings that rest on one data source when a second could confirm them, and analyses that ignore an employee's privacy rights in personal devices. Naming the source, the tool, the hash and the confirming record for each finding solves most of it.
The ACC 693 drawers
ACC 693 Module 1 Discussion example
An opening post on what computers changed for fraud examiners, told through a composite Colorado roofing contractor where a project manager's sham flashing subcontractor was invisible in a sample of invoices but obvious once all 51,400 payables were tested: whole-population testing in place of sampling, the trail every scheme now leaves in logs, metadata and messages, the problem of sheer volume, and why the examiner's judgment matters more rather than less, with Garfinkel, Quick and Choo and Bierstaker, Brody and Pacini. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 2 Data Analytics Assignment example
A data analytics assignment that runs seven tests across every payment a composite Colorado roofing contractor made from 2023 to 2025, about 51,400 invoices to 2,380 vendors: vendor matches to employee phones, addresses and bank accounts, new vendors that grew fast, invoices clustered under a $25,000 approval limit, consecutive invoice numbers, vendors paid by only one approver, taxpayer number checks and duplicate payments, with a results table, the innocent hits ruled out and the one vendor every test pointed to, with Debreceny and Gray, Bierstaker, Brody and Pacini and Nigrini. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 3 Milestone One example
The first final project milestone plans how a composite Colorado roofing contractor will find and preserve every digital trace of a project manager's sham flashing subcontractor before he learns of the inquiry: an inventory of nine sources from the payables system's change log to his company laptop, mailbox, job folders, badge and VPN logs and the personal phone he used for work texts, a preservation order that runs quietly over five days, who images what, the legal basis for each source, chain of custody and the risk that he wipes his devices first, with Kent, Chevalier, Grance and Dang, Casey and Harris. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 4 Discussion example
A discussion post on how far an employer may reach into a suspect's personal phone and private email, set at a composite Colorado roofing contractor where a project manager texted field crews from his own phone and a colleague found his Gmail password saved in a browser on the company laptop: what the company may take from its own systems and the work container, why logging into the personal account would break the Stored Communications Act as one federal court found, what phones hold as the Supreme Court described, and the lawful routes of consent and subpoena, with Pure Power Boot Camp v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, Riley v. California and Casey. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 5 Forensic Imaging Assignment example
A forensic imaging assignment that documents how evidence was acquired from a composite Colorado roofing contractor's project manager: a full image of his BitLocker-encrypted company laptop taken through a hardware write blocker in under two hours while he was at a job site, verified with matching SHA-256 values and unlocked with the company's recovery key, why a solid-state drive limits deleted-file recovery, and a narrow consent-based extraction from his personal phone covering messages with three contacts, with the forms, photographs and validation that make both defensible, with Kent, Chevalier, Grance and Dang, Bell and Boddington and Casey. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 6 Milestone Two example
The second final project milestone analyzes the preserved email, documents and logs in the composite Colorado roofing contractor case: invoice PDFs whose metadata name the project manager's Windows account and a word processor, an invoice template recovered from his laptop with 74 recent-file traces, 41 invoice emails whose headers show they left the company's own network while his badge placed him in the office, 312 mailbox hits for the subcontractor, a vendor setup request he submitted, and job-site logs and photos that never show the subcontractor's crew, with Garfinkel, Casey and Kent, Chevalier, Grance and Dang. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 7 Discussion example
A discussion post on what happens when a suspect destroys digital evidence, set the night after a composite Colorado roofing contractor's project manager was interviewed: a disk-wiping utility run on his company laptop over a home VPN connection, his OneDrive folder emptied and, after a preservation letter, his personal phone reset to factory settings, why the earlier verified image left the company's case intact, how the wipe itself became evidence, and what courts may do when a party destroys electronic information it was told to keep, with Harris, Conlan, Baggili and Breitinger and Zubulake v. UBS Warburg. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 8 Link Analysis Assignment example
A link analysis assignment that maps how a sham flashing subcontractor connects to the composite Colorado roofing contractor's project manager: the LLC's state filing naming his wife's brother as organizer, a mailbox-store business address, a domain whose historical registration listed his personal email before privacy was switched on, a phone shared with his emergency contact, a credit union account that later bank records show sent 61 percent of its deposits to an account he holds jointly with his wife, and the invoices traced to his laptop, set out as entities and links with each source and strength, with Sparrow, Kranacher and Riley and Casey. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 9 Milestone Three example
The third final project milestone merges every dated record in the composite Colorado roofing contractor case into one timeline: the LLC filing, the domain registered with the project manager's personal email, a draft invoice he mailed himself before the vendor existed, the vendor request from his account, seventy-four invoices and payments from April 2023 to May 2025, the analytics, the five-day preservation, the interview and the wipe that night, with time zones normalized and every entry traced to a source, then seven numbered findings and a loss of $1,104,350, with Chabot, Bertaux, Nicolle and Kechadi, Casey and Kent, Chevalier, Grance and Dang. Full sample paper, read it free.
ACC 693 Module 10 Final Project example
The final project delivers the investigation report for a composite Colorado roofing contractor's general counsel and sets out how each piece of digital evidence will be authenticated in its civil suit: a summary, scope and methods, seven findings on the sham flashing subcontractor and the $1,104,350 loss, a table pairing each exhibit with its route into evidence through witness testimony, hash-certified copies, system-generated records and business records, the limits of the work, and six control changes from vendor onboarding checks to monthly analytics and device policy, with Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., Casey and Kent, Chevalier, Grance and Dang. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a ACC 693 sample the right way
Read an ACC 693 sample by following one piece of evidence from the system that held it to the finding it supports: who collected it, how it was protected and what confirms it. When that chain is complete for every finding, the sample shows the work this course grades. For ACC 693, send your case, the guidelines and the rubric, and the first custom sample is written free within 24-48h.
ACC 693 questions, answered
What does ACC 693 cover?
Using data analytics and digital forensics in fraud investigations: testing accounting data, preserving and imaging devices, analyzing email and documents, privacy and legal limits, anti-forensics, link analysis and presenting digital evidence.
Do I need technical skills for ACC 693?
The course expects you to understand what forensic tools do and how evidence is protected, and to interpret data test results; it does not expect you to be a forensic examiner.
Do the ACC 693 samples use a real company?
No. They follow one composite roofing contractor and a fictional sham subcontractor so each module builds on the last; your course may provide its own case.