| Course | BMB 655 Music Business Finance |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | graduate assignment valuing a music publishing catalog with discounted cash flow |
| Length | About 1,050 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MBA in Music Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BMB 655 Module 5
Valuation of a 600-Song Publishing Catalog
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
BMB 655: Music Business Finance
Module Five Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Valuation of a 600-Song Publishing Catalog
Introduction
A songwriter who also ran a small publishing company in Austin, Texas, has decided to retire and sell his catalog of about 600 songs, mostly country and Americana, written by him and co-written with others between 1988 and 2019. He asks $3.6 million. The Nashville publisher, whose Milestone One analysis showed that a handful of titles and a single founder carry much of its income, is considering the purchase. This paper estimates what the catalog is worth to the publisher, using discounted cash flow, and tests the result against changes in assumptions and legal risks.
Historical Income
The seller provided three years of royalty statements by song. The net publisher's share, the income left after paying writers their shares, was $310,000 in 2023, $328,000 in 2024 and $342,000 in 2025, growth of about 5 percent a year driven by streaming. Two features of the income matter for valuation. It is concentrated: ten songs produce 54 percent of the total and the top two produce 23 percent. And it is old: about 80 percent comes from songs released between 1995 and 2012, and only 4 percent from songs released after 2015.
Income by song age, 2025
| Release period | Songs | Share of net publisher's share | Trend, 2023-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988-1994 | 140 | 12% | Declining about 2% a year |
| 1995-2012 | 390 | 80% | Growing about 6% a year |
| 2013-2019 | 70 | 8% | Flat |
The recent growth of the middle group came largely from playlist placement of a few songs, which may not continue. Two songs from 2001 and 2004 account for nearly all of that growth after being added to large country playlists in 2023; without them, the middle group would have been roughly flat. Playlist placements can last for years, but they can also end without warning when editors refresh their lists, so a buyer should not assume this growth will persist.
Income also varies by source. About 46 percent of the catalog's net share comes from performance royalties, 41 percent from mechanical royalties and only 6 percent from sync, with the rest from print and miscellaneous sources. The low sync share reflects the seller's lack of a licensing effort rather than the songs' potential, which is relevant in Milestone Two.
The Discount Rate
The discount rate reflects what an investor in an asset of this risk should require. Damodaran (2012) recommends building it from a risk-free rate and premiums for the risks investors bear. Starting from a ten-year Treasury yield of about 4.3 percent, adding an equity risk premium of 4.5 percent and further premiums of 0.5 percent for the catalog's small size and 0.7 percent for its lack of liquidity gives a rate of 10.0 percent. Catalog buyers with access to cheap capital may accept lower rates, but this publisher is a small private company financing the purchase partly with debt, so the rate should reflect its own cost of capital.
Projected Income
Recent growth of 5 percent a year is unlikely to last for a catalog whose income comes overwhelmingly from songs twenty to thirty years old. Before streaming, the publisher's own older songs declined 6 to 8 percent a year; since streaming, about 3 percent. Allowing for some continued streaming growth in the near term and decline thereafter, a long-run rate of minus 1 percent a year is a reasonable central assumption. The publisher also expects savings from administering the catalog itself, but those are counted in Milestone Two as a benefit of the purchase rather than as part of the catalog's standalone value.
Valuation
With next year's income of $342,000 reduced by 1 percent, about $338,600, and a perpetual decline of 1 percent, the value equals the first year's income divided by the discount rate minus the growth rate: $338,600 divided by 0.11, or about $3.08 million. Brealey et al. (2020) note that this growing-perpetuity formula is a simplification of a year-by-year forecast; a ten-year explicit forecast with the same assumptions and a terminal value gives the same answer, because the assumptions do not change over time. The result equals about nine times 2025 income.
Sensitivity
Catalog value by discount rate and long-run growth, in thousands of dollars
| Long-run growth | 9% rate | 10% rate | 11% rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minus 3% | 2,764 | 2,552 | 2,369 |
| Minus 1% | 3,386 | 3,078 | 2,822 |
| Plus 1% | 4,318 | 3,838 | 3,454 |
The asking price of $3.6 million is supported only if the catalog's income keeps growing modestly forever or if the buyer accepts a return below 9 percent with a slight decline. Under the central assumptions, the price is about $520,000 too high. The grid also shows how much the answer depends on growth: moving from minus 1 to plus 1 percent changes the value by about $760,000 at a 10 percent rate, more than the gap between the asking price and the central value. That is why the buyer's view of the catalog's future, not the arithmetic, will decide the negotiation.
Termination Rights
United States copyright law allows authors who transferred their copyrights after 1977 to terminate the transfer after thirty-five years, within a set window, by giving notice. Passman (2023) explains that this right cannot be waived by contract. Two kinds of exposure follow. The seller's own songs, transferred to the buyer in 2026, could in principle be reclaimed by him or his heirs from 2061, so far in the future that the present value effect is small. More immediately, about 15 percent of the catalog's income comes from songs co-written with others who assigned their shares to the seller's company between 1995 and 2005; those co-writers can terminate from 2030 to 2040. Assuming half exercise the right in their first eligible year, the loss of income in those years reduces the value by about $90,000, bringing the central value to about $2.99 million.
Market Comparison
Recent sales of comparable independent catalogs of older country songs reportedly ranged from about 8 to 12 times net publisher's share, with higher multiples for catalogs with famous songs and recent hits. At nine times, the central value sits near the lower middle of that range, which is consistent with the catalog's age and concentration.
Conclusion
The catalog is worth about $3.0 million to the publisher on central assumptions, within a range of about $2.4 million to $4.3 million. The asking price of $3.6 million requires optimistic assumptions about growth or return. Milestone Two will weigh the purchase, including administration savings, financing and negotiation terms, against this value.
References
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Passman, D. S. (2023). All you need to know about the music business (11th ed.). Simon & Schuster.
What the BMB 655 Module 5 instructions ask for
The Module Five assignment in BMB 655 asks you to value a music asset, usually a publishing or master recording catalog, using discounted cash flow and often a comparison with market multiples. You analyze historical income, choose a discount rate, project future cash flows with assumptions about growth or decline, calculate a value and test how sensitive it is to your assumptions. Strong papers explain each assumption with evidence from the catalog's own data, such as its age profile and concentration, and address legal features that affect value, such as reversion or termination rights. Graders expect the arithmetic to be shown and the final value compared with the asking price or market evidence.
How this BMB 655 Module 5 catalog valuation assignment example is built
The paper begins with three years of the catalog's net publisher's share, rising from $310,000 to $342,000, and shows that ten songs produce 54 percent of it and most songs date from 1995 to 2012. It builds a 10 percent discount rate from a risk-free rate, an equity premium and additions for size and illiquidity. Assuming income declines 1 percent a year over the long run, the value comes to about $3.08 million, or nine times income. A grid shows values from $2.37 million to $4.32 million as the rate moves from 9 to 11 percent and growth from minus 3 to plus 1 percent. Co-writers' termination rights reduce the value by about $90,000, and the paper compares the result with the $3.6 million asking price.
Where the BMB 655 Module 5 rubric puts the points
For the valuation paper, marks usually go to the analysis of historical income, the justification of the discount rate, the projection assumptions, the correctness of the calculation, sensitivity analysis, treatment of legal and concentration risks and the final recommendation. The strongest papers ground every assumption in the catalog's data, show the formula and the steps, present a sensitivity table and adjust for specific risks rather than adding an arbitrary discount. They also compare the result with market multiples. Papers lose credit for unexplained discount rates, for assuming income grows forever without evidence, for ignoring concentration and termination rights and for presenting a single number as if it were certain.
BMB 655 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points
Valuation papers most often fail on assumptions rather than arithmetic. Justify your discount rate with its parts, and base your growth or decline rate on the catalog's age profile and history; a catalog of older songs rarely grows for long. Show the formula and each step so a reader can check the result. Present a sensitivity grid, because the honest answer to what a catalog is worth is a range. Look for legal features such as termination rights or co-publishing reversions that cut off income at a known date, and value them explicitly. Finally, state whether the asking price is supported and at what assumptions.
Get BMB 655 Module 5 written to your instructions
Send the BMB 655 Module 5 assignment and the catalog data. You get a sourced discount rate, a decline assumption you can defend, a discounted cash flow value, a sensitivity grid and adjustments for rights risks. Valuations usually return inside two days; your first is on us. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More BMB 655 papers and related MBA in Music Business samples
- BMB 655 Module 1 Discussion: Why Music Rights Are Priced as Streams of Cash
- BMB 655 Module 2 Financial Statements Assignment: Reading a Publisher's Statements
- BMB 655 Module 3 Milestone One: A Financial Analysis of the Publisher
- BMB 655 Module 4 Discussion: Venture Money, Crowdfunding or Neither
- ACC 690 Module 8 Debt Modification Assignment: Amending the Term Loan After a Drought
- ACC 646 Module 3 Milestone One: Predication and a Plan for the Hauling Vendor
- ACC 610 Module 9 Milestone Three: The Statement of Cash Flows and Key Disclosures
- MBA 580 Module 2 Innovation Types Presentation
BMB 655 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free BMB 655 Module 5 Catalog Valuation sample?
This page includes a complete BMB 655 Module 5 valuation of a 600-song publishing catalog using discounted cash flow.
How do you value a music catalog with discounted cash flow?
Project the catalog's future net income, choose a discount rate reflecting its risk, and sum the present values, often using a growing or declining perpetuity for later years.
What discount rate is used for music catalogs?
It varies with interest rates and risk; it is commonly built from a risk-free rate plus premiums for equity risk, the catalog's size and its lack of liquidity.
What are termination rights in music publishing?
Under United States copyright law, authors who transferred their copyrights can, after a set period, terminate the transfer and recover their rights, which can reduce the income a buyer receives.
Why do catalog values change so much with small assumption changes?
Because value depends on the gap between the discount rate and the growth rate, so a change of one percentage point in either can move the value by 10 percent or more.