BUS 206 Business Law I sample papers, module by module

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA

BUS 206 introduces business students to the law that shapes everyday decisions: where legal rules come from, how disputes are resolved, when a business must pay for harm and how contracts are formed, broken and enforced. The samples below follow one composite balloon ride company near Albuquerque through the legal questions a small business actually meets in a season.

BUS 206 is SNHU’s Business Law I course. It centers on the legal environment of business: sources of law and the court system, dispute resolution, torts and negligence, liability waivers, contract formation, consideration and online terms, breach and remedies, and the link between legal duties and business ethics. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "bus 206 module 3", "BUS206 sample paper" and "BUS 206 milestone example" land on this page.

What BUS 206 is really about

BUS 206 is SNHU's first business law course, and it rewards work that takes a business problem, identifies the legal rule that governs it and applies the rule to the facts step by step. Strong submissions name the elements of a tort or a contract, test each against what happened and say what the business should do differently, rather than summarizing the law in general.

The samples on this shelf share one composite business: a family-owned hot-air balloon ride company founded in 1998 outside Albuquerque, New Mexico, with six balloons, four pilots, a ground crew of twelve, about 9,000 passengers a year and revenue near $2.6 million, much of it booked online or through hotel packages. The company, its people and its figures are illustrative.

What BUS 206’s modules ask for

Across eight modules, BUS 206 typically asks for discussions on why law matters to business, remedies for broken contracts and the line between legal and ethical, assignments on the court system, torts and contract formation, and two projects analyzing a liability problem and a set of business contracts.

Where students lose points in BUS 206

The most common BUS 206 deduction comes from naming the right area of law and never applying it, for example saying a passenger may sue for negligence without walking through duty, breach, causation and damages. Close behind are contract answers that skip offer, acceptance or consideration, and recommendations that ignore what the business can actually change. Working through each element against the facts fixes most of these.

The BUS 206 drawers

Module 1

BUS 206 Module 1 Discussion example

An opening post tracing the legal duties of a composite balloon ride company near Albuquerque to their sources: the federal statute and FAA rule that now require commercial balloon pilots to hold a medical certificate after the 2016 Lockhart, Texas crash, aviation regulations on weather and passenger briefings, New Mexico court decisions on liability releases, state tax rules and county permits for launch fields, and why knowing which source a rule comes from tells the owners who can change it and how it is enforced, with Mallor and colleagues, the NTSB Lockhart report and Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 2

BUS 206 Module 2 Court System Assignment example

A court system assignment that follows a Texas passenger's $140,000 claim for a broken ankle after a hard landing by a composite Albuquerque balloon company through every forum it could reach: the state district court in Bernalillo County, the federal district court through diversity jurisdiction and why the company, as a local defendant, cannot move a state case there, the appeal routes in each system, the small claims option that does not fit, and the arbitration clause in the passenger release, then recommends mediation first and explains why, with Mallor and colleagues, Shavell and the federal diversity statute. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 3

BUS 206 Module 3 Torts Assignment example

A torts assignment on two events from one morning at a composite Albuquerque balloon company: a pilot launched with gusts forecast above the company's own wind limit and landed hard, breaking a Texas passenger's ankle, and the same balloon came down in a farmer's chile field and flattened about $3,800 of crop, each tested element by element for negligence and trespass, with the company's liability for its pilot, the passenger's share of fault under New Mexico's pure comparative fault rule, the weakness of the signed release and the emergency-landing defense, with Mallor and colleagues, Scott v. Rizzo, Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp. and Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 4

BUS 206 Module 4 Project One example

The first project gives the owners of a composite Albuquerque balloon company a plain memo on their legal exposure after a season with one injury claim, two crop complaints and a pilot working as an independent contractor: what each claim is likely to cost, why the passenger release will not protect them under New Mexico law, how the contractor pilot could still make the company liable, what their insurance covers and where it stops, and six changes from a firm wind rule to landing agreements with farmers and a rewritten release, with Mallor and colleagues, Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp. and the NTSB Lockhart report. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 5

BUS 206 Module 5 Contract Formation Assignment example

A contract formation assignment on how a composite Albuquerque balloon company makes its contracts with customers: whether a booking on its website forms a contract and when, whether its cancellation terms bind a buyer who never opened the link at the bottom of the page, what consideration supports a gift certificate and why federal law stops the company from letting certificates expire after one year, whether a seventeen-year-old's booking can be undone, and a redesign of the checkout so the terms are part of the deal, with Mallor and colleagues, Specht v. Netscape Communications and Lucy v. Zehmer. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 6

BUS 206 Module 6 Discussion example

A discussion post on what a composite Albuquerque balloon company can recover when a resort ends its exclusive sunrise flight package three months into a two-year contract: the expected profit of about $96,000 on the remaining 1,600 passengers, the duty to find other customers before claiming that loss, why lost bookings from the resort's own guests may count but lost word of mouth probably will not, why a court will not order the resort to keep selling, and the value of a liquidated damages clause, with Hadley v. Baxendale, Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co. and Mallor and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 7

BUS 206 Module 7 Project Two example

The second project designs the contracts a composite Albuquerque balloon company needs with the eleven farms and ranches where its balloons land: why a revocable permission, a lease and an easement give the company very different rights, which form fits, the terms that make a landing agreement enforceable and useful, from a $40 landing fee and a damage schedule to insurance naming the landowner, an indemnity clause that New Mexico law may limit, notice before crossing irrigated fields and a one-year term that renews, with a model agreement in outline, a review of the risks it leaves and how the company will roll it out, with Mallor and colleagues, the Restatement of Contracts and Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 8

BUS 206 Module 8 Discussion example

A closing discussion post on the distance between lawful and right, set on a fully booked morning when a composite Albuquerque balloon company's pilot judged the forecast inside every legal and company limit but still felt uneasy about a gusty landing area, while the owners worried about refunding forty passengers: the layers of responsibility from legal duties to ethical ones, what the 2016 Lockhart crash showed about commercial pressure, and a proposal that any pilot may cancel without explaining, with Carroll, the NTSB Lockhart report and Mallor and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a BUS 206 sample the right way

Read a BUS 206 sample by finding the legal rule it relies on and checking that each element is applied to a specific fact. When every element has a fact beside it, the conclusion can be trusted. For BUS 206, send your scenario, the guidelines and the rubric, and the first custom sample is written free within 24-48h.

BUS 206 questions, answered

What does BUS 206 cover?

The legal environment of business, sources of law, courts and dispute resolution, torts and negligence, contracts from formation to remedies, and the relationship between law and ethics.

Do I need a legal background for BUS 206?

No. The course introduces legal rules for business students and asks you to apply them to realistic situations rather than to argue like a lawyer.

Is the balloon company in the BUS 206 samples real?

No. It is an invented composite so the eight modules can share one set of facts; your course may supply its own scenarios.