FIN 336 Module 7 Project Two Example

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA

This FIN 336 Module 7 Project Two sample is a full recommendation to a board on whether and how to make an international investment, built on the risk assessment and valuation that came before it. SNHU FIN 336 (FIN-336) closes its BS Finance course on multinational corporate finance with this project. The composite Sioux Falls grain bin maker must choose among building a plant in Mato Grosso, licensing its designs to a Brazilian manufacturer and forming a joint venture. The report measures each option against the export business it would replace, recommends a two-stage plant, and sets out the financing mix, the hedging policy, the controls against bribery and the milestones that would trigger stage two.

CourseFIN 336 Multinational Corporate Finance
ModuleModule 7
Paper typeundergraduate project recommending an international investment to a board
LengthAbout 1,150 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramBS Finance
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for FIN 336 Module 7

1

Recommendation to the Board: Entering Brazil in Two Stages

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

FIN 336: Multinational Corporate Finance

Project Two

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe company and its figures are composite; Brazilian tax rates and market levels are approximate.
2

Recommendation to the Board: Entering Brazil in Two Stages

Executive Summary

Management recommends that the board approve a plant near Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, built in two stages. Stage one, R$100 million in 2026 and 2027, would roll steel bin panels and assemble dryers using controls shipped from Sioux Falls. Stage two, about R$80 million, would add capacity in 2028 only if Brazilian sales reach agreed milestones. After subtracting the export margin the plant would replace, the full project is worth about $7.2 million more than the investment, compared with about $6.3 million for licensing and about $3.6 million for a joint venture. The plant also keeps control of the company's dryer technology. Two thirds of the debt would be borrowed in reais, forecast remittances would be partly hedged, and anti-bribery controls would be in place before construction starts.

What this page is doingPuts the decision on page one, as a board report should.
3

The Opportunity

Brazilian farm cooperatives have bought the company's bins for eight years, and Brazil's share of company sales has climbed to roughly a tenth. Grain output in central Brazil has outgrown storage, so demand should keep rising. Project One found Brazil's risks manageable for a manufacturer, with currency swings and high local interest rates as the largest, and recommended a country risk premium of about 2.5 points. The Module Five valuation found the plant worth R$69.3 million, or $12.7 million, above its R$180 million cost, discounted at 11.5 percent in dollars.

What this page is doingReminds the board why Brazil, in brief.
4

A Correction to the Valuation

That valuation counted the plant's own cash flows but not the profit the firm would lose by no longer shipping bins from South Dakota. Exports to Brazil earn about $0.8 million a year after tax today, and that margin is shrinking as freight costs, the import tariff and a weaker real eat into it. Valued as a stream falling 3 percent a year and discounted at 11.5 percent, it is worth about $5.5 million. The plant's true gain over continuing to export is therefore $12.7 million minus $5.5 million, or about $7.2 million. This is still positive, but it is a thinner margin of safety than the earlier figure suggested.

What this page is doingSubtracts the export margin the plant replaces.
5

Alternatives Considered

Licensing. A São Paulo manufacturer has offered to build bins to the company's designs in return for a 4 percent royalty on its sales. On sales like those forecast for our own plant, royalties would run from about R$6.0 million to R$9.2 million a year. After Brazil's 15 percent withholding tax on royalties and the U.S. tax remaining after credit for it, the company would keep about 79 percent. Converted at parity-based rates and discounted at 11.5 percent, the royalties are worth about $11.8 million, or $6.3 million after the same lost export margin, with no capital invested. The risk is that the licensee learns the dryer controls and competes once the agreement ends.

Joint venture. A manufacturer linked to a large cooperative group has proposed a 50-50 venture. It would bring land, permits and customer relationships and would halve the capital required, but it would also halve the gain, to about $3.6 million, and decisions on pricing and expansion would need the partner's agreement.

Entry options compared (dollar values in millions)

OptionCapital at riskNet value after lost export marginControl of technologyMain risk
Keep exporting onlyNoneBaseline (0)FullMargin keeps shrinking
License the designNoneAbout 6.3Weak after the termLicensee becomes a rival
Joint venture, 50%About 16.5About 3.6SharedPartner disputes
Own plant, two stages18.3 then 14.7About 7.2FullReal and demand risk
What this page is doingMeasures every option from the same starting point.
6

Why Two Stages

Building in two stages lowers the capital at risk while demand is still being proven. Stage one costs about $18.3 million at today's rate. If the plant reaches R$175 million of sales by its second year, as forecast, stage two adds capacity; if not, the company can keep the smaller plant and continue exporting premium dryers from Sioux Falls. Kogut and Kulatilaka (1994) showed that a multinational's plants in several countries have option value because the firm can shift production as exchange rates change. A Brazilian plant gives this company such an option for the first time, since in a year when the real is very weak it could ship Brazilian panels to other South American buyers.

What this page is doingValues flexibility, the reason staging beats building at once.
7

Financing Plan

The company would fund stage one with R$40 million of equity from the parent and R$60 million of debt. About R$40 million of the debt would be borrowed in reais, half from development bank equipment credit and half from a Brazilian commercial bank, and about R$20 million would be lent by the parent in dollars. Debt in reais matches the plant's revenue, so a weaker real lowers its debt and revenue together. The parent loan provides interest deductions in Brazil at its 34 percent tax rate and must be priced at arm's length. Stage two would be financed the same way once stage one is profitable.

What this page is doingGives currencies, shares and sources.
8

Hedging Policy

Two exposures need a policy. First, until the plant opens, Brazilian orders remain export sales, so every confirmed receivable in reais should be sold forward through non-deliverable forwards, as in the Module Three example. Second, once the plant is running, the company should hedge half of the next twelve months of forecast dividends from Brazil with forwards and leave the rest open. Froot et al. (1993) argue that hedging is worth its cost when it protects the cash needed for planned investment, which describes the stage-two decision exactly. Longer-term currency exposure is best handled by the plant's real costs and real debt, not by contracts.

What this page is doingSpecific instruments and horizons, not a promise to monitor.
9

Political Risk and Controls

Bekaert et al. (2014) found that much of the political risk priced in emerging market bond spreads can be reduced by insurance and contractual protections. The company should secure the Mato Grosso state tax incentive in a written agreement before buying land and should price political risk insurance from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation or a private insurer for the equity invested. It should also appoint a compliance officer for Brazil, screen every customs broker and permit agent and train local managers on the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Brazil's Clean Company Act before construction begins.

What this page is doingAddresses the risks that could still change the answer.
10

Implementation Timeline

Milestones

DateMilestone
First quarter 2026Board approval; state incentive agreement signed; site purchase
Second quarter 2026Development bank and commercial loans closed; compliance program running
Third quarter 2026 to second quarter 2027Construction of stage one
Third quarter 2027First panels and dryers delivered to cooperatives
End of 2028Stage two decision based on sales, margin and exchange rate
What this page is doingTurns approval into dated milestones.
11

Conclusion

The board is asked to approve stage one, R$100 million, with the financing, hedging and compliance conditions above, and to review stage two at the end of 2028. A two-stage plant offers the highest value of the options studied, keeps the company's dryer technology in its own hands and limits the money at risk until Brazilian demand is confirmed. If sales fall short or the real weakens sharply, the company keeps a profitable smaller plant and its export business.

What this page is doingRestates what is asked of the board and why.
12

References

Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., Lundblad, C. T., & Siegel, S. (2014). Political risk spreads. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4), 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.4

Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1993). Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1629-1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.x

Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.1.123

What the FIN 336 Module 7 instructions ask for

Project Two in FIN 336 generally asks you to recommend an international investment or expansion to senior leaders, using the country analysis from Project One and the finance tools from the later modules. Directions commonly ask for a description of the opportunity, a valuation with an appropriate discount rate, consideration of currency and political risk, a financing plan, a strategy for managing exchange rate exposure and a final recommendation with conditions. Some versions also ask you to compare entry modes such as exporting, licensing, joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries, or to discuss ethical and legal obligations abroad. Write for a board, not a professor: lead with the decision, support it with numbers and close with what management should do next.

How this FIN 336 Module 7 project two example is built

The board report leads with its recommendation in a one-paragraph summary. It then corrects the earlier valuation for something it left out: the plant would replace exports whose margin is worth about $5.5 million in present value, cutting the plant's net gain to about $7.2 million. Licensing the design at a 4 percent royalty yields about $6.3 million net of the same lost margin with no capital at risk, and a joint venture would halve both investment and reward. The report chooses a two-stage plant because it keeps control of the dryer technology and preserves the option to stop. Financing, a rolling hedge on remittances, anti-bribery controls and milestones for stage two complete it.

Where the FIN 336 Module 7 rubric puts the points

The project rubric typically includes a clear recommendation, sound valuation, analysis of alternatives, treatment of currency and country risk, a financing plan, an exposure management strategy and professional communication suitable for executives. High-scoring projects measure every option against the same baseline, show why the chosen option is better rather than only showing that it has a positive value and attach conditions to the recommendation. Projects lose points for repeating earlier assignments without integrating them, for ignoring cannibalized revenue, for vague hedging plans and for recommendations that do not address what could go wrong. An executive summary, tables and an implementation timeline are expected by most instructors and are scored on clarity.

FIN 336 Module 7 help: the mistakes that cost points

Weak final projects often paste Project One and the capital budgeting assignment together and add a conclusion. Rebuild the argument around one decision instead. Start with the alternatives the board actually has, including doing nothing new, and compare each with the same baseline, which for an exporter is usually the export margin it already earns. Check whether the investment replaces revenue the firm already has, since that is the most common gap in student valuations. Give the financing and hedging plans in specific terms: currencies, shares, instruments and horizons. Name the two or three risks that could change the answer and say what would happen then. Put the recommendation on the first page so a reader who stops there still knows what you want approved.

Get FIN 336 Module 7 written to your instructions

Share the FIN 336 Project Two directions, the grading rubric and the country you studied earlier. The sample compares entry options against a fair baseline, recommends one with financing and hedging plans and writes it as a board report. Allow about two days; the first one is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More FIN 336 papers and related BS Finance samples

FIN 336 Module 7 questions, answered

Where can I find a free FIN 336 Module 7 Project Two sample?

The complete FIN 336 Module 7 Project Two is on this page: a board report recommending a two-stage Brazilian plant over licensing or a joint venture.

What are the main ways to enter a foreign market?

Exporting, licensing or franchising, joint ventures, acquisitions and building a wholly owned subsidiary, which require more capital and control as you move down the list.

What is cannibalization in international capital budgeting?

Revenue or profit the firm already earns that a new foreign project would replace, such as exports to the same market; it must be subtracted to find the project's true value.

Why would a firm invest in stages?

Staging limits the capital at risk until early results confirm demand, and keeps the option to expand, delay or stop, which has value when the future is uncertain.

Should a firm hedge a foreign subsidiary's profits?

Many firms hedge part of the next year or two of forecast remittances to protect budgets and cash for investment, while accepting that long-run currency risk is better managed by local costs and debt.