| Course | HCM 325 Healthcare Marketing |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | BS Healthcare Administration discussion post on the ethics of health care marketing |
| Length | About 340 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCM 325 Module 1
Module One Discussion
Catches Every Cancer? Not on My Watch
Our hospital is opening a women's health center with 3D mammography, and my first assignment was a draft headline from our agency: Catches every cancer. Early. It is punchy, and it is false. No screening test catches every cancer, and some cancers found are slow-growing ones that would never have caused harm. This week's readings helped me explain to my director why health care marketing has to meet a higher standard than selling cars.
Larson et al. (2005) analyzed advertisements from academic medical centers and found that many promoted specific services, often with emotional appeals, while rarely quantifying benefits or mentioning risks. Some promoted services whose value was uncertain. If well-regarded academic centers struggle with accurate advertising, a community hospital under pressure to compete should be careful too.
Schwartz and Woloshin (2019) documented enormous growth in medical marketing in the United States over two decades, including advertising by health systems, drug companies and laboratories aimed directly at consumers. More marketing means more competing claims for patients to sort through, and patients cannot easily judge medical quality the way they judge a product they can see and try.
Victoor et al. (2012) reviewed research on how patients choose providers and found that choices are shaped by many factors, including referrals from their physicians, distance, waiting times and experiences of friends and family, and that many patients do not actively compare quality information. That suggests our marketing should focus on what actually drives choice for our community: being close, easy to schedule and trusted by local physicians. Our own patient survey found that 61% of women who went elsewhere for mammograms did so because their physician referred them there.
I proposed an alternative headline: Screening close to home, with a same-week appointment. It is true, it addresses the real barrier of a forty-minute drive and it invites action. For classmates: where would you draw the line between persuasive and misleading in health care advertising? My director agreed to test both versions.
References
Larson, R. J., Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., & Welch, H. G. (2005). Advertising by academic medical centers. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(6), 645-651. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.6.645
Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2019). Medical marketing in the United States, 1997-2016. JAMA, 321(1), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19320
Victoor, A., Delnoij, D. M. J., Friele, R. D., & Rademakers, J. J. D. J. M. (2012). Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 12, Article 272. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-272
What the HCM 325 Module 1 instructions ask for
The opening HCM 325 discussion usually asks how marketing health services differs from marketing other products and what responsibilities marketers carry. Draft a concise first post supported by a few scholarly readings cited in APA 7, then engage with at least two classmates before the week ends. Use a real or realistic example, such as an ad or campaign you have seen, and explain what makes it helpful or misleading. Connect your view to research on advertising accuracy and patient choice, suggest a better approach and invite classmates to say where they would draw the line. HCM 325 graders notice clean headings in HCM 325 papers. HCM 325 names and dates need checking before HCM 325 submission. HCM 325 prompts vary by term, so recheck HCM 325 directions.
How this HCM 325 Module 1 discussion example is built
In this post, a composite marketing coordinator rejects an agency headline claiming a new 3D mammography unit catches every cancer. Larson and colleagues' study of academic medical center ads, Schwartz and Woloshin's account of marketing growth and Victoor and colleagues' review of patient choice explain why health marketing needs extra care and what actually drives choices. The writer proposes an accurate headline focused on local access and quick appointments, then asks classmates where persuasion becomes misleading. HCM 325 students can reuse this structure for HCM 325 work. HCM 325 claims here trace to cited HCM 325 sources. HCM 325 readers can adapt each section to HCM 325 data.
Where the HCM 325 Module 1 rubric puts the points
HCM 325 instructors grading ethics posts look for a concrete example, research used accurately, thoughtful reasoning about accuracy and patient welfare, a constructive alternative, APA 7 and replies that extend the conversation. Posts that pair ethical concerns with a practical, persuasive alternative tend to score well. Credit falls when posts criticize marketing in general without an example, when sources are missing or when replies add nothing new. HCM 325 marks favor careful formatting across HCM 325 sections. HCM 325 citations keep every HCM 325 argument credible. HCM 325 instructors weigh evidence heavily in HCM 325 grading. Posts that cite specific findings rather than general impressions earn more credit.
HCM 325 Module 1 help: the mistakes that cost points
First posts in this course often argue that all health marketing is bad or all is fine, without examining a specific message. Replies that just agree earn little. Choose one ad, explain what it promises and whether evidence supports it, connect to research on advertising and patient choice and offer a better version. Share an example from your area and the HCM 325 prompt so the post fits your experience. HCM 325 drafts start well from a HCM 325 outline. HCM 325 feedback already received guides HCM 325 revisions. HCM 325 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify HCM 325 expectations. Keep your alternative message short enough to fit a real headline.
Get HCM 325 Module 1 written to your instructions
Share the HCM 325 Module 1 prompt and an ad or campaign you have seen. The post will assess its accuracy with research, explain what drives patient choice and propose a better message, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More HCM 325 papers and related BS Healthcare Administration samples
- IHP 355 Module 2 Accreditation Short Paper: Does Accreditation Improve Patient Outcomes?
- IHP 340 Module 7 Chi-Square Discussion
- HCM 205 Module 3 Abbreviations Short Paper: Error-Prone Abbreviations and How Clinics Prevent Harm
- HCM 320 Module 8 Discussion: A Closing Reflection on Thinking Like an Economist in Health Care
HCM 325 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HCM 325 Module 1 Discussion sample?
The full HCM 325 Module 1 post is on this page, using an overstated mammography ad to explore ethics in health care marketing.
Why is health care marketing held to a higher standard?
Patients cannot easily judge medical quality, and misleading claims can lead to unnecessary tests or false reassurance.
Can a screening ad promise to catch every cancer?
No; no screening test finds every cancer, so such claims are inaccurate.
How do patients choose providers?
Referrals, distance, waiting times and the experiences of friends and family often matter more than published quality data.
What makes a health ad ethical?
Accurate claims, honest limits, a focus on patient needs and a clear, helpful call to action.