HIM 690 is SNHU’s Health Information Management Capstone course. It centers on the health information management capstone: scoping and chartering a project, data collection and reliability monitoring, descriptive and inferential analysis, interpreting unexpected findings, integrating interview themes with numbers, recommendations and implementation planning, presenting results to leaders and reflecting on program competencies. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "him 690 module 3", "HIM690 sample paper" and "HIM 690 milestone example" land on this page.
What HIM 690 is really about
HIM 690 asks MS Health Information Management students to show the competencies of the whole program in one applied project, and its graders expect the methods promised in the proposal to be carried out and reported honestly. Strong capstones report what actually happened, including deviations and disappointing results, test their findings against the research question rather than against hopes, and turn results into recommendations with owners, costs and measures.
The capstone samples continue the story begun in HIM 675: the same composite Tulsa academic hospital, Cimarron Heights, and the same data integrity lead, who now runs the admission flag study designed a term earlier. Two coders re-abstract 318 records for pressure injuries, catheter infections, blood clots and fall injuries, eight staff are interviewed and the results go to the quality committee and the chief nursing officer. The manager, hospital and results are illustrative.
What HIM 690’s modules ask for
Across ten modules, HIM 690 typically asks for discussions on scope and on surprising results, a progress report on data collection, a journal on presenting findings, a closing program reflection and a capstone built in stages: an updated charter, descriptive results, the full analysis and recommendations with an implementation plan, assembled into a final capstone report.
Where students lose points in HIM 690
The most common HIM 690 deduction is a results section that reads like the proposal, describing what the study would show instead of what it found. The second is hiding deviations, such as excluded records or a lower than planned reliability score, which graders treat as a sign the methods were not followed. Graders also mark down interpretation that claims cause from association, recommendations with no owner or cost and reflections that list courses instead of competencies. The fix is to report what happened, numbers first, and let every recommendation point to a finding.
The HIM 690 drawers
HIM 690 Module 1 Discussion example
An opening capstone discussion in which the composite Tulsa data integrity manager explains the project, a study of present-on-admission flag accuracy designed in the methods course, and maps it to four program competency areas: data governance and quality, analytics and research, privacy and compliance and leadership, naming what evidence will show each and the one competency the project shows weakly, drawing on Goldman and colleagues, Weiskopf and Weng and Kahn and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 2 Final Project Milestone One example
The first capstone milestone turns a methods-course proposal into a working charter for a Tulsa teaching hospital's present-on-admission study: the question and objectives, scope and deliverables, review board approval with a HIPAA waiver, three changes made since the proposal and why, roles, a fifteen-week schedule, a risk log and how progress will be reported, drawing on Goldman and colleagues, Hulley and colleagues, Fetters and colleagues and federal research privacy guidance. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 3 Progress Report example
A capstone progress report from the Tulsa flag accuracy study at the midpoint of abstraction: 214 of 318 records done, batch kappas of 0.86 and 0.88, two records excluded and why, time per record running longer than planned because of scanned outside documents, one decision rule clarified mid-study and how drift is being watched, with the next steps and one request to the sponsors, drawing on McHugh on kappa, Kahn and colleagues on data quality checks and Weiskopf and Weng. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 4 Final Project Milestone Two example
Milestone Two reports the descriptive results of the Tulsa flag accuracy capstone: 317 records analyzed, overall agreement of 76.3% and a weighted estimate near 77%, pressure wound flags right only 61% of the time against 78% to 84% for the other three complications, 75 disagreements split 44 over-reports and 31 under-reports, pressure wounds leaning heavily toward over-reporting, documented assessments in 70% of records and reliability for the whole study, drawing on Goldman and colleagues, Bahl and colleagues and McHugh. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 5 Discussion example
A discussion in which the composite Tulsa capstone writer confronts a finding that runs against the literature, a teaching hospital over-reporting pressure wounds as present on admission when earlier research found teaching hospitals tended to under-report, lays out three explanations, defaulting by coders, missing admission skin checks and the slow appearance of deep tissue injury, says what evidence would separate them and resists picking the most comfortable one, drawing on Goldman and colleagues, Edsberg and colleagues and Bergstrom and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 6 Final Project Milestone Three example
Milestone Three completes the analysis of the Tulsa flag accuracy capstone: a logistic model in which a missing first-day skin check carries adjusted odds of disagreement of 3.4, facility admission 1.9 and pressure wounds 2.6, checked for events per variable; four themes from eight interviews with coders and nurses; and a joint display tying each number to what staff described, which supports two of the three explanations and weakens the third, drawing on Peduzzi and colleagues, Braun and Clarke and Fetters and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 7 Recommendations Short Paper example
A short paper that turns the Tulsa flag accuracy capstone's findings into five recommendations, a required skin and risk check before the admission note can be signed, a nurse query path for coders, a coding rule that replaces the yes default with a documented decision, a flowsheet view inside the coding workspace and quarterly re-audits, each tied to a finding with an owner, cost and measure, then sequenced over six months with Kotter's advice on early wins, drawing on Kotter, Bergstrom and colleagues, Bahl and colleagues and Kahn and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 8 Journal example
Reflecting after a hard meeting, the composite Oklahoma capstone writer recalls presenting to the quality committee that the hospital's proud pressure wound rate is probably understated, watches the chief nursing officer's face change and hears a physician ask whether health information is trying to make nursing look bad, then reflects on how the presentation could have prepared people better and what it means to deliver accurate data that no one wanted, drawing on Kotter, Bahl and colleagues and Goldman and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 9 Final Project example
The HIM 690 final project is the complete capstone report of a Tulsa academic hospital's admission flag accuracy study: an executive summary, the problem and questions, methods as carried out with every deviation, results for 317 charts, a model and four interview themes integrated in one view, a discussion that weighs the findings against earlier research and names limits, five recommendations with owners and measures and the competencies the project demonstrates, drawing on Goldman and colleagues, Bahl and colleagues, Pine and colleagues, McHugh, Peduzzi and colleagues, Braun and Clarke and Fetters and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
HIM 690 Module 10 Reflection example
At the end of the HIM capstone and the master's program, the composite Tulsa data integrity lead looks back across the degree and names three changes: trusting a number only after measuring how reliable it is, treating documentation as care rather than paperwork and understanding leadership as preparing people before showing them data, with McHugh, Goldman and colleagues and Kotter, and a commitment to run the quarterly re-audit for a year and publish its results inside the hospital whatever they show. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a HIM 690 sample the right way
Read an HIM 690 sample by checking whether results are reported as findings with numbers rather than as plans, whether deviations from the proposal are stated and explained and whether each recommendation names the finding it answers, an owner and a measure. For HIM 690, bring the prompt, your proposal or project and the rubric; a first custom sample is returned free in 24-48h.
HIM 690 questions, answered
What is HIM 690?
The capstone of the MS Health Information Management, in which students carry out a project, often research designed in HIM 675, and show the program's competencies.
Does the HIM 690 capstone need original data?
Usually yes, collected and analyzed under the methods proposed, with deviations reported honestly.
What makes a strong HIM 690 capstone?
Results reported as findings, honest handling of deviations, careful interpretation and recommendations tied to findings with owners and measures.