| Course | IHP 640 Measurement, Analysis, & Models for Performance Improvement |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | graduate milestone framing an operational performance problem |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MS Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for IHP 640 Module 3
Milestone One: Late Starts, Long Turnovers and Overtime in Highland Valley's Operating Rooms
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP 640: Measurement, Analysis, & Models for Performance Improvement
Module Three Milestone One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Milestone One: Late Starts, Long Turnovers and Overtime in Highland Valley's Operating Rooms
IHP 640's final project is a performance improvement report on an operational problem. This milestone frames that problem for Highland Valley Medical Center's surgical suite, using the metric definitions set in Module Two, a year of baseline data and published analysis of what operating room delays actually cost.
The Setting
Highland Valley's main suite runs 14 operating rooms on an eight-and-a-half-hour weekday staffing plan, handling about 11,200 cases a year across general, orthopedic, gynecologic, urologic and vascular surgery. First incisions are planned for half past seven. Surgeons hold block time by service, and unused blocks are released 72 hours in advance.
Baseline Performance
Over the past twelve months, 54% of first cases started on time, with mean tardiness of 9.4 minutes per first case. Mean turnover was 44 minutes, with 13% of turnovers exceeding 60 minutes. Rooms averaged 1.9 hours of underused staffed time and 0.8 hours of overtime per day. Same-day case cancellations ran at 4.2%. Monthly values were stable across the year, with no seasonal pattern, suggesting a persistent system problem rather than a temporary one.
Table 1. Baseline Surgical Suite Performance, Twelve Months
| Metric | Baseline | Peer median | Monthly range |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-case on-time rate | 54% | 76% | 49%-58% |
| First-case tardiness (minutes) | 9.4 | 4.5 | 8.1-10.7 |
| Mean turnover (minutes) | 44 | 33 | 41-47 |
| Prolonged turnovers | 13% | 6% | 11%-15% |
| Overtime per room per day (hours) | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.7-0.9 |
| Same-day cancellations | 4.2% | 2.5% | 3.6%-4.9% |
Note. Composite data; peer medians from a regional perioperative benchmarking group.
Where the Money Goes
Childers and Maggard-Gibbons (2018) estimated that operating room time in California hospitals averages in the mid-thirties of dollars per minute, and most of that is fixed cost. For Highland Valley, the direct financial effect of delays shows up mainly in overtime: 0.8 hours per room per day across 14 rooms and about 250 weekdays is about 2,800 hours a year, costing roughly $2.1 million in premium pay for nurses, technicians and anesthesia staff.
What Reducing Tardiness Is Worth
It is tempting to multiply every minute of late start by an average cost. Dexter and Epstein (2009) analyzed operating room data to estimate the savings from reducing first-case tardiness and showed that the value depends on whether rooms finish after their scheduled hours; earlier starts save money mainly by reducing overtime at the end of the day. Because Highland Valley's rooms frequently run late, reducing tardiness is likely to have real value here, though less than a naive calculation suggests.
What Faster Turnovers Are Worth
Dexter (2007) cautioned that reducing turnover times improves efficiency mainly when it reduces overtime or allows an additional case to fit into the day, which small average reductions seldom achieve. This argues for targeting prolonged turnovers, the 13% exceeding an hour, which consume far more time than a few minutes shaved from routine ones.
How Delays Travel Through the Day
Delays compound. A first case that starts fifteen minutes late pushes every later case in that room back unless a later case finishes early, which is rare. When a prolonged turnover follows, the final case may start after 2:30 p.m. and run past the end of staffed hours. Room-level data show that rooms with a late first start ran overtime on 61% of days, compared with 34% for rooms that started on time. The same pattern appears for days with at least one prolonged turnover. Late starts and long turnovers are therefore not separate problems but links in the same chain that ends in overtime.
Effects Beyond Cost
Delays affect people as well as budgets. Patients fasting since midnight wait longer, a survey found only 41% of surgeons satisfied with operating room efficiency and two orthopedic surgeons have moved some cases to a competing surgery center. Nurses cite unpredictable end times as a reason for leaving, which increases reliance on agency staff.
What Staff Say Causes Delays
Preliminary interviews with twenty staff members produced a long list of suspected causes: patients arriving late for preoperative preparation, incomplete consent forms, missing history and physical documents, surgeons arriving after the scheduled start, anesthesia evaluations completed at the last minute, instrument trays arriving incomplete from sterile processing and too few environmental services staff to clean rooms promptly. Each group named causes outside its own control. These claims have not yet been tested against data, which is the task of Milestone Two.
Stakeholders
Surgeons, anesthesiologists, operating room and preoperative nurses, sterile processing, environmental services, scheduling and patient transport all touch first starts and turnovers. Each sees part of the problem, and early interviews show each group tends to attribute delays to another. A performance improvement effort will need representatives of all of them.
Problem Statement
In Highland Valley's 14-room surgical suite, 46% of first cases start late and 13% of turnovers exceed an hour, contributing to about 0.8 hours of overtime per room per day, $2.1 million in annual premium pay, patient waiting and surgeon and staff dissatisfaction. Performance has been stable for a year and lags peer medians on every measure.
Aim
Within twelve months, the suite will raise the first-case on-time rate from 54% to 80%, reduce first-case tardiness from 9.4 to 4 minutes, cut prolonged turnovers from 13% to 6% and reduce overtime by 30%, saving about $630,000 a year, without increasing same-day cancellations.
Scope
The project covers weekday elective cases in the main suite. It excludes the obstetric rooms, the ambulatory surgery unit and emergency cases, and it does not address block allocation among surgical services, which the perioperative committee is reviewing separately.
Questions for the Analysis
Milestone Two will ask which causes account for most first-case delays and prolonged turnovers, and which case and room characteristics predict long turnovers. The capacity modeling paper will ask whether recovery room congestion contributes to delays. Milestone Three will design improvements and a control plan.
Conclusion
Highland Valley's surgical suite has a stable, measurable efficiency problem whose main financial effect is overtime and whose human effects reach patients, surgeons and staff. Framing it through precise metrics and evidence on what delays actually cost points the project toward late starts and prolonged turnovers rather than small average gains.
References
Childers, C. P., & Maggard-Gibbons, M. (2018). Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surgery, 153(4), Article e176233. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233
Dexter, F. (2007). Impact on operating room efficiency of reducing turnover times and anesthesia-controlled times. Annals of Surgery, 245(2), 336-337. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000253097.64557.7a
Dexter, F., & Epstein, R. H. (2009). Typical savings from each minute reduction in tardy first case of the day starts. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 108(4), 1262-1267. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819775cd
What the IHP 640 Module 3 instructions ask for
Milestone One in IHP 640 generally asks you to frame an operational performance problem with data: the setting, baseline measures under clear definitions, comparison with benchmarks, the costs and other effects, stakeholders, a problem statement, an aim and scope. Expect three to five APA 7 pages. Present at least a year of baseline data if possible, locate the real financial effects rather than multiplying by average costs, use research to judge what improvement is worth and write an aim with numbers, a deadline and a balancing condition. IHP 640 graders notice clean headings in IHP 640 papers. IHP 640 names and dates need checking before IHP 640 submission. IHP 640 prompts vary by term, so recheck IHP 640 directions.
How this IHP 640 Module 3 milestone one example is built
This milestone frames delays in a composite hospital's 14-room surgical suite. A table shows 54% on-time first cases, 44-minute turnovers, 13% prolonged turnovers and 0.8 hours of daily overtime against peer medians. Childers and Maggard-Gibbons supply cost context, Dexter and Epstein show that savings from earlier starts depend on overtime and Dexter explains why prolonged turnovers matter more than small average gains. The aim targets 80% on-time starts and 30% less overtime without more cancellations. IHP 640 students can reuse this structure for IHP 640 work. IHP 640 claims here trace to cited IHP 640 sources. IHP 640 readers can adapt each section to IHP 640 data.
Where the IHP 640 Module 3 rubric puts the points
Performance framing milestones in IHP 640 are commonly evaluated on clear baseline data, benchmarks, realistic costing, attention to non-financial effects, stakeholder identification, a precise problem statement, a measurable aim with a balancing measure, suitable scope, scholarly support and APA 7. The best submissions use research to decide which improvements actually matter financially. Marks slip when costs are exaggerated with average-cost multiplication, when baseline data cover only a few weeks or when the aim lacks numbers or dates. IHP 640 marks favor careful formatting across IHP 640 sections. IHP 640 citations keep every IHP 640 argument credible. IHP 640 instructors weigh evidence heavily in IHP 640 grading.
IHP 640 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points
IHP 640 framing papers frequently overstate the cost of delays by multiplying minutes by an average cost, present too little baseline data and set aims such as improving efficiency without numbers. Another frequent gap is leaving out a balancing measure. Show a year of stable baseline, compare with peers, locate costs in overtime or lost cases, target the delays that matter most and write a numeric aim with a safeguard. Share your operational data and the IHP 640 prompt so the framing fits your project. IHP 640 drafts start well from a IHP 640 outline. IHP 640 feedback already received guides IHP 640 revisions. IHP 640 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify IHP 640 expectations.
Get IHP 640 Module 3 written to your instructions
Send the IHP 640 Milestone One prompt and your operational data. The milestone will present baseline performance against benchmarks, locate the real costs, identify stakeholders and write a measurable aim with a balancing condition, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More IHP 640 papers and related MS Healthcare Administration samples
- IHP 640 Module 1 Discussion: What an Operating Room Minute Really Costs
- IHP 640 Module 2 Metrics Definition Paper: Defining On-Time Starts, Turnover and Utilization Precisely
- IHP 501 Module 5 Milestone Two: Community Health Workers and Professional Interpreters
- IHP 525 Module 6 Diagnostic Tests Paper: Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive Values for a Home Blood Pressure Device
- IHP 515 Module 7 Milestone Three: A Surveillance and Analysis Plan for Overdose Deaths
- IHP 600 Module 9 Final Project: The Organizational Analysis of Nurse Turnover at a Regional Hospital
IHP 640 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free IHP 640 Module 3 Milestone One sample?
IHP 640 Module 3 is written out on this page, framing operating room delays with baseline data, cost logic, stakeholders and a measurable aim.
How much baseline data do I need?
Ideally about a year, enough to show whether performance is stable or seasonal before changes begin.
How do I estimate the cost of operational delays?
Identify where money actually changes hands, such as overtime or lost cases, rather than multiplying minutes by an average cost.
Why target prolonged turnovers instead of average turnover?
Long delays consume far more time, and small average reductions rarely reduce overtime or allow extra cases.
What is a balancing measure in an aim?
A measure that must not worsen, such as cancellations, to ensure improvement does not cause harm elsewhere.