MBA 530 Module 3 Project Milestone One Leadership Skill example

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA Leading People and Organizations Southern New Hampshire University Full sample paper Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This complete MBA 530 Module 3 milestone selects one leadership skill for deliberate development and builds a plan around it. The composite writer, a production manager whose 360-degree feedback showed a large gap on coaching, chooses coaching direct reports instead of solving their problems for them. The paper defines the skill, reviews evidence that supervisory coaching affects satisfaction and performance, establishes a baseline from the writer's own calendar and feedback, sets specific practice goals, anticipates obstacles and explains how progress will be measured. The manager is a teaching composite, and every study cited is published.

What this page holds

The complete text of an MBA 530 Module 3 leadership skill milestone: a defined skill, research on why it matters, a behavioral baseline, a practice plan with specific goals, anticipated obstacles and a measurement plan. Searches like "mba 530 module 3 assignment", "mba530 module 3 project milestone one leadership skill" and "mba 530 module 3 example" land here.

The MBA 530 Module 3 example, in full

1

Milestone One: Coaching Instead of Rescuing, a Leadership Skill Development Plan for a Production Manager

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

MBA 530: Leading People and Organizations

Module Three Project Milestone One

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names the skill as a contrast between two behaviors, which makes the skill concrete, and identifies whose development is being planned.
2

Milestone One: Coaching Instead of Rescuing, a Leadership Skill Development Plan for a Production Manager

The Skill and Why I Chose It

The skill I will develop is coaching: helping my six cell leads work through problems and grow their own judgment, mainly by asking questions and giving feedback, instead of stepping in with the answer. I chose it because my 360-degree feedback showed my largest gap there. My direct reports rated me 2.7 out of 5 on coaching and mentoring, more than a point below my own rating, and several comments said some version of "he fixes it himself." As production manager at a composite precision machining company, I have treated fast answers as a service to my team. The feedback suggests they experience it as a lack of trust and a missed chance to learn.

Why Coaching Matters

The evidence for coaching is encouraging, with some qualifications. A meta-analysis of 17 studies found that workplace coaching by internal or external coaches had positive effects on organizational outcomes, with especially strong effects on individual results (Jones et al., 2016), though it excluded coaching by an employee's own manager. Closer to my situation, a study of supervisors and their employees in warehouse and distribution operations found that supervisory coaching behavior was positively associated with employees' job satisfaction and performance (Ellinger et al., 2003). Industrial settings like mine, with shift pressure and tight standards, are exactly where managers are tempted to direct rather than coach, and where the research suggests coaching still pays off. Coaching also builds bench strength: if my cell leads can solve more problems themselves, the plant depends less on me, which matters for a second shift that runs while I am off site.

Defining the Skill as Behavior

To practice and measure coaching, I defined it as four behaviors. First, when a cell lead brings me a problem, I ask at least two questions before offering a suggestion, such as "What have you tried?" and "What do you think is causing it?" Second, I let the cell lead choose the next step unless it creates a safety or quality risk. Third, I follow up within 48 hours to ask what happened and what they learned. Fourth, I hold a 20-minute development conversation with each cell lead every two weeks, separate from production updates. Coaching that cannot be observed cannot be improved, so each behavior is something another person could see me do or not do.

Baseline

For two weeks before starting the plan, I kept a simple log. Cell leads brought me 31 problems. In 24 of them I gave an answer or took over within the first minute; in 7 I asked questions first. I followed up on 9 of the 31. I held no development conversations that were not about production numbers. My cell leads' average rating of me on a single question, "My manager helps me solve problems myself," was 2.5 out of 5. These numbers are the starting point against which progress will be judged.

What this page is doingA behavioral baseline with counts makes the development plan measurable. Most plans skip this step and later cannot show whether anything changed.
3

Practice Plan

Over the next twelve weeks I will pursue three specific goals. By week 6, I will ask at least two questions first in 60 percent of problems brought to me, rising to 75 percent by week 12. By week 4, I will hold biweekly development conversations with all six cell leads and maintain them through week 12. By week 12, I will follow up within 48 hours on at least 80 percent of problems. To build the skill, I will use a question card I keep in my shirt pocket, review my log every Friday and ask the plant manager, who is known as a strong coach, to observe two of my conversations and give feedback. I will also read one practical coaching guide and practice its questioning approach in the development conversations.

Obstacles

The biggest obstacle is production pressure. When a machine is down and an order is late, the fastest path is still for me to decide, and some situations truly require it. My rule will be that I can take over when safety, a customer deadline within the shift or a quality escape is at stake, and I will explain afterward why I stepped in. The second obstacle is my own impatience, reflected in my low agreeableness score; questions can feel slow to me. The third is that cell leads used to receiving answers may at first find questions frustrating, so I will tell them at the start what I am trying to do and why.

Support and Accountability

Development plans fail quietly when no one else knows about them, so this one has three sources of accountability. The plant manager has agreed to a 15-minute check-in every other Friday, where I will show my log and discuss one coaching conversation that went well and one that did not. Two cell leads, one experienced and one new in the role, have agreed to give me honest feedback after our development conversations, using three questions: did I let you decide, did I help you think it through, and did you leave knowing what to do next? Finally, I will share the plan and its goals with all six cell leads at our next monthly meeting. Telling them what I am working on invites them to notice when I slip back into rescuing, and it models the kind of openness about development that I hope they will adopt with their own crews. If I miss two consecutive development conversations, I will report that to the plant manager rather than quietly catching up, because a coaching habit that gives way whenever production gets busy is the pattern the 360 feedback identified in the first place.

Measuring Success

Success will be measured three ways at week 12: the log counts against the baseline, a repeat of the single-question rating from cell leads, with a target of 3.5 or higher, and one outcome measure, the number of problems resolved at the cell level without reaching me, which I expect to rise. The full 360-degree survey will be repeated in nine months. If the behaviors improve but the ratings do not, I will ask the cell leads directly what they still need, since development that the team cannot feel is not yet complete (Northouse, 2022).

References

Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., & Keller, S. B. (2003). Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance: A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 435-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1078

Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. F. (2016). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 249-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12119

Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE.

How this MBA 530 Module 3 example is structured

The milestone follows a development logic: choose, justify, measure the starting point, plan practice, prepare for obstacles and define success. The skill is defined in behavioral terms so it can be practiced and observed. Evidence is presented with its limits. The baseline uses real counts from the writer's own work, which makes later progress measurable.

Get MBA 530 Module 3 written to your instructions

Send your MBA 530 Milestone One guidelines and rubric with the skill you are considering. A development plan for that leadership skill, grounded in research and your own baseline, comes back within 24 to 48 hours; the first is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

MBA 530 Module 3 questions, answered

What does MBA 530 Milestone One require?

Milestone One commonly asks students to identify a leadership skill they want to develop, explain why it matters for their effectiveness, assess their current level and describe how they will develop it. It often builds on earlier self-assessments and feeds into the final project.

What is managerial coaching?

Managerial coaching is a style of leading in which a manager helps employees solve problems and develop their own capabilities, mainly by asking questions, giving feedback and supporting learning, rather than by directing every task or supplying answers.

How can a leadership skill be measured?

Define the skill as specific behaviors, then count or rate them: how often a behavior occurs, how others rate it in short surveys, and what results follow, such as how many problems employees solve on their own. Measuring before and after a development period shows whether change has occurred.