MBA 699 Module 1 Exit Strategy Options Discussion example

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA MBA Capstone Southern New Hampshire University Full sample paper Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This complete MBA 699 Module 1 discussion post opens the capstone from the seat of a business development manager at a composite Midwest life sciences company whose owners want to exit. It compares four routes, a sale to a strategic buyer, a sale to a private equity firm, a public offering and remaining independent, explains what each asks of the company, and names the two things buyers will examine before price: whether the people stay and whether the story fits their strategy. Classmates are then asked which risk a buyer would probe first in their own workplace. The company is fictional; the research is not.

What this page holds

An MBA 699 Module 1 discussion post of about 450 words comparing exit options for a life sciences company, explaining why retention and strategic fit shape a sale, and closing with a question for classmates. Searches like "mba 699 module 1 assignment", "mba699 module 1 exit strategy options discussion" and "mba 699 module 1 example" land here.

The MBA 699 Module 1 example, in full

1

Module One Discussion: Strategic Opportunities and Exit Options

Re: Choosing a buyer is not only choosing a price

For this capstone I am working as a business development manager at a composite company I will call Prairieview Life Sciences, an Indianapolis-based contract manufacturer of biologic drugs with about 1,480 employees. Its founding family and minority investors have asked the board to recommend an exit within two years.

There are four realistic routes. A sale to a strategic buyer, such as a larger pharmaceutical or life sciences tools company, would likely bring the highest price because the buyer could combine our capacity with its own, but it would also bring the deepest integration and the greatest uncertainty for employees. A sale to private equity would keep Prairieview largely intact for several years, usually with more debt and a push for margin improvement before a later resale. A public offering would give the owners partial liquidity while preserving independence, but it requires a size, growth story and reporting discipline that a company our size may struggle to sustain. Remaining independent is the baseline against which the others should be judged, not a failure to act.

What struck me in the reading is that sellers do not simply take the highest bid. Graebner and Eisenhardt (2004) studied entrepreneurial firms that were acquired and found that sellers weighed strategic fit and rapport with the buyer's leaders alongside price, and that pressures such as funding needs and leadership fatigue pushed them toward a sale. Buyers, for their part, look past the income statement. In a manufacturing business built on specialized scientists and technicians, a buyer is really asking whether the people who make the product will still be there a year after closing. Research on acquisitions shows that departures of key managers rise sharply after a deal (Walsh, 1988), which is why a credible retention story can be worth as much as a good quarter.

So my early view is that Prairieview's value to any buyer depends on two things we can influence before a sale: reducing turnover in our manufacturing and quality teams, and being clear about which kind of buyer our capabilities fit best. The broader evidence that acquisitions often fail to improve performance for the buyer (King et al., 2004) is also a reason a careful buyer will discount anything uncertain.

Question for classmates: if your organization were for sale tomorrow, what is the first risk a buyer would probe, and is anyone working on it now?

What this page is doingThe post takes a position on what drives value in a sale and grounds it in the course's scenario, rather than listing exit options neutrally. The closing question invites replies that apply the idea to other organizations.
2

References

Graebner, M. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004). The seller's side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(3), 366-403. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131440

King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.371

Walsh, J. P. (1988). Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090207

How this MBA 699 Module 1 example is structured

The post introduces the company and the owners' goal in two sentences, then compares the four exit routes briefly. Research on how sellers choose buyers supports the argument that fit matters as much as price. Its last line asks classmates which risk a buyer would probe first in their own organization.

Get MBA 699 Module 1 written to your instructions

Share the MBA 699 Module 1 discussion instructions and grading rubric. A post on your organization's strategic options comes back within 24 to 48 hours, and the first is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

Request this module free All MBA 699 modules Finished samples

MBA 699 Module 1 questions, answered

What does the MBA 699 capstone scenario involve?

The capstone commonly places students as a business development manager at a large life sciences organization whose leaders are considering an exit strategy, and asks them to build the analysis a board would need, from a guiding coalition to attrition data, buyer research and a final plan.

What is an exit strategy?

An exit strategy is the plan by which owners realize the value of their investment in a company, usually through a sale to another company, a sale to a financial buyer such as private equity, a public stock offering or a transfer to management or family.

What is the difference between a strategic and a financial buyer?

A strategic buyer is an operating company that wants the target for its fit with its own business and can often pay more because of expected synergies. A financial buyer, such as a private equity firm, buys to improve and later resell the company and relies more on the target's standalone performance.