| Course | NUR 650 Care Coordination and Outcomes Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | milestone paper analyzing a population and care coordination problem |
| Length | About 1,060 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 650 Module 3
Milestone One: Analyzing 30-Day Heart Failure Readmissions Through Data, a Process Map and Root Causes
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 650: Care Coordination and Outcomes Management
Module Three Milestone One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Milestone One: Analyzing 30-Day Heart Failure Readmissions Through Data, a Process Map and Root Causes
When readmission rates are high, the pressure to act quickly can lead a hospital to choose an intervention before understanding the problem. At Brookhaven, a composite 280-bed regional hospital, heart failure patients have returned within a month at a steady 24% for three years, above the national average, and administrators have proposed adding a nurse phone call two days after discharge. The phone call may help, but no one knows whether it addresses the reasons patients return. Nationally, Jencks et al. (2009) found that heart failure was among the most common conditions leading to rehospitalization in Medicare. This milestone analyzes Brookhaven's problem before recommending any intervention. It argues that defining the population, examining data on timing and cause, mapping the process and identifying root causes will point to interventions more likely to work than the one first proposed.
Defining the Population
The population comprises adults discharged alive from Brookhaven with a principal diagnosis of heart failure, excluding patients discharged to hospice, transferred to another acute hospital or leaving against medical advice, since these patients follow different pathways. Using this definition, Brookhaven discharged 400 patients in the most recent year. Their median age was 76; 58% were Medicare beneficiaries without supplemental coverage and 14% were dually eligible for Medicaid; 31% lived alone; and 38% lived in the two rural counties the hospital serves, where the nearest cardiology clinic is more than 40 minutes away. Readmission is defined as an unplanned admission to Brookhaven or either of two nearby hospitals that share data within 30 days of discharge, for any cause.
What the Data Show
Of the 400 patients, 96 were readmitted within 30 days. Timing was concentrated early: 39 (41%) returned within the first seven days and 67 (70%) within the first fifteen. Of the 96, only 30 had seen any clinician between discharge and readmission. A chart review of all 96 readmissions, conducted by the clinical nurse leader and a heart failure nurse practitioner using a structured form, classified the primary reason for return. Volume overload accounted for 50 readmissions, other cardiac causes for 14 and noncardiac causes, such as pneumonia or falls, for 32. Among the 50 volume overload readmissions, the charts documented that 22 patients had stopped or reduced their diuretic, 15 had not weighed themselves or had not known what to do with a weight gain and 11 could not afford or obtain their medications.
The early timing matters. Hernandez et al. (2010) examined Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure and found that where more patients were seen within a week of discharge, hospitals had lower 30-day readmission rates than those from hospitals where early follow-up was less common. The current joint cardiology guideline considers an early follow-up visit, generally within seven days of discharge, reasonable for patients hospitalized with heart failure and recommends multidisciplinary disease management for patients at high risk of readmission (Heidenreich et al., 2022). At Brookhaven, only 31% of all heart failure patients had a documented visit within seven days.
Mapping the Process
The clinical nurse leader mapped the process from admission to day 30 by walking the pathway with a patient's chart, interviewing nurses, pharmacists, case managers and clinic schedulers and observing three discharges. The map revealed six handoffs and four points where the process frequently failed. First, discharge teaching occurred on the day of discharge, often in the last hour, when patients were tired and focused on leaving. Second, the follow-up appointment was written as "within 7 days" but left to the patient to schedule in 70% of cases, and rural patients often could not get an appointment that soon. Third, the discharge summary was sent by fax to the primary care office, where staff reported that it often arrived after the visit. Fourth, no one was assigned to contact the patient between discharge and the first visit, so early weight gain went unnoticed until symptoms brought the patient to the emergency department.
Root Causes
A fishbone diagram was built with staff from each discipline, grouping causes under patient, process, communication and resources. The chart review data were then used to count how often each cause contributed, producing the Pareto analysis in Table 1. The largest single cause was the absence of clinician contact in the first week. The next three, diuretic misunderstanding, weight monitoring failures and medication access, are all patient self-management problems that early contact could detect. Together, these four causes account for about 73% of the causes identified. Noncardiac readmissions are significant but less amenable to a heart failure program.
Table 1. Pareto Analysis of Contributing Causes Among 96 Readmissions
| Cause category | Readmissions linked (of 96) | Cumulative percent |
|---|---|---|
| No clinician contact before day 7 | 58 | 40% |
| Diuretic plan not understood or not followed | 22 | 55% |
| Weight monitoring not done or not acted on | 15 | 66% |
| Medication cost or access | 11 | 73% |
| Noncardiac causes (pneumonia, falls, other) | 32 | 96% |
| Other | 6 | 100% |
Note. Many readmissions had more than one contributing cause, so counts sum to more than 96; cumulative percentages are calculated on 144 total cause assignments.
What This Means for the Proposed Phone Call
The analysis suggests that a single phone call at 48 hours would address part of the problem, early contact, but not the rest. It would not ensure a visit within seven days, would not fix last-minute teaching and would not solve medication cost or rural access. The interventions most likely to work would combine teaching spread across the stay with teach-back, a follow-up appointment booked before discharge, early contact with a way to act on weight gain, medication access checked before discharge and a direct handoff to primary care. These findings will guide the comparison of transitional care models in Module Four.
Aim Statement
By the end of the next fiscal year, Brookhaven will lower all-cause returns within 30 days among adults discharged with heart failure from 24% to 19%, and will increase the proportion of these patients with a clinician visit within seven days of discharge from 31% to 70%. Both measures will be tracked monthly and reported to the quality committee.
Conclusion
The proposed phone call would have been a reasonable guess. The analysis shows why it would not be enough: most readmissions happen early, most patients have no contact before they return, and the underlying causes are gaps in understanding, monitoring and access that a single call cannot fix. Defining the population, examining data, mapping the process and ranking root causes have given Brookhaven a clearer target and an aim it can measure.
References
Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., Fang, J. C., Fedson, S. E., Fonarow, G. C., Hayek, S. S., Hernandez, A. F., Khazanie, P., Kittleson, M. M., Lee, C. S., Link, M. S., . . . Yancy, C. W. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 145(18), e895-e1032. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
Hernandez, A. F., Greiner, M. A., Fonarow, G. C., Hammill, B. G., Heidenreich, P. A., Yancy, C. W., Peterson, E. D., & Curtis, L. H. (2010). Relationship between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure. JAMA, 303(17), 1716-1722. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.533
Jencks, S. F., Williams, M. V., & Coleman, E. A. (2009). Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(14), 1418-1428. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0803563
What the NUR 650 Module 3 instructions ask for
Milestone One in NUR 650 usually asks you to identify a care coordination problem in a defined population and analyze it before proposing a solution. Expect to define the population and outcome, present data, map the relevant process, identify root causes and write an aim statement. Plan on five to seven pages in APA 7, with tables or figures for data and causes. Define inclusions and exclusions precisely, report timing as well as rates, build the process map from observation rather than policy documents, rank causes with a Pareto analysis, connect findings to published evidence and write an aim with both an outcome and a process target. Say how the analysis changes any solution leadership has already proposed.
How this NUR 650 Module 3 milestone one example is built
This milestone analyzes a 24% heart failure readmission rate at a composite hospital. It defines the population with exclusions, reports that 41% of 96 readmissions occurred within seven days and that only 30 patients saw a clinician before returning, and classifies causes through chart review. Jencks and colleagues provide national context, Hernandez and colleagues link early follow-up to fewer readmissions and the Heidenreich guideline supports visits within seven days. A process map identifies four failure points, a Pareto table ranks causes and the aim targets 19% readmission and 70% early follow-up. The analysis shows why the phone call first proposed would not be enough on its own.
Where the NUR 650 Module 3 rubric puts the points
Grading of this milestone commonly weighs the definition of the population and problem, the quality of data analysis, the process map, root cause analysis, use of evidence, the aim statement and APA 7 writing. Top-band papers report when and why patients are readmitted, not only how often, and build process maps from direct observation. Graders reward Pareto analyses that show which causes matter most and aim statements that pair an outcome with a process measure. Explaining how the analysis changes or refines a solution already proposed by leadership shows the independent judgment reviewers look for. Engaging staff from each discipline in the fishbone also strengthens the work.
NUR 650 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points
Problem analysis papers lose points when the population is loosely defined, when data are limited to an overall rate, when the process map describes how things should work rather than how they do or when root causes are listed without evidence of how often each contributes. Another gap is an aim statement without a baseline, target or date. Define the population, analyze timing and causes, map the real process, rank causes and write a measurable aim. If your problem involves a different population, such as COPD, sepsis survivors or patients discharged to skilled nursing, send it with your NUR 650 prompt so the analysis fits. Involve staff from every discipline in naming causes.
Get NUR 650 Module 3 written to your instructions
Send the NUR 650 milestone prompt, your setting and population and the rubric. Your paper will define the population precisely, analyze timing and causes with data, map the real process and write a measurable aim, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 650 papers and related MSN samples
- NUR 650 Module 1 Discussion: What Fragmented Care Costs
- NUR 650 Module 2 Risk Tool Paper: What Readmission Risk Scores Can and Cannot Tell a Care Team
- NUR 602 Module 4 Pharmacotherapy Plan: A 14-Year-Old on One Asthma Inhaler
- NUR 633 Module 4 Privacy Analysis: A Text Message That Became a Breach
- NUR 631 Module 5 Milestone Two: Business Case: Float Pool and Virtual Nursing
- NUR 601 Module 10 Journal: Reasoning From the Control Loop
NUR 650 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 650 Module 3 Milestone One sample?
This page carries the full paper: heart failure readmission data, a discharge process map, a Pareto analysis of root causes and a measurable aim statement.
What is a Pareto analysis?
A ranking of causes by how often they contribute to a problem, which shows that a few causes usually account for most of the effect.
Why does early follow-up after heart failure discharge matter?
Hospitals with higher rates of follow-up within seven days had lower 30-day readmission rates, and the 2022 guideline considers early follow-up reasonable.
How should a process map be built?
By walking the real pathway, observing care and interviewing staff in each role, rather than copying the written policy.
What makes a good aim statement?
A defined population, a baseline and target for an outcome and a process measure and a specific timeframe.