| Course | ACC 430 Data Analytics for Financial Professionals |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | undergraduate regression analysis project for cost estimation |
| Length | About 1,020 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Accounting |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACC 430 Module 4
Stops, Miles or Pounds? A Regression of Daily Delivery Cost at a Composite Janitorial Supply Distributor
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
ACC 430: Data Analytics for Financial Professionals
Project One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Stops, Miles or Pounds? A Regression of Daily Delivery Cost at a Composite Janitorial Supply Distributor
The Question
The CFO's margin question led to a narrower one: how much does it cost to deliver to a customer? Delivery is the distributor's largest cost after product, about $7.4 million a year across 34 routes. If cost depends mainly on stops, small accounts that need weekly visits may cost more to serve than they earn; if it depends mainly on miles or weight, the answer changes. This project uses regression to estimate how daily route cost responds to stops, miles and weight, so that cost can be assigned to customers in the profitability project (Datar & Rajan, 2021).
Data and Variables
The data cover 520 route-days sampled across twelve months and all 34 routes. Daily route cost, the dependent variable, includes driver wages and overtime, fuel, and a per-day allocation of truck lease and maintenance. Explanatory variables are the number of stops, miles driven from the routing system and weight delivered in thousands of pounds. Stops range from 8 to 38, miles from 40 to 260 and weight from 2,000 to 21,000 pounds, which defines the range in which the model can be used.
Results
Table 1. Regression of Daily Route Cost
| Variable | Coefficient | Standard error | t statistic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | $210.00 | 48.00 | 4.4 |
| Stops | $14.20 | 1.10 | 12.9 |
| Miles | $1.65 | 0.21 | 7.9 |
| Weight, thousands of pounds | $18.00 | 4.60 | 3.9 |
| Observations | 520 | ||
| R-squared | 0.81 |
All three variables are statistically significant, with t statistics well above 2. Together they explain about 81 percent of the variation in daily cost across the sample.
Interpretation
Holding miles and weight constant, each additional stop adds about $14.20 to the day's cost, reflecting the driver's time to park, unload, get a signature and handle paperwork. Each additional mile adds about $1.65, mostly fuel and wear. Each additional thousand pounds adds about $18, reflecting unloading time and fuel for heavier loads. The intercept of $210 represents costs that do not vary with these activities within the range of the data, such as part of the daily truck allocation, but it should not be read as the cost of a day with no deliveries, because no such days are in the data.
A typical route-day with 22 stops, 140 miles and 9,000 pounds is predicted to cost $210 plus $312 for stops, $231 for miles and $162 for weight, about $915. Of that, about a third is driven by stops, which is the figure that matters most for small accounts.
Diagnostics
Residuals plotted against predicted cost show no curve or funnel shape, suggesting the linear form and constant variance are reasonable. Two large positive residuals trace to a truck breakdown that required a second truck and to the day before Thanksgiving, when overtime was paid; both are genuine but unusual, and removing them changes coefficients by less than 3 percent, so they were kept. Stops and miles are moderately correlated at 0.48, because routes with more stops tend to cover more ground, but the variance inflation factors are about 1.3, well below levels that would make the separate coefficients unstable. Richardson et al. (2021) stress that these checks are what separate a model a manager can rely on from one that merely produced output.
How the Data Were Sampled
The 520 route-days were drawn as a stratified random sample: about 15 days from each of the 34 routes, spread across all twelve months. Stratifying by route ensured that rural routes with long miles and few stops were represented alongside dense urban routes, which matters because the model's purpose is to compare different kinds of customers. Days with partial data, such as those when a truck's telematics unit failed, were excluded before sampling, and the number excluded, 23, is recorded. A random sample of this size gives coefficients that are stable enough for planning; rerunning the regression on a second, independent sample of 520 days produced coefficients within 8 percent of the first.
Limits
The model describes cost behavior within the observed range: 8 to 38 stops, 40 to 260 miles. It should not be used to estimate the cost of a 60-stop route or a new territory twice as far away. It estimates associations, not causes; adding a stop might cost less on a dense route than on a rural one, which the model averages. And costs such as dispatcher salaries are excluded, so the per-stop figure understates the full cost of serving a customer.
Alternative Specifications
Two alternatives were tested before settling on the three-variable model. A model with stops alone explained 62 percent of the variation, showing that stops matter most but that miles and weight add real information. A model adding a dummy variable for summer months, when trucks idle with air conditioning running, raised R-squared only to 0.82, and its coefficient of about $24 per day was small relative to daily cost, so it was left out for simplicity. A logarithmic model, in which costs rise less than proportionally with stops, fit no better than the linear one within the observed range. The chosen model is therefore the simplest that explains the data well, which also makes it easier for operations managers to understand and challenge.
Use in Decisions
The estimates give a defensible way to assign delivery cost to customers: each customer's annual stops, its share of route miles and the weight it receives. A small restaurant receiving a weekly delivery of 150 pounds, on a route where it adds about 4 miles, costs roughly $14.20 plus $6.60 plus $2.70, about $23.50 per delivery, or $1,220 a year, before warehouse and order-handling costs. Davenport and Harris (2017) argue that analytics creates value when it changes specific operating decisions; this figure goes directly into the customer profitability project and the decision about minimum order sizes.
Conclusion
Daily delivery cost at the distributor is driven mainly by stops, about $14.20 each, with miles at $1.65 and weight at $18 per thousand pounds; the model explains 81 percent of the variation and passes basic diagnostic checks. Within its range, it provides a sound basis for estimating what each customer costs to deliver to.
References
Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2021). Horngren's cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (17th ed.). Pearson.
Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2017). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning (Updated ed.). Harvard Business Review Press.
Richardson, V. J., Teeter, R. A., & Terrell, K. L. (2021). Data analytics for accounting (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.
What the ACC 430 Module 4 instructions ask for
Project One in ACC 430 usually asks you to apply a predictive technique, most often regression, to a business question and interpret the results for a manager. Expect to state the question, describe the data and variables, run a simple or multiple regression, present coefficients, standard errors and fit statistics, check assumptions such as linearity, independence of residuals and reasonable correlation among predictors, and interpret each coefficient in business terms. Many versions ask how the results would be used in a decision. Explain what the model can and cannot support, especially outside the range of the data, and present at least one prediction with its context. A short note on how the data were sampled helps the reader judge whether the results generalize.
How this ACC 430 Module 4 project one example is built
The project models daily delivery cost, including driver wages, fuel, truck lease and maintenance allocations, for 520 route-days. Explanatory variables are stops, miles driven and weight delivered in thousands of pounds. The regression finds cost of $210 plus $14.20 per stop, $1.65 per mile and $18.00 per thousand pounds, with an R-squared of 0.81. All coefficients are statistically significant. Residual plots show no pattern, two outliers trace to a truck breakdown and a holiday, and stops and miles are only moderately correlated. A typical route-day of 22 stops, 140 miles and 9,000 pounds is predicted at about $915. The estimates become inputs to the customer profitability project.
Where the ACC 430 Module 4 rubric puts the points
Rubrics for ACC 430 Project One typically score the framing of the question, data description, model specification, presentation of results, diagnostics, interpretation and the discussion of limits and use. Top papers interpret each coefficient as a cost per unit holding the others constant, distinguish statistical significance from practical importance, check residuals and correlated predictors and avoid predicting outside the range of the data. Graders reward a clear link from the model to a business decision and a worked prediction with its units. Common deductions include reporting R-squared as the proportion of cost that is caused, ignoring outliers, interpreting the intercept as a meaningful fixed cost without checking whether zero activity is in the data and omitting units.
ACC 430 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points
Regression projects lose points most often by reading the output aloud instead of interpreting it, by ignoring diagnostics and by treating the intercept as a fixed cost when no route-day had zero stops. Another frequent issue is correlated predictors; if miles and stops move together, their separate coefficients become unstable, and the paper should say whether that is a problem. Projects that model something else, overhead or call center time for instance, the same structure of question, model, checks and interpretation applies. Present one worked prediction with its numbers; it shows the reader exactly what the model says and makes errors in units obvious.
Get ACC 430 Module 4 written to your instructions
With the ACC 430 Project One guidelines, data description and rubric in hand, we set out the question and variables, run and present the regression, check its assumptions, interpret coefficients in business terms and state its limits. No fee applies to a first request, and delivery takes about two days. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More ACC 430 papers and related BS Accounting samples
- ACC 430 Module 1 Discussion: Turning "Margins Are Down" Into a Question
- ACC 430 Module 2 Data Preparation Assignment: Cleaning 1.26 Million Sales Lines
- ACC 430 Module 3 Visualization and Dashboard Assignment: A One-Page Dashboard for the CFO
- ACC 330 Module 5 Business Deductions Assignment: Schedule C, Self-Employment Tax and QBI
- ACC 425 Module 5 Evidence and Chain of Custody Assignment: Securing Documents, Email and a Laptop
- FIN 320 Module 8 Final Project Financial Analysis Report
- PSY 270 Module 7 Leadership and Teams Discussion
ACC 430 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free ACC 430 Module 4 Project One sample?
This page holds a complete ACC 430 Module 4 Project One regression of delivery cost on stops, miles and weight, with diagnostics and interpretation.
How do you interpret a multiple regression coefficient?
As the expected change in the outcome for a one-unit change in that variable, holding the other variables constant.
What does R-squared mean?
The share of variation in the outcome explained by the model's variables in the sample. It does not prove causation or guarantee accurate predictions.
Why check residuals in a regression?
Patterns in residuals can reveal a misspecified model, nonlinearity or changing variance, which make coefficients and predictions less reliable.
Can a regression be used to predict outside the data range?
It should not be relied on there. Relationships observed within the range of the data may not hold beyond it.