BMB 670 is SNHU’s Music Business Leadership and Ethics course. It centers on leadership and ethics in the music business: the traits and behaviors of effective leaders, transformational, servant and authentic leadership, leadership transitions, fairness to artists, decisions under pressure, safety and duty of care, pricing and sponsorship ethics, harassment and culture, stakeholder relationships and building an ethical organization. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "bmb 670 module 3", "BMB670 sample paper" and "BMB 670 milestone example" land on this page.
What BMB 670 is really about
BMB 670 is SNHU's graduate course on leadership and ethics in the music business, and it rewards work that ties a leadership idea or ethical principle to an actual decision someone had to make, with the facts, the options and the consequences laid out. Strong submissions name who was affected, weigh obligations that conflict and show what a leader did or should have done, rather than restating theories.
The samples on this shelf share one composite company: an independent concert promoter in Columbus, Ohio founded in 2004, which books about 300 club and theater shows a year and runs a three-day summer festival on a farm outside the city with about 22,000 people a day, eighteen full-time staff and 900 volunteers. The company, its people and its figures are illustrative.
What BMB 670’s modules ask for
Across ten modules, BMB 670 typically asks for discussions on notable leaders, lineup fairness and harassment, assignments comparing leadership approaches, applying an ethical decision framework and analyzing stakeholders, three final project milestones on the organization's leadership, its ethical issues and a change plan, and a final project presenting a leadership and ethics plan.
Where students lose points in BMB 670
The most common BMB 670 deduction comes from papers that describe leadership styles or ethical theories in general and never apply them to a decision. Next come analyses that consider only the company's interests, leaving out artists, crews, fans or neighbors, and recommendations with no way to tell whether they worked. Taking one real choice and walking it through the theory, the people affected and the follow-through fixes most of these.
The BMB 670 drawers
BMB 670 Module 1 Discussion example
An opening post on what made the founder of a composite Columbus concert promoter effective for twenty years: paying every artist's guarantee during the 2020 shutdown when contracts allowed her not to, knowing every agent by name, deciding fast in a business of last-minute problems, and the habit that now holds the company back, which is that almost every decision still runs through her, weighed against research on ethical and authentic leadership, with Brown, Treviño and Harrison, Avolio and Gardner and Schein. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 2 Leadership Approaches Assignment example
A leadership approaches assignment that tests transformational, servant and authentic leadership against the real situation at a composite Columbus promoter: a founder who inspires but decides everything, an operations director who quietly serves a crew of 900 festival volunteers, and a coming handover, setting out what each approach asks of a leader, what research finds about its effects, where it fits a business of artists, crews and show-day emergencies, where it falls short, and a recommendation that the next chief executive combine authentic consistency with servant habits toward the crew, with Bass and Riggio, van Dierendonck and Avolio and Gardner. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 3 Milestone One example
The first final project milestone analyzes leadership at a composite Columbus concert promoter as its founder prepares to step back in two years: a culture in which decisions wait for her, agents whose loyalty is personal, staff who rarely disagree in meetings, an operations director trusted by 900 volunteers, three succession routes from an internal promotion to an outside hire to a shared leadership model, what research says about the risks of each, and a 24-month handover that moves decisions, relationships and authority in stages, with Schein, Giambatista, Rowe and Riaz and Edmondson. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 4 Discussion example
A discussion post on two fairness questions in a composite Columbus promoter's festival booking: only nine of thirty-eight acts on the 2024 lineup were led by women or nonbinary artists, and local openers were paid a flat $250 while the headliner received $85,000 and catering riders far exceeded what openers earned, examined through organizational justice research and studies of gender in the music industry, and a proposal for a written booking policy, a published fee floor for local acts and a target for the lineup that the talent buyer can meet without quotas on individual slots, with Colquitt, Raine and Strong and Treviño and Nelson. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 5 Ethical Decision Assignment example
An ethical decision assignment that walks through the morning a composite Columbus promoter faced a heat index of 108 degrees on day two of its farm festival, with fourteen heat calls by 1 p.m., a sold-out crowd of 22,000 and $1.9 million at stake: the facts, the people affected from fans and volunteers to artists and the township, five options from carrying on to canceling, each tested for consequences, rights, fairness and care, the moral intensity of the moment, the choice to hold the main stage until 5 p.m. with free water, cooling buses and refunds on request, what it cost and what happened, with Jones, Ebi and colleagues and Helbing and Mukerji. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 6 Milestone Two example
The second final project milestone analyzes three ethical issues at a composite Columbus promoter: crowd crush risk in front of the festival's main stage, where crowd counts hit about four people per square meter during the 2024 headliner, service fees that add about 24 percent to ticket prices and arrive only at checkout, and a $150,000 sponsorship offer from a vape brand at an all-ages festival, each tested against the company's stated values, its obligations to stakeholders and research on crowd safety, price fairness and ethical climate, with a recommended policy for each, with Helbing and Mukerji, Haws and Bearden and Treviño and Nelson. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 7 Discussion example
A discussion post on who is responsible for harassment at live music, built on a composite Columbus promoter's records: twenty-three reports through its festival text line in 2024 and almost none from its club shows, a bartender whose complaint about a touring crew member went nowhere for weeks, and research showing that most people harassed at festivals never report it, arguing that leaders own the conditions that make reporting possible, from trained responders and a code phrase at the bar to a conduct clause in every artist contract and a promise that staff complaints reach someone outside the chain of command, with Fileborn, Wadds and Tomsen, Brown, Treviño and Harrison and Edmondson. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 8 Stakeholder Analysis Assignment example
A stakeholder analysis assignment on the people and places around a composite Columbus promoter's farm festival: forty-one noise complaints from about 300 nearby households, traffic backed up 2.5 miles on the state route, a creek that ran cloudy after a rainy load-out, thirty-eight tons of waste with a fifth diverted, the family that owns the farm, the township trustees who issue the permit, the sheriff, local businesses that gain and churches whose Sunday services suffer, each ranked by power, legitimacy and urgency, with what each is owed and an engagement plan the company can carry out before the next permit hearing, with Mitchell, Agle and Wood, Freeman and Treviño and Nelson. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 9 Milestone Three example
Milestone Three maps how a composite Columbus promoter will move from a culture where people wait for the founder to one where anyone can stop a show for safety and raise a concern without fear: an honest account of the culture today, a code of conduct drafted with staff, crew and volunteers, a speak-up route outside the chain of command, stop-work authority for every shift lead, training for responders and managers, the leader behaviors that make the rest believable, an eighteen-month sequence with early wins, the resistance to expect and the measures that will show whether anything changed, with Kotter, Edmondson and Brown, Treviño and Harrison. Full sample paper, read it free.
BMB 670 Module 10 Final Project example
The final project gives a composite Columbus promoter's board one plan for leading through its founder's exit and running the company by its values: a shared leadership model with a chief executive and a head of talent, the staged handover, written policies on crowd safety, all-in pricing, sponsorship, fair booking and artist pay, harassment and neighbors, the culture work that makes them real, an ethics committee with an outside member, an annual public report, a dashboard of measures and the risks that could undo it, with Avolio and Gardner, Brown, Treviño and Harrison and Treviño and Nelson. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a BMB 670 sample the right way
Read a BMB 670 sample by finding the decision at its center and checking that the paper names the people affected, the principle applied and the action that followed. When those three are present, the theory is doing real work. For BMB 670, send your scenario, the guidelines and the rubric, and the first custom sample is written free within 24-48h.
BMB 670 questions, answered
What does BMB 670 cover?
Leadership and ethics for music business professionals: effective leaders and leadership approaches, ethical decision making, safety, fairness, harassment, stakeholders and building ethical organizations.
Does BMB 670 use music industry cases?
Yes. It examines music industry leadership scenarios and ethical issues alongside examples from other industries; these samples use one composite concert promoter throughout.
Are the people in the BMB 670 samples real?
No. The promoter, its founder, staff and festival are invented composites so each module can build on the last; your course may assign other cases.