| Course | BUS 400 Driving Business Opportunities |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | undergraduate project assessing the feasibility of a business opportunity |
| Length | About 1,020 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUS 400 Module 4
Opportunity Assessment: Herbs and Microgreens for Boston Restaurants
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
BUS 400: Driving Business Opportunities
Project One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Opportunity Assessment: Herbs and Microgreens for Boston Restaurants
Summary
The herb and microgreen opportunity is real and fits the greenhouse's strengths, but the greenhouse has never grown these crops commercially and the market evidence rests on twelve interviews. I recommend a sixty-day pilot from a converted half-bay, costing about $60,000, supplying twelve to fifteen restaurants along the Thursday Boston route. If the pilot meets targets for quality, reorders and margin, the family should proceed with the full $420,000 build.
Market Feasibility
Module Three found roughly $3.6 million a year of reachable demand among Boston-area independents that pay for local, consistent product, and judged that the greenhouse might win around 150 of those kitchens, some $410,000 of business, by year three. Eight of twelve chefs interviewed expressed interest, and a specialty distributor offered to carry the product. Kotler and Keller (2016) caution that stated interest overstates actual purchasing, so the pilot's reorder rate will be the real test.
Operational Feasibility
Space is available: one 6,000-square-foot bay, currently used for lettuce that has been losing money under grocery pricing, could be converted to vertical racks with LED lighting and its own climate controls. Skills are the gap. The head grower and her team are expert in lettuce, but basil, cilantro and microgreens have different needs for light, temperature, harvest timing and handling. The greenhouse would need to hire a grower with herb experience, budgeted at about $62,000 a year, and train two existing staff.
Logistics fit. The greenhouse's truck already drives to Boston-area grocery warehouses every Thursday, and a route adding twelve to twenty restaurant stops would take about three additional hours. Small orders require different packing and invoicing, which the office can handle with an online ordering form. Food safety certification can be extended to the new crops. Barney (1991) argues that opportunities built on existing resources are more defensible; here the trucks, certification and year-round growing are real assets, while the herb expertise must be bought.
Financial Feasibility
Full conversion would cost about $420,000: $210,000 for vertical racks and irrigation, $150,000 for LED lighting and $60,000 for climate controls and a cooler. Annual operating costs at full scale, including the herb grower, labor, seed, packaging, delivery and electricity, would be about $260,000. At $410,000 of third-year sales, gross profit would be about $150,000, paying back the investment in about three years from full operation, before any effect on the lettuce business. Module Five will build detailed projections.
Risks
Risk assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crop quality fails restaurant standards | Medium | High | Hire experienced grower; pilot before full build |
| Chefs try but do not reorder | Medium | High | Pilot measures reorder rate; target 70% |
| Indoor farm cuts microgreen prices | Medium | Medium | Lead with herbs, where competition is weaker |
| Winter electricity costs exceed estimate | Medium | Medium | Efficient lighting; meter the bay separately |
| Chef turnover ends relationships | High | Low | Build accounts with owners and sous chefs, not one chef |
| Grocery buyers react to divided attention | Low | Medium | Keep lettuce quality and service unchanged |
The two highest risks, quality and reorders, are exactly what a pilot can test before the large investment.
The Pilot
A half-bay of about 3,000 square feet can be converted with used racks and temporary lighting for about $60,000, enough to grow basil, cilantro, mint and three microgreens. Over sixty days from January, the greenhouse would supply twelve to fifteen restaurants on the Thursday route, chosen from those interviewed and introduced by the distributor. Ries (2011) describes this kind of minimum viable test as a way to learn what customers actually do at the lowest cost. The pilot would measure product quality through chef ratings collected each week, the share of restaurants reordering after the first month, average weekly order size, gross margin per pound after electricity and the extra hours the route requires.
Organizational Fit
The opportunity also asks something of the organization. The family's son would lead the restaurant business, taking time from operations he now oversees, so the family would need to promote the assistant operations manager to cover part of his role. Staff would need to accept a new kind of work: small, varied orders packed by hand, which some lettuce harvesters may enjoy and others resent. The head grower was initially skeptical and worries that the herb bay will draw attention from her lettuce crop, so the plan keeps her responsible for lettuce quality and makes the new herb grower report to her, which respects her standing and keeps growing decisions in one place. Selling to chefs is also new; the family's experience is with grocery category managers, who negotiate on price and volume, while chefs buy on quality and relationship. The son's interviews suggest he can build those relationships, but the pilot will show whether the time demands are sustainable alongside his other duties.
What the Pilot Will Not Tell Us
A sixty-day winter pilot will show whether chefs reorder and whether quality holds in the hardest growing season, but it will not show summer demand, when local farms compete, or how the business performs at 150 accounts rather than fifteen. It also relies on used racks and temporary lighting that are less efficient than the full build, so its electricity cost per pound will overstate the long-run figure. The decision gates allow for that by measuring margin on a metered basis and adjusting for the more efficient lighting in the full design.
Decision Gates
Proceed with the full build if at least 70 percent of pilot restaurants reorder, average orders reach $45 a week and gross margin per pound is at least 40 percent after metered electricity. Adjust, for example by dropping microgreens and focusing on herbs, if reorders are strong but margins on one product line are weak. Stop if fewer than half the restaurants reorder or quality problems persist after the first month, and return the bay to lettuce.
Conclusion
The opportunity fits the greenhouse's market and assets but depends on skills it lacks and demand that has only been stated, not shown. A sixty-day pilot costing about $60,000 tests exactly those uncertainties, and clear decision gates turn its results into a decision on the full $420,000 investment.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business.
What the BUS 400 Module 4 instructions ask for
Project One in BUS 400 usually asks for an opportunity assessment or feasibility analysis: a structured judgment about whether the business should pursue the opportunity it has identified. Guidelines typically cover market feasibility, operational and organizational feasibility, financial feasibility and risk, ending with a recommendation. Strong submissions draw on the earlier market analysis, test whether the business can actually deliver, compare costs with expected returns at a preliminary level and treat risks seriously. The best recommendations are often conditional, proposing a small test with defined results that would trigger the full investment. Many versions also ask how the opportunity fits the organization's people and culture, not just its equipment.
How this BUS 400 Module 4 project one example is built
The paper summarizes the market evidence: a serviceable market of about $3.6 million and a third-year target of about $410,000. It then tests operations: the greenhouse can convert one 6,000-square-foot bay to vertical racks, but its growers know lettuce, not basil and microgreens, so it would need to hire a grower with herb experience, and small restaurant orders would fit on the Thursday Boston route. Financially, full investment would cost about $420,000 for racks, lighting and climate controls. A risk table ranks crop failure, chef turnover, an indoor farm cutting prices and winter energy costs. The recommendation is a sixty-day pilot from a converted half-bay, costing about $60,000, with targets that would justify the full build.
Where the BUS 400 Module 4 rubric puts the points
The Project One rubric generally rewards the strength of market evidence, the operational and organizational analysis, the preliminary financial assessment, the risk analysis, the quality of the recommendation and professional presentation. High-scoring papers build on earlier work, test the business's real capabilities, compare cost and expected return in plain numbers, rank risks with responses and make a recommendation with conditions and decision points. Papers lose credit for assuming the business can execute without evidence, for ignoring costs or energy and labor constraints, for risk lists without responses and for all-or-nothing recommendations when a test is possible. Being candid about the blind spots of a pilot or first phase also earns credit.
BUS 400 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points
Feasibility assessments often stop at market demand. The harder questions are whether this business can deliver and at what cost. Look at space, skills, equipment, logistics and cash, and say where the business would need to hire or invest. Compare the investment with expected sales and margin, even roughly, so readers see the scale. Rank risks by likelihood and impact and give each a response. If uncertainty is high, recommend a small, time-limited test with numbers that would decide the next step. Consider what the opportunity asks of the people who already work in the business, since new work often meets quiet resistance. Say what would make you stop, not just what would make you go ahead.
Get BUS 400 Module 4 written to your instructions
Send the BUS 400 Project One guidelines and your opportunity. The assessment will weigh market, operations, money and risk, then recommend a decision with clear tests and decision points. About two days; a first project is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More BUS 400 papers and related BS Business Administration samples
- BUS 400 Module 1 Discussion: What Makes an Opportunity Worth Chasing
- BUS 400 Module 2 Opportunity Identification Assignment: Three Ways to Grow, and How to Choose
- BUS 400 Module 3 Market Analysis Assignment: Sizing the Boston Market for Herbs and Microgreens
- ACC 330 Module 7 Project Two: The Complete 2024 Return
- PSY 365 Module 3 Motivation Theory and Workplace Challenges
- ACC 315 Module 5 Database Design Assignment: An REA Model and Tables for Deliveries
- ACC 345 Module 3 Cash Flow and Earnings Quality Assignment: Profit Up, Cash Flow Down
BUS 400 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free BUS 400 Module 4 Project One sample?
This page includes the complete BUS 400 Project One opportunity assessment for a Vermont greenhouse's herb line.
What is a feasibility analysis?
An assessment of whether a proposed opportunity can work, covering market demand, the business's ability to deliver, financial viability and risks.
Why recommend a pilot before full investment?
Because a small, time-limited test can confirm key assumptions, such as demand, quality and cost, at low cost before committing large sums.
What are decision gates in a business plan?
Predefined points where results are reviewed against targets to decide whether to continue, change or stop the effort.
How should risks be presented in an opportunity assessment?
Ranked by likelihood and impact, each with a planned response and, where possible, a signal that would show the risk is materializing.