| Course | HCM 700 Healthcare Administration Capstone |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | graduate capstone milestone presenting a solution and implementation plan |
| Length | About 1,140 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MS Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCM 700 Module 6
Milestone Two: Stay and Grow, Then Catch It Early, a Two-Phase Plan for Willow Creek Care Center
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
HCM 700: Healthcare Administration Capstone
Module Six Milestone Two
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Milestone Two: Stay and Grow, Then Catch It Early, a Two-Phase Plan for Willow Creek Care Center
The first milestone and the workforce paper established that turnover drives Willow Creek Care Center's decline and identified strategies to reverse it. This milestone presents the full solution and the plan to carry it out. It describes two phases, explains why they are sequenced, sets out governance, assesses staff readiness, describes how the change will be led and communicated, provides a timeline and addresses resistance, policy changes and legal considerations.
The Solution in Two Phases
Phase one, Stay and Grow, is the retention program: a wage step scale starting at $19.50, a structured first 90 days with peer mentors, consistent assignment, posted schedules with an internal float pool, a four-rung career ladder, coaching for charge nurses and a staffing floor with new lift equipment. Phase two, Catch It Early, introduces tools and training that help aides and nurses spot and communicate changes in a resident's condition before they become emergencies, modeled on the INTERACT program. Phase two begins only when aide turnover falls below 60% a year and at least 70% of shifts follow consistent assignment.
Why the Phases Are Sequenced
The sequence follows the evidence. Ouslander et al. (2011) found a 24% reduction in hospital admissions among facilities rated as engaged in INTERACT, compared with 6% among those not engaged. Kane et al. (2017), in a randomized implementation trial, found no significant overall effect, with benefits confined to facilities that used the tools heavily. Engagement requires staff who stay long enough to learn the tools and know residents well enough to notice subtle changes. Launching phase two while turnover is near 94% would likely waste the investment. Castle (2013) linked consistent assignment with lower turnover, and it is also the practice that makes early recognition possible.
Fit With Mission and Strategy
Willow Creek's mission promises "dignified, loving care," and families' most frequent complaint is care from strangers. Stay and Grow responds directly. The plan also supports the board's strategic goals of returning to three stars within three years, restoring a positive margin and rebuilding hospital referral relationships. Every element can be explained to staff and families in terms of the mission, which matters for winning their support.
Governance
A steering committee will oversee implementation: the administrator as chair, the director of nursing, the human resources director, the chief financial officer of the parent organization, two certified nursing assistants elected by their peers and one member of the family council. The administrator in training will serve as project lead. The committee meets every two weeks during the first six months and monthly afterward, reviews the workforce dashboard and decides on adjustments. Including aides and a family member gives the people most affected a real voice.
Readiness for Change
Weiner (2009) frames readiness as something a workforce holds jointly: people must want the change and must trust that, as a group, they can deliver it. A brief anonymous survey of 58 nursing staff found reasonably strong commitment, with 74% agreeing that retention was the facility's biggest problem, but weak confidence: only 38% believed leadership would follow through. Several comments said aides had heard promises before. Readiness was therefore high on commitment and low on efficacy, which shapes the change approach.
Leading the Change
Low confidence calls for visible early action. The first change staff will see is the wage scale, effective on the first payroll after board approval, which demonstrates that leadership means it. Within the first month, the administrator will work a shift on each unit and host listening sessions on all three shifts. Aides will choose resident groups for consistent assignment with their unit manager rather than having groups assigned. Progress will be posted monthly in the break room, including results that disappoint, so staff can judge follow-through themselves.
Timeline
Implementation runs over 36 months. The first six months launch the wage scale, onboarding, mentors, scheduling and supervisor coaching. Consistent assignment and the float pool follow in months four to nine as staffing allows. The career ladder opens in month six. Phase two is expected around month 15, depending on the trigger. Table 1 summarizes.
Table 1. Implementation Timeline
| Months | Actions |
|---|---|
| 1 | Board approval; wage scale takes effect; steering committee formed |
| 1-3 | Mentor selection and training; onboarding redesign; scheduling app; charge nurse coaching begins |
| 4-9 | Consistent assignment by unit; float pool of six aides hired; lift equipment installed |
| 6-12 | Career ladder opens; first medication aide and tuition cohorts |
| About 15 | Phase two begins if turnover under 60% and consistent assignment at 70% |
| 15-24 | Early-warning tools, training and coaching on all units |
| 25-36 | Sustain, refine and report results to the board |
Note. Timeline agreed with the steering committee; phase two timing depends on the trigger.
Communication
Communication will be frequent, honest and specific to each audience. Staff will hear about changes first, at shift huddles and all-staff meetings, before any public announcement. Residents and families will learn about consistent assignment through the family council and a letter explaining what to expect. The parent organization's board will receive quarterly reports. Hospital discharge planners will hear about the plan once early results are available, since overpromising to referral sources could damage trust further.
Anticipated Resistance
Three sources of resistance are likely. Long-serving aides may resent new hires starting near their own pay; the step scale places every current aide at or above the step matching their tenure, avoiding compression. Charge nurses may see mentoring and coaching as extra work; mentoring is done by paid aide mentors, and coaching is scheduled during paid time. Finance leaders may doubt the savings; the financial analysis in the next paper sets out assumptions and a sensitivity test, and the plan includes a six-month financial checkpoint.
Policy and HR Changes
Several written policies must change: the compensation policy, to create the step scale and differentials; the scheduling policy, to set posting timelines, trading rules and the weekend rotation; job descriptions for the senior aide, medication aide and mentor roles; a tuition assistance policy with a two-year commitment; and a staffing floor policy that defines when the float pool or agency must be called.
Legal and Regulatory Considerations
The plan raises several legal questions for the parent organization's counsel. Differentials for mentoring, floating and weekends must be included in the regular rate when calculating overtime under federal wage and hour law. The medication aide role must follow the state's training and scope-of-practice rules. The tuition repayment agreement must comply with state law on repayment provisions. And the pay scale must be applied consistently to avoid discrimination claims.
Conclusion
The solution sequences a retention program ahead of a clinical early-warning program because the evidence shows clinical tools depend on stable, engaged staff. Governance that includes aides and families, visible early action to build confidence, a realistic timeline and prepared answers to resistance give the plan a strong chance of adoption. The financial analysis will test whether Willow Creek can afford it.
References
Castle, N. G. (2013). Consistent assignment of nurse aides: Association with turnover and absenteeism. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 25(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2012.705647
Kane, R. L., Huckfeldt, P., Tappen, R., Engstrom, G., Rojido, C., Newman, D., Yang, Z., & Ouslander, J. G. (2017). Effects of an intervention to reduce hospitalizations from nursing homes: A randomized implementation trial of the INTERACT program. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(9), 1257-1264. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2657
Ouslander, J. G., Lamb, G., Tappen, R., Herndon, L., Diaz, S., Roos, B. A., Grabowski, D. C., & Bonner, A. (2011). Interventions to reduce hospitalizations from nursing homes: Evaluation of the INTERACT II collaborative quality improvement project. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(4), 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03333.x
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
What the HCM 700 Module 6 instructions ask for
HCM 700 Milestone Two generally asks for your proposed solution and a plan to implement it, including governance, timeline, change management and communication. Plan for roughly 1,800 to 2,400 words with several peer-reviewed sources in APA 7. Describe the solution clearly, justify its design and any sequencing with evidence and explain how it fits the organization's mission and strategy. Assess readiness for change, choose tactics that fit what you find, provide a timeline, anticipate resistance and note policy and legal changes the plan requires. HCM 700 graders notice clean headings in HCM 700 papers. HCM 700 names and dates need checking before HCM 700 submission. HCM 700 prompts vary by term, so recheck HCM 700 directions.
How this HCM 700 Module 6 milestone two example is built
The milestone describes a retention phase and a clinical early-warning phase triggered by turnover and consistent assignment thresholds, justified by Ouslander's and Kane's INTERACT results and Castle's consistent assignment findings. Governance includes elected aides and a family member. A staff survey interpreted through Weiner's theory shows strong commitment but low confidence, so the wage scale comes first and progress is posted openly. A timeline table, audience-specific communication, three sources of resistance, policy changes and legal issues such as overtime calculation complete it. HCM 700 students can reuse this structure for HCM 700 work. HCM 700 claims here trace to cited HCM 700 sources. HCM 700 readers can adapt each section to HCM 700 data.
Where the HCM 700 Module 6 rubric puts the points
Solution and implementation milestones in HCM 700 are commonly graded on the clarity and evidence base of the solution, alignment with mission and strategy, quality of the implementation plan, attention to readiness and change management, realism of the timeline, handling of resistance and APA 7 mechanics. Stronger submissions use data on readiness to choose tactics, sequence components for a reason and include front-line staff in governance. Graders also reward awareness of legal and policy implications that a senior leader would need to manage. HCM 700 marks favor careful formatting across HCM 700 sections. HCM 700 citations keep every HCM 700 argument credible. HCM 700 instructors weigh evidence heavily in HCM 700 grading.
HCM 700 Module 6 help: the mistakes that cost points
Implementation milestones lose points when the solution is described vaguely, when the timeline lacks detail, when change management is generic or when resistance is ignored. Another frequent gap is failing to explain why components are ordered as they are. Describe, justify with evidence, align with mission, assess readiness, plan tactics and timeline and address resistance and policy. If your prompt requires a particular change model, such as Kotter's steps or Lewin's stages, send it with your HCM 700 notes so the plan uses it. HCM 700 drafts start well from a HCM 700 outline. HCM 700 feedback already received guides HCM 700 revisions. HCM 700 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify HCM 700 expectations.
Get HCM 700 Module 6 written to your instructions
Send the HCM 700 Milestone Two prompt and your solution idea. The milestone will describe and justify the solution, set up governance, assess readiness, choose change tactics, build a timeline and address resistance, policy and legal issues, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More HCM 700 papers and related MS Healthcare Administration samples
- HCM 700 Module 1 Discussion: Choosing a Capstone Issue: Turnover and Agency Staffing in a Nursing Home
- HCM 700 Module 2 Organizational Assessment Paper: Diagnosing Performance With Quality, Staffing and Financial Data
- HCM 700 Module 3 Milestone One: A Problem Statement and Review of the Literature
- HCM 700 Module 4 Workforce Strategy Paper: Retention, Career Ladders and Consistent Assignment
- HCM 700 Module 5 Discussion: Should the Federal Government Set Nursing Home Staffing Minimums?
- IHP 630 Module 8 Milestone Three: Net Present Value for an Ambulatory Surgery Investment
- IHP 515 Module 1 Discussion: Sick Individuals and Sick Populations
- IHP 510 Module 4 Message Design Paper: Targeted and Tailored Screening Messages
- IHP 610 Module 10 Journal: Evidence and Politics in Health Policy
HCM 700 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HCM 700 Module 6 Milestone Two sample?
HCM 700 Milestone Two appears in full: a two-phase nursing home workforce and quality solution with governance, readiness, timeline and resistance plans.
Why sequence a retention program before a clinical program?
Clinical early-warning tools such as INTERACT work mainly where staff use them heavily, which requires a stable workforce.
What is organizational readiness for change?
In Weiner's account, it exists when a workforce jointly wants a change and jointly trusts it can deliver the change.
Who should sit on an implementation steering committee?
Leaders who control resources plus front-line staff and, where relevant, patients or families affected by the change.
What legal issues arise from pay differentials?
Differentials generally must be included in the regular rate used to calculate overtime, so counsel should review them.