HIM 660 Module 2 Environmental Analysis Short Paper Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This HIM 660 Module 2 Environmental Analysis Short Paper sample studies the forces acting on a hospital health information department and sorts them into a usable SWOT. It was prepared for SNHU HIM 660 (HIM-660), where the second module asks MS Health Information Management students to analyze the external and internal environment before setting any strategy. The composite department serves a two-hospital system near Charleston, West Virginia. Outside, payment is moving toward value, experienced coders are hard to hire, computer-assisted coding is maturing and Medicaid covers an unusually large share of patients. Inside, accounts wait about a week for coding, nobody reviews documentation before discharge and a loyal remote coding team is aging. The paper explains each force, places it in a SWOT table and ends with three strategic questions the department's plan must answer.

CourseHIM 660 HIM Strategic Planning and Financial Management
ModuleModule 2
Paper typegraduate short paper analyzing the environment of an HIM department
LengthAbout 1,040 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMS Health Information Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HIM 660 Module 2

1

What Surrounds the Record Room: An Environmental Analysis of Health Information Management at Kanawha Ridge Health

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

HIM 660: HIM Strategic Planning and Financial Management

Module Two Short Paper

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title frames the department as something shaped by its surroundings.
2

What Surrounds the Record Room: An Environmental Analysis of Health Information Management at Kanawha Ridge Health

A strategy that ignores its environment is a wish list. Before Kanawha Ridge Health's health information department sets goals, it needs a clear view of the forces outside it, in payment, labor, technology and the population it serves, and of its own strengths and weaknesses. The department supports a composite system of one 260-bed regional hospital and one 70-bed community hospital in the Kanawha Valley, with 61 staff, most of them coders and release-of-information specialists working remotely. This paper examines the external and internal environment and sorts what it finds into strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. It closes with the strategic questions the department's plan must answer.

What this page is doingThe introduction defines the purpose and the setting.
3

External Forces: Payment

The way the system is paid is changing slowly but in one direction. Federal officials set targets in 2015 to tie most Medicare fee-for-service payments to quality or value and to move a growing share into alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations and bundled payments (Burwell, 2015). For HIM, this means that documentation and coding now affect more than the claim. Diagnosis codes feed risk adjustment, quality measures and shared savings calculations, so an incomplete record can cost the system both on the claim and in a later reconciliation. Kanawha Ridge's regional hospital joined a Medicare accountable care organization two years ago, which makes complete capture of chronic conditions a financial matter as well as a clinical one.

Payer mix adds pressure. Medicaid covers roughly a quarter of the system's discharges, a higher share than in most states, and Medicaid generally pays less than the cost of care. Thin margins leave little room for revenue lost to denials or delays, which raises the value of every day the department removes from the billing cycle.

What this page is doingPayment trends are tied to concrete HIM consequences.
4

External Forces: Labor and Technology

The coding labor market is tight. Federal labor projections expect continued demand for medical records specialists across the decade (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025), and remote work has turned local hiring into a national competition. Kanawha Ridge now competes for experienced inpatient coders with large systems and vendors in other states that can pay more. When positions sit vacant, the department fills the gap with contract coders at a much higher hourly cost.

Technology offers part of an answer. Campbell and Giadresco (2020) reviewed 38 studies of computer-assisted coding and found that it can improve accuracy and quality by catching details that manual coding misses, while warning that the shift requires deliberate change management because it reshapes coders' roles toward editing and analysis. The system's current encoder vendor offers such a module, but the department has not evaluated it, and the change would require training and workflow redesign before any savings appear.

What this page is doingLabor and technology are presented as linked forces.
5

External Forces: Regulation and Community

Two federal rules touch the department directly. Federal information blocking rules, written under the Cures Act of 2016, expect electronic health information to reach patients and other requesters without unreasonable delay, so release of information is judged on speed as well as accuracy. Hospital price transparency rules require public files of standard charges, which draws attention to how services are coded and grouped. Neither rule is new, but both raise the cost of sloppy or slow work.

The community matters as well. The Kanawha Valley's population is older than the national average and carries a heavy burden of chronic disease, which means more complex inpatient stays, more conditions to document and more patients whose care is paid by public programs. Complex patients are exactly where incomplete documentation costs the most, both in payment and in the accuracy of quality data the system reports.

What this page is doingRegulation and the population served complete the external scan.
6

Internal Environment

Inside the department, the measures are mixed. Accounts wait an average of 6.8 days after discharge for final coding against a target of four, and about 12% of claims are denied on first submission. Coders report that many denials follow from documentation that does not support the diagnoses coded, a problem a clinical documentation improvement program would address, but the system has none. Vacancies in five coding positions have pushed contract spending well past budget.

There are real strengths as well. The remote coding team is experienced and loyal, with an average tenure of eleven years, and its accuracy on internal audits is high. Release of information was outsourced successfully three years ago. The department also has a good relationship with the revenue cycle director, who shares denial data monthly. These strengths matter because any strategy will depend on the people already in place.

What this page is doingInternal performance is described with measures and strengths.
7

SWOT Summary

Table 1 sorts the findings. The aim is not to list everything but to keep the items that should change what the department does.

Table 1. SWOT Analysis of the Health Information Department

CategoryFindings
StrengthsExperienced remote coders with high audit accuracy; outsourced release of information working well; monthly denial data shared by revenue cycle
WeaknessesCoding wait of 6.8 days against a target of 4; first-pass denial rate near 12%; no clinical documentation improvement program; five coding vacancies
OpportunitiesComputer-assisted coding available from the current vendor; accountable care contract rewards complete capture of chronic conditions; remote hiring widens the candidate pool
ThreatsLarger systems and vendors recruiting the same coders; heavy Medicaid mix with thin margins; aging coding workforce near retirement; payment growing more dependent on documentation quality

Note. Compiled by the author from department reports, revenue cycle data and the sources cited.

What this page is doingThe SWOT keeps only items that should shape strategy.
8

Strategic Questions

The analysis points to three questions for the department's plan. First, how can the department shorten the wait for coding without depending permanently on expensive contract labor, whether by hiring remotely, retaining current staff or adopting computer-assisted coding? Second, should the department lead the creation of a documentation improvement program, given that denials and accountable care results both depend on documentation? Third, how should the department prepare for retirements among its most experienced coders? Each question links a weakness or threat to an opportunity, which is where a strategy is most likely to pay off.

What this page is doingThe analysis ends in questions the plan must answer.
9

Conclusion

Kanawha Ridge's health information department sits where payment, labor and technology meet. Its environment rewards complete documentation and fast, accurate coding at the same time that skilled coders are harder to keep. The SWOT shows that its strengths lie in its people and its weaknesses in process and staffing, and the plan that follows should be built around that contrast.

What this page is doingThe conclusion summarizes the environment's meaning.
10

References

Burwell, S. M. (2015). Setting value-based payment goals: HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(10), 897-899. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500445

Campbell, S., & Giadresco, K. (2020). Computer-assisted clinical coding: A narrative review of the literature on its benefits, limitations, implementation and impact on clinical coding professionals. Health Information Management Journal, 49(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358319851305

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Medical records specialists. Occupational outlook handbook. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/medical-records-and-health-information-technicians.htm

What the HIM 660 Module 2 instructions ask for

Module Two of HIM 660 calls for a short environmental analysis, usually three or four pages in APA 7, before any strategy is chosen. Scan the external environment of your department or the course case, including payment trends, payer mix, labor markets, technology and regulation, and explain what each force means for HIM in particular. Then assess the internal environment with real measures, such as coding turnaround, denial rates, staffing and audit accuracy, along with genuine strengths. Sort the most important findings into a SWOT table, keeping only items that should influence decisions. End with the strategic questions or issues the analysis raises, since those questions become the starting point for the strategic assessment and goals in later milestones.

How this HIM 660 Module 2 environmental analysis short paper example is built

Kanawha Ridge Health's department of 61, serving a 260-bed and a 70-bed hospital, is scanned from outside in. Burwell's federal value-based payment targets and the system's accountable care contract show why documentation now affects reconciliation as well as claims, and a Medicaid share near a quarter of discharges thins the margin for delay. Federal labor projections and out-of-state recruiters explain the five vacancies, while Campbell and Giadresco's review of 38 computer-assisted coding studies frames technology as a partial answer requiring change management. Inside, a 6.8-day coding wait and 12% first-pass denials sit beside an experienced remote team with eleven-year average tenure. Table 1 sorts these, and the HIM 660 paper closes with three strategic questions.

Where the HIM 660 Module 2 rubric puts the points

Graders in HIM 660 generally reward an environmental analysis that covers the major external forces with evidence, explains their specific implications for HIM rather than for health care in general, assesses internal performance with measures, recognizes real strengths and produces a focused SWOT that leads somewhere. Higher scores go to analyses that connect items across the quadrants, such as a weakness that an opportunity could fix, and that end with clear strategic questions. Credible sources for payment, labor and technology trends strengthen the work. Tables should be readable and limited to items that matter. Correct APA 7 citations, objective language and a logical structure from external to internal to synthesis complete the stronger papers.

HIM 660 Module 2 help: the mistakes that cost points

Environmental scans for this course lose points when they list national health care trends with no link to HIM, describe internal performance without numbers, fill every SWOT box with generic items or stop at the table without saying what it means. Others mix opportunities and strengths, which are internal and external respectively. If your module uses PEST, five forces or another framework instead of SWOT, or focuses on a coding vendor, a physician practice or a payer, send the prompt and a few facts about the setting so the analysis matches. Department figures, even rough ones, make the internal section credible. Our HIM 660 papers connect each force to HIM work and end with strategic questions.

Get HIM 660 Module 2 written to your instructions

Share the HIM 660 Module 2 prompt and what you know about your department's performance, staffing and payer mix. The paper will analyze outside forces and inside measures, explain what each means for HIM, sort them into a focused SWOT and end with the strategic questions your plan must answer, delivered within 24 to 48 hours, free for a first order. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More HIM 660 papers and related MS Health Information Management samples

HIM 660 Module 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HIM 660 Module 2 Environmental Analysis sample?

The whole HIM 660 Module 2 paper is on this page: an environmental analysis and SWOT of a West Virginia system's HIM department, ending in three strategic questions.

What belongs in an environmental analysis for an HIM department?

External forces such as payment trends, payer mix, labor markets, technology and regulation, plus internal measures like coding turnaround, denials, staffing and audit accuracy.

How is a SWOT different from an environmental scan?

The scan gathers evidence about forces inside and outside the department. The SWOT sorts the most important findings into strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to guide strategy.

How does value-based payment affect health information management?

Diagnosis codes and documentation feed risk adjustment, quality measures and shared savings, so incomplete records can reduce payment after the claim as well as on it.

Should computer-assisted coding appear in an HIM strategy?

Often, as an opportunity. Research suggests it can improve coding accuracy, but it changes coders' roles and requires training and workflow redesign before savings appear.