| Course | IHP 505 Leadership in Clinical Microsystems |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 7 |
| Paper type | graduate milestone implementation plan |
| Length | About 1,080 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MS Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for IHP 505 Module 7
Milestone Three: Implementing Same-Week Access at Northgate Family Medicine
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP 505: Leadership in Clinical Microsystems
Module Seven Milestone Three
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Milestone Three: Implementing Same-Week Access at Northgate Family Medicine
The first two milestones established Northgate's access problem and the evidence for advanced access and team-based care. This milestone sets out how the clinic will implement those approaches: the sequence of work, the daily huddle that will hold it together, the small tests of change, roles, timeline, measures and risks. The plan aims for a third next available appointment of 7 days or fewer within nine months while reducing after-clinic documentation.
The Sequence of Work
Murray and Berwick (2003) described advanced access as a set of changes adopted in a deliberate order. Practices first measure daily demand and supply so they understand the gap. They then work down the backlog of future appointments through a temporary increase in capacity, because opening same-day slots without clearing the backlog simply moves the wait. At the same time, they reduce appointment types and plan for predictable surges. Finally, they keep supply and demand in balance through ongoing measurement and by shifting work that does not need a visit. Northgate's plan follows that order across three phases.
Phase One: Prepare and Measure
In months one and two, the team continues daily demand and supply counts, reduces appointment types from seven to two, moves routine refills and test result calls to the care manager and medical assistants under standing orders and adjusts schedule templates. Staff help design each change in a series of short working sessions, and the practice manager explains the plan at an all-staff meeting.
Phase Two: Work Down the Backlog
In months three through five, the clinic will reduce the backlog of about 1,100 future appointments. Six volunteer clinicians will each add one extra session every other week, paid as extra time, and medical assistants will call patients booked more than three weeks ahead to offer earlier visits, phone follow-up or care manager visits where appropriate. The goal is to cut the backlog in half while protecting clinicians who did not volunteer from added load.
Phase Three: Open Access and Sustain
From month six, each clinician's schedule will hold about 60% of slots open until the same week, with contingency plans for Mondays and the flu season, such as flexing the nurse practitioner's schedule. Weekly measurement will guide adjustments.
The Daily Access Huddle
Provost et al. (2015) studied huddles in health care and found that these short, regular meetings help teams make sense of complex, changing conditions, surface problems early and strengthen relationships among team members. They described huddles as a practical tool for high reliability in settings where plans often meet surprises. Northgate's ten-minute huddle, held before the first patient each day, will include the front desk, medical assistants, the care manager and clinicians. It will review the day's open slots and expected demand, flag patients needing preparation, identify staffing gaps and ask what is not working. A simple whiteboard will show yesterday's third next available and no-show counts.
Testing Each Change
In a review of improvement reports by Taylor et al. (2014), most teams labeling their work as PDSA skipped the small, repeated, predicted tests the method depends on, one reason results vary so much. Northgate will test each major change on a small scale first. For example, the two-appointment-type template will be tested with one physician for two weeks with a prediction that her third next available will fall by at least five days, and phone follow-up by the care manager will be tested with twenty diabetes patients before expanding. Each test's prediction, result and decision will be logged.
Table 1. Initial Tests of Change
| Change | First test | Prediction | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two appointment types | One physician, two weeks | Third next available falls 5+ days | Weekly third next available |
| Care manager phone follow-up | Twenty diabetes patients | Visits saved without missed follow-up | Visits avoided; follow-up completed |
| Standing orders for refills | One teamlet, two weeks | Refill visits drop by half | Refill visit count |
| Daily huddle | Whole team, two weeks | Fewer unplanned reschedules | Reschedule count |
Note. Each test is reviewed at huddle before spreading.
Communicating with Patients
Patients need to know that the way appointments work is changing. The front desk will explain the new approach when patients call: routine visits can now usually be booked within the week, and patients do not need to book months ahead. A short notice in the waiting room and on the patient portal, in English, Spanish and Vietnamese, will explain the change and invite feedback. Patients who habitually book far ahead may be anxious that no appointment will be available when they need it; staff will reassure them and track whether that anxiety is justified. The patient advisory group will review the wording before it is posted, so that the message is clear to people with limited reading skills and does not sound like a reduction in service.
Roles
The practice manager leads the project and the huddle. The lead physician champions the changes with clinicians. A front-desk lead and a medical assistant lead represent their roles on the design team. The care manager leads phone follow-up. The health system's population health analyst produces a weekly access report. Roles were agreed at a team meeting, and the design team meets for thirty minutes every two weeks.
Measures
Third next available appointment for each clinician and the no-show rate are tracked weekly on run charts. Process measures include daily demand and supply, backlog size and how many same-day callers get a Northgate visit rather than an urgent care referral. Balancing measures include after-clinic documentation time, staff overtime, continuity with the patient's own clinician and a monthly one-question staff well-being check.
Risks and Responses
The chief risks are staff overload during backlog reduction, clinician resistance to fewer appointment types and gains fading after the project. Responses include volunteer-only extra sessions with pay, testing templates with a willing physician first and building the huddle and weekly measures into routine operations. If staff well-being scores fall for two months in a row, the design team will slow the pace.
Sustaining the Change
After month nine, the huddle, weekly access report and appointment templates become standard operations owned by the practice manager, with the lead physician reviewing access at monthly provider meetings. New staff will learn the approach in orientation, and the design team will meet quarterly to review trends and adjust.
Conclusion
The plan follows the advanced access sequence, anchors daily coordination in a huddle, tests each change on a small scale and measures access and staff well-being together. It gives Northgate a realistic path to same-week access that the team itself helps shape.
References
Murray, M., & Berwick, D. M. (2003). Advanced access: Reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA, 289(8), 1035-1040. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.8.1035
Provost, S. M., Lanham, H. J., Leykum, L. K., McDaniel, R. R., & Pugh, J. (2015). Health care huddles: Managing complexity to achieve high reliability. Health Care Management Review, 40(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000009
Taylor, M. J., McNicholas, C., Nicolay, C., Darzi, A., Bell, D., & Reed, J. E. (2014). Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(4), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862
What the IHP 505 Module 7 instructions ask for
Milestone Three in IHP 505 usually asks for an implementation plan for your microsystem improvement: the sequence of changes, how the team will coordinate, how changes will be tested, roles, timeline, measures and risks. Graduate milestones commonly run five to seven APA 7 pages. Base the sequence on evidence, include a coordination mechanism such as huddles, plan small tests with predictions and assign roles to team members rather than only to the manager. Define outcome, process and balancing measures and explain how you will respond if staff well-being suffers, since instructors expect leaders to protect their teams during change. IHP 505 graders notice clean headings in IHP 505 papers. IHP 505 names and dates need checking before IHP 505 submission.
How this IHP 505 Module 7 milestone three example is built
This milestone plans same-week access at a composite family medicine clinic. Murray and Berwick's advanced access sequence shapes three phases: preparing and reducing unnecessary visits, working down a backlog of about 1,100 appointments with paid volunteer sessions and opening 60% of slots until the same week. Provost and colleagues' research on huddles supports a ten-minute daily access huddle, and Taylor and colleagues' PDSA review shapes small tests with predictions, shown in a table. Roles span the team, measures include weekly third next available and staff well-being and risks such as overload have defined responses. IHP 505 students can reuse this structure for IHP 505 work. IHP 505 claims here trace to cited IHP 505 sources.
Where the IHP 505 Module 7 rubric puts the points
Implementation plans in IHP 505 are commonly judged on an evidence-based sequence, coordination mechanisms, small tests with predictions, shared roles, a realistic timeline, a balanced measure set, risk responses, scholarly support and APA 7. Strong plans follow the logic of the chosen model, involve front-line roles in design and include triggers for slowing down if staff suffer. Plans lose points when they launch everything at once, assign all work to the manager, omit balancing measures or ignore backlog reduction in access projects. A daily huddle with a visible measure board is often credited as practical microsystem leadership. IHP 505 marks favor careful formatting across IHP 505 sections. IHP 505 citations keep every IHP 505 argument credible.
IHP 505 Module 7 help: the mistakes that cost points
In IHP 505, Milestone Three often loses points for one-step rollouts, for missing tests of change, for roles concentrated in the manager and for no plan to protect staff. Another frequent weakness is forgetting to sustain the change after the project. Sequence changes by evidence, use a huddle, test small, share roles, measure and plan risk responses. If your improvement differs, such as reducing handoff errors, add its details to your IHP 505 notes so the plan fits it. IHP 505 drafts start well from a IHP 505 outline. IHP 505 feedback already received guides IHP 505 revisions.
Get IHP 505 Module 7 written to your instructions
Send the IHP 505 Milestone Three prompt and your improvement and evidence. The plan will set an evidence-based sequence, a daily coordination huddle, small tests with predictions, shared roles, measures and risk responses that protect staff, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More IHP 505 papers and related MS Healthcare Administration samples
- IHP 505 Module 1 Discussion: What a Clinical Microsystem Is
- IHP 505 Module 2 Microsystem Assessment Paper: A 5P Assessment of a Primary Care Clinic
- IHP 505 Module 3 Milestone One: An Access Problem Worth Fixing
- IHP 505 Module 4 Teamwork Paper: Teamwork and Relational Coordination in a Primary Care Clinic
- IHP 505 Module 5 Milestone Two: Evidence on Advanced Access and Team-Based Scheduling
- IHP 505 Module 6 Leadership Paper: Leadership That Frontline Staff Trust
- IHP 501 Module 2 Social Determinants Paper: Equity, Social Determinants and the Causes of the Causes
- IHP 435 Module 5 Six Sigma Short Paper: Six Sigma for Variable Laboratory Turnaround
- HCM 340 Module 2 Hospitals and Ambulatory Care Short Paper
- IHP 310 Module 7 Comorbidity Discussion
IHP 505 Module 7 questions, answered
Where can I find a free IHP 505 Module 7 Milestone Three sample?
The complete plan is on this page: implementing same-week access in a primary care clinic with a daily huddle, small tests and measures.
What is a huddle in health care?
A short, regular team meeting that reviews the day's work, surfaces problems early and strengthens coordination among roles.
Why work down the appointment backlog first?
Opening same-day slots without clearing the backlog just moves the wait; temporary extra capacity reduces it.
How do small tests of change work?
A change is tried on a small scale with a prediction, results are compared, and the change is adopted, adapted or abandoned before spreading.
How can leaders protect staff during access redesign?
Use volunteer, paid extra sessions, remove tasks as others are added and slow the pace if well-being measures fall.