IHP 600 Module 3 Milestone One Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This IHP 600 Module 3 Milestone One sample frames registered nurse turnover as an organizational problem rather than a personal one. It is written for SNHU IHP 600 (IHP-600), the MS Healthcare Administration course on social and organizational issues. The composite 310-bed hospital lost 187 of its 780 registered nurses last year, with first-year turnover at 38% and medical-surgical units worst affected. The milestone quantifies the problem by unit and tenure, estimates the cost at about $9.7 million, uses Hall and colleagues' review to connect staff burnout with patient safety and draws on Shanafelt and Noseworthy to argue that leaders, not individual nurses, own the conditions behind well-being. Aiken and colleagues' staffing research explains why workload sits inside the frame. The milestone closes with a scope, a measurable goal and the questions later milestones will answer.

CourseIHP 600 Social & Organizational Issues in Healthcare
ModuleModule 3
Paper typegraduate milestone framing an organizational problem
LengthAbout 1,030 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMS Healthcare Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for IHP 600 Module 3

1

Milestone One: Registered Nurse Turnover at Summit Valley Medical Center

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

IHP 600: Social and Organizational Issues in Healthcare

Module Three Milestone One

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names the problem and the organization, as a problem statement should.
2

Milestone One: Registered Nurse Turnover at Summit Valley Medical Center

The final project for this course analyzes a social or organizational issue inside a health care organization and recommends a response. This first milestone selects the issue, registered nurse turnover at Summit Valley Medical Center, and frames it: what is happening, how large the problem is, why it matters and where the analysis will focus.

What this page is doingThe introduction places the milestone within the final project.
3

Organizational Context

Summit Valley is a 310-bed nonprofit regional hospital serving a mixed rural and suburban county of about 240,000 people. It employs roughly 780 registered nurses across nine inpatient units, the emergency department and procedural areas. It is the only hospital within 40 miles offering cardiac catheterization and a level III trauma center, so staffing shortfalls affect the whole region rather than a single facility.

What this page is doingThe organization is described so the reader can judge the stakes.
4

Problem Statement

In the most recent fiscal year, 187 registered nurses left Summit Valley, a turnover rate of 24%, up from 15% three years earlier. The loss is concentrated among newer nurses and on medical-surgical units, and it is being filled with costly agency staff and mandatory overtime that further strain those who remain. Unless the hospital addresses the working conditions and culture driving departures, turnover is likely to keep rising and to affect patient safety.

What this page is doingThe problem statement is specific, measured and time-bound.
5

Where Turnover Is Concentrated

Hospital-wide figures hide important variation. Nurses in their first year left at a rate of 38%, compared with 17% among those with more than five years of service. Medical-surgical units lost 31% of their nurses, while the ICU lost 14%. Night shift turnover exceeded day shift by 9 percentage points. These patterns point toward specific working conditions rather than a general labor market effect that would touch every unit equally.

Table 1. Registered Nurse Turnover by Group, Last Fiscal Year

GroupNurses at startDeparturesTurnover
First-year nurses1304938%
One to five years2908429%
More than five years3605415%
All registered nurses78018724%

Note. Composite figures from human resources records.

What this page is doingVariation by tenure, unit and shift sharpens the frame.
6

What Turnover Costs

Summit Valley's finance office puts each nurse departure at about $52,000 once recruitment, orientation, lost productivity and temporary coverage are counted. At 187 departures, that is roughly $9.7 million a year. Agency staffing alone cost $9.2 million, much of it at rates about double the hourly cost of employed nurses. Overtime rose 34% in two years. For a hospital operating on a margin of about 1.5%, these costs threaten investment in equipment and services.

What this page is doingThe financial scale of the problem is estimated.
7

Why It Matters for Patients

Hall et al. (2016) systematically reviewed studies of health care staff well-being and patient safety and found that poor well-being and moderate to high burnout were associated with poorer patient safety outcomes, such as errors, in most of the studies they examined. Turnover and burnout are linked; nurses who leave often cite exhaustion, and those who stay absorb heavier assignments. At Summit Valley, medication events reported on medical-surgical units rose 22% over the same period, though reporting practices may also have changed.

What this page is doingThe link to patient safety is established with evidence.
8

Why Workload Belongs in the Frame

A common response to turnover is to raise sign-on bonuses. Yet in exit interviews only 18 of 97 departing nurses named pay as their main reason. Research on staffing points elsewhere: Aiken et al. (2002) reported that nurses caring for more patients each were more likely to be burned out and dissatisfied with their jobs, conditions that precede leaving. On Summit Valley's medical-surgical units, nurses commonly carry six or seven patients on day shift, compared with four or five on units with lower turnover.

What this page is doingStaffing research shows why pay alone is the wrong frame.
9

An Organizational, Not Individual, Problem

The hospital's current response is a resilience workshop offered to new graduates. Shanafelt and Noseworthy (2017) argued that burnout is largely driven by organizational factors, such as workload, inefficiency, lack of control and loss of meaning, and that leaders therefore carry responsibility for reducing it. They proposed strategies ranging from acknowledging the problem and measuring it to developing leaders and redesigning work. Framing turnover as an organizational problem shifts attention from fixing nurses to fixing the conditions in which they work.

What this page is doingThe frame is justified by research on leadership responsibility.
10

What Has Been Tried

The hospital has responded in three ways so far. Sign-on bonuses of $10,000 were introduced eighteen months ago and did raise applications, but first-year departures rose over the same period, suggesting the bonus attracted nurses without keeping them. A resilience workshop for new graduates had 62% attendance and positive evaluations, yet the units those graduates joined saw no change in turnover. Agency contracts filled gaps quickly but created resentment when agency nurses earned more for the same shift. Each response treated a symptom rather than the conditions behind departures.

What this page is doingEarlier responses and their results show why a new frame is needed.
11

Data Sources and Their Quality

The figures in this milestone come from human resources separation records, finance reports on agency and overtime spending, the annual staff survey and coded exit interviews. Separation records are reliable for counts but classify reasons loosely, so exit interviews are used for motives. Survey data are self-reported and limited by a 59% response rate. Later milestones will add interviews with unit managers and a review of scheduling data.

What this page is doingThe quality of each data source is judged.
12

Scope of the Analysis

The project will focus on registered nurses in inpatient units, where turnover is highest and data are most complete. It will not address physician or support staff turnover, although those issues interact with nursing. Pay structures will be considered only as they compare with regional markets, since the organization's financial position limits large wage increases.

What this page is doingScope boundaries are stated and explained.
13

Goal and Measures

The overall goal is to reduce registered nurse turnover from 24% to 16% within two years, with first-year turnover falling below 25%. Supporting measures will include unit-level turnover, agency hours, overtime, staff survey scores on workload and speaking up and reported medication events.

What this page is doingA measurable goal anchors the rest of the project.
14

Questions for Later Milestones

Three questions will guide the rest of the project. What are the root causes of turnover, especially on medical-surgical units and among new nurses? Which stakeholders hold influence over staffing, scheduling and culture, and where do their interests diverge? What combination of changes, and what implementation approach, is most likely to reduce turnover within the hospital's constraints?

What this page is doingThe next steps are set out as questions.
15

Conclusion

Registered nurse turnover at Summit Valley is large, costly, concentrated among newer nurses and on specific units and linked to patient safety. It is best understood as a product of working conditions and culture rather than individual shortcomings, which makes it a problem the organization can act on.

What this page is doingThe conclusion restates the framed problem.
16

References

Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J., & Silber, J. H. (2002). Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA, 288(16), 1987-1993. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.16.1987

Hall, L. H., Johnson, J., Watt, I., Tsipa, A., & O'Connor, D. B. (2016). Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 11(7), Article e0159015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159015

Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017). Executive leadership and physician well-being: Nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004

What the IHP 600 Module 3 instructions ask for

Milestone One in IHP 600 generally asks you to choose a social or organizational issue in a health care organization and frame it clearly: context, a specific problem statement, evidence of size and impact, scope and the questions your final project will address. A typical length is three to five APA 7 pages. Use the organization's own data where you can, break the problem down by group or unit, estimate costs and connect the issue to patient or community outcomes with scholarly evidence. Set a measurable goal and state what you will and will not cover. IHP 600 graders notice clean headings in IHP 600 papers. IHP 600 names and dates need checking before IHP 600 submission. IHP 600 prompts vary by term, so recheck IHP 600 directions.

How this IHP 600 Module 3 milestone one example is built

This milestone frames registered nurse turnover at a composite 310-bed hospital. A table breaks 187 departures down by tenure, showing first-year turnover at 38%, and further figures compare units and shifts. Costs are estimated at about $9.7 million. Hall and colleagues' review links burnout to patient safety, Aiken and colleagues show why workload belongs in the frame and Shanafelt and Noseworthy support treating well-being as a leadership responsibility. A two-year goal of 16% turnover, a defined scope and three guiding questions close the milestone. IHP 600 students can reuse this structure for IHP 600 work. IHP 600 claims here trace to cited IHP 600 sources. IHP 600 readers can adapt each section to IHP 600 data.

Where the IHP 600 Module 3 rubric puts the points

Problem-framing milestones in this course are usually judged on a clearly identified issue, a specific and measurable problem statement, relevant organizational context, evidence of the problem's size and impact, appropriate scope, links to scholarly research and APA 7. Higher marks go to milestones that break data down to show where the problem is concentrated and that frame the issue in organizational rather than individual terms. Marks drop when the problem is vague, when national statistics replace local data or when the scope is too broad to analyze in one project. IHP 600 marks favor careful formatting across IHP 600 sections. IHP 600 citations keep every IHP 600 argument credible. IHP 600 instructors weigh evidence heavily in IHP 600 grading.

IHP 600 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points

In IHP 600, Milestone One drafts often lose points for choosing a topic too broad to analyze, for relying on national figures with no local data and for writing a problem statement that already assumes the solution. A second weak spot is framing a workforce issue as a personal failing. Pick one issue in one organization, measure it, show where it is concentrated, connect it to outcomes and set clear scope and goals. Share your organization's details and the IHP 600 prompt so the framing fits your project. IHP 600 drafts start well from a IHP 600 outline. IHP 600 feedback already received guides IHP 600 revisions. IHP 600 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify IHP 600 expectations.

Get IHP 600 Module 3 written to your instructions

Send the IHP 600 Milestone One prompt and details of the issue you have in mind. The milestone will describe the context, write a measured problem statement, estimate costs, link the issue to outcomes and set scope and goals, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More IHP 600 papers and related MS Healthcare Administration samples

IHP 600 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free IHP 600 Module 3 Milestone One sample?

IHP 600 Module 3 is written out here as a problem statement on registered nurse turnover with data by tenure and unit, costs, scope and a measurable goal.

What is a good topic for the IHP 600 final project?

A specific issue in one organization you know, such as turnover, burnout, a failed rollout or poor communication between departments.

How do I write a strong problem statement?

Say what is happening, where, how much and since when, and why it matters, without assuming the solution.

Why frame turnover as an organizational problem?

Research links burnout and departures to workload, control and leadership, which the organization controls more than individuals do.

Should I include costs in Milestone One?

Yes, a reasoned estimate shows the size of the problem and helps justify later recommendations.