| Course | NUR 302 Clinical Judgment and Holistic Assessment in Nursing |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 7 |
| Paper type | Holistic plan of care paper |
| Length | About 1,150 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | RN to BSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 302 Module 7
Discharged to Where? A Holistic Plan of Care for Alcohol-Related Acute Pancreatitis in a Man Without Stable Housing
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 302: Clinical Judgment and Holistic Assessment in Nursing
Project Two
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Discharged to Where? A Holistic Plan of Care for Alcohol-Related Acute Pancreatitis in a Man Without Stable Housing
A plan of care for acute pancreatitis can be written almost entirely from a guideline: fluids, pain control, early feeding and monitoring for complications. That plan would be correct and would still fail Mr. T., because the conditions that brought him to the hospital are waiting for him in the parking lot. This paper presents a holistic plan of care for a composite patient, Mr. T., built from a full assessment of his physical, psychological and social situation. The plan argues that his second admission will not be his last unless the care team treats his drinking and his lack of housing as clinical problems with the same structure of goals, interventions and evaluation as his pancreas.
Assessment Summary
Mr. T. is a 46-year-old man admitted through the emergency department with severe epigastric pain radiating to his back, nausea and vomiting. His lipase was more than five times the upper limit of normal, and imaging confirmed acute pancreatitis without necrosis. This is his second episode in 14 months. He reports drinking eight to ten beers a day for several years, with his last drink the evening before admission. His AUDIT-C score was 11 of 12, well above the threshold that suggests hazardous drinking (Bush et al., 1998). On admission his heart rate was 112, blood pressure 104/68 and pain 8 of 10.
His social assessment explains the timing of both admissions. He works day labor on construction crews when work is available. He was evicted two months ago after falling behind on rent and has slept in his car since. He has no primary care provider, no health insurance and a sister in the same city with whom he has a strained relationship. He said he drinks to sleep in the car and to manage pain in his back from work. He wants to keep working and is worried about losing his place in the hiring line if he stays in the hospital long. Strengths include his work history, his clear wish to avoid a third admission and his willingness to talk openly about his drinking.
Prioritized Problems and Goals
Four problems were identified and ranked by immediate risk. Table 1 summarizes them with measurable goals.
Table 1
Prioritized Problems and Goals for Mr. T.
| Priority | Problem | Goal | Time frame |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acute pain and fluid volume deficit related to pancreatic inflammation | Pain at or below 4 of 10 on oral medication; heart rate under 100; tolerating oral diet | 48 to 72 hours |
| 2 | Risk of alcohol withdrawal | Withdrawal recognized early and treated per protocol; no seizure or delirium | First 5 days |
| 3 | Hazardous alcohol use | Patient states a personal drinking goal and accepts a treatment referral | Before discharge |
| 4 | No stable housing and no source of follow-up care | Discharge to a safe setting with a scheduled follow-up visit | Before discharge |
Note. Mr. T. is a composite patient. Goals are written so they can be evaluated by the nurse or the discharge team.
Problem 1: Pain, Fluids and Early Feeding
The American College of Gastroenterology guideline emphasizes early, goal-directed management in acute pancreatitis, including fluid resuscitation that is monitored rather than open-ended and early oral feeding as tolerated instead of prolonged fasting (Tenner et al., 2024). Nursing interventions follow that direction. The nurse assesses pain with a numeric scale every two to four hours and after each dose, gives prescribed analgesics on a schedule during the first day rather than waiting for pain to peak, and records intake, output, heart rate and blood pressure to show whether fluids are restoring volume. The nurse also watches for signs of fluid overload, such as rising respiratory rate or new crackles, because more fluid is not always better. Once nausea settles and pain is improving, the nurse offers a low-fat oral diet and documents tolerance, rather than keeping him on nothing by mouth out of habit.
Problem 2: Withdrawal Risk
With heavy daily drinking and a last drink the evening before admission, Mr. T. is at risk of withdrawal during the first several days. The nurse scores withdrawal with the CIWA-Ar, the revised scale published by Sullivan et al. (1989), whose ten items include tremor, sweating, anxiety, agitation and disturbances of perception, and repeats it as often as the unit protocol requires. Scores guide symptom-triggered treatment ordered by the provider. The nurse also keeps the environment calm and well lit, reorients him if confusion appears, and reports any rise in heart rate or blood pressure that pain alone does not explain. Asking him directly about past withdrawal, including seizures, belongs on the first shift, because a prior history raises the level of vigilance.
Problem 3: Hazardous Alcohol Use
The admission is a moment when Mr. T. is willing to talk about drinking, and the plan uses it. The nurse shares his AUDIT-C result and the link between alcohol and both of his pancreatitis episodes in plain language, without lecturing, and asks what he thinks about it. Because he drinks partly to sleep in his car and to manage back pain, the conversation addresses those reasons directly rather than treating drinking as a moral issue. With his agreement, the nurse requests an addiction medicine or social work consultation so he can hear what help exists: a medicine the provider may prescribe to reduce craving, and outpatient or community programs he could reach without a fixed address. Evaluation is his own stated goal, written in his words in the chart, and whether he accepts a referral before discharge.
Problem 4: Housing and Follow-Up
A discharge back to his car would expose Mr. T. to cold nights, poor food, no place to recover and the same drinking pattern. The nurse begins discharge planning on the first day by referring him to social work and case management. Options include a medical respite program, which offers short-term recovery care for people without housing who are too ill for a shelter but no longer need a hospital bed. A systematic review by Doran et al. (2013) found that medical respite programs reduced later hospital admissions, inpatient days and readmissions and improved housing outcomes, although the studies varied in quality. The team also explores whether his sister could offer short-term shelter, helps him apply for Medicaid coverage and schedules a follow-up visit at a community health center before he leaves. The goal is met if he leaves to a safe setting with an appointment on paper.
Evaluation
By day three, Mr. T.'s pain was controlled at 3 of 10 on oral medication, his heart rate was 88 and he was eating a low-fat diet without vomiting. His CIWA-Ar scores peaked at a moderate level on day two and responded to symptom-triggered treatment. He set a goal of stopping drinking for three months and accepted an outpatient treatment referral. He was discharged to a medical respite bed with a primary care appointment ten days later. The plan will be judged again at that visit, when readmission, drinking and housing can be reassessed together.
References
Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789-1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789
Doran, K. M., Ragins, K. T., Gross, C. P., & Zerger, S. (2013). Medical respite programs for homeless patients: A systematic review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24(2), 499-524. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2013.0053
Sullivan, J. T., Sykora, K., Schneiderman, J., Naranjo, C. A., & Sellers, E. M. (1989). Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: The revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar). British Journal of Addiction, 84(11), 1353-1357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00737.x
Tenner, S., Vege, S. S., Sheth, S. G., Sauer, B., Yang, A., Conwell, D. L., Yadlapati, R. H., & Gardner, T. B. (2024). American College of Gastroenterology guidelines: Management of acute pancreatitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 119(3), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645
What the NUR 302 Module 7 instructions ask for
Project Two in NUR 302 generally asks for a written holistic plan of care for one patient, often a case provided in the course, due near the end of the term. The instructions typically call for a summary of assessment findings across physical, psychological, cultural and social domains, a set of prioritized problems or nursing diagnoses, measurable goals, evidence-based interventions with rationales, and an evaluation plan. Many versions also ask you to show how social determinants of health shape the plan. Expect four to six pages in APA 7, with a table often allowed for the problem and goal list. The rubric usually rewards a plan in which each intervention can be traced to an assessment finding.
How this NUR 302 Module 7 project two plan of care example is built
The example opens with an assessment summary that treats social data as seriously as laboratory values, then presents four problems ranked by immediate risk in an APA table with measurable goals and time frames. Each problem then gets its own section with interventions and rationales: pain, fluids and early feeding supported by the current gastroenterology guideline; withdrawal monitoring with the CIWA-Ar; a respectful conversation about drinking that addresses his reasons for it; and discharge planning that includes a medical respite referral supported by a systematic review. The evaluation section returns to every goal in the table. Mr. T. is a composite patient, and all four references are real.
Where the NUR 302 Module 7 rubric puts the points
Project Two rubrics usually assess the holistic assessment, the prioritization of problems, the quality of goals, the evidence behind interventions, the evaluation plan and APA mechanics. Prioritization and evidence-based interventions tend to carry the most points. Graders look for goals that are specific and measurable, interventions that include a rationale and a citation where one is needed, and a clear link from each social determinant to an action in the plan. An evaluation section that returns to each goal and states whether it was met often decides whether a paper reaches the highest level. Consistent APA formatting of the table, headings and references is expected throughout.
NUR 302 Module 7 help: the mistakes that cost points
The usual weakness in Project Two is a plan in which the social problems appear in the assessment and then disappear, so the interventions address only the medical diagnosis. Another is a list of generic interventions, such as monitor vital signs, that could apply to any patient and carry no rationale. Goals written as intentions rather than outcomes also lose points. Some students prioritize by the order the case mentioned the problems instead of by risk. Before submitting, read each intervention and ask which finding it answers and which goal it moves; if you cannot name both, revise it or cut it. A plan with fewer, better-linked interventions nearly always scores higher.
Get NUR 302 Module 7 written to your instructions
Send the Project Two case from your course or the patient you have chosen, along with the instructions and rubric. The plan of care comes back written to that case in 24 to 48 hours, and your first sample from us costs nothing. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 302 papers and related RN to BSN samples
- NUR 302 Module 1 Concept Map: Asthma, Shift Work and a Rationed Inhaler
- NUR 302 Module 2 Holistic Assessment Short Paper: Living Alone With New Parkinson Disease
- NUR 302 Module 3 Cultural Assessment Short Paper: A Bosnian American Woman With New Hypertension
- NUR 302 Module 4 Project One Presentation: Energy Insecurity as a Social Determinant
- NUR 302 Module 5 Clinical Judgment Analysis: A Headache Three Days After a Fall on Warfarin
- NUR 302 Module 6 Simulation Reflection: A Resident With Dementia Who Refused Evening Care
- NUR 302 Module 8 Journal: What the Word Noncompliant Hid
- NUR 305 Module 3 Short Paper
- NUR 490 Module 8 Reflection Discussion
- NUR 400 Module 5 Short Paper
- NUR 300 Module 3 Short Paper
NUR 302 Module 7 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 302 Module 7 Project Two plan of care sample?
This page contains the full paper free: a holistic plan of care for a man with alcohol-related acute pancreatitis and no stable housing, with a prioritized problem table, rationales, evaluation, margin notes and APA references. Other cases can be written on request.
Do I need nursing diagnoses in NUR 302 Project Two?
Follow the instructions. Some sections ask for formal nursing diagnoses and others accept prioritized problems in plain language. Either way, each problem should be supported by assessment findings and linked to a measurable goal.
How do I include social determinants of health in the plan of care?
Treat each relevant determinant as a problem or as a factor in a problem, then give it goals and interventions like any clinical issue. Housing, cost of medications and transportation to follow-up often belong in the discharge section.
Can I use a table in the Project Two paper?
Yes, in most sections. A table works well for problems, goals and time frames, as long as it is labeled and formatted in APA 7 and the paper still explains the reasoning in full sentences.
How long should Project Two be?
Many sections set a range of about four to six pages, excluding the title page and references. Spend most of the space on interventions and rationales, since that is where the rubric places most of its points.