NUR 302 Module 1 Concept Map Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 302 Module 1 concept map sample shows how one patient's health perceptions connect to the conditions of his daily life, written out in full with the map, the explanation and APA 7 references. It was built for SNHU NUR 302, Clinical Judgment and Holistic Assessment in Nursing, the RN to BSN course that students also search as NUR-302. The patient is a composite: a 52-year-old line cook with persistent asthma who rations his controller inhaler, works through symptoms because a missed shift is unpaid, and believes asthma only exists when he is wheezing. The map places each belief and each social condition as a node, draws the links a nurse would act on, and ends with the two nursing priorities those links point to. Margin notes explain why each part earns its marks.

CourseNUR 302 Clinical Judgment and Holistic Assessment in Nursing
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeConcept map with written explanation
LengthAbout 1,350 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramRN to BSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 302 Module 1

1

Asthma on the Line: A Concept Map of Health Beliefs, Shift Work and a Rationed Inhaler

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 302: Clinical Judgment and Holistic Assessment in Nursing

Module One Concept Map

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names the condition, the setting and the specific behavior the map explains. A reader knows before page two that this map is about one person's choices, not asthma in general, which is what the Module 1 prompt asks for.
2

Asthma on the Line: A Concept Map of Health Beliefs, Shift Work and a Rationed Inhaler

Asthma control is usually discussed in terms of inhaler technique, triggers and step therapy. Those matter, but they describe the disease rather than the person who has to manage it between visits. This paper presents a concept map for a composite patient, Mr. R., a 52-year-old line cook with persistent asthma, and explains how his beliefs about the illness interact with the conditions of his work and income. The map argues that Mr. R.'s poor control is not a knowledge problem: he can describe his medications correctly, yet two beliefs and two social conditions combine to keep his controller inhaler in a drawer.

Mr. R. walked into urgent care early on a Monday with two days of chest tightness, a nighttime cough and wheezing. By his own count, the albuterol inhaler had been in use eight to ten times daily through most of the prior week. His prescribed inhaled corticosteroid, a daily controller, had last been refilled four months earlier for a 30-day supply. Oxygen saturation was 94% on room air, respiratory rate 24, and he could speak in full sentences. He said he had come in only because he could not get through Saturday's dinner service.

What this page is doingThe introduction states the claim the map will prove, then gives only the clinical data the map needs. Concept map papers lose points when the scenario is retold in full; here every number reappears as a node.
3

The Concept Map

The map is organized around a central node, uncontrolled persistent asthma, with four clusters branching from it: health perceptions, work, economic stability and access to care. Arrows show influence, and the label on each arrow states the relationship in plain language. Table 1 presents the map in text form so each link can be read and checked.

Table 1

Concept Map for Mr. R. Presented as Nodes and Links

NodeAssessment dataLinked toRelationship
Belief: asthma is episodic"I only have asthma when it flares up"Controller inhaler useStops the controller once symptoms settle
Belief: steroids are harmfulWorries daily steroids will "weaken" his lungsController inhaler useAdds a second reason to skip doses
Shift work without paid sick leaveSix dinner shifts a week, unpaid if absentDelayed careWaits until symptoms threaten a shift
Kitchen exposureGrill smoke, fryer vapor, cleaning spraysSymptom burdenDaily trigger he cannot avoid at work
High-deductible planController costs about $65 a month before deductibleController inhaler useRefills stretched or skipped
No usual source of careLast primary care visit three years agoUrgent care useTreatment is episodic, like his belief
Rescue inhaler overuseAlbuterol 8 to 10 times a dayExacerbation riskMarker of poor control, not a solution

Note. Mr. R. is a composite patient. Costs and schedule are illustrative. Arrows in the drawn map run from the node in the first column to the node in the third.

What this page is doingPresenting the map as a table keeps every link readable in an APA paper and lets the grader check each relationship against the data. The final column is the part most students leave out: it names what the link does.
4

Health Perceptions

Two beliefs sit at the top of the map because every other cluster runs through them. The first is what Halm et al. (2006) called the no symptoms, no asthma belief: the idea that asthma is present only during attacks. In their cohort of 198 adults hospitalized for asthma at an inner-city hospital, 53% held this belief, and it was associated with about one-third lower odds of using inhaled corticosteroids when patients felt well. Men and people without a usual place of care were more likely to hold it. Mr. R. fits both descriptions, and his statement at triage, that he only has asthma when it flares, is almost word for word the question those authors proposed for screening.

The second belief concerns the medicine itself. Horne and Weinman (2002) found that adults with asthma weigh their sense of how necessary a preventer is against their concerns about it, and that doubts about necessity together with worries about long-term harm predicted skipped doses. Mr. R. has both: he does not see the need for a daily medicine when he feels fine, and he believes steroids will weaken his lungs over time. On the map, both beliefs point to the same node, controller inhaler use, which shows why teaching technique alone would not change his behavior.

What this page is doingEach belief is supported by a study whose findings are reported accurately, including the sample and the direction of the association. The paragraph then returns to the patient's own words, which is what separates a concept map explanation from a literature summary.
5

Work and Economic Stability

The work cluster explains timing. Mr. R. works six dinner shifts a week, and a missed shift is unpaid. He described a week of worsening symptoms during which he chose to keep working, and he sought care only when he could no longer get through a service. That pattern connects the work node to the delayed care node, and delayed care connects back to the central node because each exacerbation that is allowed to build is harder to reverse. The kitchen itself is a second link from this cluster. Grill smoke, fryer vapor and cleaning products are daily irritants he cannot avoid, so his symptom burden is higher on workdays regardless of what he does at home.

The economic cluster explains the gap in refills. His employer plan carries a high deductible, and the controller inhaler costs him about $65 a month until the deductible is met. Xia et al. (2023) analyzed National Health Interview Survey data from 2013 to 2020 and found that about one in six U.S. adults with asthma reported cost-related nonadherence in the previous year, including skipping doses, taking less medication or delaying a refill to save money. Lower income and lack of insurance were among the characteristics linked to higher rates. For Mr. R., cost does not act alone. It reinforces the belief that the controller is optional, which is why the map shows two arrows arriving at the same behavior from different directions.

What this page is doingSocial determinants are tied to specific findings: the unpaid shift explains the timing of the visit, and the deductible explains the refill history. The Healthy People 2030 domains are applied, not listed.
6

Access to Care

The final cluster shows why the pattern has lasted. Mr. R. has no primary care provider and has not had a routine visit in three years. Urgent care treats each exacerbation, often with a short course of oral steroids and a new albuterol prescription, and then the episode ends. Healthy People 2030 lists health care access and quality as one of five domains of social determinants, alongside economic stability and neighborhood and built environment (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS], n.d.). On the map, episodic care links back to the episodic belief: each visit that treats only the flare confirms, from the patient's point of view, that asthma is something that happens and then goes away. Current international guidance treats heavy reliance on a short-acting reliever as a marker of poor control and higher exacerbation risk (Global Initiative for Asthma, 2024), which makes the albuterol count the most urgent piece of assessment data on the page.

What this page is doingThe loop between episodic care and the episodic belief is the insight a Distinguished map shows. Graders look for at least one link that runs back toward the center rather than only outward.
7

Nursing Priorities From the Map

Reading the map from the edges toward the center produces two nursing priorities. The first is to address the belief before the prescription. A single question, whether he thinks he has asthma all of the time or only when he has symptoms, opens a conversation about airway inflammation that continues between attacks. Pairing that explanation with his own data, eight to ten rescue puffs a day, shows him that his lungs are telling him the disease is present even on days he feels well enough to work. Teaching that respects his concern about steroids, by explaining the low dose that reaches the lungs, is more likely to change behavior than repeating the instruction to use the inhaler every day.

The second priority is to remove the cost barrier and connect him to ongoing care. The nurse can ask the provider about a lower-cost controller option or a manufacturer assistance program, and can refer him to a community health center with sliding-scale fees so that asthma is managed between flares rather than during them. A written action plan that fits a dinner shift, with a clear point at which to call rather than wait for Saturday, links the work cluster to the plan. Success can be measured at a follow-up visit two weeks later by fewer rescue puffs per day, a controller refill on time and a scheduled primary care appointment.

What this page is doingBoth priorities trace back to named nodes and forward to measurable outcomes. This is where the rubric's clinical judgment criterion is scored, so the paper spends real space here.
8

Conclusion

Mr. R.'s asthma looks like a nonadherence problem only if the assessment stops at the medication list. The concept map shows that two beliefs, one about the illness and one about the treatment, meet two social conditions, unpaid time off and the cost of a controller, and that episodic care keeps the whole system in place. A holistic assessment makes that structure visible, and it points the nurse toward interventions aimed at the connections rather than the symptoms.

What this page is doingThe conclusion restates the argument from the introduction in light of the map. It adds no new data, which is what a concluding paragraph in APA style should do.
9

References

Global Initiative for Asthma. (2024). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. https://ginasthma.org/reports/

Halm, E. A., Mora, P., & Leventhal, H. (2006). No symptoms, no asthma: The acute episodic disease belief is associated with poor self-management among inner-city adults with persistent asthma. Chest, 129(3), 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.3.573

Horne, R., & Weinman, J. (2002). Self-regulation and self-management in asthma: Exploring the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in explaining non-adherence to preventer medication. Psychology & Health, 17(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440290001502

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Social determinants of health. Healthy People 2030. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health

Xia, T., Qiu, H., Yu, B., Bi, J., Gu, X., Wang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Cost-related medication nonadherence in US adults with asthma: The National Health Interview Survey, 2013-2020. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 131(5), 606-613.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.07.013

What the NUR 302 Module 1 instructions ask for

The NUR 302 Module 1 concept map asks you to take one patient and show, visually and in writing, how that person's health perceptions connect to the conditions of daily life. Most versions of the prompt want a central problem, the beliefs the patient holds about health and illness, and the social determinants that shape those beliefs, followed by a short written explanation of the links. Some sections supply a scenario and others let you use a patient you remember, stripped of identifiers. Expect to submit the map itself, either drawn or built in a template, together with two to four pages of APA-formatted explanation and at least three scholarly sources. The instructions often ask you to close with nursing priorities, which is where the clinical judgment thread of the course starts.

How this NUR 302 Module 1 concept map example is built

This example is built from the center outward. The central node is uncontrolled persistent asthma, and four clusters branch from it: health perceptions, work, economic stability and access to care. Because a drawn map cannot carry citations or long labels, the paper presents the map as an APA table with four columns: node, assessment data, linked node and the relationship the arrow represents. The written sections then take the clusters one at a time and support each link with a study reported accurately, including its sample and its finding. The last section turns the links into two priorities with outcomes that could be measured two weeks later. The patient is a composite, and the costs and schedule are illustrative.

Where the NUR 302 Module 1 rubric puts the points

The Module 1 rubric at SNHU usually weighs three things: whether the map identifies relevant health perceptions and determinants, whether the relationships between them are explained rather than merely drawn, and whether the paper meets APA and writing expectations. The middle criterion carries the most weight in practice, because a map with many nodes and unlabeled arrows shows collection without analysis. To reach the top rating, each arrow needs a stated relationship and at least one link should run back toward the center, showing how the system sustains itself. Sources should be scholarly and current enough for the course, with every in-text citation matched to a reference entry.

NUR 302 Module 1 help: the mistakes that cost points

The first common mistake is building a map of asthma rather than a map of the patient, full of pathophysiology and textbook triggers that could belong to anyone. Another is listing social determinants as a separate branch with no arrows into the behaviors they affect. A third is writing the explanation as a summary of the map, node by node, without ever saying which connection matters most. Students also lose points for reporting a study's finding loosely, such as calling an association a cause. Before submitting, pick one arrow and ask whether a reader could tell from your paper exactly what it means and what evidence supports it. If you cannot answer quickly, the link needs another sentence.

Get NUR 302 Module 1 written to your instructions

Send your Module 1 instructions, the patient scenario your section assigned or the one you plan to use, and the rubric. A concept map and explanation written to those instructions comes back in 24 to 48 hours, and your first sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 302 papers and related RN to BSN samples

NUR 302 Module 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 302 Module 1 concept map sample paper?

The full example on this page is free to read: a concept map for a line cook with persistent asthma, presented as an APA table with a written explanation, nursing priorities and five references. If your prompt uses a different patient or template, you can request a custom sample written to your own instructions.

Can I submit my NUR 302 concept map as a table instead of a drawing?

Check your instructions first. Many sections accept any format that shows nodes and labeled links, and a table works well inside an APA paper. If the prompt asks for a drawn map, build it in the template or a free diagram tool and keep the written explanation as the place where the relationships are argued.

How many nodes should a NUR 302 Module 1 concept map have?

Fewer than most students think. Eight to twelve nodes that are each linked to a finding and to another node read better than twenty loosely connected boxes. The grade depends on the relationships you explain, not the number of items on the page.

Which social determinants should I include in the NUR 302 concept map?

Only the ones your patient's data supports. Healthy People 2030 groups them into five domains, and a strong map usually draws on two or three of them, each tied to a specific behavior or outcome. A determinant with no arrow into the patient's health adds length without adding points.

Do I need scholarly sources for a Module 1 concept map?

Yes, in most sections. Use them to support the links rather than to define terms: a study showing that a belief predicts skipped doses, for example, strengthens the arrow between that belief and the behavior. Three to five current sources are typical.