NUR 306 Module 7 Project Two Community Intervention Proposal Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 306 Module 7 Project Two sample is a full community intervention proposal that turns a vulnerable population profile into a funded, staffed and measurable program. It completes the Project Two assignment in SNHU NUR 306, Nursing in the Community, an RN to BSN course numbered NUR-306 in the SNHU catalog. It targets the captains and sternmen who fish from a composite Maine harbor, and the problem is drowning after a fall overboard, where national data show no victim wearing flotation. The proposal combines three parts: a loaner program that puts modern work life jackets on every boat for a season, man-overboard recovery drills run by the harbor master, and a peer-led message campaign. It sets objectives, names partners and costs, maps each component onto a level of the Intervention Wheel and plans evaluation with the RE-AIM framework.

CourseNUR 306 Nursing in the Community
ModuleModule 7
Paper typeCommunity health intervention proposal
LengthAbout 1,130 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramRN to BSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 306 Module 7

1

Project Two: Float, Drill, Talk, a Community Intervention to Prevent Drowning Among Pell Harbor Lobster Crews

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 306: Nursing in the Community

Project Two

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe three-word program name makes the intervention memorable for the partners, and the subtitle states the goal and population exactly.
2

Project Two: Float, Drill, Talk, a Community Intervention to Prevent Drowning Among Pell Harbor Lobster Crews

The Project One profile of Pell Harbor's lobster crews identified drowning after a fall overboard as the priority problem: no other risk on the list kills as quickly, and the behavior that protects against it is almost never seen on deck. In the federal review of the 17 years from 2000 through 2016, not one of the 204 victims of fatal falls had flotation on, close to half fished alone at the time, and the bodies of most were never found (Case et al., 2018). This proposal describes Float, Drill, Talk, a one-season community intervention built with the harbor association that removes the main barriers to wearing flotation, trains crews to recover someone who goes over, and uses respected local voices to change what is normal on deck. The town, partners and costs are composites.

What this page is doingThe introduction connects Project Two to Project One, restates the problem with precise data and summarizes the intervention in one sentence. That continuity is a common rubric requirement.
3

Goal and Objectives

The goal is to reduce the risk of drowning among Pell Harbor lobster crews by increasing the use of flotation on deck and the ability to recover a person from the water. By the end of the season, the program aims to: (1) place a work-style life jacket on at least 80% of the harbor's active boats through the loaner program; (2) have at least 60% of boats complete one man-overboard recovery drill with the harbor master; (3) raise observed flotation use on deck, measured by dockside counts, from the baseline measured in the spring to at least 40% of crew members observed; and (4) keep at least three quarters of loaned jackets in use through the end of the season, measured by a fall return survey.

What this page is doingObjectives are specific, measurable and time-limited, and the behavioral target is realistic for one season. Graders often penalize objectives that promise zero deaths.
4

Intervention Components

Float is the loaner program. The harbor association will lend each participating boat two modern work life jackets, chosen after crews tried several designs at the spring teaching session, with a choice between inflatable belt packs, suspender-style inflatables and low-profile foam vests. Crews keep them for the season and may buy them at a reduced price in the fall. Removing cost and letting crews choose a style that does not snag on lines addresses the two barriers crew members named most often.

Drill is the recovery training. The harbor master and the fire department's water rescue team will run a 30-minute man-overboard drill on each boat at its mooring, practicing how to stop the boat, throw a flotation device, bring a person alongside and get them back aboard with the equipment the boat actually carries. Boats that fish alone will be shown reboarding ladders and tether options.

Talk is the message campaign. Following the approach of a federal social marketing study in which a culturally matched fictional spokesman spoke to common barriers and misconceptions, after which fishermen reported wearing flotation more often (Teske et al., 2022), the campaign will use real Pell Harbor captains who wear flotation, photographed on their own boats, on posters at the cooperative, fuel dock and bait shop and in short videos on the association's social media page.

What this page is doingEach component is described specifically enough to run, and each is tied to a barrier identified earlier or to evidence. This is where Project Two papers earn most of their points.
5

Levels of Intervention

The components span the three levels of the Public Health Intervention Wheel (Keller et al., 2004). At the individual level, crew members receive health teaching and hands-on fitting. At the community level, the loaner program, drills and campaign reach the whole harbor, using outreach and social marketing. At the systems level, the association will vote on whether to add flotation on deck to its voluntary safety standard for members next year, and the nurse will work with the harbor committee to install a reboarding ladder at the public float. Working at all three levels matters because a behavior like wearing flotation depends on individual choice, on what peers do and on the rules a community sets for itself.

What this page is doingThe Intervention Wheel is used to show the program's reach across levels, including a policy step. Many proposals operate only at the individual level, which limits their score.
6

Partners, Roles and Budget

The harbor association owns the program and manages the loaner inventory. The community health nurse coordinates the fitting sessions, leads the teaching component, organizes evaluation and writes the final report. The harbor master and fire department run the drills. The cooperative hosts materials and provides space. A regional marine safety organization supplies sample jackets and technical advice. The estimated budget is $9,500 for 80 loaner jackets, $1,200 for printing and photography, and $800 for drill supplies, including throw bags and two reboarding ladders, for a total of $11,500. The association will seek a local foundation grant and a matching contribution from the cooperative, and crews who buy their jackets in the fall will return part of the cost to the fund.

What this page is doingRoles and costs are specific and realistic, and funding sources are named. A proposal that ignores cost is rarely seen as feasible by graders or partners.
7

Timeline

In March, baseline dockside counts are taken on two mornings and the teaching session is held at the association's spring meeting. In April and May, jackets are fitted and loaned, and posters and videos are released. From May through July, drills are scheduled boat by boat. In July and again in September, dockside counts are repeated on two mornings each. In November, crews return a short survey about jacket use and the association votes on the voluntary standard. The nurse presents results to the association and the town in December.

What this page is doingThe timeline follows the fishing season and places measurement at clear points, so the evaluation plan is feasible.
8

Evaluation

The program will be judged on the five RE-AIM dimensions described by Glasgow et al. (1999): reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. Reach is the share of active boats and crew members who receive a jacket or complete a drill. Effectiveness is the change in observed flotation use between the spring baseline and the summer and fall counts. Adoption is whether the association adopts the voluntary standard and whether other harbors ask to copy the program. Implementation is whether drills and fittings happen as planned, tracked on a simple log. Maintenance is whether jackets stay in use through the season and whether crews buy them in the fall. Because drowning deaths in one harbor are, fortunately, too rare to measure change in a single season, the program measures the protective behavior instead.

What this page is doingThe evaluation framework is applied dimension by dimension with a concrete measure for each, and the paper explains why behavior rather than deaths is the outcome. That reasoning shows mature program planning.
9

Anticipated Barriers

Three barriers are likely. Some crew members may accept a jacket and leave it in the wheelhouse; peer messaging and captains who wear flotation themselves are the main answer, supported by repeated dockside counts that make the change visible. Busy crews may skip drills in the peak season, so drills are scheduled early and kept short. Finally, a few members may see the voluntary standard as outsiders telling fishermen what to do, which is why the association, not the nurse or the town, decides whether to adopt it.

What this page is doingBarriers are anticipated honestly with a response to each, which demonstrates planning maturity and respect for the community's authority.
10

Conclusion

Float, Drill, Talk addresses the single most preventable death in Pell Harbor with three practical steps: make wearing flotation easy, make recovery possible and make it normal. The program is modest in cost, owned by the community and measured by what crews actually do on deck. If it works for one season, the association will have the evidence and the equipment to keep it going.

What this page is doingThe conclusion restates the program's logic in one line and ends on sustainability, which links back to the objectives.
11

References

Case, S. L., Lincoln, J. M., & Lucas, D. L. (2018). Fatal falls overboard in commercial fishing: United States, 2000-2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(16), 465-469. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6716a2

Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322

Keller, L. O., Strohschein, S., Lia-Hoagberg, B., & Schaffer, M. A. (2004). Population-based public health interventions: Practice-based and evidence-supported. Part I. Public Health Nursing, 21(5), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.21509.x

Teske, T. D., Case, S. L., Lucas, D. L., Forrester, C. L., & Lincoln, J. M. (2022). Have you met Angus? Development and evaluation of a social marketing intervention to improve personal flotation device use in commercial fishing. Journal of Safety Research, 83, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.022

What the NUR 306 Module 7 instructions ask for

Project Two in NUR 306 usually asks for a community health intervention proposal that addresses the priority problem you identified in Project One. The instructions typically ask for a goal and measurable objectives, a description of the intervention and the evidence behind it, the levels of prevention or intervention involved, partners and their roles, resources and budget, a timeline, an evaluation plan and a discussion of barriers. Depending on the section, it is submitted either as a written paper or as a recorded slide deck. Length varies, but four to six pages is typical for the paper version, formatted in APA 7. The strongest proposals read as something a real community partner could approve and carry out.

How this NUR 306 Module 7 project two community intervention proposal example is built

This proposal addresses drowning among lobster crews in a composite Maine harbor town. It opens by linking back to the Project One profile and restating the problem with federal data. Four measurable objectives are set for one season. The intervention has three named components: a loaner program for modern work life jackets, man-overboard drills run by the harbor master, and a peer-led message campaign modeled on a federal social marketing study. The Intervention Wheel shows action at individual, community and systems levels. Partners, roles, a composite budget and a seasonal timeline follow, then an evaluation plan organized by the five RE-AIM dimensions and a short section on likely barriers.

Where the NUR 306 Module 7 rubric puts the points

Project Two rubrics generally assess the link to the identified problem, the goal and objectives, the evidence base for the intervention, the use of a public health framework, the partnership and resource plan, the evaluation plan and the writing. The evidence criterion rewards interventions modeled on published programs, with the source described accurately. The framework criterion is met when levels of intervention or prevention are applied to the program's components. Evaluation earns full credit when each measure is matched to an objective and the chosen outcome is realistic. Budgets and timelines show feasibility, and graders often look for at least one systems-level change that could outlast the program.

NUR 306 Module 7 help: the mistakes that cost points

The most common Project Two problem is an intervention that does not follow from the Project One data, for example a nutrition class for a population whose profile identified injury as the priority. Another is an education-only program for a problem driven by cost, equipment or culture. Many proposals set objectives no one could measure in a term, such as reducing deaths, instead of measuring behavior. Some leave out partners, cost or evaluation. Build the intervention around the barriers your profile found, borrow from a published program, measure a behavior you can observe and give ownership to a community partner who will be there after you leave. The program should survive your graduation.

Get NUR 306 Module 7 written to your instructions

Send your Project One priority problem, the population and the partners you have in mind, along with the Project Two rubric. An intervention proposal with objectives, budget and evaluation for that problem arrives in 24 to 48 hours, and we write the first one free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 306 papers and related RN to BSN samples

NUR 306 Module 7 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 306 Module 7 Project Two sample?

The complete proposal on this page is free to read: a life jacket loaner, drill and peer message program for lobster crews, with objectives, components, levels of intervention, budget, timeline, RE-AIM evaluation and barriers, annotated section by section and backed by four references. The same structure fits other populations if you need a custom version.

How does NUR 306 Project Two connect to Project One?

Project Two should address the priority problem you identified in your Project One profile, for the same population, using the strengths and barriers you found there. Graders usually check this link first.

What evaluation framework works for a community intervention?

RE-AIM is a practical choice because it measures reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. Logic models and process and outcome evaluation are also common.

Does a NUR 306 intervention proposal need a budget?

Many rubrics include feasibility, and a simple budget with estimated costs and funding sources is the clearest way to show it. Label estimates as estimates.

How do I make my community intervention sustainable?

Give ownership to a community partner, include at least one systems-level change such as a policy or standard, and plan how equipment, training or messages will continue after the program ends.