| Course | NUR 306 Nursing in the Community |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 7 |
| Paper type | Community health intervention proposal |
| Length | About 1,130 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | RN to BSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 306 Module 7
Project Two: Float, Drill, Talk, a Community Intervention to Prevent Drowning Among Pell Harbor Lobster Crews
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 306: Nursing in the Community
Project Two
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Project Two: Float, Drill, Talk, a Community Intervention to Prevent Drowning Among Pell Harbor Lobster Crews
The Project One profile of Pell Harbor's lobster crews identified drowning after a fall overboard as the priority problem: no other risk on the list kills as quickly, and the behavior that protects against it is almost never seen on deck. In the federal review of the 17 years from 2000 through 2016, not one of the 204 victims of fatal falls had flotation on, close to half fished alone at the time, and the bodies of most were never found (Case et al., 2018). This proposal describes Float, Drill, Talk, a one-season community intervention built with the harbor association that removes the main barriers to wearing flotation, trains crews to recover someone who goes over, and uses respected local voices to change what is normal on deck. The town, partners and costs are composites.
Goal and Objectives
The goal is to reduce the risk of drowning among Pell Harbor lobster crews by increasing the use of flotation on deck and the ability to recover a person from the water. By the end of the season, the program aims to: (1) place a work-style life jacket on at least 80% of the harbor's active boats through the loaner program; (2) have at least 60% of boats complete one man-overboard recovery drill with the harbor master; (3) raise observed flotation use on deck, measured by dockside counts, from the baseline measured in the spring to at least 40% of crew members observed; and (4) keep at least three quarters of loaned jackets in use through the end of the season, measured by a fall return survey.
Intervention Components
Float is the loaner program. The harbor association will lend each participating boat two modern work life jackets, chosen after crews tried several designs at the spring teaching session, with a choice between inflatable belt packs, suspender-style inflatables and low-profile foam vests. Crews keep them for the season and may buy them at a reduced price in the fall. Removing cost and letting crews choose a style that does not snag on lines addresses the two barriers crew members named most often.
Drill is the recovery training. The harbor master and the fire department's water rescue team will run a 30-minute man-overboard drill on each boat at its mooring, practicing how to stop the boat, throw a flotation device, bring a person alongside and get them back aboard with the equipment the boat actually carries. Boats that fish alone will be shown reboarding ladders and tether options.
Talk is the message campaign. Following the approach of a federal social marketing study in which a culturally matched fictional spokesman spoke to common barriers and misconceptions, after which fishermen reported wearing flotation more often (Teske et al., 2022), the campaign will use real Pell Harbor captains who wear flotation, photographed on their own boats, on posters at the cooperative, fuel dock and bait shop and in short videos on the association's social media page.
Levels of Intervention
The components span the three levels of the Public Health Intervention Wheel (Keller et al., 2004). At the individual level, crew members receive health teaching and hands-on fitting. At the community level, the loaner program, drills and campaign reach the whole harbor, using outreach and social marketing. At the systems level, the association will vote on whether to add flotation on deck to its voluntary safety standard for members next year, and the nurse will work with the harbor committee to install a reboarding ladder at the public float. Working at all three levels matters because a behavior like wearing flotation depends on individual choice, on what peers do and on the rules a community sets for itself.
Partners, Roles and Budget
The harbor association owns the program and manages the loaner inventory. The community health nurse coordinates the fitting sessions, leads the teaching component, organizes evaluation and writes the final report. The harbor master and fire department run the drills. The cooperative hosts materials and provides space. A regional marine safety organization supplies sample jackets and technical advice. The estimated budget is $9,500 for 80 loaner jackets, $1,200 for printing and photography, and $800 for drill supplies, including throw bags and two reboarding ladders, for a total of $11,500. The association will seek a local foundation grant and a matching contribution from the cooperative, and crews who buy their jackets in the fall will return part of the cost to the fund.
Timeline
In March, baseline dockside counts are taken on two mornings and the teaching session is held at the association's spring meeting. In April and May, jackets are fitted and loaned, and posters and videos are released. From May through July, drills are scheduled boat by boat. In July and again in September, dockside counts are repeated on two mornings each. In November, crews return a short survey about jacket use and the association votes on the voluntary standard. The nurse presents results to the association and the town in December.
Evaluation
The program will be judged on the five RE-AIM dimensions described by Glasgow et al. (1999): reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. Reach is the share of active boats and crew members who receive a jacket or complete a drill. Effectiveness is the change in observed flotation use between the spring baseline and the summer and fall counts. Adoption is whether the association adopts the voluntary standard and whether other harbors ask to copy the program. Implementation is whether drills and fittings happen as planned, tracked on a simple log. Maintenance is whether jackets stay in use through the season and whether crews buy them in the fall. Because drowning deaths in one harbor are, fortunately, too rare to measure change in a single season, the program measures the protective behavior instead.
Anticipated Barriers
Three barriers are likely. Some crew members may accept a jacket and leave it in the wheelhouse; peer messaging and captains who wear flotation themselves are the main answer, supported by repeated dockside counts that make the change visible. Busy crews may skip drills in the peak season, so drills are scheduled early and kept short. Finally, a few members may see the voluntary standard as outsiders telling fishermen what to do, which is why the association, not the nurse or the town, decides whether to adopt it.
Conclusion
Float, Drill, Talk addresses the single most preventable death in Pell Harbor with three practical steps: make wearing flotation easy, make recovery possible and make it normal. The program is modest in cost, owned by the community and measured by what crews actually do on deck. If it works for one season, the association will have the evidence and the equipment to keep it going.
References
Case, S. L., Lincoln, J. M., & Lucas, D. L. (2018). Fatal falls overboard in commercial fishing: United States, 2000-2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(16), 465-469. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6716a2
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
Keller, L. O., Strohschein, S., Lia-Hoagberg, B., & Schaffer, M. A. (2004). Population-based public health interventions: Practice-based and evidence-supported. Part I. Public Health Nursing, 21(5), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.21509.x
Teske, T. D., Case, S. L., Lucas, D. L., Forrester, C. L., & Lincoln, J. M. (2022). Have you met Angus? Development and evaluation of a social marketing intervention to improve personal flotation device use in commercial fishing. Journal of Safety Research, 83, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.022
What the NUR 306 Module 7 instructions ask for
Project Two in NUR 306 usually asks for a community health intervention proposal that addresses the priority problem you identified in Project One. The instructions typically ask for a goal and measurable objectives, a description of the intervention and the evidence behind it, the levels of prevention or intervention involved, partners and their roles, resources and budget, a timeline, an evaluation plan and a discussion of barriers. Depending on the section, it is submitted either as a written paper or as a recorded slide deck. Length varies, but four to six pages is typical for the paper version, formatted in APA 7. The strongest proposals read as something a real community partner could approve and carry out.
How this NUR 306 Module 7 project two community intervention proposal example is built
This proposal addresses drowning among lobster crews in a composite Maine harbor town. It opens by linking back to the Project One profile and restating the problem with federal data. Four measurable objectives are set for one season. The intervention has three named components: a loaner program for modern work life jackets, man-overboard drills run by the harbor master, and a peer-led message campaign modeled on a federal social marketing study. The Intervention Wheel shows action at individual, community and systems levels. Partners, roles, a composite budget and a seasonal timeline follow, then an evaluation plan organized by the five RE-AIM dimensions and a short section on likely barriers.
Where the NUR 306 Module 7 rubric puts the points
Project Two rubrics generally assess the link to the identified problem, the goal and objectives, the evidence base for the intervention, the use of a public health framework, the partnership and resource plan, the evaluation plan and the writing. The evidence criterion rewards interventions modeled on published programs, with the source described accurately. The framework criterion is met when levels of intervention or prevention are applied to the program's components. Evaluation earns full credit when each measure is matched to an objective and the chosen outcome is realistic. Budgets and timelines show feasibility, and graders often look for at least one systems-level change that could outlast the program.
NUR 306 Module 7 help: the mistakes that cost points
The most common Project Two problem is an intervention that does not follow from the Project One data, for example a nutrition class for a population whose profile identified injury as the priority. Another is an education-only program for a problem driven by cost, equipment or culture. Many proposals set objectives no one could measure in a term, such as reducing deaths, instead of measuring behavior. Some leave out partners, cost or evaluation. Build the intervention around the barriers your profile found, borrow from a published program, measure a behavior you can observe and give ownership to a community partner who will be there after you leave. The program should survive your graduation.
Get NUR 306 Module 7 written to your instructions
Send your Project One priority problem, the population and the partners you have in mind, along with the Project Two rubric. An intervention proposal with objectives, budget and evaluation for that problem arrives in 24 to 48 hours, and we write the first one free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 306 papers and related RN to BSN samples
- NUR 306 Module 1 Short Paper: The Public Health Nurse in a Harbor Town
- NUR 306 Module 2 Epidemiology Short Paper: Falls Overboard in Commercial Fishing
- NUR 306 Module 3 Project One Vulnerable Population Profile: Lobster Crew Members in a Harbor Town
- NUR 306 Module 4 Environmental Health Short Paper: Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning and Harvest Closures
- NUR 306 Module 5 Health Teaching Plan: Life Jackets and Cold Water for Lobster Crews
- NUR 306 Module 6 Disaster Preparedness Short Paper: A Nor'easter and an Island Reached by Ferry
- NUR 306 Module 8 Journal: Community Nursing on a Working Dock
- NUR 400 Module 7 Final Project
- NUR 440 Module 6 Evidence Synthesis
- NUR 325 Module 3: sample paper, in real form
- NUR 301 Module 8 Journal
NUR 306 Module 7 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 306 Module 7 Project Two sample?
The complete proposal on this page is free to read: a life jacket loaner, drill and peer message program for lobster crews, with objectives, components, levels of intervention, budget, timeline, RE-AIM evaluation and barriers, annotated section by section and backed by four references. The same structure fits other populations if you need a custom version.
How does NUR 306 Project Two connect to Project One?
Project Two should address the priority problem you identified in your Project One profile, for the same population, using the strengths and barriers you found there. Graders usually check this link first.
What evaluation framework works for a community intervention?
RE-AIM is a practical choice because it measures reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. Logic models and process and outcome evaluation are also common.
Does a NUR 306 intervention proposal need a budget?
Many rubrics include feasibility, and a simple budget with estimated costs and funding sources is the clearest way to show it. Label estimates as estimates.
How do I make my community intervention sustainable?
Give ownership to a community partner, include at least one systems-level change such as a policy or standard, and plan how equipment, training or messages will continue after the program ends.