| Course | NUR 306 Nursing in the Community |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Vulnerable population profile |
| Length | About 1,020 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | RN to BSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 306 Module 3
Project One: Lobster Crew Members of Pell Harbor as a Vulnerable Population
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 306: Nursing in the Community
Project One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Project One: Lobster Crew Members of Pell Harbor as a Vulnerable Population
A vulnerable population is a group whose shared circumstances place its members at higher risk of poor health than the general population. In Pell Harbor, a composite lobstering town on the Maine coast, the most visible such group is not defined by age, income or diagnosis but by work. This profile describes the town's lobster crews, the captains and sternmen who fish from small boats, and argues that their vulnerability comes from a chain of linked risks: a dangerous job produces injuries, injuries produce pain that must be managed while the season is still running, and a seasonal income with limited coverage makes both harder to treat. The profile ends by selecting one priority problem for community nursing intervention.
Defining the Population
Pell Harbor has about 140 licensed commercial lobster harvesters and roughly 90 sternmen who work for them during the season, which runs heavily from late spring through late fall. Most boats carry one or two people. Crew members range from teenagers working summers to captains in their seventies, and most are men. Many families have fished for generations, and the town's fishermen's cooperative buys most of the catch. These figures are composite estimates for a town of this size; in practice, a nurse would confirm them with the cooperative and the state licensing office. The population boundary used here is anyone who worked on a Pell Harbor lobster boat during the last season, including part-time and seasonal crew, since injuries and pain do not respect job titles.
Occupational Injury
Commercial fishing is among the most dangerous occupations in the United States. Its 2016 work-related death rate was about 23 times the rate for all U.S. workers, and falls overboard accounted for 27.0% of fishing deaths from 2000 through 2016 (Case et al., 2018). East Coast lobster was among the fisheries with the most fatal falls. Nonfatal injuries are far more common. Interviewing randomly selected lobster captains from two New England states every quarter, Fulmer et al. (2016) found acute injuries at a rate of 49.7 per 100 full-time equivalents per year, with 15.0 per 100 requiring treatment, rates much higher than those drawn from Coast Guard reports. The work combines hauling heavy traps, repetitive lifting, wet decks, moving lines and long hours, so hand, back and shoulder injuries are part of ordinary seasons rather than rare events.
Pain, Opioids and Overdose Risk
Injuries in a seasonal job create pressure to keep working. A sternman with a shoulder injury in July may lose his place on the boat if he stops, and a captain may lose the income that has to last the winter. That pressure makes pain management a central health issue. Hawkins et al. (2019) coded industry and occupation on death certificates for all opioid-related overdose deaths in Massachusetts from 2011 to 2015 and found that construction and fishing workers had rates many times higher than the average for all workers. The authors also found that occupations with more work injuries, more job insecurity and less access to paid sick leave had higher overdose death rates. Lobstering has all three features. For Pell Harbor, this means that a fall on deck and an overdose death are not separate problems; they may be two points on the same path.
Income, Coverage and Access to Care
Lobster crews are often self-employed or paid by a share of the catch, which means income arrives unevenly and is concentrated in a few months. Coverage varies: some captains buy marketplace plans, some sternmen qualify for Medicaid in the off-season but not at the height of summer, and some go without. Access is thin even with coverage. The town's health center is open two days a week, the hospital is 35 minutes away, and crews leave the harbor before dawn and return in the afternoon, when most offices are closing. Healthy People 2030 identifies economic stability and health care access and quality as two of five domains of social determinants (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, n.d.), and both apply directly to this group's pattern of delayed care.
Strengths and Resources
The population also has real strengths. Crews are tightly connected through family, the cooperative and the harbor, and news travels quickly on the wharf. Fishermen have deep practical knowledge of weather, boats and the sea, and they have a long tradition of helping one another in emergencies. The cooperative already organizes safety equipment purchases and could host health events, and the harbor master and the local fire department have trained in water rescue. Any intervention should build on these assets rather than bring in outside programs that ignore them.
Priority Problem
Several problems could justify intervention, including injury, pain and overdose risk, and access. The priority chosen for the Project Two intervention is drowning after a fall overboard. The reasons are practical. It is the most lethal event in the chain, it is highly preventable, and the key protective behavior, wearing a personal flotation device on deck, is rare: none of the 204 fishermen who died after falling overboard from 2000 to 2016 was wearing one (Case et al., 2018). It is also a problem the crews themselves recognize, which makes it a credible starting point for a community nurse who wants to earn trust before taking on harder topics such as pain and opioid use.
This choice has costs. Drowning prevention does not address the more common nonfatal injuries or the overdose risk described above, and those deserve attention in later work, ideally through partnerships with the regional recovery coalition and the health center. Starting where the community is ready, however, is itself a principle of community health practice.
Conclusion
Pell Harbor's lobster crews are vulnerable not because of any individual weakness but because of the conditions of their work: dangerous decks, pressure to fish through injury, uneven income and care that is hard to reach at the hours they are free. Their strengths, close ties, practical knowledge and an established cooperative, give a community nurse a way in. The intervention that follows will begin with the most preventable death in the harbor.
References
Case, S. L., Lincoln, J. M., & Lucas, D. L. (2018). Fatal falls overboard in commercial fishing: United States, 2000-2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(16), 465-469. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6716a2
Fulmer, S., Buchholz, B., Jenkins, P., & Scribani, M. (2016). Work-time exposure and acute injuries in inshore lobstermen of the Northeast United States. Journal of Agromedicine, 21(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2016.1143431
Hawkins, D., Roelofs, C., Laing, J., & Davis, L. (2019). Opioid-related overdose deaths by industry and occupation: Massachusetts, 2011-2015. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 62(10), 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23029
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Social determinants of health. Healthy People 2030. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
What the NUR 306 Module 3 instructions ask for
Project One in NUR 306 typically asks for a vulnerable population profile. The instructions usually ask you to define a specific population in your community, describe its demographics, explain with current data why its members face higher health risks, identify social determinants that contribute to those risks, describe the population's strengths and resources, and select a priority health problem for later intervention. Some versions also ask you to connect the problem to a Healthy People 2030 objective. Most sections set a length of roughly four to five pages and expect APA 7 formatting, and many ask you to choose a population you can carry into Project Two, since the intervention proposal builds directly on this profile.
How this NUR 306 Module 3 project one vulnerable population profile example is built
This profile defines its population by work: lobster captains and sternmen in a composite Maine harbor town, bounded to include seasonal crew. It builds a chain of linked risks, occupational injury, pain and overdose risk, and income and access, supporting each link with a real source: federal fatality data, a survey-based injury rate study and a state analysis of overdose deaths by occupation. Social determinants are tied to the population's actual schedule and pay structure. A strengths section names assets an intervention can use. The priority problem, drowning after a fall overboard, is chosen with explicit reasons and an honest statement of what the choice leaves out. Local figures are labeled as composite estimates.
Where the NUR 306 Module 3 rubric puts the points
Project One rubrics usually score the definition of the population, the evidence of vulnerability, the analysis of social determinants, the identification of strengths, the selection and justification of a priority problem and writing and APA quality. Evidence of vulnerability carries the most weight, and graders expect data with a source, year and comparison group. The determinants criterion rewards specific links between conditions and health outcomes rather than a list of domains. Justification of the priority problem is where analysis shows most clearly; explain why this problem, and not another, comes first. A population defined too broadly makes every other criterion harder to meet, so precision at the start matters.
NUR 306 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points
Common mistakes in the vulnerable population profile include choosing a group too large to describe, such as all older adults in the state, and presenting statistics without saying where they came from or what they are compared with. Some profiles read like a single patient history rather than a population description. Others list social determinants without connecting them to outcomes. Many skip strengths entirely, which weakens the later intervention. Finally, students sometimes choose a priority problem that the data in the profile do not support. Define your population tightly, support every risk claim with cited data, include strengths and make sure the priority problem follows from the evidence you presented.
Get NUR 306 Module 3 written to your instructions
Describe the population you have chosen and the community it lives in, and share the Project One instructions and rubric. A profile with sourced data for that group is written and returned in 24 to 48 hours; your first sample carries no charge. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 306 papers and related RN to BSN samples
- NUR 306 Module 1 Short Paper: The Public Health Nurse in a Harbor Town
- NUR 306 Module 2 Epidemiology Short Paper: Falls Overboard in Commercial Fishing
- NUR 306 Module 4 Environmental Health Short Paper: Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning and Harvest Closures
- NUR 306 Module 5 Health Teaching Plan: Life Jackets and Cold Water for Lobster Crews
- NUR 306 Module 6 Disaster Preparedness Short Paper: A Nor'easter and an Island Reached by Ferry
- NUR 306 Module 7 Project Two Community Intervention Proposal: A Life Jacket Loaner and Drill Program
- NUR 306 Module 8 Journal: Community Nursing on a Working Dock
- NUR 315 Module 1 Case Study
- NUR 499 Module 1 Journal
- NUR 303 Module 6 Reflection Journal: A Reading of 184 Over 112 on Wash Day
- NUR 325 Module 3: sample paper, in real form
NUR 306 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 306 Module 3 Project One sample?
The complete vulnerable population profile on this page is free to read: lobster crew members in a composite Maine harbor town, with injury, overdose and access data, strengths, a justified priority problem, margin notes and four references. A profile of your own population can be requested.
How do I choose a vulnerable population for NUR 306?
Pick a group defined by shared circumstances that raise health risk, small enough to describe with data and reachable by a community nurse. Occupational groups, older adults living alone, people experiencing homelessness and new immigrant communities are common choices.
What data should a vulnerable population profile include?
Current data on the population's size and characteristics, the health risks it faces compared with a reference group and the social determinants involved. Use government reports and peer-reviewed studies, and state the year and geography of each figure.
Do I have to include strengths in Project One?
Most rubrics expect them. Strengths such as community ties, organizations and local knowledge show where an intervention can start and make your Project Two proposal more realistic.
Should Project One connect to Healthy People 2030?
If your instructions ask for it, identify a relevant objective and explain how your population's problem relates to it. Even when it is optional, a link to a national objective can strengthen the justification for your priority problem.