NUR 499 Module 4 Advocacy Letter example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN Professional Identity and Advocacy in Nursing Practice Southern New Hampshire University Full sample paper Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NUR 499 Module 4 advocacy letter is written out in full: a staff nurse and part-time clinical instructor writes to her state senator in support of a bill that would repay student loans for nurses who teach in the state's nursing programs. The letter states the request up front, explains the faculty shortage with evidence, tells one local story, answers the cost question and closes with a specific ask. The bill, senator and program are invented; the evidence is real.

What this page holds

One complete NUR 499 Module 4 advocacy letter to a legislator on nurse faculty loan repayment, in business letter form with a stated position, evidence, a local story, a response to cost concerns and references. Searches like "nur 499 module 4 assignment", "nur499 module 4 advocacy letter" and "nur 499 module 4 example" land here.

The NUR 499 Module 4 example, in full

1

[Your Name], BSN, RN

[Street Address]

[City, State ZIP]

[Email Address]

 

[Date]

 

The Honorable [Senator's Name]

State Senate, Room [Number]

[State Capitol Address]

[City, State ZIP]

 

Dear Senator [Name]:

I am a registered nurse and a resident of [Town] in your district, and I am writing to ask you to vote for Senate Bill 214, the Nurse Faculty Loan Repayment Act, when it comes before the Senate Health Committee. For eight years I have worked on a medical unit at [Hospital], and for the past three years I have also taught clinical groups part time for the associate degree nursing program at [Community College]. I see the effects of the faculty shortage from both sides: on my unit, where we cannot fill positions, and in the college, where qualified students are turned away.

Nursing schools cannot educate more nurses without more nurses who teach. Nationally, nursing programs turn away tens of thousands of qualified applicants every year, and schools consistently cite a shortage of faculty as a leading reason (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2024). The shortage is set to worsen. A national analysis projected that about one third of nursing faculty would retire between 2016 and 2025, and that those retiring were disproportionately the most experienced faculty with doctoral degrees and senior rank (Fang & Kesten, 2017). Replacing them is difficult because a nurse with a graduate degree usually earns more in clinical practice than in teaching, while carrying the student debt required to become qualified to teach.

Our program shows what this looks like locally. This fall, [Community College] received more than 300 qualified applications for 64 seats. The director told me that the program could add a second evening cohort of 24 students if it could hire two more faculty members, but two positions posted last year received no qualified applicants willing to accept the salary. I considered applying myself. With a graduate degree, I would still owe more than $60,000 in loans, and a full-time faculty salary would be well below what I earn at the bedside. Senate Bill 214 would change that calculation for nurses like me by repaying a portion of loans for each year of full-time teaching in a state nursing program.

The bill is also well designed for accountability. It limits repayment to nurses who teach full time in an approved program in this state, requires a multiyear teaching commitment, pays in annual installments only after each year of service, and asks the Board of Nursing to report how many faculty positions were filled and how many additional students were admitted. Those features mean the state pays only for teaching that actually happens and can see what it received. I would encourage the committee to keep the requirement that programs report added enrollment, because that measure connects the investment directly to the number of new nurses entering the workforce. If the committee considers amendments, I would urge it to include part-time clinical instructors who teach at least half time, since many programs rely on practicing nurses like me to supervise students in hospitals, and a small incentive could keep more of us teaching.

I understand that the bill has a cost. It is modest compared with the cost of the shortage it addresses. Each nurse faculty member can educate many new nurses over a career, and hospitals in our region are already paying premium rates for temporary staff to cover vacancies. National experts have emphasized that preparing enough nurses, including nurses ready to teach and lead, is essential to meeting the population's health needs (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2021). Investing in faculty is one of the most direct ways the state can increase the number of nurses it produces, because the seats, applicants and clinical sites already exist.

I respectfully ask you to vote yes on Senate Bill 214 and to consider co-sponsoring it. I would be glad to meet with you or your staff, to share data from our program, or to testify at the committee hearing. Thank you for your time and for your service to our district.

 

Respectfully,

[Your Name], BSN, RN

Registered Nurse and Adjunct Clinical Instructor

Constituent, [Town], District [Number]

What this page is doingThe letter states the request and the writer's credentials in the first paragraph, uses one national study and one local story, answers the cost objection and ends with a specific ask and an offer to help. Keeping claims modest and attributed protects the writer's credibility with legislative staff.
2

References

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2024). Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet. https://www.aacnnursing.org

Fang, D., & Kesten, K. (2017). Retirements and succession of nursing faculty in 2016-2025. Nursing Outlook, 65(5), 633-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.03.003

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equity. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25982

How this NUR 499 Module 4 example is structured

Letters to legislators are read quickly by staff who sort them by position and district, so this one follows that reader's needs. The first paragraph names the writer, her district, the bill number and her position. The second explains the problem in two or three facts. The third makes the issue local through one story from the writer's own program. The fourth anticipates the cost objection. The closing paragraph asks for a specific action and offers to serve as a resource. References follow the letter so that staff can verify claims, which adds credibility without cluttering the letter itself.

Get NUR 499 Module 4 written to your instructions

Send your NUR 499 letter assignment, the rubric, the bill or issue you are addressing and your legislator's name. A sample advocacy letter is written to that brief in 24 to 48 hours, and the first costs nothing. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

NUR 499 Module 4 questions, answered

What might a NUR 499 Module 4 assignment ask for?

Advocacy courses commonly include a practical exercise such as writing to a legislator, drafting a policy brief or preparing testimony on a health or nursing issue. The goal is to practice turning evidence and experience into a clear, persuasive request. Your classroom instructions set the format and audience.

How long should a letter to a legislator be?

Usually one page, or two at most. Staff read many letters and look first for the writer's position, the bill number and whether the writer is a constituent. Put those in the first paragraph, support them with a few facts and one local story, and end with a specific request.

Should I cite sources in an advocacy letter?

Brief attributions in the text are helpful, and a short reference list after the letter lets staff verify your claims. Avoid academic formatting inside the letter itself; the goal is a readable, credible message from a constituent with expertise.