NUR 560 Module 7 Milestone Two Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 560 Module 7 Milestone Two sample works through a presentation where a confident wrong answer can be fatal: sudden vertigo that might come from the inner ear or from the brainstem and cerebellum. It is written for SNHU NUR 560, Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Reasoning, the NUR-560 course in the MSN program. Its composite patient is a 61-year-old man with hypertension and diabetes who woke with continuous spinning, vomiting and trouble walking. The milestone defines the acute vestibular syndrome, shows why a normal CT scan and the absence of limb weakness do not rule out stroke, and walks through each step of the HINTS examination: head impulse, nystagmus and test of skew. It ranks posterior circulation stroke, vestibular neuritis, labyrinthitis, vestibular migraine and positional vertigo, argues each from the findings and closes with the plan and the specific results that would change it.

CourseNUR 560 Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Reasoning
ModuleModule 7
Paper typeAssessment and reasoning write-up (milestone)
LengthAbout 1,160 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 560 Module 7

1

Milestone Two: Sudden Vertigo in a 61-Year-Old Man, and Why the Head Impulse Test Decided

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 560: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Reasoning

Milestone Two

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names the milestone, the presenting problem and the single bedside test that turned the reasoning.
2

Milestone Two: Sudden Vertigo in a 61-Year-Old Man, and Why the Head Impulse Test Decided

Dizziness is among the most common reasons adults seek urgent care, and most causes are benign. A small share are strokes in the posterior circulation, which can look almost exactly like an inner-ear disorder at the bedside and are among the most frequently missed strokes. This milestone examines a composite 61-year-old man with sudden, continuous vertigo. It argues that his presentation is an acute vestibular syndrome, that his vascular risk and a normal head impulse test make stroke the leading diagnosis despite a normal CT and no limb weakness, and that a structured bedside examination outperforms early imaging in this setting.

What this page is doingThe introduction frames the stakes and gives a thesis that names the syndrome, the key finding and the claim about bedside examination.
3

History

The spinning started when he woke before dawn. The vertigo has been continuous for ten hours, worse with head movement but present at rest. He has vomited four times and cannot walk without holding the wall. He denies hearing loss, tinnitus, ear fullness, headache, double vision, slurred speech, trouble swallowing, facial numbness or limb weakness. He has had no previous episodes and no recent viral illness. His history includes hypertension, type 2 diabetes and 40 pack-years of smoking.

Three features of the history mattered most. The vertigo is continuous rather than brief and triggered, which moves the problem away from benign positional vertigo. It began suddenly and has lasted hours, which fits both vestibular neuritis and stroke. And his vascular risk profile raises the prior probability of stroke well above that of a younger patient without risk factors.

What this page is doingThe history captures timing and triggers, the organizing features of dizziness, and explains how each shifts the probabilities.
4

Naming the Syndrome

Vertigo that starts suddenly and persists for at least a day, together with nausea or vomiting, gait unsteadiness, nystagmus and intolerance of head motion, is called the acute vestibular syndrome. Most cases are caused by vestibular neuritis, but a meaningful minority are posterior circulation strokes, usually in the cerebellum or lateral medulla (Tarnutzer et al., 2011). Naming the syndrome is useful because it tells the clinician which bedside tests have been validated. The HINTS examination was studied in exactly this group and should not be applied to brief, triggered dizziness, in which a normal head impulse is expected and meaningless.

What this page is doingDefining the syndrome first shows the reader when HINTS applies and when it does not, a boundary that careful graders check.
5

Examination

Blood pressure is 172/94 mm Hg, heart rate 84 and regular, and glucose 168 mg/dL. He is alert and speaks clearly. Cranial nerves are intact apart from the eye findings, strength and sensation are normal in all limbs and finger-to-nose testing is accurate. He cannot stand without support, and when seated upright without his hands he leans to the left.

The three HINTS steps gave the following. Head impulse: when his head was turned quickly to each side while he fixed on the examiner's nose, his eyes stayed on target with no corrective saccade in either direction. Nystagmus: he had left-beating nystagmus in primary gaze that became right-beating on right gaze. Test of skew: on alternate cover testing, the left eye made a small vertical correction.

What this page is doingThe examination reports each HINTS component precisely, alongside a normal limb examination that could have been falsely reassuring.
6

Interpreting HINTS

Each of his three findings points centrally. In vestibular neuritis the damaged nerve cannot drive the reflex that holds the eyes steady, so a quick head turn toward the affected side produces a catch-up saccade; a normal head impulse in a patient with continuous vertigo is therefore a warning sign, because it suggests the peripheral reflex is intact and the problem lies in the brain. Nystagmus that changes direction with gaze is a central sign, since peripheral nystagmus beats in one direction. Skew deviation, a vertical misalignment, also points to a brainstem lesion.

In the original study of high-risk patients with the acute vestibular syndrome, a HINTS pattern suggesting a central cause was 100% sensitive and 96% specific for stroke, and it outperformed early MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging, which was falsely negative in 12% of strokes when performed in the first 48 hours (Kattah et al., 2009). A later systematic review reached the same conclusion and found that the general neurological examination was not enough on its own, because many of these strokes produce no limb weakness or speech changes (Tarnutzer et al., 2011). His severe truncal ataxia, the inability to sit or stand unsupported, added further weight.

What this page is doingThe interpretation explains the physiology behind each finding and cites the accuracy data that justify trusting the bedside exam over an early scan.
7

Summary Statement and Ranked Differential

Summary statement: a 61-year-old man with hypertension, diabetes and heavy smoking who has an acute vestibular syndrome of ten hours with a normal head impulse test, direction-changing nystagmus, skew deviation and severe truncal ataxia but no limb findings.

1. Posterior circulation stroke, most likely cerebellar or lateral medullary. For: vascular risk, all three central HINTS findings, severe truncal ataxia. Against: normal limb examination and normal CT, neither of which excludes it.

2. Vestibular neuritis. For: sudden continuous vertigo without hearing loss is its usual pattern. Against: normal head impulse, direction-changing nystagmus and skew.

3. Labyrinthitis. Against: no hearing loss or tinnitus, and the same central findings.

4. Vestibular migraine. Against: no migraine history, no headache, first episode at 61.

5. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Against: vertigo is continuous and present at rest rather than brief and triggered by position.

What this page is doingThe problem representation carries the decisive findings, and each alternative is argued against those same findings.
8

Why the CT Did Not Settle It

A noncontrast CT of the head, done before the HINTS examination, was normal. CT is useful to exclude hemorrhage but sees early infarcts in the posterior fossa poorly, because bone near the brainstem and cerebellum obscures the image. Treating that normal CT as reassurance would have been a framing error: the scan answered whether there was a bleed, not whether there was an infarct. Recognizing what a test can and cannot answer is central to diagnostic reasoning (Bowen, 2006). Here, the bedside findings carried more information than the first image.

What this page is doingThis section addresses a common trap directly and ties it to the reasoning literature.
9

Plan and What Would Change It

He is treated as a suspected posterior circulation stroke. The stroke team is activated, with urgent MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and vascular imaging of the vertebral and basilar arteries, and a decision on acute treatment based on timing and eligibility. He is kept nil by mouth until a swallow screen is completed, monitored closely for drowsiness or new brainstem signs, because swelling after a cerebellar infarct can compress the brainstem, and given antiemetics. If an early MRI is negative while the central HINTS findings persist, the clinical diagnosis stands, and repeat imaging is considered. A corrective saccade on repeat head impulse testing, unidirectional nystagmus and no skew would favor vestibular neuritis, while new hearing loss would widen the differential to include an infarct of the inner ear's blood supply.

His MRI later that day showed an acute infarct in the left cerebellar hemisphere.

What this page is doingThe plan is urgent and specific, and the paper names the findings that would move the diagnosis in either direction.
10

Conclusion

This man's continuous vertigo, vomiting and inability to walk were an acute vestibular syndrome, and his normal limb examination and normal CT could easily have led to a diagnosis of an inner-ear disorder. The three-step HINTS examination, applied to the group for which it was validated, pointed firmly to a central cause, and imaging confirmed a cerebellar stroke. The milestone shows why defining the syndrome, understanding what each test answers and trusting validated bedside findings can prevent one of the most commonly missed strokes.

What this page is doingThe conclusion connects each reasoning step to the outcome and restates the lesson.
11

References

Bowen, J. L. (2006). Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(21), 2217-2225. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054782

Kattah, J. C., Talkad, A. V., Wang, D. Z., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Newman-Toker, D. E. (2009). HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: Three-step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke, 40(11), 3504-3510. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.551234

Tarnutzer, A. A., Berkowitz, A. L., Robinson, K. A., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Newman-Toker, D. E. (2011). Does my dizzy patient have a stroke? A systematic review of bedside diagnosis in acute vestibular syndrome. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183(9), E571-E592. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.100174

What the NUR 560 Module 7 instructions ask for

Milestone Two in NUR 560 usually asks for a complete assessment of a more complex case, with a focused history and examination, interpretation of findings using validated tools, a problem representation, a ranked differential and a plan. For a neurological presentation such as acute vertigo, prompts expect you to define the syndrome, apply the correct bedside tests to the right population, explain what imaging can and cannot show and address the dangerous diagnosis first. Most milestones run four to six pages in APA 7 and build on the feedback from Milestone One. Report each examination component precisely and interpret it, since vague phrases such as abnormal eye movements earn little credit from graders. If your case includes imaging, explain what the chosen study can detect at that point in time.

How this NUR 560 Module 7 milestone two example is built

The sample assesses a composite 61-year-old man with ten hours of continuous vertigo, vomiting and inability to walk. It defines the acute vestibular syndrome, reports each HINTS component precisely and explains the physiology behind a normal head impulse, direction-changing nystagmus and skew deviation. Published accuracy data from the original HINTS study and a systematic review justify trusting the bedside findings over a normal CT and an early scan. The ranked differential argues stroke against vestibular neuritis, labyrinthitis, vestibular migraine and positional vertigo, and the plan covers urgent imaging and monitoring. Margin notes explain the choices behind each section of the paper. The case ends with the MRI result, so the reader sees how the bedside reasoning held up against the later scan.

Where the NUR 560 Module 7 rubric puts the points

Milestone Two is generally graded on thorough and precise data collection, accurate interpretation using validated tools, a concise problem representation, a ranked and argued differential that addresses the most dangerous diagnosis and a plan with clear contingencies. In neurological cases, graders look for correct use of bedside tests and awareness of imaging limits, and they often mark down papers that treat a normal CT as excluding stroke. Citing the sensitivity and specificity of the test you rely on, and naming the population in which it was validated, is what distinguishes exemplary work. Incorporating Milestone One feedback visibly also counts toward a stronger mark in most rubrics. Plans that include monitoring for deterioration, such as swelling after a cerebellar infarct, show the forward thinking graders reward.

NUR 560 Module 7 help: the mistakes that cost points

Vertigo milestones often lose points by calling every case vestibular neuritis, by applying HINTS to brief positional dizziness, by misreading a normal head impulse as reassuring or by treating a normal CT as a negative stroke workup. Define the syndrome first, report each HINTS step precisely, explain what each finding means, cite accuracy data and rank stroke first when the findings point centrally. State what imaging can and cannot answer, and give the plan clear contingencies. If your milestone case is a different neurological presentation, send it along with the prompt and rubric, and we can prepare a milestone around it with the same careful reasoning. We can also review a draft you have already written and point out where the reasoning or the evidence needs strengthening.

Get NUR 560 Module 7 written to your instructions

Send the milestone case, the prompt and the rubric. A complete write-up with a precise examination, validated tools, a ranked differential and a plan with contingencies is ready in 24 to 48 hours, and the first one is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 560 papers and related MSN samples

NUR 560 Module 7 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 560 Module 7 Milestone Two sample?

The complete milestone on this page is free to read: sudden vertigo in a composite 61-year-old man, the acute vestibular syndrome, the HINTS exam, a ranked differential and an urgent plan.

What does HINTS stand for?

Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew: three bedside eye examinations used in the acute vestibular syndrome to separate an inner-ear cause from a stroke.

Why is a normal head impulse test worrying in continuous vertigo?

In vestibular neuritis the head impulse is usually abnormal. A normal result in a patient with continuous vertigo suggests the problem lies in the brain rather than the inner ear.

How accurate is HINTS compared with MRI?

In the original study, a central HINTS pattern was 100% sensitive and 96% specific for stroke, while early diffusion-weighted MRI missed 12% of strokes in the first 48 hours.

Does a normal head CT rule out a stroke causing vertigo?

No. CT sees early infarcts in the brainstem and cerebellum poorly. It mainly excludes bleeding.