NUR 616 Module 5 Case Study Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 616 Module 5 Case Study sample takes on one of the most common reasons older adults with atrial fibrillation go without stroke prevention: a history of falls. It addresses the Module 5 case in SNHU NUR 616, Primary Care of Adults and Gerontological Patients, a family practice course in the SNHU MSN coded NUR-616. At its center is a composite retired seamstress, 82 and 58 kg, newly found to have atrial fibrillation, who tripped on a rug six months ago and takes daily aspirin. Her daughter asks whether a blood thinner is too dangerous. The case calculates her CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, weighs a decision analysis on falls, a meta-analysis of direct oral anticoagulants and the 2023 ACC/AHA atrial fibrillation guideline, and recommends apixaban at the reduced dose her age and weight require. It stops the aspirin and adds fall prevention and follow-up.

CourseNUR 616 Primary Care of Adults and Gerontological Patients
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeCase study on anticoagulation decisions in an older adult
LengthAbout 1,030 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 616 Module 5

1

Case Study: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation When the Patient Is 82 and Has Fallen

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 616: Primary Care of Adults and Gerontological Patients

Module Five Case Study

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title frames the case as a stroke prevention decision complicated by falls, the tension the analysis resolves.
2

Case Study: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation When the Patient Is 82 and Has Fallen

Atrial fibrillation raises the risk of stroke about fivefold, and the risk climbs with age. Yet older adults, who have the most to gain from anticoagulation, are the least likely to receive it, and fear of bleeding after a fall is one of the most common reasons clinicians and families give. This case study examines that fear in a woman in her eighties with atrial fibrillation and a recent fall. It argues that her stroke risk far exceeds the bleeding risk from falls, that a direct oral anticoagulant at the correct dose is the best choice and that the fall itself should be treated as a problem to prevent rather than a reason to withhold treatment.

What this page is doingThe introduction describes the treatment gap in older adults, names falls as a common reason and states the three-part argument.
3

Case Presentation

Mrs. N. is 82, a retired seamstress who lives with her daughter. At a routine visit her pulse was irregular, and an ECG showed atrial fibrillation with a ventricular rate of 92. She reports occasional fluttering in her chest but no chest pain, breathlessness or fainting. Six months ago she tripped over a loose rug in her bedroom and fell onto her hip without injury; she has not fallen since. She has hypertension, controlled on lisinopril 10 mg, and osteoarthritis. A daily 81 mg aspirin, begun long ago "for her heart" with no clear indication, is still on her list, and acetaminophen as needed. She has no history of stroke, bleeding, liver disease or alcohol use.

Examination: blood pressure 132/78 mm Hg; irregularly irregular pulse at 88; weight 58 kg. No murmur. Timed Up and Go 12 seconds. No orthostatic drop. Labs: hemoglobin 12.8 g/dL, platelets 230,000, creatinine 1.1 mg/dL with creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault about 36 mL/min, normal liver tests and TSH. Echocardiogram: normal left ventricular function, mild left atrial enlargement, no significant valve disease.

Her daughter says, "If she falls again on a blood thinner, won't she bleed into her brain?"

What this page is doingThe case includes the details needed for risk scores and dosing: age, weight, creatinine, blood pressure, a fall history with its circumstances and an unexplained aspirin.
4

Stroke and Bleeding Risk

Her CHA2DS2-VASc score is 4: two points for age 75 or older, one for hypertension and one for female sex. The 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline recommends oral anticoagulation for patients with an estimated annual stroke risk of 2% or more, which corresponds to a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more in men and 3 or more in women, and it notes that female sex acts as a risk modifier rather than a risk on its own (Joglar et al., 2024). She clearly qualifies.

Her HAS-BLED score is 2: one point for age over 65 and one for aspirin use. A score of 3 or more flags higher bleeding risk, and the tool's value lies less in deciding whether to anticoagulate than in identifying bleeding risks that can be changed. Her aspirin is one such modifiable factor.

What this page is doingBoth scores are calculated component by component, the stroke score is tied to the current guideline threshold and the bleeding score is used to identify modifiable risks rather than to deny treatment.
5

What the Evidence Says About Falls

The concern about falls has been studied directly. In a decision analysis of older patients with atrial fibrillation, investigators modeled the risk of subdural hematoma from falls against the benefit of stroke prevention with warfarin. By their estimate, only someone falling roughly 295 times annually would reach the point where subdural bleeding on warfarin cancels its protection, and that fall risk was not an important factor in choosing therapy regardless of age or baseline stroke risk (Man-Son-Hing et al., 1999). One fall six months ago, caused by a rug, is nowhere near that threshold.

Since that analysis, direct oral anticoagulants have lowered the risk further. A meta-analysis of the four major trials comparing them with warfarin found a 19% reduction in stroke or systemic embolism and about half the rate of intracranial hemorrhage, with a relative risk of 0.48, although gastrointestinal bleeding was more common (Ruff et al., 2014). Intracranial bleeding is precisely the event her daughter fears, and it is the complication these drugs reduce most. That finding held in the trials' older participants as well, who made up a large share of each study, so the benefit is not confined to younger patients who rarely fall.

What this page is doingThe section answers the daughter's question with a decision analysis and then updates it with a meta-analysis of newer drugs, focusing on the outcome the family fears.
6

Choosing and Dosing the Drug

Apixaban is a reasonable choice for an older adult with reduced kidney function. Its label halves the standard twice-daily dose from 5 mg to 2.5 mg only when two of three conditions hold: the patient is at least 80, weighs no more than 60 kg or has a creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL or above. Mrs. N. is past 80 and under 60 kg, while her creatinine is lower, so two conditions hold and the halved dose is correct. Underdosing is common in practice and removes much of the protection, so the dose is checked against the criteria rather than chosen by feel. Her creatinine clearance of 36 mL/min would call for dose adjustment with some other agents, which is another reason apixaban suits her. Warfarin remains an option if cost is prohibitive for her family, but it requires monitoring and carries a higher intracranial bleeding risk. Aspirin should be stopped, since it adds bleeding risk without meaningful stroke protection in atrial fibrillation.

What this page is doingThe drug choice is justified for her kidney function, the dose is derived from the labeled criteria she meets and the aspirin is removed for a stated reason.
7

Plan

Start apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and stop aspirin. Rate control: start metoprolol succinate 25 mg daily for a resting rate above 80 and symptoms, with a target resting rate below 100. Falls: remove loose rugs and add night lights, which she and her daughter agreed to do this week; refer for a home safety evaluation and physical therapy for strength and balance; review footwear and vision. Monitoring: hemoglobin and creatinine in one month and then every six months, with dose reassessment if her weight or creatinine changes. Education: take doses 12 hours apart, do not double up after a missed dose, call about tarry stools, pink or red urine or bruises she cannot explain and seek emergency care for a head injury or sudden severe headache, even without visible bleeding. Follow-up in four weeks.

What this page is doingThe plan combines anticoagulation, rate control, fall prevention and bleeding monitoring with specific education, treating falls as a modifiable problem.
8

Conclusion

For Mrs. N., a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4 means a substantial annual stroke risk, while one fall on a rug adds little to her bleeding risk. A correctly reduced dose of apixaban, the removal of an unnecessary aspirin and a plan to prevent the next fall answer her daughter's question honestly: the greater danger is a stroke without treatment.

What this page is doingThe conclusion restates the balance of risks in the patient's terms and answers the family's question directly.
9

References

Joglar, J. A., Chung, M. K., Armbruster, A. L., Benjamin, E. J., Chyou, J. Y., Cronin, E. M., Deswal, A., Eckhardt, L. L., Goldberger, Z. D., Gopinathannair, R., Gorenek, B., Hess, P. L., Hlatky, M., Hogan, G., Ibeh, C., Indik, J. H., Kido, K., Kusumoto, F., Link, M. S., . . . Van Wagoner, D. R. (2024). 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 149(1), e1-e156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193

Man-Son-Hing, M., Nichol, G., Lau, A., & Laupacis, A. (1999). Choosing antithrombotic therapy for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who are at risk for falls. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159(7), 677-685. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.7.677

Ruff, C. T., Giugliano, R. P., Braunwald, E., Hoffman, E. B., Deenadayalu, N., Ezekowitz, M. D., Camm, A. J., Weitz, J. I., Lewis, B. S., Parkhomenko, A., Yamashita, T., & Antman, E. M. (2014). Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet, 383(9921), 955-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0

What the NUR 616 Module 5 instructions ask for

The NUR 616 case study usually presents an older adult with a condition that requires weighing benefit against harm, such as anticoagulation, intensive glucose control or a new antihypertensive, and asks you to analyze the risks, review the evidence, recommend a plan and address patient and family concerns. Expect three to five pages in APA 7 with a guideline, a key trial or meta-analysis and any tools the decision uses. Calculate every risk score component by component, derive doses from labeled criteria rather than estimating them and answer the family's question directly with evidence, because this assignment is graded on whether the analysis reaches a defensible decision for this particular patient. Show your arithmetic.

How this NUR 616 Module 5 case study example is built

The sample analyzes a composite retired seamstress in her eighties with new atrial fibrillation, one fall on a rug six months ago and an unexplained daily aspirin. It calculates CHA2DS2-VASc at 4 and HAS-BLED at 2 with each component shown, then applies the 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS threshold. The Man-Son-Hing decision analysis, with its estimate of about 295 falls a year, and the Ruff meta-analysis, showing roughly half the intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants, answer the daughter's fear. Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily is chosen because she meets two dose-reduction criteria. The plan stops aspirin, adds rate control and fall prevention and sets monitoring and education.

Where the NUR 616 Module 5 rubric puts the points

Case study rubrics in this course typically weigh the analysis of the clinical problem, correct use of risk tools, integration of current evidence, the recommended plan with accurate dosing, attention to patient and family concerns and APA 7 writing. The top band usually requires showing each score's components, tying the decision to a guideline threshold and using evidence that addresses the specific concern raised, such as falls. Graders reward correct dose adjustment for age, weight and kidney function and the removal of drugs that add risk without benefit. Treating the complicating factor, here falls, as a target for intervention shows integrated geriatric reasoning that goes beyond a single drug decision.

NUR 616 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points

Anticoagulation case studies lose points when fall history is treated as an automatic reason to withhold therapy, when scores are reported without components, when a direct oral anticoagulant is dosed without checking reduction criteria or when aspirin is left in place. Another common gap is ignoring the family's concern instead of answering it. Show each score, cite the guideline threshold, bring in evidence on the specific worry, derive the dose from the criteria, remove unnecessary antiplatelets, add fall prevention and plan monitoring. If your case involves chronic kidney disease, a recent bleed or dementia, send it with the rubric for an analysis built on those factors and your patient's own numbers.

Get NUR 616 Module 5 written to your instructions

Send the case, the family's concerns if any and the rubric. A case study that shows each risk score, cites the guideline and the evidence on the specific worry, doses correctly and adds a plan for the complicating factor will be delivered within 24 to 48 hours, and your first is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 616 papers and related MSN samples

NUR 616 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 616 Module 5 Case Study sample?

This page contains the full case study: anticoagulation for an 82-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation and a history of falls, with CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, apixaban dosing and APA 7 references.

Should older adults who fall be denied anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation?

Usually not. A decision analysis estimated a person on warfarin would need to fall about 295 times a year for bleeding risk to outweigh stroke prevention, and newer agents carry less intracranial bleeding risk.

When should the lower apixaban dose be used?

The label drops the dose from 5 mg to 2.5 mg twice daily only when a patient has two of these three features: 80 or older, 60 kg or lighter, creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or more.

What CHA2DS2-VASc score calls for anticoagulation?

The 2023 guideline recommends anticoagulation when annual stroke risk is 2% or more, corresponding to a score of 2 or more in men and 3 or more in women.

Should aspirin continue with an anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation?

Generally not, unless there is a specific indication such as a recent coronary stent. Aspirin adds bleeding risk without meaningful stroke protection in atrial fibrillation.