| Course | NUR 654 Curriculum Foundations in Nursing Education |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | paper on integrating interprofessional education into a nursing curriculum |
| Length | About 1,070 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 654 Module 4
Adding Interprofessional Education to an Online RN to BSN Program: Competencies, Evidence and Design
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 654: Curriculum Foundations in Nursing Education
Module Four Interprofessional Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Adding Interprofessional Education to an Online RN to BSN Program: Competencies, Evidence and Design
Working nurses already practice alongside physicians, pharmacists, social workers and therapists every day, so an RN to BSN program might seem to have little to add about teamwork. Yet collaboration at work often happens by habit rather than design, and communication failures between professions remain a leading contributor to harm. The 2021 AACN Essentials include interprofessional partnerships as a domain, and accreditors will look for it in the curriculum. The composite Pine Ridge College is building an online RN to BSN program and also offers online degrees in social work, public health and health administration. This paper plans how interprofessional education can be built into the nursing program in partnership with those programs. It argues that interprofessional education should be designed around shared competencies, delivered through experiences in which students genuinely learn with each other and presented with honest claims about what the evidence shows.
What Interprofessional Education Is
The World Health Organization (2010) defined interprofessional education as occurring when students from two or more professions learn about, from and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes. The definition excludes a common substitute: students from different programs sitting in the same lecture without interacting. Learning together requires shared tasks in which each profession's knowledge is needed and students must negotiate roles and decisions. The WHO framework also argued that interprofessional education prepares a collaborative practice-ready workforce and that health systems benefit when professionals learn to collaborate before and during practice.
Competencies to Guide Outcomes
The Interprofessional Education Collaborative (2016) organized core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice into four domains: values and ethics for interprofessional practice, roles and responsibilities, interprofessional communication and teams and teamwork. Each domain includes specific sub-competencies, such as communicating one's role clearly to patients and other professionals and applying relationship-building values and team principles to plan and deliver care. The collaborative's sponsoring organizations span many health professions, which makes the competencies a shared language that nursing, social work, public health and health administration faculty can all use. Pine Ridge will write one program outcome for each domain, shared across all four programs, so that students from each profession are working toward the same competencies in joint activities.
What the Evidence Shows
Enthusiasm for interprofessional education has outpaced the evidence. Reeves et al. (2013) conducted a Cochrane review of studies that evaluated interprofessional education interventions against control groups and measured effects on professional practice or health care outcomes. They found fifteen studies. Some reported positive outcomes, such as improved working culture and patient satisfaction in emergency departments, improved collaborative team behavior and reduced clinical error rates, and better management of care in several settings, while others found mixed or no effects. Because the studies were few, varied and often small, the reviewers concluded that the evidence did not allow generalizable conclusions about the effectiveness of interprofessional education. For Pine Ridge, the implication is to design carefully, measure outcomes and avoid promising partners that the program will reduce errors or improve patient outcomes on its own.
Three Online Experiences
First, a shared case module in the program's second term: small teams of four, one student from each program, work through an unfolding case of an older man with heart failure, depression and housing insecurity over three weeks. Each stage requires knowledge from more than one profession, such as a social worker's assessment of benefits eligibility or a health administration student's understanding of post-acute payment rules, and teams post a joint care plan with a brief statement of each member's contribution.
Second, a synchronous virtual team meeting in the leadership course: students role-play a discharge planning conference by video, with a faculty member playing the patient's daughter, and must reach a plan the family accepts. A structured debriefing addresses communication and role clarity.
Third, a workplace project in the capstone: each nursing student interviews two colleagues from other professions at their own workplace about a shared problem, such as delays in discharge, and proposes an improvement developed with them. Because RN to BSN students work in health care, this project brings interprofessional learning into real practice.
Assessment and Faculty Agreements
Assessment will use a shared rubric aligned with the four IPEC domains, scored by faculty from at least two programs for each team product, and a brief self-assessment of collaborative competence at the start and end of the program. Peer evaluation within teams will inform individual grades. Joint activities require agreements that are easy to overlook: aligned academic calendars for the shared weeks, a common learning platform, workload credit for faculty from each program and a shared policy for team conflicts. The four program directors will sign a memorandum covering these points before the first shared module runs.
Using What Working Nurses Bring
RN to BSN students differ from prelicensure students in an important way: they have already worked on interprofessional teams, sometimes for decades, and they bring both skill and frustration. Their experience can enrich the shared modules, since a nurse who has sat through hundreds of discharge conferences knows where plans fall apart. It can also bring entrenched assumptions about other professions, such as the belief that social workers only arrange placements or that administrators care only about cost. The shared case is designed to challenge those assumptions by placing each profession's knowledge where it is genuinely needed. Early in the module, each team member will describe what their profession contributes and what they wish other professions understood about their work, which gives students from other programs a chance to correct misconceptions directly.
Social work, public health and health administration students, most of whom also work, bring perspectives nursing students rarely hear, such as how payment rules shape discharge options or how a county health department sets priorities. Faculty will prepare discussion prompts that draw these perspectives out rather than letting the most experienced clinicians dominate, and team roles such as facilitator and recorder will rotate.
Conclusion
Interprofessional education belongs in Pine Ridge's RN to BSN program because the Essentials require it and because collaboration improves when it is learned deliberately. Grounding outcomes in the IPEC domains, designing experiences in which students truly learn with each other and assessing them jointly gives the program a sound approach. The Cochrane evidence counsels humility: the program should measure what its experiences achieve and claim only what its data support.
References
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), Article CD002213. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3
World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. World Health Organization.
What the NUR 654 Module 4 instructions ask for
Interprofessional education papers in NUR 654 usually ask you to explain what interprofessional education is, review competencies and evidence and propose how to integrate it into a nursing curriculum. Expect to define the concept, use a competency framework, appraise the research and design learning experiences with assessment. Plan on about five pages in APA 7. Be precise about the difference between learning together and learning side by side, write outcomes from a recognized competency framework, report the strength of the evidence honestly, design experiences that require each profession's knowledge, plan joint assessment and address the practical agreements among programs that make shared learning possible. For RN to BSN students, consider how their work experience helps and hinders.
How this NUR 654 Module 4 interprofessional paper example is built
This paper plans interprofessional education for a composite college's online RN to BSN program with its social work, public health and health administration programs. It uses the WHO definition of students learning about, from and with each other and sets one shared outcome for each of the four IPEC domains. The Reeves Cochrane review, with fifteen studies and mixed results, tempers expectations. Three experiences follow: a shared unfolding case, a virtual discharge conference and a workplace project with colleagues from other professions. A shared rubric, peer evaluation and a memorandum among program directors complete the plan. Working nurses' experience is used while their assumptions about other professions are challenged.
Where the NUR 654 Module 4 rubric puts the points
Grading of interprofessional papers generally weighs accurate definition of the concept, use of a competency framework, honest appraisal of evidence, the design of learning experiences, assessment, feasibility and APA 7 writing. Top-band papers design experiences in which each profession's contribution is necessary rather than activities where students merely share a space. Graders reward outcomes drawn from the IPEC domains, evidence reported with its limitations and assessments scored by faculty from more than one profession. Addressing calendars, platforms and workload credit shows the practical understanding that makes interprofessional education actually happen. Attention to what experienced learners bring, including assumptions, adds depth. Plans that measure outcomes rather than assume them also score well.
NUR 654 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points
Interprofessional papers lose points when shared lectures are presented as interprofessional education, when competencies are named without shaping outcomes, when evidence is overstated or when practical barriers among programs are ignored. Another gap is assessing only nursing students' perspectives. Define the concept precisely, write outcomes from IPEC, appraise evidence honestly, design interdependent tasks, assess jointly and plan the agreements. If your setting lacks partner programs, or your paper focuses on interprofessional simulation or clinical placements, send those details with your NUR 654 prompt so the design fits. Plan for the experience and assumptions working nurses bring, and rotate team roles. Measure, rather than assume, what students gain.
Get NUR 654 Module 4 written to your instructions
Send us your NUR 654 prompt, the programs you could partner with and how the paper is graded. We will define interprofessional education precisely, write outcomes from IPEC, appraise the evidence honestly and design experiences that require every profession, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 654 papers and related MSN samples
- NUR 654 Module 1 Discussion: Why the Goldmark and Brown Reports Still Matter
- NUR 654 Module 2 Curriculum Model Paper: Tyler's Four Questions Applied to an RN to BSN Curriculum
- NUR 654 Module 3 Milestone One: The External Frame: Regulation and Accreditation
- NUR 557 Module 7 Milestone Two: Epilepsy, Valproate and a Safer Choice Before Pregnancy
- NUR 555 Module 9 Final Project: Separating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus From Its Mimics
- NUR 640 Module 1 Discussion: Formative Checks That Change Tomorrow's Class
- NUR 636 Module 9 Final Project: Iron Deficiency Anemia and Language Delay at Two
NUR 654 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 654 Module 4 Interprofessional Paper sample?
This page carries the full paper: the WHO definition, the four IPEC domains, Cochrane evidence and three online interprofessional experiences for an RN to BSN program.
What is interprofessional education?
Occasions when students from two or more professions learn about, from and with each other to enable collaboration and improve health outcomes.
What are the four IPEC competency domains?
Values and ethics for interprofessional practice, roles and responsibilities, interprofessional communication and teams and teamwork.
Does interprofessional education improve outcomes?
A Cochrane review found some positive effects but too few and varied studies to draw general conclusions.
How can online programs offer interprofessional education?
Through shared case modules, virtual team meetings and workplace projects that require each profession's knowledge.