PHE 340 is SNHU’s Social and Behavioral Health course. It centers on social and behavioral foundations of health: individual, interpersonal and community levels of influence, the health belief model, the theory of planned behavior, the transtheoretical model, social norms, social cognitive theory and self-efficacy, environmental supports, behavioral diagnosis through surveys and interviews and theory-based intervention design. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "phe 340 module 3", "PHE340 sample paper" and "PHE 340 milestone example" land on this page.
What PHE 340 is really about
PHE 340 is where SNHU's BS in Public Health students learn the major behavior theories, and graders expect theories applied, not recited. Strong work picks constructs that fit the behavior, uses the audience's own words to fill them in, explains which constructs are most changeable and designs interventions in which every activity targets a named construct, while recognizing that laws, design and enforcement often change behavior more than persuasion does.
The samples are set in a composite Sandhills county of about 6,000 people in north central Nebraska, a state where officers may cite drivers for not wearing a belt only when stopping them for something else. Most residents drive pickups on gravel and paved roads every day, crashes often involve a single vehicle rolling on a rural road and the county coroner has noted that most local crash deaths in recent years were unbelted drivers. The county and its residents are illustrative.
What PHE 340’s modules ask for
Across eight modules, PHE 340 typically asks for discussions on the social nature of behavior and on stages and norms, short papers applying the health belief model, the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory, and two projects: a behavioral diagnosis using local data and a theory-based intervention.
Where students lose points in PHE 340
The most common PHE 340 deduction is reciting a theory's constructs without filling them with evidence about the actual audience. The second is designing an intervention whose activities do not map to the constructs the student identified as most important. Graders also mark down papers that treat behavior as purely individual, ignore the role of laws and environments, and present theory as proven fact rather than a tool. The fix is to ask the audience, map every answer to a construct and let the weakest construct drive the design.
The PHE 340 drawers
PHE 340 Module 1 Discussion example
A first-week post from a composite Sandhills student who rides along with a county road crew and notices that nobody in the truck buckles up, then argues that belt use is shaped less by individual knowledge than by what crews, families and the law make normal, drawing on Strine and colleagues on rural and urban differences in belt use, Dinh-Zarr and colleagues on laws and enforcement and McLeroy and colleagues on levels of influence. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 2 Health Belief Model Short Paper example
A short paper that applies the health belief model to belt use among Sandhills ranchers, filling each construct with what twelve interviewed drivers said: low susceptibility on short gravel trips, high severity, benefits accepted in theory, barriers of getting in and out of the truck and gates, few cues to action and confidence not in doubt, and concluding that susceptibility and barriers are the constructs worth targeting, drawing on Janz and Becker, Strine and colleagues and Dinh-Zarr and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 3 Planned Behavior Short Paper example
A short paper that applies the theory of planned behavior to belt use on Sandhills ranch roads, separating drivers' attitudes, the people whose opinions matter to them and their sense of control, using interview answers to show that injunctive norms favor belts while the descriptive norm of an unbuckled cab does not, and that intention collapses on gate-heavy runs, drawing on Ajzen, Strine and colleagues and Janz and Becker. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 4 Discussion example
A discussion in which a composite Sandhills student sorts interviewed drivers into stages of change, from a rancher who sees no reason to buckle near home to a young worker who buckles except when the crew doesn't, and argues that stage-matched messages help but that norms and routines move people between stages faster than information, drawing on Prochaska and Velicer, Ajzen and Strine and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 5 Project One example
The first PHE 340 project diagnoses seat belt use in a composite Sandhills county with three kinds of evidence: roadside observation of 610 pickups at a grain elevator and a highway junction, a survey of 240 adult drivers at the county fair and livestock sale and the earlier interviews, then maps the results onto health belief, planned behavior and stage constructs to rank what most strongly separates drivers who buckle on short trips from those who do not, drawing on Strine and colleagues, Ajzen, Janz and Becker, Prochaska and Velicer and McLeroy and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 6 Social Cognitive Short Paper example
A short paper that applies social cognitive theory to belt use among Sandhills drivers, explaining reciprocal determinism between person, behavior and environment, observational learning from foremen and fathers, outcome expectations, self-regulation on gate-heavy runs and environmental supports such as employer vehicle policies and keeping chimes working, then shows how the theory turns the diagnosis into specific strategies, drawing on Bandura, Dinh-Zarr and colleagues and McLeroy and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 7 Project Two example
The second PHE 340 project designs Buckle Every Gate, a one-year plan for a composite Sandhills county with five components mapped construct by construct: foremen and respected ranchers as visible models, belt policies for county and cooperative vehicles, gate-run routines taught at chore-heavy employers, local rollover stories told by people who survived them and a harvest enforcement and chime repair week, with objectives, a logic table, partners, budget and an evaluation using the same roadside observation as the diagnosis, drawing on Bandura, Ajzen, Janz and Becker, Dinh-Zarr and colleagues and Strine and colleagues. Full sample paper, read it free.
PHE 340 Module 8 Discussion example
A closing post in which the composite Sandhills student reflects on what a term of behavior theory taught about real ranchers: that each theory lit up a different corner of the same pickup cab, that the people drivers watch mattered more than the facts they knew and that theory works best as a set of questions to ask an audience, recalling a 64-year-old rancher who started buckling after his foreman did, drawing on Bandura, Ajzen and Janz and Becker. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a PHE 340 sample the right way
Read a PHE 340 sample by checking whether each theory construct is filled with evidence about the real audience, whether the most changeable constructs are identified and whether every intervention activity targets a named construct alongside laws and environments. For PHE 340, bring the prompt, your behavior or the course case and the rubric; a first custom sample is returned free in 24-48h.
PHE 340 questions, answered
What does PHE 340 cover?
The social and behavioral sciences in public health, including the health belief model, theory of planned behavior, transtheoretical model, social cognitive theory, norms and the ecological model.
Do I have to choose one theory in PHE 340?
Usually several are applied across the term, and projects often combine constructs from more than one theory.
What makes a strong PHE 340 project?
Constructs filled with evidence from the audience, a clear choice of the most changeable ones and activities mapped construct by construct.