BMB 655 Module 6 Milestone Two Example

Reviewed by Portia Lambrick, MBA

This BMB 655 Module 6 Milestone Two sample decides whether a music company should buy a catalog, at what price and with what financing. SNHU BMB 655 (BMB-655) asks MBA in Music Business students for this second final project milestone in Module Six. A composite Nashville publisher has valued a retiring songwriter's 600-song catalog at about $3.0 million on its own, against an asking price of $3.6 million. The paper adds the value only this buyer can capture, works out the deal's present-value gain and its rate of return at a negotiated price, designs a loan and tests its coverage, proposes terms that protect against title and termination risks and recommends whether to proceed.

CourseBMB 655 Music Business Finance
ModuleModule 6
Paper typegraduate milestone evaluating a catalog acquisition and its financing
LengthAbout 1,010 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMBA in Music Business
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BMB 655 Module 6

1

Catalog Acquisition Decision and Financing

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

BMB 655: Music Business Finance

Milestone Two

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names both the decision and its funding.
2

Catalog Acquisition Decision and Financing

Introduction

Module Five valued the 600-song catalog at about $3.0 million on its own, after allowing for co-writers' termination rights, against an asking price of $3.6 million. This milestone decides whether the publisher should buy it and how to pay for it. It adds the value only this buyer can capture, measures the deal's NPV and IRR at a negotiated price, designs and stress-tests a loan, proposes protective terms and sets a walk-away price. The decision also responds to Milestone One's finding that too much of the publisher's income rests on a handful of titles and one writer; the catalog would ease that dependence by adding about 600 songs by other writers.

What this page is doingThe decision to be made.
3

Value to This Buyer

Two benefits are specific to this buyer. First, administration savings: the seller paid an outside administrator 12 percent of collections, about $45,000 a year, while the publisher can administer the catalog with existing staff and systems at an added cost of about $20,000, saving about $25,000 a year. Second, sync income: the seller's catalog earned almost nothing from licensing because no one pitched it, while the publisher's licensing team places about 1 percent of its songs a year at an average net of about $6,500; applied conservatively to the new catalog, that suggests about $40,000 a year. Damodaran (2012) warns that buyers often overpay by paying the seller for value the buyer itself will create, so these benefits are estimated cautiously and the price will not reflect all of them.

Valued with the same 10 percent rate and minus 1 percent long-run growth as the catalog, the two benefits are worth about $590,000 together. The catalog's value to the publisher is therefore about $3.58 million: $2.99 million standalone, after the termination adjustment, plus $0.59 million in benefits.

What this page is doingBenefits only the publisher can capture.
4

Net Present Value and Return

The seller's asking price is $3.6 million. Given comparable sales and the age of the catalog, a price of $3.3 million is a realistic target. At that price, the net present value to the publisher is about $280,000. The internal rate of return, for a perpetuity declining at 1 percent with first-year cash of about $404,000 including both benefits, is about 11.2 percent, above the 10 percent required return. At the full asking price, the net present value would be slightly negative, about minus $25,000, with a return of about 10.2 percent before the termination losses, which leaves no margin for error. Brealey et al. (2020) treat a project as worth doing when the present value of what it returns exceeds what it costs; this one passes that test, but only modestly, and only at prices well below the asking figure.

What this page is doingTesting a negotiated price.
5

Financing

The publisher has $1.15 million in cash and an existing $600,000 term loan. It proposes paying $900,000 in cash and borrowing $2.4 million from a specialist music-rights lender against the security of both the new and existing catalogs, at about 7.75 percent over twelve years. Annual payments of principal and interest would be about $314,000.

Debt service coverage under three income cases, first year

CaseCatalog income with benefitsLoan paymentCoverage
Expected$404,000$314,0001.29
Income 15% lower$343,000$314,0001.09
Income 25% lower$303,000$314,0000.96

Under expected income, the catalog covers its own loan with a modest margin. If its income fell 25 percent, the publisher's existing operating income of about $510,000 would cover the shortfall. A ten-year loan would raise payments to about $354,000 and leave coverage near 1.14, so the longer term is preferred.

What this page is doingCash and a catalog-secured loan.
6

Deal Terms

Passman (2023) notes that catalog purchases depend on clean chain of title: proof that the seller owns what he is selling. The publisher will require representations that the seller owns the stated shares of each song, a schedule of every co-writer and their agreements, and indemnification for title claims. Ten percent of the price, $330,000, will be held back for three years to cover any claims. The seller will also be asked to provide notices of any termination already served. If the seller rejects the holdback, the publisher should reduce its price by a similar amount. Due diligence before signing will include a registration audit, checking that every song is registered with the performing rights organizations and the Mechanical Licensing Collective under the correct shares, because unregistered or misregistered songs are a common source of uncollected income and can be a quick gain for a new owner.

What this page is doingProtecting against what the numbers cannot.
7

Integration

Closing is the start of the work. In the first ninety days the publisher will transfer administration from the seller's administrator, notify collecting organizations and licensees of the new ownership, load the catalog into its royalty system and tag the songs for its licensing team. Income will dip for one or two quarters as statements catch up with the change of ownership, which the cash budget in Module Eight will need to reflect. The seller has agreed to remain available as a consultant for a year to help locate contracts and answer questions about co-writers, at a modest fee that is included in the price.

What this page is doingThe first year after closing.
8

Recommendation

The publisher should buy the catalog at $3.3 million and walk away above $3.4 million, financing it with $900,000 in cash and a twelve-year $2.4 million loan, with a 10 percent holdback. The purchase earns a return modestly above the required rate, reduces income concentration and uses the publisher's strengths in administration and licensing. The recommendation rests on the conservative benefit estimates; if the licensing team fails to place any of the new songs, the purchase at $3.3 million gives up only about $85,000 of value, an acceptable downside for an investment that also diversifies the company and adds 600 songs the licensing team can keep pitching for years.

What this page is doingBuy, with a ceiling.
9

Conclusion

Valued on its own, the catalog does not justify the asking price. Valued with the benefits this buyer can create, and bought at a negotiated price with protective terms, it adds value, diversifies the company's income and can carry most of its own financing. Milestone Three will examine the company's overall funding plan with this purchase included, alongside the other demands on its cash over the next three years.

What this page is doingThe decision is summarized.
10

References

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Passman, D. S. (2023). All you need to know about the music business (11th ed.). Simon & Schuster.

What the BMB 655 Module 6 instructions ask for

Milestone Two in BMB 655 typically asks you to make and defend an investment decision for the music company in your final project, often an acquisition, a new venture or a major expansion. Guidelines usually call for capital budgeting tools such as NPV and IRR, a financing plan, risk analysis and a recommendation. Strong submissions distinguish the asset's standalone value from its value to this particular buyer, test the financing against the cash the investment will produce, and use negotiation terms to manage risks that the numbers cannot remove. The recommendation should state the conditions under which the company should walk away, along with the price above which it should not go.

How this BMB 655 Module 6 milestone two example is built

The paper starts from the Module Five value of about $3.0 million and adds two benefits only this buyer can capture: about $25,000 a year in administration savings and about $40,000 a year in added sync income from pitching the catalog to supervisors. With those, the catalog is worth about $3.58 million to the publisher. At a negotiated price of $3.3 million, the net present value is about $280,000 and the internal rate of return about 11 percent. A $2.4 million twelve-year loan secured by both catalogs costs about $314,000 a year, covered 1.3 times by the catalog's income. Terms include a 10 percent holdback for title and termination claims, and the paper recommends buying at no more than $3.4 million.

Where the BMB 655 Module 6 rubric puts the points

Scoring on this milestone generally reflects the capital budgeting analysis, the distinction between standalone and buyer-specific value, the financing plan and its coverage, the risk analysis, the use of deal terms and the clarity of the recommendation. High-scoring papers show their calculations, explain each assumption, stress-test debt service against weaker income and propose specific terms that shift risk to the seller where appropriate. They set a walk-away price. Papers lose credit for skipping the integration work after closing, for counting synergies without evidence, for financing that ignores debt coverage, for recommendations without conditions and for treating the asking price as fixed.

BMB 655 Module 6 help: the mistakes that cost points

Acquisition decisions often go wrong when the buyer counts every possible benefit and pays for all of them. Separate the asset's value on its own from what only you can add, and be conservative about the second. Test the financing: if income falls 20 percent, can you still make the loan payments, and from what other source? Use deal terms, such as holdbacks and representations about ownership, to handle risks you cannot quantify. Set a maximum price and say why. Finally, connect the decision to the company's broader situation from Milestone One, such as the need to reduce concentration in a few songs, and to the cash it will need while the purchase settles in.

Get BMB 655 Module 6 written to your instructions

Send the BMB 655 Milestone Two guidelines and your valuation. The paper will add buyer-specific value, compute NPV and IRR at a negotiated price, design and test the financing and set protective terms. Usually two days; a first milestone is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More BMB 655 papers and related MBA in Music Business samples

BMB 655 Module 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free BMB 655 Module 6 Milestone Two sample?

The full BMB 655 Milestone Two acquisition decision and financing plan for a 600-song catalog is on this page.

What is the difference between standalone value and value to a buyer?

Standalone value is what the asset is worth on its own; value to a buyer adds benefits that buyer can capture, such as cost savings or new income, which it should be careful not to pay away.

How should a catalog purchase be financed?

Often with a mix of cash and debt secured by catalog income, sized so that expected royalties cover loan payments with a margin even if income declines.

What is a debt service coverage ratio?

Income available for debt payments divided by required principal and interest; lenders typically want it well above 1.0 to allow for shortfalls.

What is a holdback in an acquisition?

A portion of the price held back for a period to cover claims, such as disputes over ownership of copyrights, before being paid to the seller.