| Course | BUS 225 Critical Business Skills for Success |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | undergraduate project report analyzing a business problem and recommending solutions |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUS 225 Module 4
Callback Problem Analysis and Recommendations
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
BUS 225: Critical Business Skills for Success
Project One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Callback Problem Analysis and Recommendations
Summary
Callbacks rose from 6 to 11 percent of visits mainly because of two company decisions: the March switch to a cheaper perimeter product and the end of a text that told customers to expect some insect activity after treatment. Newer technicians and busier routes contribute smaller effects. The data do not show that technicians have become careless. Four changes, costing about $26,000 a year, should bring callbacks back to about 7 percent and cut roughly $40,000 a year from the cost of return trips, with a larger benefit from fewer cancellations.
The Problem
Over the year to August 2025, nearly one visit in nine became a free return trip, up from about one in seventeen the year before; the extra trips cost some $62,000, and the share of customers quitting each year climbed by five points to 19 percent.
How the Problem Was Investigated
Six possible causes were identified through interviews and a review of changes in the past year, organized with a cause-and-effect diagram (Ishikawa, 1986). Each was tested against 31,400 service records by comparing callback rates before and after March 2025, across service types, technician experience and route density, and by what technicians found on return visits.
Findings
Evidence on each possible cause
| Possible cause | Key evidence | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Cheaper perimeter product | Perimeter callbacks rose from 5% to 13% after March; interior unchanged | Strong |
| Discontinued customer text | No-pests-found callbacks rose from 15% to 38% of callbacks | Strong |
| New technicians, shorter training | 12% versus 10% for experienced technicians | Moderate |
| More stops per route | 11.8% at 17 or more stops versus 10.1% under 15 | Moderate |
| Wet summer | Interior callbacks flat; neighboring companies steady | Weak |
| Technician carelessness | Rise concentrated in one service; experienced staff affected too | Weak |
Knaflic (2015) recommends that analysts make the main message of a table obvious, and the message here is that the two strongest causes are both changes the company made and can reverse.
Recommendations
Recommended actions
| Action | Cost per year | Expected effect |
|---|---|---|
| Test old perimeter product on half of routes for two months, then adopt if confirmed | About $11,000 if adopted | Perimeter callbacks back toward 5% |
| Restore the post-treatment text this week | Under $500 | Fewer no-pests-found callbacks |
| Return new-hire training to three weeks | About $9,000 | Narrow the gap for new technicians |
| Cap routes at fifteen stops, adding one technician in peak months | About $6,000 net of added revenue | Small reduction in callbacks |
The product test comes first because it is the largest effect and the least certain of the causes to reverse: the March change coincided with busier routes, and a two-month test on half the routes will separate the two. The text should be restored immediately since it costs almost nothing.
Why These Four and Not Others
Several other options were considered. Switching to a premium product used by some competitors would likely reduce callbacks further but would cost about $38,000 more a year than the old product, and the evidence does not yet show it is needed. Adding a follow-up visit two weeks after every perimeter treatment would catch problems early but would add about 6,000 visits a year, far more than the callbacks it would prevent. Offering customers a small credit for each callback would protect goodwill but would reward the company for failures rather than prevent them. The four recommended actions address the causes the evidence supports at the lowest cost, and the measurement plan will show whether more is needed.
Implementation
The office manager will restore the post-treatment text through the scheduling software this week; it requires only reactivating a message template. The purchasing coordinator will order the old perimeter product for half the routes, chosen so that each half includes busy and quiet routes and new and experienced technicians, and the test will run in September and October. The training lead will restore the third week of new-hire training for the two technicians starting in October. The operations manager will redesign routes to cap stops at fifteen, with a seasonal technician added from April to September. The analyst will compile results monthly and report the product test after eight weeks.
Expected Results
If the old product restores perimeter callbacks to their earlier level and the text cuts no-pests-found callbacks back to about 15 percent of callbacks, the overall rate should fall to about 7 percent, about 1,000 fewer return visits a year, worth about $48,000 in technician time and materials. After the $26,000 in added costs, net savings are about $22,000, but the larger gain is in retention: if cancellations fall back toward 14 percent, the company keeps about 300 more customers a year, worth roughly $90,000 in annual revenue.
The Proposed Bonus Penalty
The owner's proposal to cut bonuses for technicians with more than three callbacks a month rests on the carelessness explanation, which the evidence does not support. Deming (1986) argued that most quality problems arise from the system, such as materials, methods and training, rather than from individual workers, and that blaming workers for system problems damages morale without improving quality. A penalty now would fall mainly on technicians working perimeter routes with the new product, and it could push experienced technicians to leave. The owner's concern about effort is reasonable, and the measurement plan below will show whether any individual technicians stand out once the system causes are fixed.
Measurement
The company will track the callback rate monthly by service type, the share of callbacks finding no pests, the rate for new versus experienced technicians and the cancellation rate. Results from the product test will be reviewed after two months. A short monthly update will report these four numbers, with a one-paragraph note on anything unusual, and the owner and analyst will meet after the test to decide whether to adopt the old product on every route.
Conclusion
The callback rise has identifiable causes that the company can reverse at modest cost. Restoring the customer text now, testing the old product, restoring training and capping routes should cut callbacks by about a third and protect customer retention. The bonus penalty should be set aside until the data show it is needed.
References
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Ishikawa, K. (1986). Guide to quality control (2nd ed.). Asian Productivity Organization.
Knaflic, C. N. (2015). Storytelling with data: A data visualization guide for business professionals. Wiley.
What the BUS 225 Module 4 instructions ask for
Project One in BUS 225 typically asks you to analyze a business problem and recommend a solution in a professional report. You usually state the problem, explain how you investigated it, present the evidence, evaluate alternative explanations or solutions, recommend action and explain how results would be measured. Strong reports are written for a decision maker who will read the first page carefully and skim the rest, so they lead with the conclusion, support it with evidence and keep each recommendation tied to a finding. They also address the decision maker's own view of the problem respectfully, especially if the evidence contradicts it. Most versions also ask for an implementation plan showing who will do what and when.
How this BUS 225 Module 4 project one example is built
The report opens with a summary stating that callbacks rose mainly because of a cheaper perimeter product and a discontinued customer text, not technician carelessness. It sets out the problem in one sentence, reviews the six explanations with the evidence for each, and recommends four actions: test the old product on half the routes for two months, restore the post-treatment text immediately, return new-hire training to three weeks and cap routes at fifteen stops. It estimates the cost of each and an expected fall in callbacks to about 7 percent, saving about $40,000 a year, and explains why the bonus penalty would not address the causes. A measurement plan closes the report.
Where the BUS 225 Module 4 rubric puts the points
The Project One rubric generally scores the problem statement, the analysis and use of evidence, consideration of alternatives, the quality and feasibility of recommendations, the measurement plan and professional writing. The strongest reports lead with a clear summary, connect each recommendation to specific evidence, estimate costs and benefits, and anticipate the decision maker's questions. They also respectfully address competing views. Reports lose credit for recommendations not supported by the analysis, for missing costs, for burying the conclusion and for ignoring how the owner will judge whether the fixes worked. Graders also look for options that were considered and rejected, which shows the recommendation is a choice rather than the only idea.
BUS 225 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points
The most common weakness in problem analysis reports is presenting the investigation in the order it happened rather than the order the reader needs. Put the conclusion and recommendations first, then the evidence. Tie every recommendation to a finding, give it a rough cost and say what result to expect. If the decision maker holds a different view, address it directly with evidence and without condescension. Include a short plan for measuring results so the owner can see whether the changes worked. Explain who will carry out each recommendation and by when, since an owner cannot act on a recommendation without an owner. Mentioning one or two rejected options strengthens the case for the ones you chose.
Get BUS 225 Module 4 written to your instructions
Send the BUS 225 Project One guidelines and your problem. The report will define the problem, weigh the evidence on each cause, recommend costed actions and set measures, written for a busy decision maker. About two days; a first project is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More BUS 225 papers and related BS Business Administration samples
- BUS 225 Module 1 Discussion: The Skills an Employer Notices First
- BUS 225 Module 2 Critical Thinking Assignment: What the Callback Problem Really Is
- BUS 225 Module 3 Data Analysis Assignment: Reading a Year of Service Records
- ACC 317 Module 4 Project One: Five Steps for a Resort Contract Under ASC 606
- ACC 430 Module 7 Project Two: Customer Profitability and Cost to Serve
- ACC 345 Module 5 Forecasting Assignment: Pro Forma Statements for Next Year
- FIN 320 Module 2 Financial Statement Analysis Paper
BUS 225 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free BUS 225 Module 4 Project One sample?
This page includes the complete BUS 225 Project One problem analysis report for a pest control company.
What should a problem analysis report include?
A summary of conclusions, the problem statement, the method, the evidence on possible causes, recommendations with costs and expected results, and a plan for measuring success.
How do you write recommendations for a business owner?
Lead with the recommended actions, link each to the evidence that supports it, estimate its cost and benefit, and explain how its results will be checked.
How should a report address a manager's mistaken assumption?
With evidence and respect, acknowledging the manager's experience, showing what the data indicate and explaining why another approach is more likely to work.
Why test a solution before adopting it fully?
Because a small, controlled test confirms whether the solution works and avoids the cost of a full change based on an incorrect diagnosis.