| Course | CSR 610 Business Ethics and Culture |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | graduate discussion post on goal pressure, rationalization and the normalization of shortcuts |
| Length | About 360 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MS Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for CSR 610 Module 4
Module Four Discussion
Friday Afternoons With the Batch Records
At the supplement plant I have been studying, quarterly shipping targets rose about 8 percent each quarter for three years. Early in that period, one second-shift supervisor found that completing batch records during the shift slowed his line by about twenty minutes. He began filling them in on Friday afternoons from notes and memory. His shift hit its target, and at the next town hall it was named the top shift. Within a year, most supervisors were doing the same. In the lab, analysts asked to check a failed potency result again learned that a passing retest closed the matter without paperwork. Retesting became routine.
The benefits of specific, challenging goals have been overstated, one group of researchers argues, because such goals can narrow attention to what is measured, encourage risk taking and motivate cutting corners on what is not (Ordóñez et al., 2009). Units shipped were measured; record accuracy and the reasons tests failed were not. That is almost exactly what happened here.
Anand et al. (2004) describe how questionable practices become accepted through rationalization and socialization. The plant had its rationalizations: "It's just paperwork," "The product is fine," "Everyone does it on Fridays." It also had socialization: new supervisors were shown the Friday routine by the people training them, and new analysts learned from colleagues that a retest was the normal next step. No one decided to falsify anything; the practice was learned. Treviño and Nelson treat this kind of drift as what one should expect when a company pays for outcomes and never inspects the route taken (Treviño & Nelson, 2021).
Two changes would interrupt it. First, supervisors' goals should include record accuracy checked by random audits, so that how a target is met becomes part of meeting it. Second, any failed test should require a written investigation signed by the quality manager before a retest result can be used, which makes the shortcut harder than the right path.
For classmates: when targets tighten again next spring, would these two changes hold, or would supervisors find a new way around them? What else would you add?
References
Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.13837437
Ordóñez, L. D., Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.37007999
Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2021). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (8th ed.). Wiley.
What the CSR 610 Module 4 instructions ask for
The Module Four discussion in CSR 610 usually asks how organizational culture, pressure or leadership influences ethical behavior. Prompts may ask about the role of goals and incentives, how unethical practices become normal or how leaders can prevent this. A strong post traces a specific practice from its start to its acceptance, shows the pressures and rationalizations involved and uses research to explain the pattern. It then proposes changes to the system rather than only to individuals. Replies can test whether a classmate's proposed change would survive the next quarter's targets. Many versions ask you to connect the case to a well-known corporate scandal, which works if you draw a specific parallel. Expect to cite at least one source on goals or rationalization.
How this CSR 610 Module 4 discussion example is built
The post describes how a supervisor began completing batch records on Friday afternoons when targets rose and recording during shifts slowed the line, and how others copied him because his shift kept winning. The lab, asked to check failed tests again, learned that a passing retest ended the problem. People explained the practices as paperwork, not quality, and as what everyone does. The post uses research on how specific, challenging goals can narrow attention and encourage cutting corners, and on how organizations come to accept and pass on questionable practices through rationalization and socialization. It proposes adding record accuracy to supervisors' goals and requiring a written investigation for any failed test, and asks whether these would survive pressure.
Where the CSR 610 Module 4 rubric puts the points
Marking for this discussion usually considers how well the post traces the development of a practice, the use of research on pressure and normalization, the focus on system-level causes, the quality of proposed changes and engagement. Strong posts identify the specific pressure, the first step, the rationalizations and the social processes that spread the practice, and they propose changes to goals, measures or structure. Posts that call the employees unethical without examining the system, or propose only more training, earn less. The most useful replies imagine a tight quarter and ask whether a classmate's fix would still stand. Instructors also value posts that name the rationalizations people actually used, since they reveal how the practice felt acceptable.
CSR 610 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points
Posts about culture and pressure often blame individuals or speak vaguely about bad culture. Trace one practice instead: where did it start, what pressure caused it, how did people explain it and how did it spread? Research on goal setting and on how organizations normalize questionable practice gives you the vocabulary. Then propose a change to the system, such as what supervisors are measured on, and ask whether it would hold when targets are tight. Avoid proposals that rely only on telling people to try harder. Quote or paraphrase what people said to justify the shortcut; rationalizations are evidence of culture.
Get CSR 610 Module 4 written to your instructions
Send the CSR 610 Module 4 prompt. The post will trace how pressure turned a shortcut into routine at one company, explain it with research and propose specific interruptions. About two days; your first post is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More CSR 610 papers and related MS Management samples
- CSR 610 Module 1 Discussion: Why Ethics Became a Business Problem in Ogden
- CSR 610 Module 2 Ethical Theories Assignment: A Borderline Batch Through Four Lenses
- CSR 610 Module 3 Milestone One: Assessing the Company's Ethical Culture
- ACC 610 Module 2 Codification Research Assignment: Principal or Agent for Spraying Services
- ACC 690 Module 6 Milestone Two: Accounting for a Transferable Clean Fuel Credit
- MBA 687 Module 5 Milestone Two Change Management Plan
- ACC 640 Module 4 Discussion: Skepticism and the Returns Reserve
CSR 610 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free CSR 610 Module 4 Discussion sample?
This page includes the full CSR 610 Module 4 post on how shipping targets turned shortcuts into routine at a supplement maker.
How can goals encourage unethical behavior?
Specific, demanding goals can narrow attention to the measured outcome, increase risk taking and encourage people to cut corners on things that are not measured.
How do unethical practices become normal in organizations?
Through small first steps that seem harmless, rationalizations that make them acceptable and socialization in which new members learn them as how things are done.
What are common rationalizations for workplace shortcuts?
Claims that no one is harmed, that everyone does it, that the rule is just paperwork, that higher goals justify it or that the organization demanded it.
How can leaders interrupt the normalization of shortcuts?
By measuring and rewarding how results are achieved, creating checks such as required investigations, telling stories about people who did the right thing and responding visibly when problems are raised.