| Course | HIM 550 Data Management and Data Quality |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | graduate milestone analyzing discharge timing, length of stay and emergency boarding |
| Length | About 1,020 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MS Health Information Management |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HIM 550 Module 5
Final Project Milestone Two: Does Leaving Before Noon Shorten Stays? Discharge Timing and Bed Flow in a Louisiana Hospital
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
HIM 550: Data Management and Data Quality
Final Project Milestone Two
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Final Project Milestone Two: Does Leaving Before Noon Shorten Stays? Discharge Timing and Bed Flow in a Louisiana Hospital
Cypress Hollow Medical Center's leaders intend to raise the share of patients discharged before noon from about a third to 40%, expecting shorter stays and fewer admitted patients held on emergency stretchers until a bed opens. The first milestone found the data usable only after replacing the registration discharge time with the nursing departure time and applying a unit crosswalk. This milestone uses the corrected data to ask whether earlier discharge is associated with shorter length of stay, whether it is associated with shorter emergency boarding and what leaders should expect from the new target.
Analytic Sample and Measures
The analysis began with the 9,840 discharges assessed in Milestone One. Following the written rules from that assessment, 186 deaths and 212 transfers to other acute hospitals were excluded, 131 patients who left against medical advice were set aside for separate review and 671 routine discharges with no nursing departure time were excluded, leaving 8,640 routine discharges.
Discharge before noon was defined as a nursing departure time before 12:00. Length of stay was measured in days from admission time to departure time. Emergency boarding was measured as hours from the admission order to the patient's arrival on an inpatient unit, drawn from the bed management system for 4,915 patients admitted through the emergency department. Every measure and exclusion is recorded in the project's data dictionary so the analysis can be repeated.
Describing the Data
Length of stay is strongly right-skewed: most patients stay a few days, and a small number stay weeks. The mean was 4.9 days, pulled upward by long stays, while the median was 3.7 days and half of all stays fell between 2.1 and 6.0 days. Because of this skew, the analysis reports medians and ranges rather than means and uses comparisons that do not assume a normal distribution. Overall, 3,180 of 8,640 patients, or 36.8%, left before noon. Table 1 shows that the rate differed sharply between medical and surgical units.
Table 1. Discharge Timing and Length of Stay by Unit Type, January to June
| Unit type | Discharges | Left before noon | Median length of stay, before noon | Median length of stay, after noon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical units | 5,410 | 28.1% | 4.3 days | 4.0 days |
| Surgical units | 3,230 | 51.4% | 3.1 days | 3.0 days |
| All routine discharges | 8,640 | 36.8% | 3.8 days | 3.6 days |
Note. Prepared by the author from the corrected discharge data set; deaths, transfers and patients leaving against advice excluded.
Weekly Pattern
A run chart of the weekly before-noon rate across 26 weeks showed a median of 36.5% with no shifts, trends or unusual runs. Perla et al. (2011) explain that such rules separate ordinary variation from signals of change, and by those rules the process was stable: nothing leaders tried during the six months, including a February reminder email, changed it. That matters for the target, because a stable process will not reach 40% without a change in how discharges are prepared.
Discharge Timing and Length of Stay
Patients who left before noon did not have shorter stays. Their median was 3.8 days compared with 3.6 days for afternoon departures, and the pattern held within both medical and surgical units. The likely explanation is that many morning discharges are patients held over an extra night, whose departure the following morning counts as early.
Published findings point the same way. In the program Wertheimer et al. (2014) described, the before-noon share climbed from 11% to 38% while the hospital's observed-to-expected length of stay fell, but the same effort also changed rounding and teamwork, so the timing itself cannot be credited with the drop. Rajkomar et al. (2016), studying medical and surgical discharges at an academic center, reported that morning discharge went along with slightly longer, not shorter, stays across medical and surgical patients. Together with local data, these studies suggest the target should not be sold as a way to shorten length of stay.
Discharge Timing and Emergency Boarding
The picture changes when the question is bed flow. On the 38 weekdays when at least 40% of patients left before noon, median boarding for emergency admissions was 3.2 hours; on the 41 weekdays below 30%, it was 4.6 hours. Emergency admission requests peak between late morning and midafternoon, while most departures occur between 2 and 5 p.m., so beds freed earlier line up better with the demand. This is an association across days, not proof of cause. Busy days may have fewer morning discharges and longer boarding for reasons unrelated to timing, such as high census or staffing, and the analysis could not adjust for all of them.
What the Old Timestamp Would Have Shown
To show why the quality assessment mattered, the analysis was repeated with the registration discharge time the dashboard has always used. On that basis only 29% of patients left before noon, the medical units appeared to discharge fewer than one patient in five in the morning and the link between morning discharges and shorter boarding almost disappeared, because clerk closing times bear little relation to when beds actually empty. Leaders reading that version would have concluded that the hospital was far from its target and that earlier discharge made no difference to the emergency department. Both conclusions would have been wrong. The comparison makes a practical case for the data management recommendations in the next milestone: the measure must be built on the event it claims to describe.
Limitations
The analysis covers only six months at one hospital. Nursing departure times were missing for 671 routine discharges, and if those patients differ from the rest, the rates may be slightly off. Length of stay was not adjusted for severity, although comparing within unit types reduces that concern. Finally, the before-noon and boarding results describe patterns, not the effect of an intervention.
What Leaders Should Expect
The data support pursuing earlier discharge for bed flow, not for shorter stays. If the goal is described as reducing emergency boarding, leaders can track the right outcome, set realistic expectations and avoid keeping patients an extra night to leave in the morning, which would lengthen stays. The medical units, at 28%, have the most room to improve. The next milestone will recommend how the hospital should manage these data so the measure stays accurate as the program begins.
References
Perla, R. J., Provost, L. P., & Murray, S. K. (2011). The run chart: A simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(1), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2009.037895
Rajkomar, A., Valencia, V., Novelero, M., Mourad, M., & Auerbach, A. (2016). The association between discharge before noon and length of stay in medical and surgical patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 11(12), 859-861. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2529
Wertheimer, B., Jacobs, R. E. A., Bailey, M., Holstein, S., Chatfield, S., Ohta, B., Horrocks, A., & Hochman, K. (2014). Discharge before noon: An achievable hospital goal. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 9(4), 210-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2154
What the HIM 550 Module 5 instructions ask for
Milestone Two of the HIM 550 final project asks you to analyze data to inform a decision in your case organization. Expect around five pages in APA 7 plus tables or charts. Begin by stating the decision and the specific questions your analysis will answer, then describe the analytic sample, exclusions and how each measure is defined, following the rules from your quality assessment. Describe the data with statistics suited to their distribution, present results in clear tables or charts and compare local findings with published research. Separate association from cause, state limitations honestly and finish by explaining what the results mean for the decision leaders face.
How this HIM 550 Module 5 final project milestone two example is built
Cypress Hollow Medical Center's data manager analyzes 8,640 routine discharges using nursing departure time. Length of stay is skewed, so medians replace means, and a run chart of 26 weekly rates around a 36.5% median shows a stable process. Morning departures had slightly longer stays, 3.8 versus 3.6 days, matching Rajkomar and colleagues and qualifying Wertheimer and colleagues' results, while weekdays with at least 40% before noon had median emergency boarding of 3.2 hours against 4.6 on low days. The HIM 550 milestone advises leaders to frame the target around bed flow, lists its limits and points to the medical units. A rerun on the old timestamp shows how the wrong field would have misled leaders.
Where the HIM 550 Module 5 rubric puts the points
HIM 550 analysis milestones tend to be graded on a clear question tied to a decision, a documented sample and measures, statistics that fit the data's distribution, accurate tables and charts, comparison with research, honest separation of association from causation, stated limitations and implications that leaders can use, with APA 7 formatting. Stronger papers choose medians for skewed data, use run charts or control charts to read change over time and resist overstating what the numbers show. Graders reward analyses whose findings change the framing of a decision, as when a result redirects a target from one outcome to another, because that shows analysis serving management. Repeating results on a flawed field can also show why data quality work matters.
HIM 550 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points
HIM 550 analysis drafts tend to slip when a mean stands in for skewed data, when exclusions go unstated, when before-and-after comparisons ignore ordinary variation, when association is presented as cause or when the decision disappears under statistics. Some drafts also forget to carry forward the rules from their quality assessment. If your analysis uses a different question or data set, such as readmissions, clinic wait times or coding productivity, send the prompt and a summary of your data, and the milestone will be built around them with the same care. Any output you have from Excel or another tool helps. HIM 550 analyses we write define measures, describe distributions and tie results to the decision.
Get HIM 550 Module 5 written to your instructions
Send the HIM 550 Milestone Two guidelines, your decision question and a summary or file of your data. The analysis will define the sample and measures, describe distributions properly, present tables and a run chart, compare results with research, state limits and tell leaders what the numbers mean, in 24 to 48 hours, free on a first order. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More HIM 550 papers and related MS Health Information Management samples
- HIM 550 Module 1 Discussion: What Fitness for Use Means for Hospital Data
- HIM 550 Module 2 Journal: Following One Data Element Through Its Life Cycle
- HIM 550 Module 3 Final Project Milestone One: A Data Quality Assessment of the Discharge Data Set
- HIM 550 Module 4 Warehousing Short Paper: Warehouses, Metadata and the Nightly Load
- HIM 550 Module 6 Journal: The Ethics of Secondary Use
- HIM 550 Module 7 Final Project Milestone Three: Data Management Recommendations
- HIM 550 Module 8 Visualization Short Paper: Dashboards That Inform Rather Than Mislead
- HIM 550 Module 9 Final Project: The Data Management Plan
- HIM 550 Module 10 Reflection: What Managing Data Taught the Writer
- HIM 530 Module 10 Reflection: What Protecting Information Taught the Writer
- HIM 510 Module 3 Final Project Milestone One: A Revenue Cycle Assessment With Defined Measures
- HIM 520 Module 8 Policy Short Paper: Revising the Remote Work Policy
- HIM 500 Module 7 Final Project Milestone Three: Technology Recommendations for the Hospital
HIM 550 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HIM 550 Module 5 Milestone Two sample?
This page holds the whole HIM 550 Milestone Two paper: analyzing 8,640 discharges to test whether leaving before noon shortens stays or eases ED boarding.
Why report the median length of stay instead of the mean?
Length of stay is usually right-skewed, so a few long stays pull the mean up; the median better describes a typical patient.
Does discharge before noon shorten length of stay?
Published studies are mixed, and some found slightly longer stays; its clearer benefit may be freeing beds when emergency admissions peak.
What does a run chart show?
It plots a measure over time around its median so rules can distinguish ordinary variation from signs of real change.
Why separate association from causation in an analysis?
Two measures can move together because of a third factor, such as census, so an association alone cannot prove that one causes the other.