HIM 550 Module 5 Final Project Milestone Two Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This HIM 550 Module 5 Final Project Milestone Two sample analyzes discharge timing and length of stay to inform a decision leaders are about to make. It is written for SNHU HIM 550 (HIM-550), where MS Health Information Management students take data they have already tested and use them to answer a real question. At the composite 310-bed hospital in southern Louisiana, leaders plan to push for 40% of discharges before noon on the belief that it will shorten stays. Using the nursing departure time and 8,640 routine discharges, the analysis reports the skewed distribution of length of stay with medians, tracks weekly before-noon rates on a run chart and compares outcomes. Earlier discharges did not come with shorter stays, but days with more morning discharges had shorter emergency boarding. The milestone explains what the data can and cannot show.

CourseHIM 550 Data Management and Data Quality
ModuleModule 5
Paper typegraduate milestone analyzing discharge timing, length of stay and emergency boarding
LengthAbout 1,020 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMS Health Information Management
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HIM 550 Module 5

1

Final Project Milestone Two: Does Leaving Before Noon Shorten Stays? Discharge Timing and Bed Flow in a Louisiana Hospital

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

HIM 550: Data Management and Data Quality

Final Project Milestone Two

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title asks the decision question the analysis answers.
2

Final Project Milestone Two: Does Leaving Before Noon Shorten Stays? Discharge Timing and Bed Flow in a Louisiana Hospital

Cypress Hollow Medical Center's leaders intend to raise the share of patients discharged before noon from about a third to 40%, expecting shorter stays and fewer admitted patients held on emergency stretchers until a bed opens. The first milestone found the data usable only after replacing the registration discharge time with the nursing departure time and applying a unit crosswalk. This milestone uses the corrected data to ask whether earlier discharge is associated with shorter length of stay, whether it is associated with shorter emergency boarding and what leaders should expect from the new target.

What this page is doingThe introduction states the decision and the questions.
3

Analytic Sample and Measures

The analysis began with the 9,840 discharges assessed in Milestone One. Following the written rules from that assessment, 186 deaths and 212 transfers to other acute hospitals were excluded, 131 patients who left against medical advice were set aside for separate review and 671 routine discharges with no nursing departure time were excluded, leaving 8,640 routine discharges.

Discharge before noon was defined as a nursing departure time before 12:00. Length of stay was measured in days from admission time to departure time. Emergency boarding was measured as hours from the admission order to the patient's arrival on an inpatient unit, drawn from the bed management system for 4,915 patients admitted through the emergency department. Every measure and exclusion is recorded in the project's data dictionary so the analysis can be repeated.

What this page is doingExclusions and measure definitions follow the earlier rules.
4

Describing the Data

Length of stay is strongly right-skewed: most patients stay a few days, and a small number stay weeks. The mean was 4.9 days, pulled upward by long stays, while the median was 3.7 days and half of all stays fell between 2.1 and 6.0 days. Because of this skew, the analysis reports medians and ranges rather than means and uses comparisons that do not assume a normal distribution. Overall, 3,180 of 8,640 patients, or 36.8%, left before noon. Table 1 shows that the rate differed sharply between medical and surgical units.

Table 1. Discharge Timing and Length of Stay by Unit Type, January to June

Unit typeDischargesLeft before noonMedian length of stay, before noonMedian length of stay, after noon
Medical units5,41028.1%4.3 days4.0 days
Surgical units3,23051.4%3.1 days3.0 days
All routine discharges8,64036.8%3.8 days3.6 days

Note. Prepared by the author from the corrected discharge data set; deaths, transfers and patients leaving against advice excluded.

What this page is doingTable 1 shows skewed stays and unit differences.
5

Weekly Pattern

A run chart of the weekly before-noon rate across 26 weeks showed a median of 36.5% with no shifts, trends or unusual runs. Perla et al. (2011) explain that such rules separate ordinary variation from signals of change, and by those rules the process was stable: nothing leaders tried during the six months, including a February reminder email, changed it. That matters for the target, because a stable process will not reach 40% without a change in how discharges are prepared.

What this page is doingA run chart shows a stable process.
6

Discharge Timing and Length of Stay

Patients who left before noon did not have shorter stays. Their median was 3.8 days compared with 3.6 days for afternoon departures, and the pattern held within both medical and surgical units. The likely explanation is that many morning discharges are patients held over an extra night, whose departure the following morning counts as early.

Published findings point the same way. In the program Wertheimer et al. (2014) described, the before-noon share climbed from 11% to 38% while the hospital's observed-to-expected length of stay fell, but the same effort also changed rounding and teamwork, so the timing itself cannot be credited with the drop. Rajkomar et al. (2016), studying medical and surgical discharges at an academic center, reported that morning discharge went along with slightly longer, not shorter, stays across medical and surgical patients. Together with local data, these studies suggest the target should not be sold as a way to shorten length of stay.

What this page is doingLocal results are compared with two published studies.
7

Discharge Timing and Emergency Boarding

The picture changes when the question is bed flow. On the 38 weekdays when at least 40% of patients left before noon, median boarding for emergency admissions was 3.2 hours; on the 41 weekdays below 30%, it was 4.6 hours. Emergency admission requests peak between late morning and midafternoon, while most departures occur between 2 and 5 p.m., so beds freed earlier line up better with the demand. This is an association across days, not proof of cause. Busy days may have fewer morning discharges and longer boarding for reasons unrelated to timing, such as high census or staffing, and the analysis could not adjust for all of them.

What this page is doingBoarding results are reported with their limits.
8

What the Old Timestamp Would Have Shown

To show why the quality assessment mattered, the analysis was repeated with the registration discharge time the dashboard has always used. On that basis only 29% of patients left before noon, the medical units appeared to discharge fewer than one patient in five in the morning and the link between morning discharges and shorter boarding almost disappeared, because clerk closing times bear little relation to when beds actually empty. Leaders reading that version would have concluded that the hospital was far from its target and that earlier discharge made no difference to the emergency department. Both conclusions would have been wrong. The comparison makes a practical case for the data management recommendations in the next milestone: the measure must be built on the event it claims to describe.

What this page is doingRepeating the analysis on the old field shows the cost of poor data.
9

Limitations

The analysis covers only six months at one hospital. Nursing departure times were missing for 671 routine discharges, and if those patients differ from the rest, the rates may be slightly off. Length of stay was not adjusted for severity, although comparing within unit types reduces that concern. Finally, the before-noon and boarding results describe patterns, not the effect of an intervention.

What this page is doingLimitations are stated plainly.
10

What Leaders Should Expect

The data support pursuing earlier discharge for bed flow, not for shorter stays. If the goal is described as reducing emergency boarding, leaders can track the right outcome, set realistic expectations and avoid keeping patients an extra night to leave in the morning, which would lengthen stays. The medical units, at 28%, have the most room to improve. The next milestone will recommend how the hospital should manage these data so the measure stays accurate as the program begins.

What this page is doingThe analysis is turned into advice for the decision.
11

References

Perla, R. J., Provost, L. P., & Murray, S. K. (2011). The run chart: A simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(1), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2009.037895

Rajkomar, A., Valencia, V., Novelero, M., Mourad, M., & Auerbach, A. (2016). The association between discharge before noon and length of stay in medical and surgical patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 11(12), 859-861. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2529

Wertheimer, B., Jacobs, R. E. A., Bailey, M., Holstein, S., Chatfield, S., Ohta, B., Horrocks, A., & Hochman, K. (2014). Discharge before noon: An achievable hospital goal. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 9(4), 210-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2154

What the HIM 550 Module 5 instructions ask for

Milestone Two of the HIM 550 final project asks you to analyze data to inform a decision in your case organization. Expect around five pages in APA 7 plus tables or charts. Begin by stating the decision and the specific questions your analysis will answer, then describe the analytic sample, exclusions and how each measure is defined, following the rules from your quality assessment. Describe the data with statistics suited to their distribution, present results in clear tables or charts and compare local findings with published research. Separate association from cause, state limitations honestly and finish by explaining what the results mean for the decision leaders face.

How this HIM 550 Module 5 final project milestone two example is built

Cypress Hollow Medical Center's data manager analyzes 8,640 routine discharges using nursing departure time. Length of stay is skewed, so medians replace means, and a run chart of 26 weekly rates around a 36.5% median shows a stable process. Morning departures had slightly longer stays, 3.8 versus 3.6 days, matching Rajkomar and colleagues and qualifying Wertheimer and colleagues' results, while weekdays with at least 40% before noon had median emergency boarding of 3.2 hours against 4.6 on low days. The HIM 550 milestone advises leaders to frame the target around bed flow, lists its limits and points to the medical units. A rerun on the old timestamp shows how the wrong field would have misled leaders.

Where the HIM 550 Module 5 rubric puts the points

HIM 550 analysis milestones tend to be graded on a clear question tied to a decision, a documented sample and measures, statistics that fit the data's distribution, accurate tables and charts, comparison with research, honest separation of association from causation, stated limitations and implications that leaders can use, with APA 7 formatting. Stronger papers choose medians for skewed data, use run charts or control charts to read change over time and resist overstating what the numbers show. Graders reward analyses whose findings change the framing of a decision, as when a result redirects a target from one outcome to another, because that shows analysis serving management. Repeating results on a flawed field can also show why data quality work matters.

HIM 550 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points

HIM 550 analysis drafts tend to slip when a mean stands in for skewed data, when exclusions go unstated, when before-and-after comparisons ignore ordinary variation, when association is presented as cause or when the decision disappears under statistics. Some drafts also forget to carry forward the rules from their quality assessment. If your analysis uses a different question or data set, such as readmissions, clinic wait times or coding productivity, send the prompt and a summary of your data, and the milestone will be built around them with the same care. Any output you have from Excel or another tool helps. HIM 550 analyses we write define measures, describe distributions and tie results to the decision.

Get HIM 550 Module 5 written to your instructions

Send the HIM 550 Milestone Two guidelines, your decision question and a summary or file of your data. The analysis will define the sample and measures, describe distributions properly, present tables and a run chart, compare results with research, state limits and tell leaders what the numbers mean, in 24 to 48 hours, free on a first order. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More HIM 550 papers and related MS Health Information Management samples

HIM 550 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HIM 550 Module 5 Milestone Two sample?

This page holds the whole HIM 550 Milestone Two paper: analyzing 8,640 discharges to test whether leaving before noon shortens stays or eases ED boarding.

Why report the median length of stay instead of the mean?

Length of stay is usually right-skewed, so a few long stays pull the mean up; the median better describes a typical patient.

Does discharge before noon shorten length of stay?

Published studies are mixed, and some found slightly longer stays; its clearer benefit may be freeing beds when emergency admissions peak.

What does a run chart show?

It plots a measure over time around its median so rules can distinguish ordinary variation from signs of real change.

Why separate association from causation in an analysis?

Two measures can move together because of a third factor, such as census, so an association alone cannot prove that one causes the other.