| Course | IHP 670 Program Design, Planning and Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | graduate milestone framing a health program's purpose and evidence base |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MPH |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for IHP 670 Module 3
Milestone One: Framing Steady Steps, a Falls Prevention Program for Alder County
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP 670: Program Design, Planning and Evaluation
Module Three Milestone One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Milestone One: Framing Steady Steps, a Falls Prevention Program for Alder County
IHP 670 culminates in a full program proposal. This first milestone frames that program: why it exists, whom it serves first, what it will do and what evidence supports those choices. It builds directly on the needs assessment, which found that falls among Alder County's 64,000 older adults cause about 2,900 emergency visits a year and that almost no evidence-based programs exist.
Purpose Statement
Steady Steps aims to reduce falls and fall injuries among Alder County adults aged 65 and older by offering evidence-based balance and strength programs close to home, connecting primary care screening to those programs and reducing fear of falling so older adults stay active and independent.
Priority Population
All county adults 65 and older are eligible, but the program will prioritize those at highest risk and with the least access: residents of the three rural townships, people living alone, adults who have fallen in the past year and those who report fear of falling. These groups had the highest fall and admission rates in the needs assessment and the fewest services nearby.
A Complex Intervention
Steady Steps has several interacting parts delivered across different settings, which makes it a complex intervention. Craig et al. (2008), presenting updated Medical Research Council guidance, argued that such interventions should be developed systematically, drawing on evidence and theory, tested for feasibility, evaluated with methods suited to their complexity and implemented with attention to context. They stressed understanding how components work together and how local conditions shape results, rather than treating the program as a single pill.
Component One: Group Exercise
The core of Steady Steps is structured group exercise emphasizing balance and strength. Sherrington et al. (2019) concluded from their Cochrane review that regular exercise cuts the number of falls among community-dwelling seniors, and that balance-centered training and mixed programs show the steadiest gains. Tai chi also showed benefit. Steady Steps will offer a tai chi program designed for fall prevention, twice weekly for 24 weeks, and, for people wanting a briefer option, a seven-session group course that pairs home-safety education with exercise.
Can It Work in Community Settings?
Trials conducted by research teams do not always translate to community delivery. Li et al. (2008) adapted their tai chi fall prevention program for delivery by trained instructors in community senior centers and found that centers could adopt and deliver it with good fidelity and that participants improved on measures of balance and physical function. That experience supports using Alder County's nine senior centers as delivery sites.
Component Two: Clinical Screening and Referral
Primary care practices in both hospital systems will screen patients 65 and older for fall risk at annual visits using a brief three-question screen, review medications that raise fall risk and refer at-risk patients directly to Steady Steps classes through an electronic referral that the program coordinator follows up within a week.
Component Three: Access Supports
Because rural residents cited distance and transportation, the Area Agency on Aging's volunteer driver program will offer rides to classes, and classes will be scheduled in the three rural townships first. Participants can bring a friend, responding to focus group comments that companionship would encourage attendance.
Evidence Summary
The table summarizes the evidence base for each component and the local fit.
Table 1. Steady Steps Components and Evidence
| Component | Evidence | Local fit |
|---|---|---|
| Tai chi for balance, 24 weeks | Reduced falls in reviews and trials; translated to senior centers | Strong interest in focus groups; 9 senior centers |
| Seven-week group education and exercise | Reduced falls in a community trial | Option for those wanting a shorter program |
| Primary care screening and referral | Modeling suggests large potential when paired with programs | Two clinics already screening; referral path missing |
| Transportation and companionship | Addresses access barriers identified locally | Volunteer driver program exists |
Note. Composite summary for program planning.
What the Program Will Not Do
Framing also means choosing what to leave out. Steady Steps will not fund home modification grants, although it will provide home safety checklists and referrals to an existing home repair program for low-income seniors. It will not offer one-time lectures, which older adults in focus groups said they would not attend and which lack evidence of reducing falls. It will not duplicate the one existing falls program but will partner with it, offering its graduates a tai chi class as a next step. These choices keep the grant focused on the components with the strongest evidence and local demand.
Partners and Roles
The health department will lead the program and employ a coordinator. Senior centers will host classes and help recruit participants. The YMCA will train and supply instructors. Both hospital systems will embed screening and referral in primary care and consider referrals at emergency department discharge. The Area Agency on Aging will provide transportation and help reach homebound adults. A community advisory group of older adults, including residents of rural townships, will review plans and materials. Written agreements will set out each partner's responsibilities before classes begin.
Goal
Over three years, Steady Steps aims to enroll 1,800 older adults, with at least 40% from priority groups, and to cut the county's senior emergency visits for falls by a tenth. Detailed objectives will be developed in the next modules.
Scope
The program covers community-dwelling adults 65 and older in Alder County. It does not include nursing home residents, whose falls require facility-based approaches, or hospital inpatient fall prevention, which hospitals manage separately.
Questions for Later Milestones
How will activities lead to outcomes, and what theory explains that path? How will the program be implemented across senior centers and clinics with different capacities? How will its reach, effectiveness and fidelity be evaluated? And how will it be funded after the grant ends?
Conclusion
Steady Steps is framed as a complex intervention combining tested exercise programs, clinical referral and access supports, aimed first at the older adults most at risk and least served. The evidence and local assets support that design, and the next milestones will turn it into a logic model, implementation plan and evaluation. Each later step will be checked against this frame.
References
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, Article a1655. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655
Li, F., Harmer, P., Glasgow, R., Mack, K. A., Sleet, D., Fisher, K. J., Kohn, M. A., Millet, L. M., Mead, J., Xu, J., Lin, M. L., Yang, T., Sutton, B., & Tompkins, Y. (2008). Translation of an effective tai chi intervention into a community-based falls-prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 98(7), 1195-1198. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.120402
Sherrington, C., Fairhall, N. J., Wallbank, G. K., Tiedemann, A., Michaleff, Z. A., Howard, K., Clemson, L., Hopewell, S., & Lamb, S. E. (2019). Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), Article CD012424. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2
What the IHP 670 Module 3 instructions ask for
Milestone One in IHP 670 generally asks you to frame the program you will design: its purpose, the population it will serve, its main components and the evidence behind them. Allow three to five APA 7 pages. Build on your needs assessment, write a concise purpose statement, define a priority population with reasons and describe each component with supporting research. Show how components fit together and fit the local context, state an overall goal and scope and list the questions your later milestones will answer. IHP 670 graders notice clean headings in IHP 670 papers. IHP 670 names and dates need checking before IHP 670 submission. IHP 670 prompts vary by term, so recheck IHP 670 directions. Keep the frame consistent with the needs assessment's numbers.
How this IHP 670 Module 3 milestone one example is built
This milestone frames Steady Steps, a composite county's falls prevention program. It defines a priority population of rural residents, people living alone and those who have fallen, treats the program as a complex intervention using Craig and colleagues' guidance and supports tai chi and group exercise with Sherrington and colleagues' review and Li and colleagues' senior center translation. A table links components to evidence and fit, and a three-year goal and scope follow. IHP 670 students can reuse this structure for IHP 670 work. IHP 670 claims here trace to cited IHP 670 sources. IHP 670 readers can adapt each section to IHP 670 data. Questions for later milestones close the frame.
Where the IHP 670 Module 3 rubric puts the points
Program framing milestones in IHP 670 are commonly evaluated on a clear purpose, a justified priority population, components supported by evidence, attention to local fit and translation, a coherent overall design, a stated goal and scope, scholarly support and APA 7. The strongest submissions show why each component was chosen and how the pieces work together. Credit is lost when components appear without evidence, when the population is everyone or when the design ignores what the needs assessment found. IHP 670 marks favor careful formatting across IHP 670 sections. IHP 670 citations keep every IHP 670 argument credible. IHP 670 instructors weigh evidence heavily in IHP 670 grading. A table linking each component to evidence helps graders.
IHP 670 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points
Program framing papers in this course often describe activities without explaining why they will work, define the population too broadly and cite trials without asking whether results carry over to community settings. Another frequent gap is forgetting access barriers. Build from your needs assessment, prioritize a population, justify each component with evidence and local fit, address access and state a measurable goal. Share your program idea and the IHP 670 prompt so the framing fits your project. IHP 670 drafts start well from a IHP 670 outline. IHP 670 feedback already received guides IHP 670 revisions. IHP 670 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify IHP 670 expectations. Name the specific programs you will use rather than generic exercise.
Get IHP 670 Module 3 written to your instructions
Send the IHP 670 Milestone One prompt and your program idea. The milestone will write a purpose statement, define a priority population, justify each component with evidence and local fit and set a goal and scope, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More IHP 670 papers and related MPH samples
- IHP 670 Module 1 Discussion: Choosing a Program Because the Evidence Supports It
- IHP 670 Module 2 Needs Assessment Paper: Documenting the Burden of Falls Among Older Adults in One County
- IHP 600 Module 6 Milestone Two: A Root Cause Analysis of Turnover Using Job Demands and Resources
- IHP 645 Module 5 Discussion: Just Culture and Fair Accountability After an Error
- IHP 604 Module 8 Milestone Three: PDSA Results and a Plan to Spread What Worked
- IHP 640 Module 9 Final Project: The Performance Improvement Report on Operating Room Efficiency
IHP 670 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free IHP 670 Module 3 Milestone One sample?
The full IHP 670 Module 3 milestone is on this page, framing a falls prevention program's purpose, population, components and evidence.
What is a complex intervention?
A program with several interacting components, settings or behaviors, whose effects depend on how the parts work together and on context.
Why define a priority population?
Focusing on those at highest risk and with least access directs limited resources where they can do the most good.
Do trial results work in community settings?
Not always; look for studies showing a program can be adopted and delivered with fidelity outside research conditions.
Should my program have more than one component?
Often yes, if needs assessment shows several barriers, such as lack of programs, referral gaps and transportation.