IHP 670 is SNHU’s Program Design, Planning and Evaluation course. It centers on designing, planning and evaluating health programs: needs assessment, evidence-based program selection, logic models, behavioral theory such as social cognitive theory, SMART objectives, implementation frameworks, evaluation models such as RE-AIM and the CDC framework, budgets, sustainability and complete program proposals. Every module below opens a full sample paper or takes a free request for one; searches like "ihp 670 module 3", "IHP670 sample paper" and "IHP 670 milestone example" land on this page.
What IHP 670 is really about
IHP 670 is a program planning course taken by SNHU graduate health students, and its rubrics reward coherence from need to evaluation. Graders look for needs documented with local data, programs chosen for evidence and fit, logic models that connect activities to outcomes, objectives with numbers and dates, implementation plans that anticipate barriers and evaluation designs that match the questions stakeholders will ask.
Samples on this shelf follow a composite program planner at the Alder County Public Health Department, where about 64,000 adults are 65 or older and falls cause roughly 2,900 emergency visits, 610 hospital stays and 38 deaths a year. Across the term, the planner reviews evidence, assesses need, frames the program, builds a logic model, writes objectives, plans implementation through senior centers and clinics, designs the evaluation, budgets for sustainability and writes a full proposal for a program called Steady Steps. The planner and county are illustrative.
What IHP 670’s modules ask for
Across ten modules, IHP 670 typically asks for discussions of evidence and evaluation, papers on logic models, objectives and implementation, three milestones that assess need, design the evaluation and plan budget and sustainability, a final program proposal and a reflection.
Where students lose points in IHP 670
The most common IHP 670 deduction is a program built on enthusiasm rather than evidence and local data. The second is a logic model that lists activities and outcomes without showing how one leads to the other. Graders also mark down objectives without numbers or dates, evaluation plans that measure only attendance and budgets with no path to continued funding. The fix is to document need, choose tested programs, map the causal logic, write measurable objectives and plan evaluation and sustainability from the start.
The IHP 670 drawers
IHP 670 Module 1 Discussion example
An opening discussion post from a composite county program planner deciding how to spend a new falls prevention grant. It weighs a commissioner's favored balance-screening fair against Sherrington and colleagues' Cochrane review of exercise for fall prevention, Li and colleagues' tai chi trial and Clemson and colleagues' trial of a community education program, and argues for choosing tested programs. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 2 Needs Assessment Paper example
A needs assessment paper documenting falls among older adults in a composite county, combining surveillance data, hospital records, a community survey and focus groups with an inventory of assets and gaps. It compares local figures with national data from Bergen, Stevens and Burns, estimates costs using Florence and colleagues and uses Stevens and Lee's modeling to show how much could be prevented. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 3 Milestone One example
A first milestone that frames a composite county's falls prevention program, Steady Steps: its purpose, priority population, components and evidence. It treats the program as a complex intervention using the Medical Research Council guidance described by Craig and colleagues, grounds exercise choices in Sherrington and colleagues' Cochrane review and draws on Li and colleagues' translation of tai chi into community senior centers. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 4 Logic Model Paper example
A logic model paper for a composite county falls prevention program that maps resources, activities, outputs and short-, intermediate- and long-term outcomes. It draws on Kaplan and Garrett's study of how community initiatives use logic models, explains the causal path with Bandura's social cognitive theory and supports the fear-of-falling pathway with Zijlstra and colleagues' systematic review, stating assumptions and external factors. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 5 Discussion example
A discussion post in which a composite county planner rewrites vague grant objectives into ones a funder could verify. It uses Milstein and Wetterhall's framework of evaluation steps and standards, Glasgow, Vogt and Boles's RE-AIM dimensions to cover reach and adoption as well as effectiveness and Sherrington and colleagues' review to set realistic targets for fewer falls. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 6 Milestone Two example
A Milestone Two implementation plan for a composite county's falls prevention program, moving from preparation through a three-site pilot to countywide scale. It assesses site readiness with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research described by Damschroder and colleagues, sets fidelity monitoring and adaptation rules informed by Durlak and DuPre's review of implementation and draws on Li and colleagues' senior center translation. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 7 Evaluation Design Paper example
An evaluation design paper for a composite county's falls prevention program that applies the CDC evaluation framework as described by Milstein and Wetterhall and organizes indicators by the RE-AIM dimensions of Glasgow, Vogt and Boles. It follows Craig and colleagues' guidance on evaluating complex interventions, combining process measures, participant outcomes, a wait-list comparison and county trends. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 8 Milestone Three example
A Milestone Three budget and sustainability plan for a composite county's three-year falls prevention grant. It itemizes $1.2 million in costs and in-kind support, calculates cost per participant, makes the value case with Florence and colleagues' medical cost estimates and Carande-Kulis and colleagues' cost-benefit analysis and plans continued funding using Scheirer and Dearing's research agenda on sustaining public health programs. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 9 Final Project example
A complete program proposal for a composite county's falls prevention initiative, Steady Steps, written for a state funder. It brings together need, evidence, logic model, objectives, implementation, evaluation, budget and sustainability, drawing on Sherrington and colleagues' Cochrane review, Durlak and DuPre on implementation quality, Glasgow, Vogt and Boles's RE-AIM framework and Carande-Kulis and colleagues' cost-benefit analysis. Full sample paper, read it free.
IHP 670 Module 10 Journal example
A closing journal in which a composite county program planner reflects on how older adults on an advisory group reshaped a falls prevention program. It draws on Kaplan and Garrett's findings on building logic models with partners, Bandura's account of self-efficacy and Scheirer and Dearing's work on what makes programs last, and names habits for future planning. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Southern New Hampshire University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a IHP 670 sample the right way
Read an IHP 670 sample by checking whether need is documented with local data, whether the logic model shows causal links and whether objectives and evaluation measures can actually be checked. For IHP 670, send the assignment wording, your community or program idea and the grading criteria, and the first custom sample comes back free in 24-48h.
IHP 670 questions, answered
What does IHP 670 cover?
Needs assessment, evidence-based program selection, logic models, theory, objectives, implementation planning, evaluation design, budgets and sustainability.
What program should I design for IHP 670?
One addressing a documented health problem in a community you know, using an intervention with published evidence.
What makes a strong IHP 670 paper?
Local data on need, a program chosen for evidence and fit, a logic model with causal links, measurable objectives and a matched evaluation.