IHP 600 Module 6 Milestone Two Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This IHP 600 Module 6 Milestone Two sample carries out a root cause analysis of registered nurse turnover at a composite hospital. It is written for SNHU IHP 600 (IHP-600), the MS Healthcare Administration course on social and organizational issues. Building on the problem framed in Milestone One, the analysis uses the job demands-resources model from Demerouti and colleagues to separate heavy demands, such as seven-patient assignments and mandatory overtime, from missing resources, such as break relief, protected precepting and input into schedules. Unit data show turnover rising with patient load, and exit interviews are read through Maslach and Leiter's areas of work life. A Pareto table ranks causes by how often departing nurses cited them. Brand and colleagues' review of whole-system approaches supports tackling causes together rather than one at a time.

CourseIHP 600 Social & Organizational Issues in Healthcare
ModuleModule 6
Paper typegraduate milestone analyzing root causes of an organizational problem
LengthAbout 1,050 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMS Healthcare Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for IHP 600 Module 6

1

Milestone Two: Why Nurses Leave Summit Valley, a Root Cause Analysis

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

IHP 600: Social and Organizational Issues in Healthcare

Module Six Milestone Two

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title asks the question the analysis answers and names the method.
2

Milestone Two: Why Nurses Leave Summit Valley, a Root Cause Analysis

Milestone One established that 187 registered nurses left Summit Valley Medical Center last year, with the heaviest losses among first-year nurses and on medical-surgical units. This milestone asks why. It combines exit interviews, survey results, unit staffing data and interviews with four nurse managers, organizes the causes using a recognized model and ranks them so that the recommendations in Milestone Three target what matters most.

What this page is doingThe introduction links the milestone to the framed problem.
3

The Analytic Framework

Demerouti et al. (2001) proposed the job demands-resources model, which holds that every job has demands, the physical, psychological and organizational aspects that require sustained effort, and resources, the aspects that help people achieve goals, reduce the cost of demands or support growth. In their study, high demands were linked mainly to exhaustion, while a lack of resources was linked mainly to disengagement. The model suits this analysis because it points to two different kinds of fixes: reducing demands and adding resources.

What this page is doingThe framework is explained and its fit justified.
4

Evidence Gathered

Four sources informed the analysis: 97 coded exit interviews; the staff survey, answered by 612 nursing staff; staffing and turnover records for nine inpatient units; and structured interviews with four nurse managers. A cause-and-effect diagram was drafted with six managers and charge nurses and then tested against the data, so that causes remained in the analysis only if at least two sources supported them.

What this page is doingSources and the rule for keeping causes are stated.
5

Demand: Patient Load

The strongest pattern in the unit data is between average patients per nurse on day shift and annual turnover. The three units averaging 6.5 or more patients per nurse lost between 29% and 34% of their nurses; the three averaging under 5 lost between 12% and 16%. Acuity is also rising, with the share of medical-surgical patients requiring frequent reassessment up by about a fifth in three years. Sixty-one of 97 departing nurses named workload.

Table 1. Day-Shift Patient Load and Turnover by Unit Group

Unit groupAverage patients per RNUnitsTurnover range
Higher load6.5 or more329% to 34%
Middle load5.0 to 6.4319% to 25%
Lower loadUnder 5.0312% to 16%

Note. Composite data for nine inpatient units over one fiscal year.

What this page is doingPatient load is tied to turnover with unit data.
6

Demand: Overtime and Schedules

Mandatory overtime rose 34% in two years, and on higher-load units nurses reported being held over an average of twice a month. Schedules are posted two weeks ahead and changed often, making childcare and school difficult. Night shift nurses reported the least predictability and left at higher rates.

What this page is doingOvertime and schedule instability are documented.
7

Missing Resource: Break Relief and Support

No unit has a dedicated break relief nurse, so breaks depend on colleagues covering one another's patients on top of their own. Survey respondents on higher-load units reported missing a meal break on more than half their shifts. Nursing assistants are frequently pulled to sit with confused patients, removing another source of help.

What this page is doingThe absence of relief is shown as a resource gap.
8

Missing Resource: Precepting for New Nurses

New graduates receive eight weeks of orientation with a preceptor who carries a full assignment of their own. Managers described preceptors as exhausted and new nurses as left alone within weeks. Of the 49 first-year nurses who left, 31 cited feeling unprepared or unsupported. There is no structured program after orientation ends, the period when many new nurses find the transition hardest.

What this page is doingThe first-year pattern is traced to precepting design.
9

Missing Resource: Control and Voice

Nurses have no input into assignments or schedules, and survey results showed only 33% of medical-surgical nurses believe leaders act on feedback. Maslach and Leiter (2016) identify control and fairness among the areas of work life where mismatches feed burnout; exit interviews at Summit Valley echoed both, with nurses describing assignments made without regard to acuity and agency colleagues paid more for identical work.

What this page is doingLack of control and fairness is linked to burnout research.
10

What Is Not a Primary Cause

Pay was named as the main reason by only 18 of 97 departing nurses, and Summit Valley's base rates sit within 3% of the regional median. Pay matters, and targeted adjustments for night shift may be warranted, but the evidence does not support pay as the root cause. Similarly, relocation and retirement accounted for 22 departures, which the hospital cannot readily prevent.

What this page is doingRuling out weaker causes strengthens the analysis.
11

What the Managers Added

The four manager interviews explained how these causes feel from the middle of the organization. Each manager described spending the first hour of most shifts rebuilding a schedule after call-outs, leaving little time to round on staff or follow up on concerns. Two said they had stopped escalating staffing problems because requests for float nurses were routinely denied. All four named the same wish: authority to approve break relief or an extra nurse on high-acuity days without a lengthy approval chain. Their accounts suggest that the lack of voice nurses report is partly inherited from managers who themselves lack control over resources.

What this page is doingManager interviews show how the resource gap extends upward.
12

Ranking the Causes

A Pareto table ranks causes by how often departing nurses named them as a primary or secondary reason. Workload, unsupported transition, lack of voice and schedule instability together account for most of the cited reasons, and all four are within the hospital's control.

Table 2. Causes Cited in 97 Exit Interviews

CauseTypeTimes citedShare of all citations
Excessive patient loadDemand6129%
Complaints not acted onResource (voice)4421%
Unsupported transitionResource (precepting)3115%
Unpredictable schedulesDemand2813%
Relocation or retirementExternal2210%
PayExternal or resource189%
OtherMixed63%

Note. Nurses could name up to two reasons; 210 citations in total.

What this page is doingCauses are prioritized.
13

Why the Causes Must Be Tackled Together

The causes interact. Heavy loads leave no one free to relieve breaks or precept properly, which makes new nurses leave, which raises loads further. Brand et al. (2017) reviewed whole-system approaches to health care worker well-being, meaning interventions that act at several levels of an organization at once, and concluded that such approaches showed promise for improving staff health and well-being, although the evidence base was still limited. Addressing only one cause, such as adding a residency without easing loads, is likely to leave the cycle intact.

What this page is doingInteraction among causes argues for a combined response.
14

Limitations

Exit interviews capture stated reasons, which may differ from underlying ones. The unit comparison shows association, not proof that load causes turnover, since high-load units may differ in other ways such as leadership. The author's role as a manager may have influenced what managers and charge nurses shared.

What this page is doingLimits of the evidence are acknowledged.
15

Conclusion

Turnover at Summit Valley is driven mainly by high demands, especially patient load and unstable schedules, and by missing resources, especially break relief, structured support for new nurses and a voice in decisions. These causes are interconnected and largely within the hospital's control. Milestone Three will design responses aimed at each.

What this page is doingThe conclusion summarizes the root causes.
16

References

Brand, S. L., Thompson Coon, J., Fleming, L. E., Carroll, L., Bethel, A., & Wyatt, K. (2017). Whole-system approaches to improving the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 12(12), Article e0188418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188418

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311

What the IHP 600 Module 6 instructions ask for

Milestone Two in IHP 600 generally asks you to analyze the causes of the problem you framed in Milestone One. Expect four to six APA 7 pages. Choose a recognized framework or tool, such as a cause-and-effect diagram, five whys or a model from the readings, and explain why it fits. Gather evidence from more than one source, test each proposed cause against the data, rank causes by importance and show how they interact. Say which causes the organization can control, rule out weaker explanations with evidence and acknowledge the limits of your data. IHP 600 graders notice clean headings in IHP 600 papers. IHP 600 names and dates need checking before IHP 600 submission. IHP 600 prompts vary by term, so recheck IHP 600 directions.

How this IHP 600 Module 6 milestone two example is built

This milestone analyzes why 187 nurses left a composite hospital. Demerouti and colleagues' job demands-resources model separates demands, such as patient loads above 6.5 and rising overtime, from missing resources, such as break relief, precepting and voice. A unit table links load to turnover, Maslach and Leiter's areas of work life frame control and fairness and a Pareto table ranks 210 exit interview citations. Pay is ruled out as a primary cause. Brand and colleagues' review of whole-system approaches supports tackling the interacting causes together. IHP 600 students can reuse this structure for IHP 600 work. IHP 600 claims here trace to cited IHP 600 sources. IHP 600 readers can adapt each section to IHP 600 data.

Where the IHP 600 Module 6 rubric puts the points

Root cause milestones in this course are usually judged on a clear and appropriate analytic framework, use of multiple data sources, causes supported by evidence, sensible prioritization, attention to how causes interact, identification of controllable factors, acknowledgment of limitations, scholarly support and APA 7. Higher marks go to analyses that test causes rather than assert them and that rule out popular but weak explanations. Marks fall when causes are listed from opinion, when a framework is named but not used or when the analysis jumps straight to solutions. IHP 600 marks favor careful formatting across IHP 600 sections. IHP 600 citations keep every IHP 600 argument credible. IHP 600 instructors weigh evidence heavily in IHP 600 grading.

IHP 600 Module 6 help: the mistakes that cost points

In IHP 600, Milestone Two drafts often lose points for listing every possible cause without ranking them, for relying on a single data source and for jumping ahead to solutions. Another common gap is ignoring how causes feed one another. Pick one framework and use it throughout, test each cause against at least two sources, rank them with a simple table, show the interactions and keep recommendations for Milestone Three. Share your Milestone One draft and the IHP 600 prompt so the analysis builds on your project. IHP 600 drafts start well from a IHP 600 outline. IHP 600 feedback already received guides IHP 600 revisions. IHP 600 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify IHP 600 expectations.

Get IHP 600 Module 6 written to your instructions

Send the IHP 600 Milestone Two prompt with your Milestone One draft. The analysis will apply a recognized framework, test causes against your data, rank them, show how they interact and rule out weaker explanations, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More IHP 600 papers and related MS Healthcare Administration samples

IHP 600 Module 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free IHP 600 Module 6 Milestone Two sample?

IHP 600 Module 6 is laid out here in full as a root cause analysis of nurse turnover using the job demands-resources model, unit data and a Pareto table.

What is the job demands-resources model?

A model that sorts job features into demands that require sustained effort and resources that help people cope and grow, linking each to different outcomes.

Which root cause tools work for an organizational problem?

Cause-and-effect diagrams, five whys, Pareto charts and frameworks from the readings all work if you test causes against data.

Should I include recommendations in Milestone Two?

Usually not; keep the focus on causes and save solutions for Milestone Three so each builds on the last.

How do I show that a cause is real?

Support it with at least two sources, such as exit interviews and unit data, and explain alternative explanations.