| Course | IHP 600 Social & Organizational Issues in Healthcare |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | graduate milestone analyzing root causes of an organizational problem |
| Length | About 1,050 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MS Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for IHP 600 Module 6
Milestone Two: Why Nurses Leave Summit Valley, a Root Cause Analysis
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP 600: Social and Organizational Issues in Healthcare
Module Six Milestone Two
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Milestone Two: Why Nurses Leave Summit Valley, a Root Cause Analysis
Milestone One established that 187 registered nurses left Summit Valley Medical Center last year, with the heaviest losses among first-year nurses and on medical-surgical units. This milestone asks why. It combines exit interviews, survey results, unit staffing data and interviews with four nurse managers, organizes the causes using a recognized model and ranks them so that the recommendations in Milestone Three target what matters most.
The Analytic Framework
Demerouti et al. (2001) proposed the job demands-resources model, which holds that every job has demands, the physical, psychological and organizational aspects that require sustained effort, and resources, the aspects that help people achieve goals, reduce the cost of demands or support growth. In their study, high demands were linked mainly to exhaustion, while a lack of resources was linked mainly to disengagement. The model suits this analysis because it points to two different kinds of fixes: reducing demands and adding resources.
Evidence Gathered
Four sources informed the analysis: 97 coded exit interviews; the staff survey, answered by 612 nursing staff; staffing and turnover records for nine inpatient units; and structured interviews with four nurse managers. A cause-and-effect diagram was drafted with six managers and charge nurses and then tested against the data, so that causes remained in the analysis only if at least two sources supported them.
Demand: Patient Load
The strongest pattern in the unit data is between average patients per nurse on day shift and annual turnover. The three units averaging 6.5 or more patients per nurse lost between 29% and 34% of their nurses; the three averaging under 5 lost between 12% and 16%. Acuity is also rising, with the share of medical-surgical patients requiring frequent reassessment up by about a fifth in three years. Sixty-one of 97 departing nurses named workload.
Table 1. Day-Shift Patient Load and Turnover by Unit Group
| Unit group | Average patients per RN | Units | Turnover range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher load | 6.5 or more | 3 | 29% to 34% |
| Middle load | 5.0 to 6.4 | 3 | 19% to 25% |
| Lower load | Under 5.0 | 3 | 12% to 16% |
Note. Composite data for nine inpatient units over one fiscal year.
Demand: Overtime and Schedules
Mandatory overtime rose 34% in two years, and on higher-load units nurses reported being held over an average of twice a month. Schedules are posted two weeks ahead and changed often, making childcare and school difficult. Night shift nurses reported the least predictability and left at higher rates.
Missing Resource: Break Relief and Support
No unit has a dedicated break relief nurse, so breaks depend on colleagues covering one another's patients on top of their own. Survey respondents on higher-load units reported missing a meal break on more than half their shifts. Nursing assistants are frequently pulled to sit with confused patients, removing another source of help.
Missing Resource: Precepting for New Nurses
New graduates receive eight weeks of orientation with a preceptor who carries a full assignment of their own. Managers described preceptors as exhausted and new nurses as left alone within weeks. Of the 49 first-year nurses who left, 31 cited feeling unprepared or unsupported. There is no structured program after orientation ends, the period when many new nurses find the transition hardest.
Missing Resource: Control and Voice
Nurses have no input into assignments or schedules, and survey results showed only 33% of medical-surgical nurses believe leaders act on feedback. Maslach and Leiter (2016) identify control and fairness among the areas of work life where mismatches feed burnout; exit interviews at Summit Valley echoed both, with nurses describing assignments made without regard to acuity and agency colleagues paid more for identical work.
What Is Not a Primary Cause
Pay was named as the main reason by only 18 of 97 departing nurses, and Summit Valley's base rates sit within 3% of the regional median. Pay matters, and targeted adjustments for night shift may be warranted, but the evidence does not support pay as the root cause. Similarly, relocation and retirement accounted for 22 departures, which the hospital cannot readily prevent.
What the Managers Added
The four manager interviews explained how these causes feel from the middle of the organization. Each manager described spending the first hour of most shifts rebuilding a schedule after call-outs, leaving little time to round on staff or follow up on concerns. Two said they had stopped escalating staffing problems because requests for float nurses were routinely denied. All four named the same wish: authority to approve break relief or an extra nurse on high-acuity days without a lengthy approval chain. Their accounts suggest that the lack of voice nurses report is partly inherited from managers who themselves lack control over resources.
Ranking the Causes
A Pareto table ranks causes by how often departing nurses named them as a primary or secondary reason. Workload, unsupported transition, lack of voice and schedule instability together account for most of the cited reasons, and all four are within the hospital's control.
Table 2. Causes Cited in 97 Exit Interviews
| Cause | Type | Times cited | Share of all citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excessive patient load | Demand | 61 | 29% |
| Complaints not acted on | Resource (voice) | 44 | 21% |
| Unsupported transition | Resource (precepting) | 31 | 15% |
| Unpredictable schedules | Demand | 28 | 13% |
| Relocation or retirement | External | 22 | 10% |
| Pay | External or resource | 18 | 9% |
| Other | Mixed | 6 | 3% |
Note. Nurses could name up to two reasons; 210 citations in total.
Why the Causes Must Be Tackled Together
The causes interact. Heavy loads leave no one free to relieve breaks or precept properly, which makes new nurses leave, which raises loads further. Brand et al. (2017) reviewed whole-system approaches to health care worker well-being, meaning interventions that act at several levels of an organization at once, and concluded that such approaches showed promise for improving staff health and well-being, although the evidence base was still limited. Addressing only one cause, such as adding a residency without easing loads, is likely to leave the cycle intact.
Limitations
Exit interviews capture stated reasons, which may differ from underlying ones. The unit comparison shows association, not proof that load causes turnover, since high-load units may differ in other ways such as leadership. The author's role as a manager may have influenced what managers and charge nurses shared.
Conclusion
Turnover at Summit Valley is driven mainly by high demands, especially patient load and unstable schedules, and by missing resources, especially break relief, structured support for new nurses and a voice in decisions. These causes are interconnected and largely within the hospital's control. Milestone Three will design responses aimed at each.
References
Brand, S. L., Thompson Coon, J., Fleming, L. E., Carroll, L., Bethel, A., & Wyatt, K. (2017). Whole-system approaches to improving the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 12(12), Article e0188418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188418
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
What the IHP 600 Module 6 instructions ask for
Milestone Two in IHP 600 generally asks you to analyze the causes of the problem you framed in Milestone One. Expect four to six APA 7 pages. Choose a recognized framework or tool, such as a cause-and-effect diagram, five whys or a model from the readings, and explain why it fits. Gather evidence from more than one source, test each proposed cause against the data, rank causes by importance and show how they interact. Say which causes the organization can control, rule out weaker explanations with evidence and acknowledge the limits of your data. IHP 600 graders notice clean headings in IHP 600 papers. IHP 600 names and dates need checking before IHP 600 submission. IHP 600 prompts vary by term, so recheck IHP 600 directions.
How this IHP 600 Module 6 milestone two example is built
This milestone analyzes why 187 nurses left a composite hospital. Demerouti and colleagues' job demands-resources model separates demands, such as patient loads above 6.5 and rising overtime, from missing resources, such as break relief, precepting and voice. A unit table links load to turnover, Maslach and Leiter's areas of work life frame control and fairness and a Pareto table ranks 210 exit interview citations. Pay is ruled out as a primary cause. Brand and colleagues' review of whole-system approaches supports tackling the interacting causes together. IHP 600 students can reuse this structure for IHP 600 work. IHP 600 claims here trace to cited IHP 600 sources. IHP 600 readers can adapt each section to IHP 600 data.
Where the IHP 600 Module 6 rubric puts the points
Root cause milestones in this course are usually judged on a clear and appropriate analytic framework, use of multiple data sources, causes supported by evidence, sensible prioritization, attention to how causes interact, identification of controllable factors, acknowledgment of limitations, scholarly support and APA 7. Higher marks go to analyses that test causes rather than assert them and that rule out popular but weak explanations. Marks fall when causes are listed from opinion, when a framework is named but not used or when the analysis jumps straight to solutions. IHP 600 marks favor careful formatting across IHP 600 sections. IHP 600 citations keep every IHP 600 argument credible. IHP 600 instructors weigh evidence heavily in IHP 600 grading.
IHP 600 Module 6 help: the mistakes that cost points
In IHP 600, Milestone Two drafts often lose points for listing every possible cause without ranking them, for relying on a single data source and for jumping ahead to solutions. Another common gap is ignoring how causes feed one another. Pick one framework and use it throughout, test each cause against at least two sources, rank them with a simple table, show the interactions and keep recommendations for Milestone Three. Share your Milestone One draft and the IHP 600 prompt so the analysis builds on your project. IHP 600 drafts start well from a IHP 600 outline. IHP 600 feedback already received guides IHP 600 revisions. IHP 600 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify IHP 600 expectations.
Get IHP 600 Module 6 written to your instructions
Send the IHP 600 Milestone Two prompt with your Milestone One draft. The analysis will apply a recognized framework, test causes against your data, rank them, show how they interact and rule out weaker explanations, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More IHP 600 papers and related MS Healthcare Administration samples
- IHP 600 Module 1 Discussion: The Social Forces Behind the Nursing Shortage
- IHP 600 Module 2 Organizational Culture Paper: Assessing a Hospital's Culture With Evidence Instead of Slogans
- IHP 600 Module 3 Milestone One: Framing Registered Nurse Turnover as an Organizational Problem
- IHP 600 Module 4 Stakeholder Analysis Paper: Mapping Interest and Influence Around a Staffing Decision
- IHP 600 Module 5 Discussion: Burnout as a Signal of Working Conditions
- IHP 501 Module 7 Milestone Three: An Intervention Plan Built with the Community
- IHP 525 Module 7 Milestone Three: Regression Results Adjusted for Age, Sex and Baseline Pressure
- IHP 515 Module 10 Journal: Thinking Like an Epidemiologist
- IHP 510 Module 8 Crisis Communication Paper: Communicating During a Crisis: A Mailing Error and a Kit Recall
IHP 600 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free IHP 600 Module 6 Milestone Two sample?
IHP 600 Module 6 is laid out here in full as a root cause analysis of nurse turnover using the job demands-resources model, unit data and a Pareto table.
What is the job demands-resources model?
A model that sorts job features into demands that require sustained effort and resources that help people cope and grow, linking each to different outcomes.
Which root cause tools work for an organizational problem?
Cause-and-effect diagrams, five whys, Pareto charts and frameworks from the readings all work if you test causes against data.
Should I include recommendations in Milestone Two?
Usually not; keep the focus on causes and save solutions for Milestone Three so each builds on the last.
How do I show that a cause is real?
Support it with at least two sources, such as exit interviews and unit data, and explain alternative explanations.