NUR 307 Module 8 Journal Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 307 Module 8 journal sample is a finished closing reflection for an informatics course, written in the first person with APA 7 citations. It suits the final journal in SNHU NUR 307, Exploring Information Technology for Professional Practice, the RN to BSN course that appears in degree plans as NUR-307. The writer, a medical-surgical nurse who began the term describing technology as something that happens to nurses, reflects on three assignments that changed that view: an alert dismissed twenty times a shift, a pump-tracking proposal built from a unit audit and a smartwatch message that no policy covered. The journal names what the writer now understands about design, evidence and responsibility, and it closes with two concrete commitments, one of which the writer has already started on the unit.

CourseNUR 307 Exploring Information Technology for Professional Practice
ModuleModule 8
Paper typeClosing reflective journal
LengthAbout 470 words, 3 pages
FormatJournal entry with APA 7 citations
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramRN to BSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 307 Module 8

1

Module Eight Journal

The Box I Stopped Clicking: From Using Technology to Shaping It

At the start of this course, I wrote in a discussion post that technology is something that happens to nurses. New systems arrived on my unit with a training module and a go-live date, and my job was to learn where to click. I meant it as a complaint, but I also believed it. Eight weeks later, I think that belief was the real problem, and several assignments changed my mind.

The first was the decision support paper. I chose the mobility alert that I dismiss many times a shift, expecting to write about how annoying it is. Instead, I found evidence that the goal behind it is sound and research showing that clinicians accept fewer alerts as they receive more of them, especially repeats (Ancker et al., 2017). The alert was not failing because nurses are careless. It was failing because nobody who designed it had asked when in a nurse's shift a mobility decision is actually made. That is a question I can answer better than any analyst.

What this page is doingThe journal opens with a quoted belief from the writer's own earlier work, which makes the change visible, and anchors the first lesson in a specific assignment and source.
2

The second was the pump-tracking proposal. Our practice council's audit showed nurses searching for pumps well over a hundred times in two weeks, which fits what Hendrich et al. (2008) found about how much of nurses' time goes to work other than direct patient care. Writing the implementation plan, I used the sociotechnical model of Sittig and Singh (2010) and discovered that most of the work had nothing to do with the tags. It was about who owns the system, how environmental services marks a pump clean, what policy protects staff from being tracked and how we would know it worked. Nurses have knowledge about every one of those dimensions.

The third was the smaller paper about a patient's smartwatch screenshots arriving in the portal on a Friday night. Nobody had decided who should read them, how quickly, or what to do next. The nurse who opened the message on Monday handled it well, but only because that nurse chose to pick up the phone. Writing that paper, I realized how many of the gaps I complain about at work are not failures of any single nurse but decisions no one ever made, and that nurses are often the only people in a position to notice them.

My two commitments follow from this. First, I have joined our hospital's clinical informatics council as the unit representative, and at my first meeting I brought the mobility alert data. Second, whenever a new system is announced, I will ask two questions out loud: which nurses tested it before go-live, and how will we know whether it helps. Asking those questions is a small act, but it is the difference between technology that happens to nurses and technology nurses help build.

What this page is doingThe second lesson connects a model to insight about nursing knowledge, and the commitments are concrete and partly already underway. That combination scores highest on the application criterion.
3

References

Ancker, J. S., Edwards, A., Nosal, S., Hauser, D., Mauer, E., Kaushal, R., & HITEC Investigators. (2017). Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8

Hendrich, A., Chow, M. P., Skierczynski, B. A., & Lu, Z. (2008). A 36-hospital time and motion study: How do medical-surgical nurses spend their time? The Permanente Journal, 12(3), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/08-021

Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(Suppl. 3), i68-i74. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.042085

What the NUR 307 Module 8 instructions ask for

The closing journal in NUR 307 usually invites a look back at the course's lessons on information technology in nursing and how your view of your role has changed. Common prompts ask which assignment or concept was most meaningful, how you now think about evidence, privacy or design, what role nurses should play in technology decisions and what you will do differently at work. The entry is usually short, a page or two written in your own voice, with a small number of APA citations to course readings. Some instructors ask you to reread an early discussion post and compare it with your current view, which is an easy way to show growth with specific evidence rather than general claims.

How this NUR 307 Module 8 journal example is built

This journal starts from a sentence the writer posted in the first week, that technology is something that happens to nurses, and uses two assignments to show how that belief changed. The decision support paper supplies the first lesson, supported by research on repeated alerts, and the pump-tracking proposal and implementation plan supply the second, supported by a time and motion study and the sociotechnical model. The entry ends with two commitments, one already begun: joining the hospital's informatics council and asking two specific questions whenever a new system arrives. It runs about 460 words and cites three real sources in APA 7, each tied to the assignment it explains.

Where the NUR 307 Module 8 rubric puts the points

Grading for the final journal generally looks at depth of reflection, connection to course concepts, application to practice and quality of writing. Depth is shown by a clear before and after, ideally using your own earlier words, and by an explanation of why your view changed. Connection to course concepts rewards naming specific models, frameworks or studies and using them to explain the change. Application earns the most when commitments are concrete and already under way or scheduled, rather than vague hopes for some point in the future. Writing should be personal but professional, with correct citations and a length that respects the prompt's range without padding.

NUR 307 Module 8 help: the mistakes that cost points

Common problems with this journal include a summary of each module with no clear change in thinking, general enthusiasm about technology with no evidence behind it and commitments too vague to verify a month later. Some writers repeat the course objectives instead of reflecting on their own experience. Reread something you wrote early in the course, pick the two assignments that changed your view most, explain each change with one source or model and finish with one or two actions you can start this month. If you have already started one, say so, because it shows the change is real and not just intended.

Get NUR 307 Module 8 written to your instructions

Tell us which NUR 307 assignments mattered most to you and paste the final journal prompt. A closing reflection built from your own work in the course arrives in 24 to 48 hours, with the first sample free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 307 papers and related RN to BSN samples

NUR 307 Module 8 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 307 Module 8 journal sample?

Read the full journal here without charge: a medical-surgical nurse reflects on moving from technology user to technology shaper, using two course assignments, three sources and two concrete commitments. Journals built on your own coursework can be requested.

What should the final NUR 307 journal focus on?

How your view of information technology and your role in it changed during the course, explained with specific assignments or concepts, and what you will now do differently at work.

Do I need citations in the NUR 307 journal?

Most sections expect one to three citations from course readings in APA 7. Each one should do work in the entry, usually by explaining what shifted your view.

How can I show growth in a reflection journal?

Compare something you wrote or believed at the start of the course with your current view, and explain which assignment or source caused the change.

What counts as a strong commitment in a NUR 307 reflection?

An action someone could observe, such as joining an informatics council, testing a new system, reporting a problematic alert or asking specific questions at go-live, ideally with a start date.