| Course | NUR 520 Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Measures of disease frequency analysis |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 520 Module 3
Same Counties, Different Rankings: Crude and Age-Adjusted COPD Prevalence in New Hampshire
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 520: Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare
Module Three Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Same Counties, Different Rankings: Crude and Age-Adjusted COPD Prevalence in New Hampshire
Measures of disease frequency answer the question of how common a condition is, but the answer depends on the measure chosen. This paper compares crude and age-adjusted prevalence of diagnosed COPD among adults in New Hampshire's ten counties, using CDC's PLACES 2025 county estimates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). It shows that Coös County ranks highest under both measures, which strengthens the case that its burden is not simply a result of an older population, while other counties move several places, which illustrates why comparisons between places must account for age.
Prevalence, Not Incidence
Two families of measures describe how common a disease is. Incidence tracks the rate at which people who were free of the disease develop it during a stated interval, while prevalence captures everyone who has it, whether diagnosed last week or twenty years ago, as a share of the population at one time (Celentano & Szklo, 2019). For a chronic, largely irreversible disease such as COPD, a prevalence figure blends two things at once, the pace at which people are newly diagnosed and the years they survive afterward. It is the right measure for planning ongoing services such as pulmonary rehabilitation and inhaler education, because it describes how many people need them now. Incidence would be better for evaluating whether prevention is working, but county-level COPD incidence is not publicly available, which is itself a limit worth stating.
Crude and Age-Adjusted Prevalence
Crude prevalence is the proportion of all adults in a county who have diagnosed COPD. It describes the real burden in that population. Because COPD becomes more common with age, an older county can post a higher crude figure even when, age for age, its residents carry no extra risk at all. Age-adjusted prevalence removes that effect. In the direct method, the age-specific rates observed in each county are applied to a single standard population, so every county is compared as if it had the same age structure. Federal statistics commonly use the projected 2000 U.S. population as the standard, which allows comparisons across places and years (Klein & Schoenborn, 2001). PLACES reports both measures for every county.
The County Comparison
Table 1 lists the ten counties with both measures and their rank under each.
Table 1
Estimated Prevalence of Diagnosed COPD Among Adults by New Hampshire County, Crude and Age-Adjusted
| County | Crude prevalence (%) | Crude rank | Age-adjusted prevalence (%) | Adjusted rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coös | 9.5 | 1 | 7.1 | 1 |
| Sullivan | 8.0 | 2 | 6.2 | 2 |
| Belknap | 7.5 | 3 (tie) | 5.7 | 3 (tie) |
| Carroll | 7.5 | 3 (tie) | 5.2 | 8 |
| Cheshire | 7.1 | 5 | 5.7 | 3 (tie) |
| Grafton | 6.4 | 6 (tie) | 5.3 | 6 (tie) |
| Merrimack | 6.4 | 6 (tie) | 5.3 | 6 (tie) |
| Strafford | 6.0 | 8 | 5.5 | 5 |
| Hillsborough | 5.7 | 9 (tie) | 4.9 | 9 |
| Rockingham | 5.7 | 9 (tie) | 4.6 | 10 |
Note. Data from CDC PLACES, 2025 release, model-based estimates. Ranks were assigned for this paper; ties share a rank.
Why the Rankings Change
Two counties illustrate the effect of age. Carroll County, a lakes and mountains region popular with retirees, ties for third on crude prevalence at 7.5% but falls to eighth after age adjustment, at 5.2%. Much of its crude burden reflects an older population rather than higher age-specific risk. Strafford County, home to a large state university and a younger population, moves the other way, from eighth on crude prevalence to fifth after adjustment, suggesting that its age-specific risk is higher than its crude figure implies. Coös County remains first under both measures, although its figure falls from 9.5% to 7.1% after adjustment. The county's older age structure explains part of its burden, but not all of it: even at a standard age structure, Coös residents are estimated to have the highest prevalence in the state.
Which Measure to Use for What
Each measure answers a different planning question. Crude prevalence tells a nurse leader in Coös how many adults actually live with diagnosed COPD, which is what matters for sizing a pulmonary rehabilitation program or estimating how many patients a care manager might follow. Applied to the county's roughly 26,000 adults, a crude prevalence of 9.5% suggests about 2,500 adults with diagnosed COPD, a calculation made for this paper from the published estimates. Age-adjusted prevalence tells the same leader whether Coös residents face higher risk than people elsewhere at the same ages, which matters for arguing that the county needs more prevention resources than its size alone would justify. Using the wrong measure for the question can mislead: crude figures exaggerate risk in older counties, while adjusted figures understate how many people need care there.
Age-Specific Rates as a Next Step
Age adjustment summarizes a comparison in a single number, but it can hide important detail. Two counties with the same age-adjusted prevalence could differ sharply in one age group, for example if one has unusually high COPD among adults in their fifties because of past occupational exposure. PLACES does not publish county estimates by age group, so that detail is not available from this source. A nurse leader could obtain it from local clinical data, counting patients with a COPD diagnosis by age group in the county's health center and hospital records, while recognizing that those counts describe only people who reached care. If the county's excess were concentrated in adults under 65, the response would lean toward workplace and cessation programs; if it were concentrated among older adults, toward rehabilitation, home oxygen support and transitions of care.
Limits of the Comparison
These are model-based estimates, each with a confidence interval, so small differences between counties may not be meaningful; the next module examines that question directly. The estimates describe diagnosed COPD only. And age adjustment removes differences due to age, but not those due to smoking, occupation or access to diagnosis, which are the very factors a nurse leader would want to investigate next.
Conclusion
Crude and age-adjusted prevalence rank New Hampshire's counties differently because the counties differ in age. Coös County ranks highest either way, which strengthens the case that its COPD burden reflects more than an older population. For planning services, the crude figure shows how many people need care; for arguing about risk and prevention resources, the adjusted figure provides a fair comparison.
References
Celentano, D. D., & Szklo, M. (2019). Gordis epidemiology (6th ed.). Elsevier.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: County data (GIS friendly format), 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/d/i46a-9kgh
Klein, R. J., & Schoenborn, C. A. (2001). Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population (Healthy People 2010 Statistical Notes No. 20). National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf
What the NUR 520 Module 3 instructions ask for
The Module 3 assignment in NUR 520 usually asks you to calculate or report measures of disease frequency for your population health problem and interpret them. Common instructions ask you to distinguish incidence and prevalence, explain crude, specific and adjusted rates, present rates for your population and at least one comparison population, and discuss what the measures mean for nursing practice or planning. Some sections provide a worksheet with practice calculations. The written portion is usually two to four pages in APA 7 with a table. Using real published rates, and explaining exactly which rates you report, matters more than the number of calculations you show in the assignment, so spend your words on interpretation.
How this NUR 520 Module 3 measures of disease frequency example is built
This example uses real CDC PLACES 2025 county estimates to compare crude and age-adjusted COPD prevalence across New Hampshire's ten counties. It explains why prevalence rather than incidence suits a chronic disease, defines both measures and the direct method of age adjustment with the 2000 U.S. standard population, and presents a table with both measures and both rankings. It interprets specific ranking changes, including an older county that falls from third to eighth, and shows that Coös County ranks first either way. A section matches each measure to a planning decision with a clearly labeled calculation, another explains what age-specific rates would add, and a limits section points to the next module.
Where the NUR 520 Module 3 rubric puts the points
Grading for this assignment typically considers the accuracy of the measures, the explanation of concepts such as incidence, prevalence and adjustment, the comparison with another population, the interpretation for practice and the presentation of data. Accuracy is checked against the source, so report numbers exactly as published and label any you calculate. Interpretation earns the most credit when it explains why figures differ, not only that they differ. Tables should follow APA format with a number, title and note, and each table should be discussed in the text. Papers that connect each measure to a specific use in planning or practice show the applied understanding the course aims for.
NUR 520 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points
Students lose the most points here by comparing crude rates between populations of very different ages and concluding that one is sicker. Another is mixing crude and adjusted figures in the same comparison without saying so. Some papers define incidence and prevalence correctly but then use the wrong one for a chronic disease. Others present a table with no interpretation. Report each rate with its type, source and year, compare like with like, explain any ranking changes, match each measure to the decision it supports and state what adjustment does and does not remove. A single sentence of interpretation under each table goes a long way.
Get NUR 520 Module 3 written to your instructions
Share your population health problem, the populations you want to compare and the Module 3 worksheet or rubric. An analysis of crude and adjusted measures using real published data comes back in 24 to 48 hours, and the first sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 520 papers and related MSN samples
- NUR 520 Module 1 Short Paper: The Epidemiologic Triangle and COPD in Coös County
- NUR 520 Module 2 Data Sources Paper: Judging the Data Behind County COPD Estimates
- NUR 520 Module 4 Milestone One: Describing COPD and Smoking in Coös County
- NUR 520 Module 5 Statistical Inference Paper: Confidence Intervals Around County Estimates
- NUR 520 Module 6 Study Designs Paper: Matching Designs to Questions About COPD
- NUR 520 Module 7 Milestone Two: An Analysis Plan With Relative Risk and Odds Ratios
- NUR 520 Module 8 Screening Paper: Screening Accuracy and the Case Against COPD Screening
- NUR 520 Module 9 Final Project: An Epidemiological Analysis of COPD With Population-Level Recommendations
- NUR 520 Module 10 Journal: Learning to Read Population Data as a Nurse
- NUR 502 Module 6 Technology in Teaching Paper
- NUR 508 Module 6 Professional Development Plan
- NUR 506 Module 8 Final Evidence-Based Practice Proposal
- NUR 350 Module 8 Discussion
NUR 520 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 520 Module 3 measures of disease frequency sample?
This page offers the complete paper free: crude and age-adjusted COPD prevalence across ten New Hampshire counties from CDC PLACES, with a table, ranking changes explained, planning uses and three references. Analyses for your own population can be requested.
How is incidence different from prevalence in NUR 520?
Incidence measures new cases in a population at risk over a period. Prevalence reflects every current case, new or longstanding, at a given time. Prevalence suits chronic diseases for planning services.
Why do we age-adjust rates?
To compare populations fairly when their age structures differ. Adjustment applies each population's age-specific rates to one standard population, removing the effect of age differences.
What standard population is used for age adjustment in U.S. data?
Federal statistics commonly use the projected 2000 U.S. population as the standard, which allows comparison across places and years.
Should I report crude or adjusted rates in my NUR 520 paper?
Often both. Crude rates show the actual burden for planning services; adjusted rates allow fair comparison of risk between populations. Label each clearly.