NUR 520 Module 3 Measures of Disease Frequency Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 520 Module 3 measures of disease frequency sample uses real county data to show why crude and age-adjusted prevalence can tell different stories, and what each is for. It answers the disease frequency assignment in SNHU NUR 520, Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare, the MSN course whose catalog form is NUR-520. Using CDC's PLACES 2025 county estimates for adults in all ten New Hampshire counties, the paper tabulates crude and age-adjusted COPD prevalence, ranks the counties both ways and explains the movement: one older lakes-region county falls from third to eighth once age is accounted for, while a younger university county rises. It explains prevalence versus incidence, the direct method of age adjustment and the 2000 U.S. standard population, and closes with what each measure should be used for when an MSN nurse plans services for Coös County.

CourseNUR 520 Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeMeasures of disease frequency analysis
LengthAbout 1,010 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 520 Module 3

1

Same Counties, Different Rankings: Crude and Age-Adjusted COPD Prevalence in New Hampshire

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 520: Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare

Module Three Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

What this page is doingThe title states the key finding, that rankings change, which tells the grader the paper will interpret the measures rather than only compute them.
2

Same Counties, Different Rankings: Crude and Age-Adjusted COPD Prevalence in New Hampshire

Measures of disease frequency answer the question of how common a condition is, but the answer depends on the measure chosen. This paper compares crude and age-adjusted prevalence of diagnosed COPD among adults in New Hampshire's ten counties, using CDC's PLACES 2025 county estimates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). It shows that Coös County ranks highest under both measures, which strengthens the case that its burden is not simply a result of an older population, while other counties move several places, which illustrates why comparisons between places must account for age.

What this page is doingThe introduction frames the paper around a finding and its meaning, which is more than the calculation-focused prompts usually receive.
3

Prevalence, Not Incidence

Two families of measures describe how common a disease is. Incidence tracks the rate at which people who were free of the disease develop it during a stated interval, while prevalence captures everyone who has it, whether diagnosed last week or twenty years ago, as a share of the population at one time (Celentano & Szklo, 2019). For a chronic, largely irreversible disease such as COPD, a prevalence figure blends two things at once, the pace at which people are newly diagnosed and the years they survive afterward. It is the right measure for planning ongoing services such as pulmonary rehabilitation and inhaler education, because it describes how many people need them now. Incidence would be better for evaluating whether prevention is working, but county-level COPD incidence is not publicly available, which is itself a limit worth stating.

What this page is doingThe distinction between incidence and prevalence is explained and connected to planning, with an honest note about data availability.
4

Crude and Age-Adjusted Prevalence

Crude prevalence is the proportion of all adults in a county who have diagnosed COPD. It describes the real burden in that population. Because COPD becomes more common with age, an older county can post a higher crude figure even when, age for age, its residents carry no extra risk at all. Age-adjusted prevalence removes that effect. In the direct method, the age-specific rates observed in each county are applied to a single standard population, so every county is compared as if it had the same age structure. Federal statistics commonly use the projected 2000 U.S. population as the standard, which allows comparisons across places and years (Klein & Schoenborn, 2001). PLACES reports both measures for every county.

What this page is doingBoth measures are defined, the direct method is explained accurately and the standard population is sourced. Clear explanation of method is a core rubric element.
5

The County Comparison

Table 1 lists the ten counties with both measures and their rank under each.

Table 1

Estimated Prevalence of Diagnosed COPD Among Adults by New Hampshire County, Crude and Age-Adjusted

CountyCrude prevalence (%)Crude rankAge-adjusted prevalence (%)Adjusted rank
Coös9.517.11
Sullivan8.026.22
Belknap7.53 (tie)5.73 (tie)
Carroll7.53 (tie)5.28
Cheshire7.155.73 (tie)
Grafton6.46 (tie)5.36 (tie)
Merrimack6.46 (tie)5.36 (tie)
Strafford6.085.55
Hillsborough5.79 (tie)4.99
Rockingham5.79 (tie)4.610

Note. Data from CDC PLACES, 2025 release, model-based estimates. Ranks were assigned for this paper; ties share a rank.

What this page is doingThe table presents real figures with both measures and both rankings, making the movement visible at a glance. The note distinguishes published values from derived ranks.
6

Why the Rankings Change

Two counties illustrate the effect of age. Carroll County, a lakes and mountains region popular with retirees, ties for third on crude prevalence at 7.5% but falls to eighth after age adjustment, at 5.2%. Much of its crude burden reflects an older population rather than higher age-specific risk. Strafford County, home to a large state university and a younger population, moves the other way, from eighth on crude prevalence to fifth after adjustment, suggesting that its age-specific risk is higher than its crude figure implies. Coös County remains first under both measures, although its figure falls from 9.5% to 7.1% after adjustment. The county's older age structure explains part of its burden, but not all of it: even at a standard age structure, Coös residents are estimated to have the highest prevalence in the state.

What this page is doingThe interpretation explains specific movements with plausible demographic reasons and draws the key conclusion for Coös. Interpretation is where most points in this assignment are earned.
7

Which Measure to Use for What

Each measure answers a different planning question. Crude prevalence tells a nurse leader in Coös how many adults actually live with diagnosed COPD, which is what matters for sizing a pulmonary rehabilitation program or estimating how many patients a care manager might follow. Applied to the county's roughly 26,000 adults, a crude prevalence of 9.5% suggests about 2,500 adults with diagnosed COPD, a calculation made for this paper from the published estimates. Age-adjusted prevalence tells the same leader whether Coös residents face higher risk than people elsewhere at the same ages, which matters for arguing that the county needs more prevention resources than its size alone would justify. Using the wrong measure for the question can mislead: crude figures exaggerate risk in older counties, while adjusted figures understate how many people need care there.

What this page is doingThe paper matches each measure to a planning decision and shows a simple, clearly labeled calculation, which demonstrates practical use of biostatistics.
8

Age-Specific Rates as a Next Step

Age adjustment summarizes a comparison in a single number, but it can hide important detail. Two counties with the same age-adjusted prevalence could differ sharply in one age group, for example if one has unusually high COPD among adults in their fifties because of past occupational exposure. PLACES does not publish county estimates by age group, so that detail is not available from this source. A nurse leader could obtain it from local clinical data, counting patients with a COPD diagnosis by age group in the county's health center and hospital records, while recognizing that those counts describe only people who reached care. If the county's excess were concentrated in adults under 65, the response would lean toward workplace and cessation programs; if it were concentrated among older adults, toward rehabilitation, home oxygen support and transitions of care.

What this page is doingExplaining what adjustment hides and how age-specific rates would change the response shows deeper understanding of the measures than a definition alone.
9

Limits of the Comparison

These are model-based estimates, each with a confidence interval, so small differences between counties may not be meaningful; the next module examines that question directly. The estimates describe diagnosed COPD only. And age adjustment removes differences due to age, but not those due to smoking, occupation or access to diagnosis, which are the very factors a nurse leader would want to investigate next.

What this page is doingLimits are stated briefly and precisely and point forward to the next module, maintaining the course sequence.
10

Conclusion

Crude and age-adjusted prevalence rank New Hampshire's counties differently because the counties differ in age. Coös County ranks highest either way, which strengthens the case that its COPD burden reflects more than an older population. For planning services, the crude figure shows how many people need care; for arguing about risk and prevention resources, the adjusted figure provides a fair comparison.

What this page is doingThe conclusion states the finding and the practical rule for choosing a measure.
11

References

Celentano, D. D., & Szklo, M. (2019). Gordis epidemiology (6th ed.). Elsevier.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: County data (GIS friendly format), 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/d/i46a-9kgh

Klein, R. J., & Schoenborn, C. A. (2001). Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population (Healthy People 2010 Statistical Notes No. 20). National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf

What the NUR 520 Module 3 instructions ask for

The Module 3 assignment in NUR 520 usually asks you to calculate or report measures of disease frequency for your population health problem and interpret them. Common instructions ask you to distinguish incidence and prevalence, explain crude, specific and adjusted rates, present rates for your population and at least one comparison population, and discuss what the measures mean for nursing practice or planning. Some sections provide a worksheet with practice calculations. The written portion is usually two to four pages in APA 7 with a table. Using real published rates, and explaining exactly which rates you report, matters more than the number of calculations you show in the assignment, so spend your words on interpretation.

How this NUR 520 Module 3 measures of disease frequency example is built

This example uses real CDC PLACES 2025 county estimates to compare crude and age-adjusted COPD prevalence across New Hampshire's ten counties. It explains why prevalence rather than incidence suits a chronic disease, defines both measures and the direct method of age adjustment with the 2000 U.S. standard population, and presents a table with both measures and both rankings. It interprets specific ranking changes, including an older county that falls from third to eighth, and shows that Coös County ranks first either way. A section matches each measure to a planning decision with a clearly labeled calculation, another explains what age-specific rates would add, and a limits section points to the next module.

Where the NUR 520 Module 3 rubric puts the points

Grading for this assignment typically considers the accuracy of the measures, the explanation of concepts such as incidence, prevalence and adjustment, the comparison with another population, the interpretation for practice and the presentation of data. Accuracy is checked against the source, so report numbers exactly as published and label any you calculate. Interpretation earns the most credit when it explains why figures differ, not only that they differ. Tables should follow APA format with a number, title and note, and each table should be discussed in the text. Papers that connect each measure to a specific use in planning or practice show the applied understanding the course aims for.

NUR 520 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points

Students lose the most points here by comparing crude rates between populations of very different ages and concluding that one is sicker. Another is mixing crude and adjusted figures in the same comparison without saying so. Some papers define incidence and prevalence correctly but then use the wrong one for a chronic disease. Others present a table with no interpretation. Report each rate with its type, source and year, compare like with like, explain any ranking changes, match each measure to the decision it supports and state what adjustment does and does not remove. A single sentence of interpretation under each table goes a long way.

Get NUR 520 Module 3 written to your instructions

Share your population health problem, the populations you want to compare and the Module 3 worksheet or rubric. An analysis of crude and adjusted measures using real published data comes back in 24 to 48 hours, and the first sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 520 papers and related MSN samples

NUR 520 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 520 Module 3 measures of disease frequency sample?

This page offers the complete paper free: crude and age-adjusted COPD prevalence across ten New Hampshire counties from CDC PLACES, with a table, ranking changes explained, planning uses and three references. Analyses for your own population can be requested.

How is incidence different from prevalence in NUR 520?

Incidence measures new cases in a population at risk over a period. Prevalence reflects every current case, new or longstanding, at a given time. Prevalence suits chronic diseases for planning services.

Why do we age-adjust rates?

To compare populations fairly when their age structures differ. Adjustment applies each population's age-specific rates to one standard population, removing the effect of age differences.

What standard population is used for age adjustment in U.S. data?

Federal statistics commonly use the projected 2000 U.S. population as the standard, which allows comparison across places and years.

Should I report crude or adjusted rates in my NUR 520 paper?

Often both. Crude rates show the actual burden for planning services; adjusted rates allow fair comparison of risk between populations. Label each clearly.