| Course | NUR 520 Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Population health problem description (milestone) |
| Length | About 1,080 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 520 Module 4
Milestone One: COPD Among Adults in Coös County, New Hampshire, as a Population Health Problem
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 520: Epidemiological and Biostatistical Applications in Healthcare
Milestone One
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Milestone One: COPD Among Adults in Coös County, New Hampshire, as a Population Health Problem
A population health problem has to be described before it can be analyzed. This milestone describes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults in Coös County, New Hampshire: who is affected, how many, how the county compares with the rest of the state and what conditions appear to drive the difference. The description shows that Coös has the state's highest estimated COPD prevalence under both crude and age-adjusted measures, that it also has the highest estimated smoking prevalence, and that barriers to care likely compound both, which together justify treating COPD in the county as a priority for nurse-led population health work.
The Population
Coös County is the northernmost and least populous county in New Hampshire, with an estimated total population of about 31,400 and about 26,300 adults aged 18 and older in the population base used by CDC's 2025 county estimates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). It is mostly rural, with small towns spread across mountains and forest, and its largest community grew around a paper mill that has since closed. Its residents skew older than New Hampshire as a whole, and age is one of the strongest predictors of COPD. The population of interest for this project is all adults living in the county, with particular attention to current and former smokers and to adults aged 65 and older.
Magnitude of the Problem
In the 2025 PLACES release, the crude estimate for diagnosed COPD among the county's adults is 9.5%, bounded by a 95% confidence interval of 7.7% to 11.4%. The age-adjusted estimate is 7.1% (5.9% to 8.5%). Both are the highest of New Hampshire's ten counties (CDC, 2025). Applied to about 26,300 adults, the crude estimate suggests roughly 2,500 adults living with diagnosed COPD, a figure calculated for this milestone. For context, weighting all ten counties by their adult populations gives a statewide figure near 6.2%, again computed for this milestone, and the national figure, standardized for age, held close to 6% across the decade from 2011, while remaining higher among adults aged 65 and older, rural residents and people who have ever smoked (Liu et al., 2023).
About the Estimates
Because the county is small, these figures are model-based estimates rather than direct counts. PLACES combines national survey responses with census data to estimate prevalence for every county, city and census tract, a design meant to give local health departments usable data regardless of population size (Greenlund et al., 2022). That design makes the Coös estimates possible, but it also means they should be read with their confidence intervals and described as estimates in every report. They count only adults who have been told by a health professional that they have COPD, so the true burden, including undiagnosed disease, is likely higher. These cautions do not weaken the problem description; they tell the reader how much weight each number can bear.
Determinants Suggested by the Data
The same data source shows several determinants that set Coös apart. Table 1 compares the county with the statewide average for selected measures.
Table 1
Selected PLACES Estimates for Coös County Compared With the New Hampshire County Average
| Measure (adults) | Coös County, crude % | Statewide weighted average, crude % |
|---|---|---|
| Current cigarette smoking | 15.2 | 10.8 |
| Diagnosed COPD | 9.5 | 6.2 |
| Fair or poor self-rated health | 20.3 | 14.5 |
| Any disability | 34.3 | 26.1 |
| No health insurance, ages 18 to 64 | 8.6 | 6.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation | 7.3 | 5.6 |
Note. Coös values are from CDC PLACES, 2025 release. Statewide averages were calculated for this milestone by weighting the ten county estimates by adult population; they are not published CDC figures.
Interpreting the Determinants
Smoking is the most important determinant. Current smoking prevalence in Coös is about 40% higher than the statewide average, and smoking is the leading cause of COPD in the United States. The national trend data show COPD prevalence increasing among current and former smokers over the past decade (Liu et al., 2023), which makes cessation central to any response. The higher shares of adults reporting fair or poor health and disability suggest that many residents already live with chronic conditions that limit activity, consistent with a population in which COPD is advanced by the time it is diagnosed. Lack of insurance and transportation do not cause COPD, but they make diagnosis, cessation support and pulmonary rehabilitation harder to reach, and in a county where specialty care may be an hour or more away, those barriers can delay care until an exacerbation.
Problem Statement
Adults in Coös County have the highest estimated prevalence of diagnosed COPD and current smoking in New Hampshire, even after accounting for age, and they face greater barriers to insurance coverage and transportation than adults elsewhere in the state. Because these conditions compound one another, COPD in the county is likely to be diagnosed later, managed less consistently and accompanied by more disability than in other counties. This problem warrants population-level nursing interventions focused on cessation, earlier case finding in adults with symptoms and access to rehabilitation.
Significance for Nursing
Nurses are present at every point where this problem could be interrupted. Primary care nurses and care managers can deliver brief cessation counseling and follow up on referrals. Hospital and emergency nurses see exacerbations and can connect patients to rehabilitation and follow-up before discharge. Home health and public health nurses can reach people who cannot travel. For an MSN-prepared nurse in a leadership, education or population health role, the value of this description is that it shows where the burden is highest and which barriers are most likely to block care, which is the information needed to decide where nursing effort will make the most difference.
Questions for the Analysis Plan
The description raises questions that Milestone Two's analysis plan will need to address. How strong is the association between smoking and COPD, and how should it be measured? Are the differences between Coös and other counties larger than the uncertainty in the estimates? How much of the county's burden might be undiagnosed, given that the data count diagnosed disease only? And which outcomes, such as admissions for exacerbations or referrals to rehabilitation, could local clinical data provide to evaluate an intervention? These questions shape the statistical work in Modules 5 through 8.
Conclusion
COPD in Coös County is a well-defined population health problem: the highest estimated prevalence in the state, driven largely by smoking and compounded by barriers to care in a rural, older population. The data are model-based and describe diagnosed disease only, but they are consistent across measures and with national patterns. The next milestone will plan how to analyze the problem more precisely and how to measure the effect of a response.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: County data (GIS friendly format), 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/d/i46a-9kgh
Greenlund, K. J., Lu, H., Wang, Y., Matthews, K. A., LeClercq, J. M., Lee, B., & Carlson, S. A. (2022). PLACES: Local data for better health. Preventing Chronic Disease, 19, Article 210459. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210459
Liu, Y., Carlson, S. A., Watson, K. B., Xu, F., & Greenlund, K. J. (2023). Trends in the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults aged 18 years and older: United States, 2011-2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72(46), 1250-1256. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7246a1
What the NUR 520 Module 4 instructions ask for
Milestone One in NUR 520 usually asks you to describe the population health problem you will analyze in later milestones and the final project. Instructions typically ask you to define the population, describe the problem's magnitude with current data, compare it with a reference population, identify contributing factors or determinants, explain the significance for nursing and write a clear problem statement. Some sections provide a milestone template or ask specific questions in order. The submission is often three to five pages in APA 7, and a table of key data is usually welcome. Because later work depends on this milestone, precise definitions of population and measures save rework in every module after it.
How this NUR 520 Module 4 milestone one example is built
This milestone describes COPD among adults in Coös County, New Hampshire, using real CDC PLACES 2025 county estimates and national surveillance. It defines the population with size and subgroups of interest, states magnitude as a crude and age-adjusted rate with confidence intervals and as an estimated count, and compares the county with a clearly labeled statewide average. A table presents six measures side by side, and the interpretation distinguishes causes such as smoking from barriers such as transportation. The milestone ends with a formal problem statement and a list of questions for the analysis plan in Milestone Two. All data values are real, and every derived figure is labeled as such.
Where the NUR 520 Module 4 rubric puts the points
Milestone One is usually graded on the definition of the population, the description of magnitude with credible data, the comparison with a reference population, the identification of determinants, the problem statement and the writing. Data quality matters most: graders check sources, years and whether figures are described correctly as estimates, rates or counts. The determinants criterion rewards explanation of how each factor affects the problem. The problem statement earns full credit when it is specific, evidence-based and sets up later analysis. Clear labeling of any calculations you performed yourself is an easy way to show sound epidemiologic practice to the grader, and it protects you if a figure is questioned.
NUR 520 Module 4 help: the mistakes that cost points
Common problems in Milestone One include a population defined vaguely, such as rural adults, data drawn only from national figures, and determinants listed from general knowledge with no local data. Some papers give a prevalence without its year, geography or uncertainty. Others write a problem statement that is really a topic, such as COPD is a serious disease. Define the population precisely, use local or county data wherever it exists, compare with a reference population, explain what each determinant does and write a problem statement that someone could disagree with, because that is what makes it testable in later milestones and useful to anyone who reads it.
Get NUR 520 Module 4 written to your instructions
Send the population and health problem you chose, any data you have gathered and the Milestone One template. A problem description built on real published data for your population is ready in 24 to 48 hours, and the first sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 520 papers and related MSN samples
- NUR 520 Module 1 Short Paper: The Epidemiologic Triangle and COPD in Coös County
- NUR 520 Module 2 Data Sources Paper: Judging the Data Behind County COPD Estimates
- NUR 520 Module 3 Measures of Disease Frequency: Crude and Age-Adjusted COPD Across Ten Counties
- NUR 520 Module 5 Statistical Inference Paper: Confidence Intervals Around County Estimates
- NUR 520 Module 6 Study Designs Paper: Matching Designs to Questions About COPD
- NUR 520 Module 7 Milestone Two: An Analysis Plan With Relative Risk and Odds Ratios
- NUR 520 Module 8 Screening Paper: Screening Accuracy and the Case Against COPD Screening
- NUR 520 Module 9 Final Project: An Epidemiological Analysis of COPD With Population-Level Recommendations
- NUR 520 Module 10 Journal: Learning to Read Population Data as a Nurse
- NUR 506 Module 3 Search Strategy Paper
- NUR 508 Module 2 Role Theory Paper
- NUR 502 Module 4 Teaching Plan
- NUR 400 Module 2 Milestone One
NUR 520 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 520 Module 4 Milestone One sample?
This page carries the full milestone, free to read: COPD among adults in Coös County, New Hampshire, described with CDC county estimates, a comparison table, determinants, a problem statement and questions for Milestone Two, with three references. Milestones on your own problem can be ordered.
What goes into a population health problem description?
The population, the problem's magnitude with current data, a comparison with a reference population, the determinants that contribute and a clear problem statement.
Can I calculate my own comparison figures in NUR 520?
Yes, if you explain how. For example, a population-weighted average of county estimates is a reasonable comparison, but label it as your calculation rather than a published figure.
How specific should my problem statement be?
Specific enough to test: name the population, the condition, how it compares with others and the factors you believe drive it. Avoid general statements that any population could share.
How does Milestone One connect to the final project?
The final project analyzes and responds to the problem you describe here, so the population, measures and determinants you define now carry through every later milestone.