NUR 531 Module 10 Journal Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 531 Module 10 Journal sample closes a term of interprofessional leadership work with an honest look at what changed in the writer. It serves the final reflective journal in SNHU NUR 531, Interprofessional Leadership in Healthcare, the MSN course coded NUR-531. The writer, a composite nurse manager of an oncology unit, began the term with a self-evaluation in which colleagues rated them lowest on asking for input before deciding. Weeks later, a patient on the unit developed Legionnaires' disease from the hospital's water, and nearly every fix belonged to facilities, construction and informatics. The entry describes how the self-evaluation played out under that pressure, what the writer learned from a plumbing supervisor and a staff nurse, and why policy turned out to be a leadership tool. It ends with the measure the writer will use to check progress.

CourseNUR 531 Interprofessional Leadership in Healthcare
ModuleModule 10
Paper typeClosing reflective journal
LengthAbout 440 words, 3 pages
FormatJournal entry with APA 7 citations
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 531 Module 10

1

Module Ten Journal

The Plumbing Supervisor Knew More Than I Did

In week three, six colleagues told me, anonymously and kindly, that my requests for input come once my mind is made up. The pharmacist rated me a 2 on that item. I wrote a development plan with a tidy goal and a date, and I assumed I would work on it slowly over the next six months. Four weeks later a patient on my unit developed Legionnaires' disease, and I had to practice the goal under the worst possible conditions.

My instinct in the first hours was the old one: decide, then inform. I closed the showers and started bottled water before anyone asked me, and I still think that was right. But by the second day I was drafting an action plan for the building, which I did not understand, and I caught myself. The plumbing supervisor knew where every branch ran and why the valve had been turned. Walumbwa et al. (2008) describe balanced processing as weighing information, including views that challenge your own, before deciding. In the root cause analysis, that meant asking the supervisor to walk us through the pipes before anyone proposed a fix.

What this page is doingThe entry opens with the uncomfortable feedback, then shows the writer applying it in a real crisis, including a moment of self-correction. That arc is what makes reflection credible.
2

Two other moments stay with me. The first was hearing that the supervisor had adjusted the valve to stop patients being scalded in the new unit. I had arrived ready to find someone at fault, and RCA2's insistence on causes that name systems rather than people (National Patient Safety Foundation, 2015) stopped me. The supervisor had solved one safety problem inside a system that never checked for a second. The second moment came from a staff nurse on the failure mode team, who pointed out that charge nurses close rooms for a single shift when a bed breaks. No engineer knew that. The most important finding in the analysis came from the most junior person in the room.

I also changed my mind about policy. I used to think of policies as paperwork. Our 2018 water policy was well written and did nothing, because nothing in it made anyone act. Writing the revision taught me that a policy leads only if it alters an ordinary Tuesday on the unit.

What this page is doingEach moment connects an experience to a course source or concept and states what changed in the writer's thinking.
3

Research on nursing leadership keeps finding that relational leadership produces better results than leadership focused on tasks (Cummings et al., 2018). This term showed me what that looks like when the people you need are plumbers, contractors and informatics analysts. I will repeat the colleague survey in three months. If the pharmacist's rating on asking before deciding has not moved, I will know the lesson has not stuck yet.

What this page is doingThe closing ties the experience to evidence and ends with a concrete, measurable check, which is stronger than a general promise to keep growing.
4

References

Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 85, 19-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016

National Patient Safety Foundation. (2015). RCA2: Improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm. https://www.ihi.org/resources/tools/rca2-improving-root-cause-analyses-and-actions-prevent-harm

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913

What the NUR 531 Module 10 instructions ask for

NUR 531 usually ends with a reflective journal on your development as an interprofessional leader across the term. Prompts often ask how your leadership style has changed since your self-evaluation, what you learned from working through the adverse event, analyses and policy, which concepts or readings mattered most, and what you will do next. Journals are typically private to the instructor, written in the first person and one to two pages long, with a few citations. The self-evaluation from Project One is a natural anchor: go back to the gaps you named and say honestly whether and how you worked on them. A single well-told episode usually does more than a survey of every module.

How this NUR 531 Module 10 journal example is built

In the sample, a composite oncology nurse manager returns to the colleague feedback from the self-evaluation, which rated them lowest on seeking input before deciding. The entry shows that habit resurfacing during a Legionnaires' investigation, the moment of self-correction and the plumbing supervisor's knowledge that shaped the analysis. It describes how the RCA2 approach stopped a search for blame and how a staff nurse's observation changed the failure mode analysis. It reflects on policy as a leadership tool and closes with a specific measure the writer will use to check progress. Three real references connect the reflection to the course readings: the authentic leadership measure, the RCA2 guidance and a nursing leadership review.

Where the NUR 531 Module 10 rubric puts the points

Closing journals in NUR 531 are generally assessed for self-awareness, integration of course concepts, application to leadership practice and clarity. Integration earns full marks when a named concept or reading explains a specific moment from your projects, rather than being mentioned in passing. Self-awareness shows best when you return to an earlier self-assessment and describe progress or its absence honestly. Application is strongest when it names a behavior you will continue and how you will know whether you have. Journals that recount the projects in order without saying what changed in you tend to score in the middle of the range, however polished the prose.

NUR 531 Module 10 help: the mistakes that cost points

Final journals often become summaries of the course, or collections of general statements about growth that could come from any student. Instead, reread your Project One self-evaluation, pick the gap that mattered most and tell the story of one or two moments when it was tested. Name what you learned from someone in another profession, cite the readings that explained it and end with a measurable way to check yourself. Honesty about slips is more convincing than a claim of complete change. If you need a journal drafted from notes on your own projects, we can draft one in your voice, ready for your own edits and additions before you submit it.

Get NUR 531 Module 10 written to your instructions

Send the journal prompt, your Project One self-evaluation and a few notes on the moments that stood out in your projects. A first-person closing journal that draws on your NUR 531 readings is ready in 24 to 48 hours, and the first one is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 531 papers and related MSN samples

NUR 531 Module 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 531 Module 10 Journal sample?

The complete journal on this page is free to read: a nurse manager's reflection on applying colleague feedback during an infection investigation, learning from other professions and seeing policy as a leadership tool, with three real references.

What should the NUR 531 final journal cover?

How your leadership changed since your self-evaluation, what you learned from the course projects, which concepts mattered most and what you will do next.

Should I refer to my Project One self-evaluation in the journal?

Yes. Returning to the gaps you identified and describing progress honestly is one of the clearest ways to show self-awareness.

How do I cite readings in a reflective journal?

Use APA 7 in-text citations where a concept explains an experience, and include a short reference list at the end.

How do I end a leadership reflection?

With a specific behavior you will keep and a way to check it, such as repeating a colleague survey in a set number of months.