NUR 656 Module 5 Case Study Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 656 Module 5 Case Study sample shows how to evaluate heavy bleeding systematically instead of reaching straight for a prescription. It is written for SNHU NUR 656 (NUR-656), the MSN family nurse practitioner course on primary care of women. The composite patient is Renee, 44, whose periods have lengthened to eight days with clots and flooding, and who is exhausted. The case works through the FIGO PALM-COEIN classification described by Munro and colleagues, which separates structural causes from nonstructural ones. It applies ACOG guidance on pregnancy testing, blood counts, thyroid testing, imaging and endometrial sampling, which is warranted for her because of her age and obesity. It finds iron deficiency anemia, a small intramural fibroid and benign endometrium. The ECLIPSE trial, in which a levonorgestrel IUD outperformed usual medical treatment, supports the chosen plan, alongside iron replacement and follow-up.

CourseNUR 656 Primary Care of Women
ModuleModule 5
Paper typecase study on the evaluation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding
LengthAbout 1,040 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 656 Module 5

1

Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in a 44-Year-Old Using PALM-COEIN

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 656: Primary Care of Women

Module Five Case Study

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names the classification system because the case uses it to organize every step of the evaluation.
2

Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in a 44-Year-Old Using PALM-COEIN

Heavy menstrual bleeding is common in women in their forties and is often dismissed as a normal part of approaching menopause. It can, however, reflect conditions ranging from fibroids and polyps to endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, and it frequently causes iron deficiency anemia that affects energy and quality of life. A systematic approach protects against both missing serious disease and overtreating benign causes. Renee, 44, came to the composite community health center because of heavy periods. This case study documents her evaluation and management using the FIGO classification system. It argues that organizing the evaluation by structural and nonstructural causes, sampling the endometrium when risk warrants and choosing treatment based on trial evidence and the patient's goals provides safe, effective care.

What this page is doingThe introduction explains why heavy bleeding deserves systematic evaluation and states the case's approach.
3

Presentation

Renee reports that over the past year her periods have become heavier and longer, lasting eight days, with clots the size of a quarter and flooding through a pad and tampon within an hour on the heaviest two days. She has missed work twice. Her cycles remain regular at 26 to 28 days, with no bleeding between periods or after intercourse. She feels tired and short of breath on stairs. She has no history of easy bruising, nosebleeds or bleeding after dental work, and no family history of bleeding disorders. She had two vaginal births, has had a tubal ligation and takes no medications. Her body mass index is 34. She has no symptoms of thyroid disease. She wants her bleeding controlled and prefers to avoid surgery if possible.

On examination her blood pressure is 128/80 and heart rate 94. Her conjunctivae are pale. Pelvic examination shows a normal cervix and a slightly enlarged, regular uterus without tenderness.

What this page is doingThe presentation documents the bleeding pattern, anemia symptoms, bleeding history, risk factors and the patient's goals.
4

Organizing the Differential With PALM-COEIN

Munro et al. (2011) described the FIGO classification system for abnormal uterine bleeding in nonpregnant women of reproductive age. Its first four categories, forming PALM, are structural causes that can be seen on imaging or histology: polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas and malignancy or hyperplasia. The remaining five, forming COEIN, are nonstructural: coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, endometrial disorders, iatrogenic causes and causes not yet classified. The system also standardized terminology, replacing vague terms such as menorrhagia with descriptions of frequency, regularity, duration and volume, and allows more than one cause to be recorded, since many women have several.

Applied to Renee: her regular cycles make ovulatory dysfunction less likely; her negative bleeding history makes coagulopathy unlikely, though not impossible; she takes no medications that cause bleeding; and her enlarged uterus raises the possibility of leiomyomas or adenomyosis. Her age and obesity, which increases estrogen exposure, make it necessary to exclude hyperplasia or malignancy.

What this page is doingThe classification is explained accurately and applied category by category to the patient.
5

Evaluation

ACOG guidance on abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women recommends a pregnancy test, a complete blood count and, depending on history, thyroid testing and screening for coagulation disorders; transvaginal ultrasound as the first imaging test when a structural cause is suspected; and a biopsy of the uterine lining as an initial step for anyone 45 or older, and for those under 45 whose estrogen has gone unopposed by progesterone for long periods, as with obesity or polycystic ovary syndrome, or whose bleeding persists or fails to respond to medical treatment (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012). Although Renee is 44, her obesity and persistent heavy bleeding meet criteria for sampling.

Her urine pregnancy test was negative. Her hemoglobin came back at 10.1 g/dL, her red cells were small at an MCV of 76, and ferritin was 8 ng/mL, confirming iron deficiency anemia. Thyroid-stimulating hormone was normal. Transvaginal ultrasound showed a 3 cm intramural fibroid that did not distort the uterine cavity and a normal endometrial thickness. An office endometrial biopsy showed benign proliferative endometrium without hyperplasia.

What this page is doingACOG recommendations guide testing and sampling, and results confirm anemia, a nondistorting fibroid and benign endometrium.
6

Assessment

Heavy menstrual bleeding classified as AUB-L, associated with a 3 cm intramural leiomyoma that does not distort the cavity, with possible contribution from an endometrial cause, and iron deficiency anemia. Malignancy and hyperplasia have been excluded by biopsy. The fibroid's size and location make it an unlikely sole cause, and the treatment chosen should address heavy bleeding regardless of which contributes more.

What this page is doingThe assessment uses PALM-COEIN notation and acknowledges uncertainty about the relative contribution of causes.
7

Choosing Treatment

Options discussed included the levonorgestrel IUD, tranexamic acid during menses, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, combined hormonal contraception and progestin therapy, with referral for procedures such as endometrial ablation or hysterectomy if medical treatment fails. Combined hormonal contraception was less attractive because of her age and obesity, which raise thrombotic risk. Gupta et al. (2013) randomized 571 women with heavy menstrual bleeding in primary care to the levonorgestrel intrauterine system or usual medical treatment, including tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined hormonal contraception or progestogen. Over two years, women with the IUD reported greater improvement in the effect of bleeding on their daily lives and were more likely to continue their treatment. Because her fibroid does not distort the cavity, an IUD can be placed. Renee chose the levonorgestrel IUD.

What this page is doingOptions are weighed against her risks, and the ECLIPSE trial supports the patient's choice of the IUD.
8

Plan and Follow-Up

The levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD was placed at a second visit. She was told that irregular spotting is common for the first three to six months and that bleeding usually decreases substantially over time. Tranexamic acid 1,300 mg three times daily for up to five days during heavy flow was prescribed as a bridge for the first cycles. Oral iron, 65 mg of elemental iron taken every other day, was started, with a repeat hemoglobin and ferritin in eight weeks. She will return in three months to assess bleeding and anemia, with referral to gynecology if bleeding remains heavy, if anemia does not improve or if the fibroid grows. She was advised to seek care for bleeding that soaks a pad every hour for more than two hours, dizziness or fainting.

Her follow-up also includes a check of symptoms that would suggest a different cause, such as new bleeding between periods or after intercourse, which would prompt repeat evaluation.

What this page is doingThe plan specifies placement, expected bleeding changes, a bridge therapy, iron dosing, follow-up and referral triggers.
9

Conclusion

Renee's heavy bleeding was not simply a sign of approaching menopause. A systematic evaluation using PALM-COEIN, guided by ACOG recommendations, found iron deficiency anemia and a small fibroid and excluded endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. A levonorgestrel IUD, supported by trial evidence and chosen by the patient, together with iron replacement and follow-up, addresses both the bleeding and its consequences.

What this page is doingThe conclusion summarizes the systematic evaluation and evidence-based plan.
10

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2012). Practice bulletin no. 128: Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 120(1), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e320

Gupta, J., Kai, J., Middleton, L., Pattison, H., Gray, R., & Daniels, J. (2013). Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(2), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1204724

Munro, M. G., Critchley, H. O. D., Broder, M. S., & Fraser, I. S. (2011). FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 113(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011

What the NUR 656 Module 5 instructions ask for

Case studies on abnormal bleeding in NUR 656 usually ask you to present a patient, organize a differential diagnosis, describe an evaluation plan with rationale, interpret results and recommend management with follow-up. Expect four to six pages in APA 7. Describe the bleeding pattern with standardized terms, organize causes with PALM-COEIN, justify each test with guidance, state whether and why endometrial sampling is indicated, classify the final diagnosis in the system's notation, weigh treatment options against the patient's risks and goals with trial evidence and include iron replacement and referral criteria when anemia or treatment failure is possible. Record the patient's goals, such as avoiding surgery, because they shape which options make sense.

How this NUR 656 Module 5 case study example is built

This case follows a composite 44-year-old with eight-day periods, clots and fatigue. It explains the Munro PALM-COEIN system and applies each category. ACOG guidance directs testing and supports endometrial sampling because of her obesity and persistent bleeding despite her age of 44. Results show a hemoglobin of 10.1, ferritin of 8, a 3 cm nondistorting fibroid and benign endometrium, classified as AUB-L. Combined hormonal contraception is set aside because of thrombotic risk, and the Gupta ECLIPSE trial supports her choice of a levonorgestrel IUD, with tranexamic acid as a bridge, iron and follow-up. Her wish to avoid surgery shapes the options, and referral triggers are set in advance.

Where the NUR 656 Module 5 rubric puts the points

Grading of bleeding case studies commonly weighs the history and examination, the organization of the differential, the rationale for testing, interpretation of results, classification, evidence-based management, patient-centered decision making and APA 7 writing. Top-band papers use the classification system to structure reasoning, not merely name it, and explain when endometrial sampling is required. Graders reward treatment choices that account for contraindications, such as thrombotic risk, and that cite comparative evidence. Addressing anemia, expected side effects and referral criteria shows complete primary care management that reviewers look for. Documenting the patient's goals and setting referral triggers in advance earns credit as well. Correct notation for the diagnosis also helps.

NUR 656 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points

Bleeding case studies lose points when the evaluation skips pregnancy testing or blood counts, when endometrial sampling is omitted for women who meet criteria, when PALM-COEIN is listed without being applied or when treatment ignores the patient's risks and preferences. Another gap is treating the bleeding but not the anemia. Describe the pattern, apply the classification, justify tests and sampling, classify the diagnosis, weigh options with evidence and address anemia and follow-up. If your case involves postmenopausal bleeding, an adolescent or suspected coagulopathy, send it with your NUR 656 template so the evaluation follows the right guidance. Record her goals and state clear triggers for referral. Classify with the system's notation.

Get NUR 656 Module 5 written to your instructions

Share the NUR 656 case, your template and the grading criteria, and the paper you receive will organize the differential with PALM-COEIN, justify each test and sampling decision, weigh treatment with evidence and address anemia and follow-up, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 656 papers and related MSN samples

NUR 656 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 656 Module 5 Case Study sample?

This page carries the full case: heavy menstrual bleeding at 44 worked through PALM-COEIN, with endometrial sampling, anemia and a levonorgestrel IUD.

What does PALM-COEIN stand for?

Polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma and malignancy or hyperplasia for structural causes; coagulopathy, ovulatory, endometrial, iatrogenic and not yet classified for nonstructural causes.

When should the endometrium be sampled in abnormal uterine bleeding?

In women 45 and older and in younger women with unopposed estrogen exposure such as obesity, failed medical management or persistent bleeding.

Is a levonorgestrel IUD effective for heavy menstrual bleeding?

In the ECLIPSE trial, it improved the effect of bleeding on daily life more than usual medical treatment over two years.

Can an IUD be placed with fibroids?

Often yes, if the fibroids do not distort the uterine cavity, as confirmed by imaging.