NUR 656 Module 8 SOAP Note Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This NUR 656 Module 8 SOAP Note sample shows how office testing turns a common complaint into a precise diagnosis. It is written for SNHU NUR 656 (NUR-656), the MSN family nurse practitioner course on primary care of women. The composite patient is Danielle, 29, with a week of thin gray discharge and a fishy odor that is worse after intercourse, without itching or pain. The note works through the differential of bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis and cervicitis. It confirms bacterial vaginosis by Amsel's criteria and notes the Nugent Gram stain standard. Treatment follows the 2021 CDC STI guidelines with seven days of oral metronidazole. The plan explains why partners need not be treated, adds STI testing and prepares her for the recurrence rate Bradshaw and colleagues found.

CourseNUR 656 Primary Care of Women
ModuleModule 8
Paper typeSOAP note for vaginal discharge and bacterial vaginosis
LengthAbout 1,020 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 656 Module 8

1

SOAP Note: Vaginal Discharge in a 29-Year-Old Diagnosed as Bacterial Vaginosis by Amsel Criteria

[Student Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

NUR 656: Primary Care of Women

Module Eight SOAP Note

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.

What this page is doingThe title names the diagnostic criteria because the note's central task is confirming the diagnosis objectively.
2

SOAP Note: Vaginal Discharge in a 29-Year-Old Diagnosed as Bacterial Vaginosis by Amsel Criteria

Few complaints bring women to primary care more often than vaginal discharge, and the three usual causes, bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis and trichomoniasis, are often treated empirically on the basis of symptoms. Symptom-based diagnosis is frequently wrong, leading to repeated visits, unnecessary antifungal use and missed sexually transmitted infections. A few minutes of office testing can make the diagnosis reliable. Danielle is a 29-year-old seen for discharge and odor. This SOAP note documents her evaluation and treatment. It argues that a structured differential, objective criteria, guideline-based treatment and counseling about recurrence provide better care than treating symptoms alone.

What this page is doingThe introduction explains why symptom-based treatment of discharge often fails and states the note's approach.
3

Subjective

Chief concern: "I have a smell I can't get rid of."

History of present illness: Danielle reports seven days of increased thin, grayish discharge with a fishy odor that is stronger after intercourse and after her period, which ended nine days ago. She has no itching, burning, pain with intercourse, pelvic pain, fever or abnormal bleeding. She douched twice last week to control the odor. She had similar symptoms a year ago treated with an antifungal cream from the pharmacy, which did not help. Her relationship with her male partner has lasted two years, and she relies on a copper IUD; condoms are not used. She has no new partners. Last STI testing was a year ago and negative. Medications: none. Allergies: none.

What this page is doingThe history captures discharge character, odor timing, absence of itching or pain, douching, prior self-treatment and sexual history.
4

Objective

Vital signs normal. External genitalia without erythema or lesions. On speculum view, a thin, even, grayish film clings to the vaginal walls; the cervix looks healthy, does not bleed on contact and shows no pus-like discharge. Moving the cervix causes no pain, and the adnexa are not tender. Office testing: vaginal pH 5.0; a fishy amine odor when potassium hydroxide was added to the discharge sample; saline microscopy showing clue cells making up about 30% of epithelial cells, no motile trichomonads and few white blood cells; potassium hydroxide microscopy without yeast or pseudohyphae.

What this page is doingThe examination and office tests are documented in enough detail to apply the diagnostic criteria.
5

Assessment

1. Bacterial vaginosis. Amsel et al. (1983) described clinical criteria for what was then called nonspecific vaginitis: a thin, homogeneous discharge; vaginal pH above 4.5; a positive amine or whiff test; and clue cells on microscopy. The presence of three of the four supports the diagnosis. Danielle meets all four. In research and laboratory settings, the Nugent score, a standardized method of interpreting a Gram stain of vaginal fluid by counting bacterial morphotypes, is considered the reference standard for diagnosis (Nugent et al., 1991); Amsel criteria remain practical and accurate for office use.

Differential diagnoses: vulvovaginal candidiasis, unlikely given absence of itching, normal pH expected in candidiasis and no yeast on microscopy, which also explains why her earlier antifungal cream failed; trichomoniasis, unlikely with no motile organisms, though microscopy misses many cases; and cervicitis from chlamydia or gonorrhea, unlikely with a normal cervix but not excluded without testing. Douching is a known risk factor for bacterial vaginosis.

What this page is doingThe assessment applies Amsel criteria explicitly, notes the laboratory reference standard and works through the differential.
6

Plan

The 2021 CDC sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines recommend metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for seven days, metronidazole gel 0.75% intravaginally once daily for five days or clindamycin cream 2% intravaginally at bedtime for seven days for bacterial vaginosis, and note that refraining from alcohol during metronidazole treatment is no longer considered necessary (Workowski et al., 2021). Danielle chose the oral route, so she will take 500 mg of metronidazole every twelve hours for a week. Because microscopy misses many cases of trichomoniasis, a vaginal nucleic acid amplification test for trichomonas, chlamydia and gonorrhea was sent, with HIV and syphilis testing offered and accepted. Her copper IUD does not need removal.

Partner management: the guidelines do not recommend routine treatment of male partners, since trials have not shown that it reduces recurrence. She was advised to stop douching, which disrupts the protective lactobacilli, and told that condom use may reduce recurrence. A test of cure is not needed if symptoms resolve.

What this page is doingTreatment follows the CDC guideline with patient preference, adds STI testing and explains partner management and prevention.
7

Why It Matters Beyond Symptoms

Bacterial vaginosis is more than a nuisance. It reflects a shift in the vaginal ecosystem from protective lactobacilli, which keep the pH low, to a mixture of anaerobic bacteria. Women with this imbalance are more likely to pick up other sexually transmitted infections, HIV among them, with pelvic inflammatory disease after gynecologic procedures and, in pregnancy, with preterm birth. These associations are one reason to confirm the diagnosis rather than guess, to test for other infections at the same visit and to treat symptomatic women. For Danielle, who has a copper IUD, the associations do not require removing the device, but they do support treating the infection promptly and returning if she develops pelvic pain or fever.

The visit also explained why her earlier treatment failed. Many women assume that any discharge or odor is a yeast infection and use over-the-counter antifungal products. Surveys of women who self-diagnose have found that many do not actually have candidiasis. Using antifungals for bacterial vaginosis delays effective treatment and can leave women frustrated and repeatedly symptomatic. Danielle was shown her own test results, including the elevated pH and clue cells, so that she could see why this infection is different and why it needs a different medicine.

What this page is doingThe health implications of bacterial vaginosis and the reasons self-treatment fails justify objective diagnosis and prompt treatment.
8

Counseling About Recurrence

Danielle was told that bacterial vaginosis often returns. Bradshaw et al. (2006) followed women after treatment with oral metronidazole and found that more than half had a recurrence within twelve months, with recurrence associated with factors such as having a regular sexual partner and a history of the condition. Knowing this helps patients recognize a recurrence as common rather than as a treatment failure or a sign of infidelity. She was asked to return if symptoms recur, in which case a longer or suppressive regimen could be considered, and to avoid treating herself with antifungal products, since her symptoms have not been caused by yeast.

What this page is doingRecurrence evidence is used to set expectations and prevent misattribution and inappropriate self-treatment.
9

Conclusion

Danielle's odor and discharge had been misattributed to yeast. A structured differential and a few office tests confirmed bacterial vaginosis by all four Amsel criteria. Guideline-based metronidazole, STI testing, advice to stop douching and honest counseling about recurrence address both the current episode and the likelihood of future ones.

What this page is doingThe conclusion restates the diagnostic reasoning and the comprehensive plan.
10

References

Amsel, R., Totten, P. A., Spiegel, C. A., Chen, K. C., Eschenbach, D., & Holmes, K. K. (1983). Nonspecific vaginitis: Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. The American Journal of Medicine, 74(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9

Bradshaw, C. S., Morton, A. N., Hocking, J., Garland, S. M., Morris, M. B., Moss, L. M., Horvath, L. B., Kuzevska, I., & Fairley, C. K. (2006). High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 193(11), 1478-1486. https://doi.org/10.1086/503780

Nugent, R. P., Krohn, M. A., & Hillier, S. L. (1991). Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29(2), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991

Workowski, K. A., Bachmann, L. H., Chan, P. A., Johnston, C. M., Muzny, C. A., Park, I., Reno, H., Zenilman, J. M., & Bolan, G. A. (2021). Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 70(4), 1-187. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1

What the NUR 656 Module 8 instructions ask for

SOAP notes on vaginal complaints in NUR 656 usually ask for a focused history, examination and office testing, an assessment with differential diagnosis and a plan with treatment, partner management and education. Expect three to four pages in APA 7 in your program's template. Describe the discharge, odor and associated symptoms precisely, document pH, whiff test and microscopy results, apply named diagnostic criteria rather than impressions, rule out other causes explicitly, follow the current CDC treatment guideline, address partner treatment and STI testing correctly and prepare the patient for recurrence where it is common so she knows when to return. Explain why the diagnosis matters beyond symptoms, including links to other infections and pregnancy outcomes.

How this NUR 656 Module 8 soap note example is built

This note documents a composite 29-year-old with thin gray discharge and fishy odor after menses, no itching and a prior failed antifungal. Office testing shows pH 5.0, a positive whiff test and 30% clue cells. The assessment applies the four Amsel criteria, notes the Nugent Gram stain standard and rules out candidiasis, trichomoniasis and cervicitis. Treatment follows the Workowski 2021 CDC guideline with oral metronidazole for seven days, with no alcohol restriction required. Trichomonas, chlamydia and gonorrhea testing is added, partners are not treated and the Bradshaw study frames recurrence counseling. A section explains links to STI acquisition and preterm birth and shows her the test results that separate this from yeast.

Where the NUR 656 Module 8 rubric puts the points

Grading of vaginitis notes commonly weighs the history, the completeness of examination and office testing, correct application of diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, guideline-based treatment, partner management, STI testing, education and APA 7 writing. Top-band notes document objective test results and apply named criteria explicitly. Graders reward accurate current guidance, such as dosing and the updated advice on alcohol, correct statements about partner treatment and testing for trichomoniasis when microscopy is negative. Counseling that prepares the patient for recurrence and discourages inappropriate self-treatment shows attention to the patient's experience beyond the visit. Explaining the health implications, and why self-treatment failed, adds depth that graders notice. Current dosing matters.

NUR 656 Module 8 help: the mistakes that cost points

Vaginitis notes lose points when the diagnosis rests on symptoms alone, when pH and microscopy are not documented, when outdated treatment advice is given or when male partners are treated routinely. Another gap is skipping STI testing because the diagnosis seems clear. Document objective findings, apply criteria, rule out alternatives, follow the current CDC guideline, address partners and testing correctly and counsel about recurrence and douching. If your case involves recurrent candidiasis, trichomoniasis or vaginitis in pregnancy, send it with your NUR 656 template so the note follows the right guidance. Show the patient why her earlier self-treatment failed, and explain the health links. Stop douching advice helps.

Get NUR 656 Module 8 written to your instructions

Share the NUR 656 case, your SOAP template and the grading criteria, and the note you receive will document objective findings, apply named criteria, follow the current CDC guideline and address partners, testing and recurrence, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More NUR 656 papers and related MSN samples

NUR 656 Module 8 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 656 Module 8 SOAP Note sample?

This page carries the full note: vaginal discharge at 29 diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis by Amsel criteria, metronidazole under 2021 CDC guidelines and recurrence counseling.

What are the Amsel criteria for bacterial vaginosis?

Thin homogeneous discharge, vaginal pH above 4.5, a positive whiff test and clue cells; three of the four support the diagnosis.

What is the recommended treatment for bacterial vaginosis?

Metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for seven days, metronidazole gel for five days or clindamycin cream for seven days.

Should male partners be treated for bacterial vaginosis?

No. CDC guidelines do not recommend routine treatment of male partners because it has not reduced recurrence.

How often does bacterial vaginosis come back?

A study found more than half of women had a recurrence within twelve months after oral metronidazole.