| Course | NUR 650 Care Coordination and Outcomes Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 9 |
| Paper type | comprehensive care coordination program proposal |
| Length | About 1,090 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 650 Module 9
Final Project: A Tiered Care Coordination Program to Reduce Heart Failure Readmissions
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
NUR 650: Care Coordination and Outcomes Management
Module Nine Final Project
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Final Project: A Tiered Care Coordination Program to Reduce Heart Failure Readmissions
Heart failure is one of the most common reasons older adults are hospitalized and one of the most common reasons they return. In the composite Brookhaven hospital, 24% of heart failure patients are readmitted within 30 days, a rate that has held for three years, exposes the hospital to federal payment penalties and, more importantly, reflects patients who became sick again at home. This proposal asks the executive team to fund a tiered care coordination program for heart failure. It brings together the analysis, design, measurement and evaluation work completed over the past term and argues that a program built on local root causes, tested transitional care components, reconciliation that reaches primary care and honest evaluation can lower readmissions to 19% within a year at a cost the hospital can recover.
The Problem and Its Causes
The analysis reviewed 400 heart failure discharges and all 96 readmissions from the past year. Readmissions came early, with 41% occurring in the first week, and most patients had seen no clinician before returning. A Pareto analysis showed that most readmissions traced back to four linked gaps: silence between discharge and the end of the first week, confusion about the water pill, weights that were never taken or never acted on, and drugs patients could not afford or obtain. Fewer than a third were seen by any clinician inside a week, and one in four had a medication discrepancy at one week. The process map found that teaching happened in the final hour, follow-up was left to patients to schedule and discharge summaries often reached clinics after the first visit.
The Program
Every eligible patient receives the universal tier, adapted from Project RED, which in a randomized trial cut the combined count of return emergency visits and readmissions over the next month by about 30% (Jack et al., 2009). It includes daily teaching with teach-back from the first hospital day, a follow-up visit booked before discharge within seven days using reserved clinic slots, a pharmacist review of the discharge list against guideline-directed therapy and insurance coverage, a plain-language care plan, an electronic discharge summary sent the same day and a pharmacist call by day three. The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline supports guideline-directed medical therapy, early follow-up and multidisciplinary care for patients at high risk (Heidenreich et al., 2022).
Patients flagged by the HOSPITAL score, by the five-item social and functional screen, or by a nurse's concern move up to the second tier: a transitional care nurse who begins coaching in the hospital, a home visit within 72 hours, weekly calls for four weeks and a weight gain protocol that allows the nurse, with the cardiology nurse practitioner, to adjust diuretics before symptoms become severe. This tier borrows the clinical responsiveness of the model tested by Naylor et al. (2004), in which nurse practitioners following older heart failure patients from hospital to home lengthened the time to readmission and lowered costs, at a lower intensity suited to Brookhaven's resources.
Medication Reconciliation Across Settings
Because many medication errors arise after discharge, reconciliation extends beyond the hospital. It begins with a two-source history, typically the bottles from home plus pharmacy fill records, labels each discharge medication as new, changed, continued or stopped, includes a stop list for medications at home and ends with a reconciled list transmitted the same day to the patient's clinic and pharmacy, with confirmation of receipt. Caregivers who manage medications are included in teaching. Discrepancies are measured directly on the day-three call.
Measurement and Evaluation
The measurement set follows Donabedian's structure, process and outcome framework, with process measures for each bundle component and an all-or-none composite, outcomes including 30-day readmission, emergency visits, mortality and the Care Transitions Measure, and balancing measures for length of stay, observation returns and staff time. Evaluation uses an interrupted time series of monthly readmissions spanning three years before launch and a year and a half after, with pneumonia readmissions as a comparison series, because readmissions were already falling nationally under federal policy. Decision rules set in advance determine when results can be credited to the program. Results will be examined by payer, race and rural residence to ensure all groups benefit.
Staffing, Costs and Return
Table 1 estimates annual costs of about $200,000. At Brookhaven's average cost of $14,500 per heart failure readmission, preventing about 14 readmissions a year would cover the program's cost before counting any reduction in federal penalties. Reducing the rate from 24% to 19% among 400 discharges would prevent about 20 readmissions. The estimate is conservative in counting only direct hospital costs, and it will be revisited after the first year using the same attribution rules as the clinical evaluation.
Table 1. Estimated Annual Program Costs
| Item | Annual cost (estimate) |
|---|---|
| Transitional care nurse, 1.0 FTE with benefits | $118,000 |
| Pharmacist time, 0.4 FTE for reconciliation and calls | $62,000 |
| Home visit travel and scales for patients without one | $9,000 |
| Training, text message weight reporting and printed materials | $11,000 |
| Total | $200,000 |
Note. Case management and scheduling work is absorbed within existing positions; reserved clinic slots were negotiated at no direct cost.
Governance and Timeline
The clinical nurse leader will serve as program lead, reporting monthly to the quality committee. Each component has an owner: bedside nurse managers for teaching, case management for appointments, pharmacy for reconciliation and calls and the transitional care nurse for the high-risk tier, supervised by the cardiology section. Implementation will proceed in three phases over six months: small tests of each component on one unit, spread to all medical units and full operation with the evaluation clock starting. A steering group of nursing, pharmacy, cardiology, case management, primary care and a patient representative will meet quarterly to review results and decide on changes.
Risks
The main risks are that components will be delivered inconsistently as attention fades, that clinics will not keep reserved slots, that the transitional care nurse's caseload will exceed capacity and that readmissions will fall less than hoped. Mitigation includes monthly process data shared with each owner, written agreements with clinics, a cap on the high-risk caseload with ranking by risk and a candid evaluation that treats a smaller effect as useful information rather than failure.
Conclusion
This proposal asks for about $200,000 a year to address a problem that harms patients and costs the hospital more than that. It is built on local causes, tested components, reconciliation that reaches primary care, measures that show what is delivered and what changes and an evaluation designed to tell the truth. With clear owners and a phased launch, it gives Brookhaven a realistic path from 24% to 19% and the information to know whether it has arrived.
References
Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., Fang, J. C., Fedson, S. E., Fonarow, G. C., Hayek, S. S., Hernandez, A. F., Khazanie, P., Kittleson, M. M., Lee, C. S., Link, M. S., . . . Yancy, C. W. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 145(18), e895-e1032. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
Jack, B. W., Chetty, V. K., Anthony, D., Greenwald, J. L., Sanchez, G. M., Johnson, A. E., Forsythe, S. R., O'Donnell, J. K., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Manasseh, C., Martin, S., & Culpepper, L. (2009). A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 150(3), 178-187. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00007
Naylor, M. D., Brooten, D. A., Campbell, R. L., Maislin, G., McCauley, K. M., & Schwartz, J. S. (2004). Transitional care of older adults hospitalized with heart failure: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(5), 675-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52202.x
What the NUR 650 Module 9 instructions ask for
The NUR 650 Final Project usually asks for a complete care coordination or outcomes management program proposal for a defined population in your setting. It typically brings together the milestones: problem analysis, intervention design, measures and evaluation, along with resources and implementation. Plan on ten to twelve pages in APA 7, often with tables for costs and measures. Write for decision makers, lead with the problem and the request, summarize the analysis with key figures, describe the intervention with its evidence, show what will be measured and how results will be judged, itemize costs with a break-even estimate and name who owns each part of the program. Close with the specific decision you are asking leaders to make.
How this NUR 650 Module 9 final project example is built
This project proposes a tiered heart failure program at a composite hospital with a 24% readmission rate. It summarizes the root causes and key figures, describes a universal tier adapted from the Jack Project RED trial and a high-risk tier informed by the Naylor transitional care trial, with clinical elements anchored in the Heidenreich guideline. Reconciliation extends to primary care. Measures follow Donabedian, and an interrupted time series with a comparison condition guides evaluation. A cost table totals about $200,000 a year, with break-even at about 14 prevented readmissions, and governance names owners, phases and a steering group. The proposal ends by restating the request and what the hospital receives for it.
Where the NUR 650 Module 9 rubric puts the points
Grading of the final project typically weighs the clarity of the problem and its analysis, the evidence base and fit of the intervention, the measurement and evaluation plan, the financial analysis, implementation and governance, attention to risks and equity and APA 7 writing. Top-band proposals read as a single argument to decision makers rather than a sequence of milestone summaries. Graders reward itemized costs with a transparent break-even estimate, clear ownership of each component and an evaluation that accounts for outside trends. Naming risks with specific mitigation and committing to report results honestly signal a proposal that leaders can trust. A clear closing request is also valued.
NUR 650 Module 9 help: the mistakes that cost points
Program proposals lose points when they restate milestones without connecting them, when costs are missing or unexplained, when no one owns the components or when evaluation credits the program for trends it did not cause. Another gap is a proposal that asks for money without saying what the hospital gets back. Lead with the problem and request, connect analysis to design, cite trial evidence, itemize costs, estimate break-even, name owners, plan evaluation and address risks. If your proposal targets a different population, such as COPD, diabetes or post-surgical patients, send it with your NUR 650 prompt so the program fits. End with a clear request.
Get NUR 650 Module 9 written to your instructions
Send the NUR 650 final project prompt, your population and setting and the rubric. Your proposal will connect analysis to design, cite trial evidence, itemize costs with a break-even estimate, name owners and plan an honest evaluation, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More NUR 650 papers and related MSN samples
- NUR 650 Module 1 Discussion: What Fragmented Care Costs
- NUR 650 Module 2 Risk Tool Paper: What Readmission Risk Scores Can and Cannot Tell a Care Team
- NUR 650 Module 3 Milestone One: Heart Failure Readmissions: Data, Process Map and Root Causes
- NUR 650 Module 4 Model Comparison Paper: Three Transitional Care Models Compared
- NUR 650 Module 5 Milestone Two: A Discharge and Follow-Up Bundle for Heart Failure
- NUR 650 Module 6 Measures Paper: Measuring Care Coordination With Structure, Process and Outcome
- NUR 650 Module 7 Milestone Three: Evaluating the Bundle Amid National Trends and Observation Stays
- NUR 650 Module 8 Medication Paper: Medication Discrepancies at Discharge and the Handoff to Primary Care
- NUR 631 Module 8 Balanced Scorecard: Twelve Measures for the Staffing Strategy
- NUR 645 Module 2 Needs Assessment Paper: A Needs Assessment Before Curriculum Change
- NUR 531 Module 3 Project One: A Leadership Style Self-Evaluation With Colleague Feedback
- NUR 557 Module 5 Case Paper: Adolescent Depression, Fluoxetine and the Boxed Warning
NUR 650 Module 9 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 650 Module 9 Final Project sample?
This page carries the full proposal: a tiered heart failure care coordination program with root causes, bundle design, reconciliation, measures, costs and evaluation.
What should a care coordination program proposal include?
The problem and its causes, the population and risk stratification, the intervention with evidence, measures, an evaluation design, costs, governance and risks.
How do you estimate break-even for a readmission program?
Divide the program's annual cost by the average cost of a readmission to find how many readmissions must be prevented to cover it.
Why use a tiered design?
It gives every patient low-cost core components and reserves more intensive support for patients at highest risk, matching resources to need.
Who should govern a care coordination program?
A named program lead with owners for each component and a steering group that includes nursing, pharmacy, physicians, primary care and patients.