HIM 350 Module 8 Discussion Example

Reviewed by Delia Ravenscroft, MSN, RN

This HIM 350 Module 8 Discussion sample asks, at the end of the course, what communication technology is really for. It is written for SNHU HIM 350 (HIM-350), whose final discussion typically asks BS Health Information Management students what they learned and how it will shape their work. The writer, a composite health information coordinator at a rural behavioral health agency, began the term focused on tools and ends it focused on relationships. Evidence that remote mental health care works, research showing who gets left out of digital health and guidance on professionalism online each changed the writer's thinking. The post concludes that the best communication technology protects the connection between clients and staff, and asks classmates what they will carry forward.

CourseHIM 350 Communication and Technologies
ModuleModule 8
Paper typeBS Health Information Management closing discussion on communication technology
LengthAbout 340 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolSouthern New Hampshire University
ProgramBS Health Information Management
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HIM 350 Module 8

1

Module Eight Discussion

The Text Message Was Never the Point

At the start of the term, I thought of our agency's communication problems as technology problems: the wrong reminder system, too many pagers, a portal few people use. Eight weeks later I think of them as relationship problems that technology can either help or harm.

What this page is doingThe writer describes a shift from tools to relationships.
2

The first lesson came from our video visits. Hilty et al. (2013) concluded that remote mental health care was effective and appeared comparable to office visits across many groups of patients, and our clinicians agree that most therapy works well on screen. But when I looked at who missed video visits, I found clients on Medicaid and in our most rural areas. National survey work by Kontos et al. (2014) points the same way: the less income and schooling people have, the less they use digital health tools. A tool that works well on average can still leave behind the very clients a community agency exists to serve.

The second lesson came from the case managers' texts. I first saw them only as a privacy problem, and they are one. Then clients told us those messages were the most helpful thing we do. The goal was never to stop the texting but to move it somewhere safe and documented, so the relationship survives and the risk does not.

The third lesson came from our social media page. Greysen et al. (2010) described social media as a mirror of professional identity, and seeing staff accidentally confirm that commenters were clients showed me how quickly a friendly reply can cross a line. Professional boundaries protect relationships too, and a clear policy protects staff who are only trying to be kind.

What this page is doingThree lessons are tied to readings and to the agency's experience.
3

In my next role on our technology committee, I plan to ask two questions about every new tool: who will it leave out, and what will it do to the relationship between clients and the people who help them? For classmates: which communication tool in your workplace strengthens relationships most, and which one quietly weakens them?

What this page is doingTwo guiding questions for future work and a question for peers end the post.
4

References

Greysen, S. R., Kind, T., & Chretien, K. C. (2010). Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(11), 1227-1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1447-1

Hilty, D. M., Ferrer, D. C., Parish, M. B., Johnston, B., Callahan, E. J., & Yellowlees, P. M. (2013). The effectiveness of telemental health: A 2013 review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(6), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0075

Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W.-Y. S., & Prestin, A. (2014). Predictors of eHealth usage: Insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(7), Article e172. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3117

What the HIM 350 Module 8 instructions ask for

In the closing HIM 350 discussion, students usually reflect on how their thinking about healthcare communication technology changed and what they will do differently. Around 350 to 450 words is typical, supported by two or three sources in APA 7, with responses to peers later. Choose a few genuine shifts in your thinking, show each through a moment from your coursework or workplace and connect each to a reading. End with how you will apply the lessons, stated specifically, and a question that asks classmates to evaluate tools in their own settings. HIM 350 graders notice clean headings in HIM 350 papers. HIM 350 names and dates need checking before HIM 350 submission. HIM 350 prompts vary by term, so recheck HIM 350 directions.

How this HIM 350 Module 8 discussion example is built

A health information coordinator moves from seeing communication problems as technology problems to seeing them as relationship problems. Hilty and colleagues' telemental health review supports video visits, while Kontos and colleagues' digital divide findings explain who misses them. Case managers' texts, first seen only as a privacy risk, turn out to be what clients value most. Greysen and colleagues' view of social media as a mirror of professional identity frames staff replies that crossed a line. The post ends with two questions for evaluating any tool. HIM 350 students can reuse this structure for HIM 350 work. HIM 350 claims here trace to cited HIM 350 sources. HIM 350 readers can adapt each section to HIM 350 data.

Where the HIM 350 Module 8 rubric puts the points

Instructors reading the last HIM 350 post look for a genuine change of mind, sources used accurately, examples from real work, plans concrete enough to observe and thoughtful replies to peers. The best entries admit tensions, such as a tool that helps clients but threatens privacy, and turn what they learned into habits or questions they will actually use. A final question that pushes classmates to judge their own tools, rather than simply name them, tends to spark the richest thread. HIM 350 marks favor careful formatting across HIM 350 sections. HIM 350 citations keep every HIM 350 argument credible. HIM 350 instructors weigh evidence heavily in HIM 350 grading.

HIM 350 Module 8 help: the mistakes that cost points

Reflection posts lose points when they summarize course topics, cite readings without linking them to experience, describe only benefits of technology or end with vague plans. Another frequent gap is missing the human side of communication tools. Choose honest turning points, give each a scene and a source and say exactly how you will act on them. If your prompt asks you to focus on a particular competency or course outcome, send it with your HIM 350 notes so the reflection addresses it. HIM 350 drafts start well from a HIM 350 outline. HIM 350 feedback already received guides HIM 350 revisions. HIM 350 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify HIM 350 expectations.

Get HIM 350 Module 8 written to your instructions

Send the HIM 350 Module 8 directions along with two or three things that surprised you this term. We will shape them into a short, honest post that links each surprise to a course reading, commits you to something specific at work and leaves classmates with a question worth debating, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.

More HIM 350 papers and related BS Health Information Management samples

HIM 350 Module 8 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HIM 350 Module 8 Discussion sample?

Scroll up for the complete HIM 350 Module 8 post on telehealth, the digital divide and keeping human connection in digital care.

What should an HIM 350 closing reflection include?

A few honest turns in your thinking, the scene behind each, the reading that explains it and a concrete plan for using it at work.

Can a communication tool work on average but still cause harm?

Yes. A tool can help most users while excluding groups with less access, as digital divide research shows.

Why do professional boundaries matter online?

Public replies can reveal that someone is a client and blur the professional relationship that protects them.

What questions should guide new communication tools?

Who will it leave out, and how will it affect the relationship between patients and the people who help them?