| Course | HIM 350 Communication and Technologies |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | undergraduate paper on clinical communication technologies and handoffs |
| Length | About 1,040 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Health Information Management |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HIM 350 Module 3
Who Needs to Know, and How Fast? Clinical Communication at Sandstone Behavioral Health
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
HIM 350: Communication and Technologies
Module Three Short Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Who Needs to Know, and How Fast? Clinical Communication at Sandstone Behavioral Health
Most talk about healthcare communication technology focuses on patients. Yet much of the risk lies in communication between staff: a crisis worker who cannot reach a therapist, a discharge summary that sits unread or a message that gets lost among hundreds of automated notices. At Sandstone Behavioral Health, a missed handoff last spring meant a client discharged from a psychiatric hospital waited 16 days for a follow-up appointment. This paper maps how Sandstone's clinicians communicate, reviews evidence on alternatives and recommends changes.
Current Channels
Sandstone's clinicians use four main channels. The mobile crisis team carries one-way pagers and calls back from personal phones. Outpatient clinicians use the record system's in-basket for messages, results and refill requests. Hospital discharge notices arrive by fax or through the state health information exchange and are routed to intake staff. Urgent coordination happens by phone, often without any record of what was said. No single channel is reliable for time-sensitive information.
Table 1. Clinical Communication Channels at Sandstone
| Channel | Used for | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-way pagers | Crisis team alerts | Reliable signal in rural areas | No detail; callback from personal phones |
| Record in-basket | Messages, results, refills | Documented; linked to chart | Overloaded with automated notices |
| Fax and exchange alerts | Hospital discharge notices | Arrive consistently | Routed slowly; no acknowledgment |
| Phone calls | Urgent coordination | Fast; allows discussion | Often undocumented |
Note. Compiled by the author from staff interviews and message logs.
Evidence on Secure Messaging
Przybylo et al. (2014) conducted a cluster-randomized trial on inpatient medicine teams at an academic hospital, adding a secure group messaging application for smartphones to traditional one-way paging. Team members using the application rated it significantly more effective than paging for communicating clearly and efficiently and for fitting into workflow during rounds and discharge, and reported higher overall satisfaction. The study measured perceptions rather than patient outcomes, but it supports replacing callback-dependent paging with secure, detailed messaging for teams like Sandstone's crisis unit.
When Messages Become Noise
More messaging is not always better. Tai-Seale et al. (2019) studied physicians in a large multispecialty group and found that those receiving more in-basket messages generated automatically by the record system, such as notifications and reminders, were more likely to report burnout and plans to reduce clinical time. At Sandstone, a psychiatrist's in-basket averages more than 150 items a day, most automated. Important messages, such as a hospital discharge notice, can drown in that volume.
Evidence on Structured Handoffs
Handoffs transfer responsibility for a patient between clinicians or settings. Starmer et al. (2014) introduced I-PASS, a handoff routine whose letters prompt the sender to rate how sick the patient is, summarize the case, list tasks and flag contingencies, and then ask the receiver to restate the plan, in nine pediatric residency programs. Afterward, medical errors dropped about a quarter and preventable harms nearly a third, and handoffs took no longer than before. The setting differs from community behavioral health, but the principle of a consistent structure with confirmation by the receiver transfers well.
The Missed Discharge Follow-Up
In the case that prompted this paper, a psychiatric hospital sent a discharge notice by fax on a Friday afternoon. Intake staff scanned it Monday and routed it to the assigned therapist's in-basket, where it sat among automated notices while the therapist was on leave. No one confirmed receipt. The client's first appointment came 16 days after discharge, beyond the seven-day follow-up standard that quality measures use for behavioral health hospitalizations. The failure involved channel, volume and the absence of a handoff structure.
What Belongs in the Record
Clinical communication raises a documentation question central to HIM: which messages are part of the legal health record? Sandstone's policy treats messages that contain clinical decisions, instructions or information used in care as part of the record, while routine scheduling logistics are business records. Phone conversations that change a treatment plan must be summarized in a note. Secure messaging platforms must allow clinically relevant messages to be saved to the chart, and retention rules must cover them.
The Rural Coverage Problem
Any technology choice must work in Sandstone's service area, where cellular coverage disappears along stretches of county road and some clients live beyond broadband. Crisis workers report that pagers, which use a separate network, reach them in places phones do not. That is why the recommendation below keeps pagers as backup rather than eliminating them. The crisis team also needs a way to document a field contact when no signal is available, so the secure messaging application must store messages offline and send them when a connection returns.
Communicating With Outside Partners
Many of Sandstone's most important handoffs involve other organizations: psychiatric hospitals, emergency departments, jails and primary care clinics. These partners use different record systems and communication habits. Sandstone plans to publish a single intake line and a secure direct messaging address for referrals and discharge notices, ask the two hospitals that discharge most of its clients to call intake as well as fax and share a one-page handoff form that covers risk, medications, the next appointment and who to call. A shared form works across systems when shared software does not.
Recommendations
Four changes follow. Replace crisis team pagers with a secure messaging application under a business associate agreement, with pagers kept as backup in areas without cellular coverage. Filter automated in-basket notices into separate folders so discharge notices and clinical messages appear first. Adopt a structured discharge handoff: intake calls the hospital within one business day, confirms the follow-up appointment and documents it using a short template modeled on I-PASS elements. And require a same-day note for phone conversations that change care.
Measuring Improvement
Progress will be tracked through the share of hospital discharges with follow-up within seven days, currently 61%, the median time from discharge notice to confirmed appointment, crisis team callback times and clinician-reported in-basket burden in an annual survey. The HIM department will also audit whether clinically relevant secure messages are saved to the chart.
Conclusion
Sandstone's clinicians communicate through tools that were adequate one by one but fail together, as the 16-day follow-up showed. Evidence supports secure messaging, disciplined control of automated messages and structured handoffs. Together with clear rules about which messages belong in the record, these changes can make sure the right person knows the right thing in time.
References
Przybylo, J. A., Wang, A., Loftus, P., Evans, K. H., Chu, I., & Shieh, L. (2014). Smarter hospital communication: Secure smartphone text messaging improves provider satisfaction and perception of efficacy, workflow. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 9(9), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2228
Starmer, A. J., Spector, N. D., Srivastava, R., West, D. C., Rosenbluth, G., Allen, A. D., Noble, E. L., Tse, L. L., Dalal, A. K., Keohane, C. A., Lipsitz, S. R., Rothschild, J. M., Wien, M. F., Yoon, C. S., Zigmont, K. R., Wilson, K. M., O'Toole, J. K., Solan, L. G., Aylor, M., . . . Landrigan, C. P. (2014). Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(19), 1803-1812. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1405556
Tai-Seale, M., Dillon, E. C., Yang, Y., Nordgren, R., Steinberg, R. L., Nauenberg, T., Lee, T. C., Meehan, A., Li, J., Chan, A. S., & Frosch, D. L. (2019). Physicians' well-being linked to in-basket messages generated by algorithms in electronic health records. Health Affairs, 38(7), 1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05509
What the HIM 350 Module 3 instructions ask for
The HIM 350 clinical communication module typically asks how clinicians communicate with each other through technology and how those tools affect safety and documentation. A paper of 1,100 to 1,400 words usually satisfies the rubric when it rests on three or more journal studies formatted in APA 7. Map the channels an organization uses, weigh research on alternatives such as secure messaging and structured handoffs and analyze at least one communication failure. Address which messages belong in the legal health record and recommend changes with measures of success. Consider coverage limits in rural areas and handoffs with outside partners, not only internal messages. HIM 350 graders notice clean headings in HIM 350 papers. HIM 350 names and dates need checking before HIM 350 submission. HIM 350 prompts vary by term, so recheck HIM 350 directions.
How this HIM 350 Module 3 clinical communication short paper example is built
The paper maps a behavioral health agency's pagers, in-baskets, fax alerts and phone calls in a table. Przybylo and colleagues' trial supports secure messaging, Tai-Seale and colleagues' study warns about automated in-basket overload and Starmer and colleagues' I-PASS results support structured handoffs. A discharge notice lost in an in-basket leads to a 16-day follow-up gap. Record status of clinical messages is explained, and four recommendations with measures, including seven-day follow-up, complete it. Rural coverage limits and handoffs with outside hospitals receive separate attention. HIM 350 students can reuse this structure for HIM 350 work. HIM 350 claims here trace to cited HIM 350 sources. HIM 350 readers can adapt each section to HIM 350 data.
Where the HIM 350 Module 3 rubric puts the points
Clinical communication papers in HIM 350 are commonly evaluated on accurate mapping of channels, use of evidence, analysis of a real or composite failure, attention to record status and retention, practical recommendations and APA 7 mechanics. The strongest papers recognize that adding channels can increase overload, adapt evidence from other settings thoughtfully and include measures such as follow-up rates. Graders reward attention to documentation of phone and message content, a core HIM concern. HIM 350 marks favor careful formatting across HIM 350 sections. HIM 350 citations keep every HIM 350 argument credible. HIM 350 instructors weigh evidence heavily in HIM 350 grading.
HIM 350 Module 3 help: the mistakes that cost points
Communication papers lose points when they recommend technology without evidence, ignore message overload, describe failures without analyzing causes or skip the question of what belongs in the record. Another frequent gap is omitting backup plans for rural areas with poor coverage. Map channels, use research, analyze a failure, address record status and recommend measurable changes. If your prompt focuses on hospital nursing or emergency settings, send it with your HIM 350 notes so the channels and evidence fit. HIM 350 drafts start well from a HIM 350 outline. HIM 350 feedback already received guides HIM 350 revisions. HIM 350 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify HIM 350 expectations.
Get HIM 350 Module 3 written to your instructions
Share the HIM 350 Module 3 directions and how clinicians communicate in your setting. You will receive a paper that maps channels, weighs evidence on secure messaging and handoffs, analyzes a communication failure, clarifies record status and recommends measurable changes, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More HIM 350 papers and related BS Health Information Management samples
- HIM 350 Module 1 Discussion: How Technology Changed Care Conversations After 2020
- HIM 350 Module 2 Telehealth Short Paper: Evidence, Modalities and Documentation for Video and Phone Visits
- HIM 350 Module 4 Project One: A Communication Technology Audit of a Behavioral Health Agency
- HIM 350 Module 5 Patient Communication Short Paper: Reminders, Portals, Health Literacy and Access
- HIM 350 Module 6 Digital Privacy Short Paper: Texting, Email, Social Media and Substance Use Disorder Rules
- HIM 350 Module 7 Project Two: A Communication Technology Improvement Plan
- HIM 350 Module 8 Discussion: A Closing Reflection on Technology and Human Connection
- HIM 220 Module 5 Healthcare Statistics Short Paper: Census, Length of Stay, Occupancy and Readmission Rates
- HIM 200 Module 5 Usability and Safety Short Paper: When Record Design Contributes to Harm
- HIM 215 Module 1 Discussion: Why Accurate Coding Matters Beyond Billing
HIM 350 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HIM 350 Module 3 Clinical Communication Short Paper sample?
Here, in full: HIM 350 Module 3 examines pagers, secure messaging, in-basket overload and structured handoffs in a behavioral health agency.
Is secure messaging better than paging?
Przybylo and colleagues found clinicians rated secure group messaging more effective and satisfying than one-way paging.
What is I-PASS?
A structured handoff program; Starmer and colleagues found errors fell roughly a quarter and preventable harms nearly a third after it was adopted.
Can too many EHR messages harm clinicians?
Tai-Seale and colleagues linked higher volumes of automated in-basket messages with physician burnout.
Are clinical text messages part of the medical record?
Messages containing clinical decisions or information used in care generally should be saved to the record per policy.