| Course | HIM 350 Communication and Technologies |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | undergraduate paper on patient communication technology, health literacy and access |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Southern New Hampshire University |
| Program | BS Health Information Management |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HIM 350 Module 5
Sent Is Not Understood: Patient Communication at Sandstone Behavioral Health
[Student Name]
Southern New Hampshire University
HIM 350: Communication and Technologies
Module Five Short Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The organization, setting and figures below are a composite written as a model document. No real employer, client, colleague or patient is described.
Sent Is Not Understood: Patient Communication at Sandstone Behavioral Health
The Project One audit found that Sandstone Behavioral Health's most valued communication with clients happens informally, through case managers' texts, while its official channels miss many clients. Robocall reminders reach disconnected numbers, the portal serves mainly younger clients with email and written materials are hard to read. This paper reviews research on reminders, health literacy and access and proposes changes to how Sandstone communicates with clients between visits.
Text Reminders Work
Guy et al. (2012) combined the randomized trials of texted appointment reminders and reported a consistent lift in attendance, roughly a 50% gain in the odds of showing up, that held whether the clinic was a doctor's office or a hospital department and whatever the lead time of the message. Sandstone's clients agree: 43% of those surveyed preferred texts to calls. Replacing robocalls with texts, while keeping a call option for clients without mobile phones, is well supported.
Two-Way Messages and Privacy
A two-way reminder that lets clients confirm, cancel or ask to reschedule is more useful than a one-way notice. But reminders from a behavioral health agency can reveal sensitive information if someone else sees the phone. Sandstone's texts will identify only "Sandstone" and the date and time, never the clinic type or clinician, and clients will choose at enrollment whether to receive texts at all. For the substance use disorder program, reminders will contain no program name.
Why Health Literacy Matters
Berkman et al. (2011) pulled together the research on reading and numeracy skills in health and tied weak skills to heavier hospital and emergency use, more trouble following medication directions or reading labels and, for older people, worse health and earlier death. Many Sandstone clients face additional barriers, such as the effects of trauma, psychosis or substance use on attention and memory. Communication that assumes strong reading skills will fail them.
Checking Understanding
Schillinger et al. (2003) audio-recorded diabetes appointments for people with limited reading skills. Doctors seldom asked those patients to say new instructions back, yet when they did, the patients tended to have better blood sugar control. This technique, often called teach-back, applies to behavioral health as well: having a client describe, without prompting, how a new medication should be taken or when the crisis line is the right call shows whether the message landed.
Materials People Can Read
Stossel et al. (2012) evaluated patient education materials available through common point-of-care resources and found most were written above the reading levels recommended for patients. Sandstone's handouts on medications and coping skills tested at an eleventh- to college-level reading grade. The agency will rewrite its twenty most-used handouts in plain language, aiming for a sixth- to eighth-grade level, using short sentences, common words, headings and pictures, and will test drafts with clients from the peer advisory group.
The Digital Divide
Kontos et al. (2014) drew on a federal health information survey and found that online health activities, from emailing a clinician to viewing records, fell off among adults with less schooling and lower incomes. At Sandstone, portal enrollment is lowest among clients over 60, those without email and those in the most rural areas. Any plan that relies only on the portal will widen existing gaps.
Making the Portal Usable
Three portal changes would help. Enrollment by text message link, without requiring an email address, would remove one barrier. A short in-person or phone walkthrough, offered by front-desk staff or peer specialists, would help clients who have never used a portal. And simplifying the home screen to show only the next appointment, messages and a crisis line number would reduce confusion. Clients who prefer not to use the portal will continue to receive information by phone and mail.
Language Access
About 18% of Sandstone's clients prefer Spanish. Federal civil rights law obliges agencies receiving federal money to serve clients who speak limited English effectively, which in practice means qualified interpreters, translated vital documents and reminders in the client's preferred language. Currently, reminders go out only in English and some clinics rely on bilingual staff without interpreter training. The plan adds Spanish reminders, professional translation of the rewritten handouts and video remote interpreting for less common languages.
Disability Access
Clients who are deaf or hard of hearing need captioned or interpreter-supported video visits, and clients with visual impairments need portal and web content that works with screen readers. Recent federal disability rules require health care organizations receiving federal funds to make web and mobile content meet recognized accessibility standards on a phased schedule. Sandstone's IT team will test the portal and website against those standards and fix barriers.
The Human Channel Still Matters
The audit showed that clients value their case managers' personal contact above every automated tool. Technology should support that relationship, not replace it. When the secure texting platform proposed in Project Two arrives, case managers will be able to keep the check-in messages clients appreciate, now inside a documented and protected system. Peer specialists, who share lived experience with clients, will help with portal walkthroughs and plain-language testing, bringing credibility that staff alone cannot provide.
Measures
Table 1 lists the changes with a measure for each. Reporting results by age, language and insurance will show whether changes help the clients who have been missed.
Table 1. Patient Communication Changes and Measures
| Change | Measure | Baseline | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-way text reminders | No-show rate | 13% overall | 10% |
| Portal enrollment by text link and walkthrough | Enrollment among clients over 60 | 9% | 20% |
| Plain-language handouts | Reading grade of top 20 handouts | Grades 11 to college | Grade 6 to 8 |
| Spanish reminders and translated handouts | Spanish-speaking client no-show rate | 17% | 12% |
| Teach-back training | Share of clinicians trained | 0% | 90% |
Note. Baselines from the Project One audit and scheduling reports.
Conclusion
Communication with clients succeeds only when it reaches them in a form they can use and understand. Evidence supports text reminders, plain-language materials and checking understanding, while research on literacy and the digital divide warns against relying on tools that exclude many clients. Sandstone's changes pair digital options with human support and alternatives, so every client can receive and act on what matters.
References
Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
Guy, R., Hocking, J., Wand, H., Stott, S., Ali, H., & Kaldor, J. (2012). How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Health Services Research, 47(2), 614-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01342.x
Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W.-Y. S., & Prestin, A. (2014). Predictors of eHealth usage: Insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(7), Article e172. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3117
Schillinger, D., Piette, J., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., Wilson, C., Daher, C., Leong-Grotz, K., Castro, C., & Bindman, A. B. (2003). Closing the loop: Physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.1.83
Stossel, L. M., Segar, N., Gliatto, P., Fallar, R., & Karani, R. (2012). Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(9), 1165-1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0
What the HIM 350 Module 5 instructions ask for
The HIM 350 patient communication assignment usually asks how organizations communicate with patients through technology and how to make that communication accessible and understandable. A paper of about 1,100 to 1,400 words citing four or more peer-reviewed studies in APA 7 is common. Review evidence on at least one communication tool, explain health literacy and its effects, address the digital divide and cover language and disability access. Propose specific changes with measures, and report results by patient group so gaps become visible. HIM 350 graders notice clean headings in HIM 350 papers. HIM 350 names and dates need checking before HIM 350 submission. HIM 350 prompts vary by term, so recheck HIM 350 directions.
How this HIM 350 Module 5 patient communication short paper example is built
Guy and colleagues' meta-analysis supports replacing robocalls with two-way texts, with privacy wording suited to behavioral health. Berkman and colleagues' review explains health literacy's effects, Schillinger and colleagues' study supports teach-back and Stossel and colleagues' readability findings justify rewriting handouts. Kontos and colleagues' digital divide research shapes portal changes such as text-link enrollment and walkthroughs. Language and disability access are addressed, and a table pairs five changes with baselines and targets. Peer specialists help keep the human connection clients value. HIM 350 students can reuse this structure for HIM 350 work. HIM 350 claims here trace to cited HIM 350 sources. HIM 350 readers can adapt each section to HIM 350 data.
Where the HIM 350 Module 5 rubric puts the points
Patient communication papers in HIM 350 are typically graded on evidence for proposed tools, understanding of health literacy, attention to the digital divide, coverage of language and disability access, specificity of changes and measures and APA 7 mechanics. Papers that stand out keep non-digital options, tailor privacy to sensitive services, test materials with patients and track results by group. Graders reward concrete targets, such as reading grade levels and group-specific no-show rates. Keeping personal outreach alongside automated tools also earns credit. HIM 350 marks favor careful formatting across HIM 350 sections. HIM 350 citations keep every HIM 350 argument credible. HIM 350 instructors weigh evidence heavily in HIM 350 grading.
HIM 350 Module 5 help: the mistakes that cost points
Patient communication papers lose points when they assume everyone can use a portal, recommend reminders without privacy safeguards, ignore language or disability access or measure only overall averages. Another frequent gap is writing about plain language in dense, technical prose. Use evidence, address literacy and access, protect privacy, keep alternatives and measure by group. If your prompt concerns a different population, such as older adults or pediatric families, send it with your HIM 350 notes so the recommendations fit. HIM 350 drafts start well from a HIM 350 outline. HIM 350 feedback already received guides HIM 350 revisions. HIM 350 rubrics posted in Brightspace clarify HIM 350 expectations.
Get HIM 350 Module 5 written to your instructions
Share the HIM 350 Module 5 directions and how your organization communicates with patients. You will receive a paper that reviews evidence on reminders and portals, addresses literacy, language and disability access and proposes specific changes with group-level measures, within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Southern New Hampshire University document.
More HIM 350 papers and related BS Health Information Management samples
- HIM 350 Module 1 Discussion: How Technology Changed Care Conversations After 2020
- HIM 350 Module 2 Telehealth Short Paper: Evidence, Modalities and Documentation for Video and Phone Visits
- HIM 350 Module 3 Clinical Communication Short Paper: Secure Messaging, Paging and Structured Handoffs
- HIM 350 Module 4 Project One: A Communication Technology Audit of a Behavioral Health Agency
- HIM 350 Module 6 Digital Privacy Short Paper: Texting, Email, Social Media and Substance Use Disorder Rules
- HIM 350 Module 7 Project Two: A Communication Technology Improvement Plan
- HIM 350 Module 8 Discussion: A Closing Reflection on Technology and Human Connection
- HIM 220 Module 5 Healthcare Statistics Short Paper: Census, Length of Stay, Occupancy and Readmission Rates
- HIM 215 Module 6 Coding Compliance Short Paper: Queries, Upcoding and Clinical Validation
- HIM 200 Module 4 Project One: Evaluating a Hospital's Patient Portal
HIM 350 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HIM 350 Module 5 Patient Communication Short Paper sample?
Read the complete HIM 350 Module 5 paper here: reminders, portals and materials redesigned for clients with limited literacy, language or internet access.
Do text message reminders improve attendance?
Guy and colleagues' meta-analysis found patients receiving text reminders were about half again as likely to attend.
What is teach-back?
A clinician asks the patient to say instructions back in plain words; Schillinger and colleagues tied the habit to better diabetes control.
What reading level should patient materials use?
Plain-language guidance commonly targets about a sixth- to eighth-grade reading level.
How can patient portals reach more people?
Allow enrollment without email, offer walkthroughs, simplify screens and keep phone and mail alternatives.